Author: "Krause, E." - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Krause, E."' showing total 3,067 results

Start Over Author "Krause, E."

3,067 results on '"Krause, E."'

1. Enhancing weak lensing redshift distribution characterization by optimizing the Dark Energy Survey Self-Organizing Map Photo-z method

Author: Campos, A., Yin, B., Dodelson, S., Amon, A., Alarcon, A., Sánchez, C., Bernstein, G. M., Giannini, G., Myles, J., Samuroff, S., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lima, M., Lin, H., Marshall, J. L., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Paterno, M., Pereira, M. E. S., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Vikram, V., and Weaverdyck, N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Abstract: Characterization of the redshift distribution of ensembles of galaxies is pivotal for large scale structure cosmological studies. In this work, we focus on improving the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) methodology for photometric redshift estimation (SOMPZ), specifically in anticipation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 6 (DES Y6) data. This data set, featuring deeper and fainter galaxies than DES Year 3 (DES Y3), demands adapted techniques to ensure accurate recovery of the underlying redshift distribution. We investigate three strategies for enhancing the existing SOM-based approach used in DES Y3: 1) Replacing the Y3 SOM algorithm with one tailored for redshift estimation challenges; 2) Incorporating $\textit{g}$-band flux information to refine redshift estimates (i.e. using $\textit{griz}$ fluxes as opposed to only $\textit{riz}$); 3) Augmenting redshift data for galaxies where available. These methods are applied to DES Y3 data, and results are compared to the Y3 fiducial ones. Our analysis indicates significant improvements with the first two strategies, notably reducing the overlap between redshift bins. By combining strategies 1 and 2, we have successfully managed to reduce redshift bin overlap in DES Y3 by up to 66$\%$. Conversely, the third strategy, involving the addition of redshift data for selected galaxies as an additional feature in the method, yields inferior results and is abandoned. Our findings contribute to the advancement of weak lensing redshift characterization and lay the groundwork for better redshift characterization in DES Year 6 and future stage IV surveys, like the Rubin Observatory.
Published: 2024

2. SPT Clusters with DES and HST Weak Lensing. II. Cosmological Constraints from the Abundance of Massive Halos

Author: Bocquet, S., Grandis, S., Bleem, L. E., Klein, M., Mohr, J. J., Schrabback, T., Abbott, T. M. C., Ade, P. A. R., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Allen, S. W., Alves, O., Amon, A., Anderson, A. J., Annis, J., Ansarinejad, B., Austermann, J. E., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bayliss, M., Beall, J. A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bender, A. N., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bhargava, S., Bianchini, F., Brodwin, M., Brooks, D., Bryant, L., Campos, A., Canning, R. E. A., Carlstrom, J. E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C. L., Chang, C., Chaubal, P., Chen, R., Chiang, H. C., Choi, A., Chou, T-L., Citron, R., Moran, C. Corbett, Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crawford, T. M., Crites, A. T., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., DeRose, J., Desai, S., de Haan, T., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Everett, W., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flores, A. M., Frieman, J., Gallicchio, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., George, E. M., Giannini, G., Gladders, M. D., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gupta, N., Gutierrez, G., Halverson, N. W., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., Huang, N., Hubmayr, J., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Irwin, K. D., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Khullar, G., Kim, K., Knox, L., Kraft, R., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Kéruzoré, F., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Leget, P. -F., Li, D., Lin, H., Lowitz, A., MacCrann, N., Mahler, G., Mantz, A., Marshall, J. L., McCullough, J., McDonald, M., McMahon, J. J., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Montgomery, J., Myles, J., Natoli, T., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nibarger, J. P., Noble, G. I., Novosad, V., Ogando, R. L. C., Omori, Y., Padin, S., Pandey, S., Paschos, P., Patil, S., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Pryke, C., Raveri, M., Reichardt, C. L., Roberson, J., Rollins, R. P., Romero, C., Roodman, A., Ruhl, J. E., Rykoff, E. S., Saliwanchik, B. R., Salvati, L., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Saro, A., Schaffer, K. K., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sharon, K., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Sievers, C., Smecher, G., Smith, M., Somboonpanyakul, T., Sommer, M., Stalder, B., Stark, A. A., Stephen, J., Strazzullo, V., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, C., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Veach, T., Vieira, J. D., Vikhlinin, A., von der Linden, A., Wang, G., Weaverdyck, N., Weller, J., Whitehorn, N., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yefremenko, V., Yin, B., Young, M., Zebrowski, J. A., Zhang, Y., Zohren, H., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the abundance of galaxy clusters selected via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect in South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The cluster sample is constructed from the combined SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d surveys, and comprises 1,005 confirmed clusters in the redshift range $0.25-1.78$ over a total sky area of 5,200 deg$^2$. We use DES Year 3 weak-lensing data for 688 clusters with redshifts $z<0.95$ and HST weak-lensing data for 39 clusters with $0.6
Published: 2024

3. Modeling Neutrino-Induced Scale-Dependent Galaxy Clustering for Photometric Galaxy Surveys

Author: Rogozenski, P., Krause, E., and Miranda, V.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: The increasing statistical precision of photometric redshift surveys requires improved accuracy of theoretical predictions for large-scale structure observables to obtain unbiased cosmological constraints. In $\Lambda$CDM cosmologies, massive neutrinos stream freely at small cosmological scales, suppressing the small-scale power spectrum. In massive neutrino cosmologies, galaxy bias modeling needs to accurately relate the scale-dependent growth of the underlying matter field to observed galaxy clustering statistics. In this work, we implement a computationally efficient approximation of the neutrino-induced scale-dependent bias (NISDB). Through simulated likelihood analyses of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DESY3) and Legacy Survey of Space and Time Year 1 (LSSTY1) synthetic data that contain an appreciable NISDB, we examine the impact of linear galaxy bias and neutrino mass modeling choices on cosmological parameter inference. We find model misspecification of the NISDB approximation and neutrino mass models to decrease the constraining power of photometric galaxy surveys and cause parameter biases in the cosmological interpretation of future surveys. We quantify these biases and devise mitigation strategies., Comment: 23 pages, 5 figures
Published: 2023

4. Detection of the significant impact of source clustering on higher-order statistics with DES Year 3 weak gravitational lensing data

Author: Gatti, M., Jeffrey, N., Whiteway, L., Ajani, V., Kacprzak, T., Zürcher, D., Chang, C., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Krause, E., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M., Bernstein, G., Campos, A., Chen, R., Choi, A., Davis, C., Derose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Eckert, K., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferte, A., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. F., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Sanchez, C., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Allam, S. S., Alves, O., Aguena, M., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., da Costa, L. N., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Doel, P., García-Bellido, J., Giannini, G., Gutierrez, G., Ferrero, I., Frieman, J., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Marshall, J. L., Mena-Fernández, J., Miquel, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Pereira, M. E. S., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Schubnell, M., Smith, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Weaverdyck, N., and Wiseman, P.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are larger at small scales and for statistics applied to combinations of low and high redshift samples, and diminish at high redshift. We evaluate the impact on different weak lensing observables, finding that third moments and wavelet phase harmonics are more affected than peak count statistics. Using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data we construct null tests for the source-clustering-free case, finding a $p$-value of $p=4\times10^{-3}$ (2.6 $\sigma$) using third-order map moments and $p=3\times10^{-11}$ (6.5 $\sigma$) using wavelet phase harmonics. The impact of source clustering on cosmological inference can be either be included in the model or minimized through \textit{ad-hoc} procedures (e.g. scale cuts). We verify that the procedures adopted in existing DES Y3 cosmological analyses (using map moments and peaks) were sufficient to render this effect negligible. Failing to account for source clustering can significantly impact cosmological inference from higher-order gravitational lensing statistics, e.g. higher-order N-point functions, wavelet-moment observables (including phase harmonics and scattering transforms), and deep learning or field level summary statistics of weak lensing maps. We provide recipes both to minimise the impact of source clustering and to incorporate source clustering effects into forward-modelled mock data., Comment: 5 pages, 2 figures, submitted to MNRAS Letters
Published: 2023

5. The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high-redshift sample: selection, characterization, and analysis of galaxy clustering

Author: Sánchez, C, Alarcon, A, Bernstein, GM, Sanchez, J, Pandey, S, Raveri, M, Prat, J, Weaverdyck, N, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Chang, C, Baxter, E, Omori, Y, Jain, B, Alves, O, Amon, A, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Blazek, J, Choi, A, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Crocce, M, Cross, D, DeRose, J, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Fang, X, Fosalba, P, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Kuropatkin, N, MacCrann, N, McCullough, J, Myles, J, Krause, E, Porredon, A, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Rykoff, ES, Secco, LF, Sheldon, E, Troxel, MA, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Cawthon, R, Conselice, C, Costanzi, M, Pereira, MES, Desai, S, Doel, P, Doux, C, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gutierrez, G, Herner, K, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Marshall, JL, Mena-Fernández, J, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Ogando, RLC, Palmese, A, Paz-Chinchón, F, Pieres, A, Malagón, AA Plazas, Sanchez, E, Scarpine, V, Schubnell, M, Smith, M, Suchyta, E, Tarle, G, Thomas, D, and To, C
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, galaxies: high-redshift, cosmological parameters, large-scale structure of Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging surveys like DES typically probe the Universe at redshifts z < 1. We present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samples using DES Year 3 data, and the analysis of their galaxy clustering measurements. In particular, we use galaxies that are fainter than those used in the previous DES Year 3 analyses and a Bayesian redshift scheme to define three tomographic bins with mean redshifts around z ∼0.9, 1.2, and 1.5, which extend the redshift coverage of the fiducial DES Year 3 analysis. These samples contain a total of about 9 million galaxies, and their galaxy density is more than 2 times higher than those in the DES Year 3 fiducial case. We characterize the redshift uncertainties of the samples, including the usage of various spectroscopic and high-quality redshift samples, and we develop a machine-learning method to correct for correlations between galaxy density and survey observing conditions. The analysis of galaxy clustering measurements, with a total signal to noise S/N ∼70 after scale cuts, yields robust cosmological constraints on a combination of the fraction of matter in the Universe
Published: 2023

6. DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys

Author: Survey, Dark Energy, Collaboration, Kilo-Degree Survey, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Asgari, M., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Bilicki, M., Blazek, J., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burger, P., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, Dalal, R., Davis, C., de Jong, J. T. A., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Dvornik, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Giblin, B., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., Hinton, S. R., Hoekstra, H., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Jeltema, T., Joachimi, B., Joudaki, S., Kannawadi, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuijken, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Li, S. -S., Li, X., Liddle, A. R., Lima, M., Lin, C. -A, Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Mahony, C., Marshall, J. L., McCullough, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Napolitano, N., Navarro-Alsina, A., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paterno, M., Peacock, J. A., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Radovich, M., Raveri, M., Reischke, R., Robertson, N. C., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Schneider, P., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shan, H. -Y., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Sifón, C., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Stölzner, B., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Tröster, T., Tutusaus, I., Busch, J. L. van den, Varga, T. N., Walker, A. R., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Wiseman, P., Wright, A. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Yoon, M., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of $0.790^{+0.018}_{-0.014}$. The mean marginal is lower than the maximum a posteriori estimate, $S_8=0.801$, owing to skewness in the marginal distribution and projection effects in the multi-dimensional parameter space. Our results are consistent with $S_8$ constraints from observations of the cosmic microwave background by Planck, with agreement at the $1.7\sigma$ level. We use a Hybrid analysis pipeline, defined from a mock survey study quantifying the impact of the different analysis choices originally adopted by each survey team. We review intrinsic alignment models, baryon feedback mitigation strategies, priors, samplers and models of the non-linear matter power spectrum., Comment: 40 pages, 21 figures, 15 tables, accepted Open Journal of Astrophysics. Download the chains from https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y3a2/Y3key-joint-des-kids or create your own chains with CosmoSIS using https://github.com/joezuntz/cosmosis-standard-library/blob/main/examples/des-y3_and_kids-1000.ini Watch the core team discuss this analysis at https://cosmologytalks.com/2023/05/26/des-kids
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

7. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: magnification modelling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing

Author: Elvin-Poole, J, MacCrann, N, Everett, S, Prat, J, Rykoff, ES, De Vicente, J, Yanny, B, Herner, K, Ferté, A, Di Valentino, E, Choi, A, Burke, DL, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Amon, A, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Baxter, E, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Chen, R, Cordero, J, Crocce, M, Davis, C, DeRose, J, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Fang, X, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Krause, E, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, Lemos, P, Liddle, AR, McCullough, J, Muir, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Pandey, S, Park, Y, Porredon, A, Raveri, M, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, J, Secco, LF, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troxel, MA, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Weaverdyck, N, Wechsler, RH, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Aguena, M, Avila, S, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, García-Bellido, J, Honscheid, K, Jarvis, M, Li, TS, Mena-Fernández, J, To, C, Wilkinson, RD, and Collaboration, DES
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, cosmology: observations, cosmological parameters, gravitational lensing: weak, large-scale structure of Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering autocorrelation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in ΛCDM and wCDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlation functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the autocorrelation of the lens bins, indicating that systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show that adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns.
Published: 2023

8. Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing: Comparison of mitigation schemes

Author: Prat, J., Zacharegkas, G., Park, Y., MacCrann, N., Switzer, E. R., Pandey, S., Chang, C., Blazek, J., Miquel, R., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Chen, R., Choi, A., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Gerdes, D. W., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Lima, M., Menanteau, F., Mena-Fernández, J., Palmese, A., Paterno, M., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Sanchez, E., Schubnell, M., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Weaverdyck, N., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale $\theta$ or physical scale $R$ carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. Here we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the Point-Mass marginalization methodology and the Annular Differential Surface Density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like setup and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 setup, we find that the mitigation schemes yield $\sim$1.3 times more constraining $S_8$ results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme., Comment: 11+4 pages, 4+4 figures. Matches the accepted version in MNRAS
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy–galaxy lensing: comparison of mitigation schemes

Author: Prat, J, Zacharegkas, G, Park, Y, MacCrann, N, Switzer, ER, Pandey, S, Chang, C, Blazek, J, Miquel, R, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Amon, A, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Chen, R, Choi, A, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Cawthon, R, Cordero, J, Crocce, M, Davis, C, DeRose, J, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Fang, X, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, McCullough, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Porredon, A, Raveri, M, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Rykoff, ES, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, J, Secco, LF, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troxel, MA, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Costanzi, M, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Gerdes, DW, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, James, DJ, Lima, M, Menanteau, F, Mena-Fernández, J, and Palmese, A
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, gravitational lensing: weak, cosmological parameters, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3 × 2pt, had to discard a lot of signal to noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy–galaxy lensing, or the position–shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale θ or physical scale R carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently, there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy–galaxy lensing signal. Here, we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the point-mass marginalization methodology, and the annular differential surface density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like set-up and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 set-up, we find that the mitigation schemes yield ∼1.3 times more constraining S8 results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme.
Published: 2023

10. The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering

Author: Sánchez, C., Alarcon, A., Bernstein, G. M., Sanchez, J., Pandey, S., Raveri, M., Prat, J., Weaverdyck, N., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Chang, C., Baxter, E., Omori, Y., Jain, B., Alves, O., Amon, A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Blazek, J., Choi, A., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Crocce, M., Cross, D., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Fosalba, P., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Kuropatkin, N., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Krause, E., Porredon, A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rykoff, E. S., Secco, L. F., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gutierrez, G., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Marshall, J. L., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and To, C.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Abstract: The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts $z < 1$. This is mainly because of the limited depth of these surveys, and also because such analyses rely heavily on galaxy lensing, which is more efficient at low redshifts. In this work we present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samples using DES Year 3 data, and the analysis of their galaxy clustering measurements. In particular, we use galaxies that are fainter than those used in the previous DES Year 3 analyses and a Bayesian redshift scheme to define three tomographic bins with mean redshifts around $z \sim 0.9$, $1.2$ and $1.5$, which significantly extend the redshift coverage of the fiducial DES Year 3 analysis. These samples contain a total of about 9 million galaxies, and their galaxy density is more than 2 times higher than those in the DES Year 3 fiducial case. We characterize the redshift uncertainties of the samples, including the usage of various spectroscopic and high-quality redshift samples, and we develop a machine-learning method to correct for correlations between galaxy density and survey observing conditions. The analysis of galaxy clustering measurements, with a total signal-to-noise $S/N \sim 70$ after scale cuts, yields robust cosmological constraints on a combination of the fraction of matter in the Universe $\Omega_m$ and the Hubble parameter $h$, $\Omega_m h = 0.195^{+0.023}_{-0.018}$, and 2-3% measurements of the amplitude of the galaxy clustering signals, probing galaxy bias and the amplitude of matter fluctuations, $b \sigma_8$. A companion paper $\textit{(in preparation)}$ will present the cross-correlations of these high-$z$ samples with CMB lensing from Planck and SPT, and the cosmological analysis of those measurements in combination with the galaxy clustering presented in this work., Comment: 28 pages, 25 figures. To be submitted to MNRAS. Comments welcome
Published: 2022

11. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Author: Elvin-Poole, J., MacCrann, N., Everett, S., Prat, J., Rykoff, E. S., De Vicente, J., Yanny, B., Herner, K., Ferté, A., Di Valentino, E., Choi, A., Burke, D. L., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Fang, X., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., García-Bellido, J., Honscheid, K., Jarvis, M., Li, T. S., Mena-Fernández, J., To, C., and Wilkinson, R. D.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering auto-correlation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlations functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the auto-correlation of the lens bins, indicating systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns., Comment: Version accepted for publication in MNRAS. 21 pages, 13 figures, See this https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ URL for the full DES Y3 cosmology release
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

12. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim Lens Sample from the combination of SOMPZ and clustering and its impact on Cosmology

Author: Giannini, G., Alarcon, A., Gatti, M., Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Bernstein, G. M., Cawthon, R., Sánchez, C., Doux, C., Elvin-Poole, J., Raveri, M., Myles, J., Amon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Choi, A., Cordero, J., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Everett, S., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Lemos, P., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, D. L., Weaverdyck, N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kent, S., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Melchior, P., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Paterno, M., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Vincenzi, M.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present an alternative calibration of the MagLim lens sample redshift distributions from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) first three years of data (Y3). The new calibration is based on a combination of a Self-Organising Maps based scheme and clustering redshifts to estimate redshift distributions and inherent uncertainties, which is expected to be more accurate than the original DES Y3 redshift calibration of the lens sample. We describe in detail the methodology, we validate it on simulations and discuss the main effects dominating our error budget. The new calibration is in fair agreement with the fiducial DES Y3 redshift distributions calibration, with only mild differences ($<3\sigma$) in the means and widths of the distributions. We study the impact of this new calibration on cosmological constraints, analysing DES Y3 galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, assuming a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. We obtain $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.30\pm 0.04$, $\sigma_8 = 0.81\pm 0.07 $ and $S_8 = 0.81\pm 0.04$, which implies a $\sim 0.4\sigma$ shift in the $\Omega_{\rm}-S_8$ plane compared to the fiducial DES Y3 results, highlighting the importance of the redshift calibration of the lens sample in multi-probe cosmological analyses.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

13. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on extensions to $\Lambda$CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering

Author: DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Birrer, S., Blazek, J., Bocquet, S., Brandao-Souza, A., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, A., Chen, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedel, D., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Giani, L., Giannantonio, T., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hamaus, N., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Jeltema, T., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lee, S., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Leonard, C. D., Liddle, A. R., Lima, M., Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Marshall, J. L., McCullough, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Miranda, V., Mohr, J. J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Nadathur, S., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nichol, R. C., Ogando, R. L. C., Omori, Y., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paterno, M., Paz-Chinchón, F., Percival, W. J., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rogozenski, P., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Scarpine, V., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tabbutt, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Vincenzi, M., Walker, A. R., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We constrain extensions to the $\Lambda$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraining power is limited by the absence of nonlinear predictions that are reliable at our required precision. The models are: dark energy with a time-dependent equation of state, non-zero spatial curvature, sterile neutrinos, modifications of gravitational physics, and a binned $\sigma_8(z)$ model which serves as a probe of structure growth. For the time-varying dark energy equation of state evaluated at the pivot redshift we find $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-0.99^{+0.28}_{-0.17},-0.9\pm 1.2)$ at 68% confidence with $z_{\rm p}=0.24$ from the DES measurements alone, and $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-1.03^{+0.04}_{-0.03},-0.4^{+0.4}_{-0.3})$ with $z_{\rm p}=0.21$ for the combination of all data considered. Curvature constraints of $\Omega_k=0.0009\pm 0.0017$ and effective relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}=3.10^{+0.15}_{-0.16}$ are dominated by external data. For massive sterile neutrinos, we improve the upper bound on the mass $m_{\rm eff}$ by a factor of three compared to previous analyses, giving 95% limits of $(\Delta N_{\rm eff},m_{\rm eff})\leq (0.28, 0.20\, {\rm eV})$. We also constrain changes to the lensing and Poisson equations controlled by functions $\Sigma(k,z) = \Sigma_0 \Omega_{\Lambda}(z)/\Omega_{\Lambda,0}$ and $\mu(k,z)=\mu_0 \Omega_{\Lambda}(z)/\Omega_{\Lambda,0}$ respectively to $\Sigma_0=0.6^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$ from DES alone and $(\Sigma_0,\mu_0)=(0.04\pm 0.05,0.08^{+0.21}_{-0.19})$ for the combination of all data. Overall, we find no significant evidence for physics beyond $\Lambda$CDM., Comment: Updated to match published version and fix a citation reference. 46 pages, 25 figures, data available at https://dev.des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y3a2/Y3key-extensions
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

14. Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck III: Combined cosmological constraints

Author: Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Ansarinejad, B., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E. J., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Carlstrom, J. E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chang, C. L., Chen, R., Choi, A., Chown, R., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crawford, T., Crites, A. T., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., de Haan, T., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Everett, W., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., George, E. M., Giannantonio, T., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Halverson, N. W., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Kent, S., Knox, L., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., Lidman, C., Luong-Van, D., McMahon, J. J., MacCrann, N., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McCullough, J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Myles, J., Natoli, T., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nichol, R. C., Omori, Y., Padin, S., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pereira, M. E. S., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Pryke, C., Raveri, M., Reichardt, C. L., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Ruhl, J. E., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Schaffer, K. K., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Vieira, J. D., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Williamson, R., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB lensing, we find $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.344\pm 0.030$ and $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.773\pm 0.016$, assuming $\Lambda$CDM. When additionally combining with measurements of the CMB lensing autospectrum, we find $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.306^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ and $S_8 = 0.792\pm 0.012$. The high signal-to-noise of the CMB lensing cross-correlations enables several powerful consistency tests of these results, including comparisons with constraints derived from cross-correlations only, and comparisons designed to test the robustness of the galaxy lensing and clustering measurements from DES. Applying these tests to our measurements, we find no evidence of significant biases in the baseline cosmological constraints from the DES-only analyses or from the joint analyses with CMB lensing cross-correlations. However, the CMB lensing cross-correlations suggest possible problems with the correlation function measurements using alternative lens galaxy samples, in particular the redMaGiC galaxies and high-redshift MagLim galaxies, consistent with the findings of previous studies. We use the CMB lensing cross-correlations to identify directions for further investigating these problems., Comment: 20 pages, 15 figures
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

15. Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements

Author: Chen, A., Aricò, G., Huterer, D., Angulo, R., Weaverdyck, N., Friedrich, O., Secco, L. F., Hernández-Monteagudo, C., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Brandao-Souza, A., Bridle, S. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Chintalapati, P., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hoffmann, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Kacprzak, T., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Omori, Y., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Refregier, A., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Sanchez, E., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and To, C.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our analysis pipeline to focus on the constraints of the baryonic suppression effects, utilizing the implication given by a principal component analysis on the Fisher forecasts. Our constraint on the baryonic effects can then be used to better model and ameliorate the effects of baryons in producing cosmological constraints from the next generation large-scale structure surveys. We detect the baryonic suppression on the cosmic shear measurements with a $\sim 2 \sigma$ significance. The characteristic halo mass for which half of the gas is ejected by baryonic feedback is constrained to be $M_c > 10^{13.2} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$ (95\% C.L.). The best-fit baryonic suppression is $\sim 5\%$ at $k=1.0 {\rm Mpc}\ h^{-1}$ and $\sim 15\%$ at $k=5.0 {\rm Mpc} \ h^{-1}$. Our findings are robust with respect to the assumptions about the cosmological parameters, specifics of the baryonic model, and intrinsic alignments., Comment: 20 pages, 10 figures. DES Collaboration, Year-3 analysis
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

16. Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints

Author: Chang, C., Omori, Y., Baxter, E. J., Doux, C., Choi, A., Pandey, S., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bianchini, F., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Cordero, J., Crawford, T. M., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Carretero, J., Chang, C. L., Chown, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Crites, A. T., Pereira, M. E. S., de Haan, T., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Doel, P., Everett, W., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., George, E. M., Giannantonio, T., Halverson, N. W., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Knox, L., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Lima, M., Luong-Van, D., March, M., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Natoli, T., Padin, S., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Pryke, C., Reichardt, C. L., Rodríguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Ruhl, J. E., Sanchez, E., Schaffer, K. K., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Vieira, J. D., Weller, J., and Williamson, R.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and modeling of the cross-correlations between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey with CMB lensing maps derived from a combination of data from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ survey conducted with the South Pole Telescope and full-sky data from the Planck satellite. The CMB lensing maps used in this analysis have been constructed in a way that minimizes biases from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, making them well suited for cross-correlation studies. The total signal-to-noise of the cross-correlation measurements is 23.9 (25.7) when using a choice of angular scales optimized for a linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias model. We use the cross-correlation measurements to obtain constraints on cosmological parameters. For our fiducial galaxy sample, which consist of four bins of magnitude-selected galaxies, we find constraints of $\Omega_{m} = 0.272^{+0.032}_{-0.052}$ and $S_{8} \equiv \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{m}/0.3}= 0.736^{+0.032}_{-0.028}$ ($\Omega_{m} = 0.245^{+0.026}_{-0.044}$ and $S_{8} = 0.734^{+0.035}_{-0.028}$) when assuming linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias in our modeling. Considering only the cross-correlation of galaxy shear with CMB lensing, we find $\Omega_{m} = 0.270^{+0.043}_{-0.061}$ and $S_{8} = 0.740^{+0.034}_{-0.029}$. Our constraints on $S_8$ are consistent with recent cosmic shear measurements, but lower than the values preferred by primary CMB measurements from Planck., Comment: 25 pages, 19 figures, submitted to PRD
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

17. Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck I: Construction of CMB Lensing Maps and Modeling Choices

Author: Omori, Y., Baxter, E. J., Chang, C., Friedrich, O., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Crawford, T. M., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Carretero, J., Chang, C. L., Chown, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Crites, A. T., Pereira, M. E. S., de Haan, T., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Doel, P., Everett, W., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., George, E. M., Giannantonio, T., Halverson, N. W., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Knox, L., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Lima, M., Luong-Van, D., March, M., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Natoli, T., Padin, S., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Pryke, C., Reichardt, C. L., Romer, A. K., Ruhl, J. E., Sanchez, E., Schaffer, K. K., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Vieira, J. D., Weller, J., and Williamson, R.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and CMB data from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Here we present two key ingredients of this analysis: (1) an improved CMB lensing map in the SPT-SZ survey footprint, and (2) the analysis methodology that will be used to extract cosmological information from the cross-correlation measurements. Relative to previous lensing maps made from the same CMB observations, we have implemented techniques to remove contamination from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, enabling the extraction of cosmological information from smaller angular scales of the cross-correlation measurements than in previous analyses with DES Year 1 data. We describe our model for the cross-correlations between these maps and DES data, and validate our modeling choices to demonstrate the robustness of our analysis. We then forecast the expected cosmological constraints from the galaxy survey-CMB lensing auto and cross-correlations. We find that the galaxy-CMB lensing and galaxy shear-CMB lensing correlations will on their own provide a constraint on $S_8=\sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}$ at the few percent level, providing a powerful consistency check for the DES-only constraints. We explore scenarios where external priors on shear calibration are removed, finding that the joint analysis of CMB lensing cross-correlations can provide constraints on the shear calibration amplitude at the 5 to 10% level., Comment: 30 pages, 20 figures, To be submitted to PRD
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

18. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space

Author: Doux, C., Jain, B., Zeurcher, D., Lee, J., Fang, X., Rosenfeld, R., Amon, A., Camacho, H., Choi, A., Secco, L. F., Blazek, J., Chang, C., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Jeffrey, N., Raveri, M., Samuroff, S., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kim, A. G., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Reil, K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, such as baryons and intrinsic alignments (IA), making this analysis an important cross-check. In the context of $\Lambda$CDM, and using the same fiducial model as in the DES Y3 real space analysis, we find ${S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.793^{+0.038}_{-0.025}}$, which further improves to ${S_8 = 0.784\pm 0.026 }$ when including shear ratios. This constraint is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real space analysis, and in agreement with DES~Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favors a slightly higher value of $S_8$, which reduces the tension with the Planck cosmic microwave background 2018 results from $2.3\sigma$ in the real space analysis to $1.5\sigma$ in this work. We explore less conservative IA models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to $k_{\rm max}={5}{h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}}$, which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, which is found to be about 20\% lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the $1.5\sigma$ lower $S_8$ value.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

19. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Three-Point Shear Correlations and Mass Aperture Moments

Author: Secco, L. F., Jarvis, M., Jain, B., Chang, C., Gatti, M., Frieman, J., Adhikari, S., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Choi, A., Cordero, J., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Everett, S., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Prat, J., Rollins, R. P., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, C., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Zeurcher, D., Aguena, M., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Eckert, K., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huterer, D., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Paz-Chinchon, F., Pieres, A., Malagon, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Serrano, S., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present high signal-to-noise measurements of three-point shear correlations and the third moment of the mass aperture statistic using the first 3 years of data from the Dark Energy Survey. We additionally obtain the first measurements of the configuration and scale dependence of the four three-point shear correlations which carry cosmological information. With the third-order mass aperture statistic, we present tomographic measurements over angular scales of 4 to 60 arcminutes with a combined statistical significance of 15.0$\sigma$. Using the tomographic information and measuring also the second-order mass aperture, we additionally obtain a skewness parameter and its redshift evolution. We find that the amplitudes and scale-dependence of these shear 3pt functions are in qualitative agreement with measurements in a mock galaxy catalog based on N-body simulations, indicating promise for including them in future cosmological analyses. We validate our measurements by showing that B-modes, parity-violating contributions and PSF modeling uncertainties are negligible, and determine that the measured signals are likely to be of astrophysical and gravitational origin., Comment: Minor changes. Matches version published in PRD
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

20. Dark energy survey year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space

Author: Doux, C, Jain, B, Zeurcher, D, Lee, J, Fang, X, Rosenfeld, R, Amon, A, Camacho, H, Choi, A, Secco, LF, Blazek, J, Chang, C, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Jeffrey, N, Raveri, M, Samuroff, S, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Baxter, E, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Cawthon, R, Chen, R, Cordero, J, Crocce, M, Davis, C, DeRose, J, Dodelson, S, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, Lemos, P, Liddle, AR, MacCrann, N, McCullough, J, Muir, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Pandey, S, Park, Y, Porredon, A, Prat, J, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Ross, AJ, Rykoff, ES, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, J, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troja, A, Troxel, MA, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Weaverdyck, N, Wechsler, RH, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, and Pereira, MES
Subjects: Particle and High Energy Physics, Physical Sciences, gravitational lensing: weak, cosmological parameters, large-scale structure of Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-Cℓ method and complement the analysis of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, making this analysis an important cross-check. Using the same fiducial Lambda cold dark matter model as in the DES Y3 real-space analysis, we find S8 ≡σ8 √Ωm/0.3 = 0.793-0.025+0.038 , which further improves to S8 = 0.784±0.026 when including shear ratios. This result is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real-space constraint, and in agreement with DES Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favours a slightly higher value of S8 , which reduces the tension with the Planck 2018 constraints from 2.3σ in the real space analysis to 1.5σ here. We explore less conservative intrinsic alignments models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to kmax = 5 h Mpc-1 , which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, found to be about 20 per cent lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the lo wer S8 value.
Published: 2022

21. Cross-correlation of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 lensing data with ACT and Planck thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect observations. II. Modeling and constraints on halo pressure profiles

Author: Pandey, S, Gatti, M, Baxter, E, Hill, JC, Fang, X, Doux, C, Giannini, G, Raveri, M, DeRose, J, Huang, H, Moser, E, Battaglia, N, Alarcon, A, Amon, A, Becker, M, Campos, A, Chang, C, Chen, R, Choi, A, Eckert, K, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Ferte, A, Harrison, I, Maccrann, N, Mccullough, J, Myles, J, Alsina, A Navarro, Prat, J, Rollins, RP, Sanchez, C, Shin, T, Troxel, M, Tutusaus, I, Yin, B, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bernstein, GM, Bertin, E, Bolliet, B, Bond, JR, Brooks, D, Calabrese, E, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Cawthon, R, Costanzi, M, Crocce, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Dunkley, J, Evrard, AE, Ferraro, S, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Herner, K, Hincks, AD, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Hughes, JP, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Krause, E, Kuehn, K, Lahav, O, Lima, M, Lokken, M, Madhavacheril, MS, Maia, MAG, Mcmahon, JJ, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Mohr, JJ, Moodley, K, Morgan, R, Nati, F, Niemack, MD, Page, L, and Palmese, A
Subjects: Nuclear and Plasma Physics, Physical Sciences, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics, Quantum Physics, Nuclear & Particles Physics, Mathematical physics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics
Abstract: Hot, ionized gas leaves an imprint on the cosmic microwave background via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (tSZ) effect. The cross-correlation of gravitational lensing (which traces the projected mass) with the tSZ effect (which traces the projected gas pressure) is a powerful probe of the thermal state of ionized baryons throughout the Universe and is sensitive to effects such as baryonic feedback. In a companion paper (Gatti et al. Phys. Rev. D 105, 123525 (2022)PRVDAQ2470-0010), we present tomographic measurements and validation tests of the cross-correlation between Galaxy shear measurements from the first three years of observations of the Dark Energy Survey and tSZ measurements from a combination of Atacama Cosmology Telescope and Planck observations. In this work, we use the same measurements to constrain models for the pressure profiles of halos across a wide range of halo mass and redshift. We find evidence for reduced pressure in low-mass halos, consistent with predictions for the effects of feedback from active Galactic nuclei. We infer the hydrostatic mass bias (BM500c/MSZ) from our measurements, finding B=1.8±0.1 when adopting the Planck-preferred cosmological parameters. We additionally find that our measurements are consistent with a nonzero redshift evolution of B, with the correct sign and sufficient magnitude to explain the mass bias necessary to reconcile cluster count measurements with the Planck-preferred cosmology. Our analysis introduces a model for the impact of intrinsic alignments (IAs) of galaxy shapes on the shear-tSZ correlation. We show that IA can have a significant impact on these correlations at current noise levels.
Published: 2022

22. Cross-correlation of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 lensing data with ACT and Planck thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect observations. I. Measurements, systematics tests, and feedback model constraints

Author: Gatti, M, Pandey, S, Baxter, E, Hill, JC, Moser, E, Raveri, M, Fang, X, DeRose, J, Giannini, G, Doux, C, Huang, H, Battaglia, N, Alarcon, A, Amon, A, Becker, M, Campos, A, Chang, C, Chen, R, Choi, A, Eckert, K, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Ferte, A, Harrison, I, Maccrann, N, Mccullough, J, Myles, J, Alsina, A Navarro, Prat, J, Rollins, RP, Sanchez, C, Shin, T, Troxel, M, Tutusaus, I, Yin, B, Abbott, T, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Annis, J, Bernstein, G, Bertin, E, Bolliet, B, Bond, JR, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Calabrese, E, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Cawthon, R, Costanzi, M, Crocce, M, da Costa, LN, da Silva Pereira, ME, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Dunkley, J, Evrard, AE, Ferraro, S, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Herner, K, Hincks, AD, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Hughes, JP, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Krause, E, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Lidman, C, Lima, M, Lokken, M, Madhavacheril, MS, Maia, MAG, Marshall, JL, Mcmahon, JJ, Melchior, P, Moodley, K, Mohr, JJ, Morgan, R, and Nati, F
Subjects: Nuclear and Plasma Physics, Physical Sciences, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics, Quantum Physics, Nuclear & Particles Physics, Mathematical physics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics
Abstract: We present a tomographic measurement of the cross-correlation between thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (TSZ) maps from Planck and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and weak galaxy lensing shears measured during the first three years of observations of the Dark Energy Survey. This correlation is sensitive to the thermal energy in baryons over a wide redshift range and is therefore a powerful probe of astrophysical feedback. We detect the correlation at a statistical significance of 21σ, the highest significance to date. We examine the TSZ maps for potential contaminants, including cosmic infrared background and radio sources, finding that cosmic infrared background has a substantial impact on our measurements and must be taken into account in our analysis. We use the cross-correlation measurements to test different feedback models. In particular, we model the TSZ using several different pressure profile models calibrated against hydrodynamical simulations. Our analysis marginalizes over redshift uncertainties, shear calibration biases, and intrinsic alignment effects. We also marginalize over ωm and σ8 using Planck or DES priors. We find that the data prefer the model with a low amplitude of the pressure profile at small scales, compatible with a scenario with strong active galactic nuclei feedback and ejection of gas from the inner part of the halos. When using a more flexible model for the shear profile, constraints are weaker, and the data cannot discriminate between different baryonic prescriptions.
Published: 2022

23. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing validation on cosmological simulations

Author: DeRose, J, Wechsler, RH, Becker, MR, Rykoff, ES, Pandey, S, MacCrann, N, Amon, A, Myles, J, Krause, E, Gruen, D, Jain, B, Troxel, MA, Prat, J, Alarcon, A, Sánchez, C, Blazek, J, Crocce, M, Giannini, G, Gatti, M, Bernstein, GM, Zuntz, J, Dodelson, S, Fang, X, Friedrich, O, Secco, LF, Elvin-Poole, J, Porredon, A, Everett, S, Choi, A, Harrison, I, Cordero, J, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, McCullough, J, Cawthon, R, Chen, A, Alves, O, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bechtol, K, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Diehl, HT, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Gruendl, RA, Hartley, WG, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Kuropatkin, N, Raveri, M, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Sanchez, J, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Fosalba, P, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Bacon, D, Bhargava, S, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Chang, C, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Evrard, AE, Ferrero, I, Ferté, A, Flaugher, B, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Giannantonio, T, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Huterer, D, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Lahav, O, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, and Marshall, JL
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Abstract: We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) 3×2-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak-lensing analyses. We show that the buzzard2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak-lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the 3×2-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the nonlinear matter power spectrum, nonlinear galaxy bias, and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties.
Published: 2022

24. Research Biases

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

25. Tools for Measuring Behaviour

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

26. Quantification of Behavioural Processes

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

27. Data Analysis and Presentation

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

28. General Principles

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

29. Introduction

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

30. Experimental Planning and Experimental Design

Author: Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, Krause, E. Tobias, Naguib, Marc, Wagner, Gretchen F., Snijders, Lysanne, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

31. Lensing Without Borders. I. A Blind Comparison of the Amplitude of Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing Between Independent Imaging Surveys

Author: Leauthaud, A., Amon, A., Singh, S., Gruen, D., Lange, J. U., Huang, S., Robertson, N. C., Varga, T. N., Luo, Y., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., Blake, C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Blazek, J., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Choi, A., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Eckert, K., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Hartley, W. G., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Joachimi, B., Kannawadi, A., Kim, A. G., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuijken, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lima, M., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A. G., Makler, M., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Miyatake, H., Mohr, J. J., Moraes, B., More, S., Surhud, M., Morgan, R., Myles, J., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Malagon, A. A. Plazas, Prat, J., Rau, M. M., Rhodes, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Roodman, A., Ross, A. J., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, C., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schlegel, D. J., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sifon, C., Smith, M., Speagle, J. S., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Tinker, J., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Van Waerbeke, L., Vielzeuf, P., and Wright, A. H.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Lensing Without Borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals ($\Delta\Sigma$) across different data-sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of $\Delta\Sigma$ using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3$\sigma$ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with $z_{\rm L}>0.43$ and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4$\sigma$ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognised galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At $z_{\rm L}>0.54$ amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets which are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15% (25%) ruled out in three lens bins at 68% (95%) confidence at $z<0.54$. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30% level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the "lensing is low" effect at $z<0.54$. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses., Comment: 41 page, 20 figures
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

32. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps

Author: Gatti, M., Jain, B., Chang, C., Raveri, M., Zürcher, D., Secco, L., Whiteway, L., Jeffrey, N., Doux, C., Kacprzak, T., Bacon, D., Fosalba, P., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M., Bernstein, G., Blazek, J., Campos, A., Choi, A., Davis, C., Derose, J., Dodelson, S., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferte, A., Gruen, D., Harrison, I., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Leget, P. F., Lemos, P., Maccrann, N., Mccullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro, A., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Sanchez, C., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M., Tutusaus, I., Yin, B., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Anni, J., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Giannantonio, T., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Laha, O., Lidman, C., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Reil, K., Rodriguez-Monroyv, M., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Varga, T. N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a cosmological analysis using the second and third moments of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years of data (Y3) data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). The survey spans an effective area of 4139 square degrees and uses the images of over 100 million galaxies to reconstruct the convergence field. The second moment of the convergence as a function of smoothing scale contains information similar to standard shear 2-point statistics. The third moment, or the skewness, contains additional non-Gaussian information. The data is analysed in the context of the $\Lambda$CDM model, varying 5 cosmological parameters and 19 nuisance parameters modelling astrophysical and measurement systematics. Our modelling of the observables is completely analytical, and has been tested with simulations in our previous methodology study. We obtain a 1.7\% measurement of the amplitude of fluctuations parameter $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.784\pm 0.013$. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales, and between second and third moments. In particular, the measured third moment is consistent with the expectation of gravitational clustering under the $\Lambda$CDM model. The addition of the third moment improves the constraints on $S_8$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}$ by $\sim$15\% and $\sim$25\% compared to an analysis that only uses second moments. We compare our results with {\it Planck} constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), finding a $2.2$ \textendash $2.8\sigma$ tension in the full parameter space, depending on the combination of moments considered. The third moment independently is in $2.8\sigma$ tension with {\it Planck}, and thus provides a cross-check on analyses of 2-point correlations., Comment: 27 pages, 20 figures, accepted for publication in PRD
Published: 2021

33. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Marginalisation over redshift distribution uncertainties using ranking of discrete realisations

Author: Cordero, Juan P., Harrison, Ian, Rollins, Richard P., Bernstein, G. M., Bridle, S. L., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Choi, A., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Everett, S., Fang, X., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Hartley, W. G., Huff, E. M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Pandey, S., Raveri, M., Rosenfeld, R., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sánchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M., Wechsler, R., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J., Doel, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. Plazas, Sánchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Varga, T. N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, using discrete samples from the space of all possible redshift distributions. This is demonstrated in contrast to previous highly simplified parametric models of the redshift distribution uncertainty. In hyperrank the set of proposed redshift distributions is ranked according to a small (in this work between one and four) number of summary values, which are then sampled along with other nuisance parameters and cosmological parameters in the Monte Carlo chain used for inference. This can be regarded as a general method for marginalising over discrete realisations of data vector variation with nuisance parameters, which can consequently be sampled separately to the main parameters of interest, allowing for increased computational efficiency. We focus on the case of weak lensing cosmic shear analyses and demonstrate our method using simulations made for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We show the method can correctly and efficiently marginalise over a range of models for the redshift distribution uncertainty. Finally, we compare hyperrank to the common mean-shifting method of marginalising over redshift uncertainty, validating that this simpler model is sufficient for use in the DES Year 3 cosmology results presented in companion papers., Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 17 pages, 12 figures, comments welcome Replacement: Added small comments suggested by referee
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

34. Use of an outdoor run by fattening pigs kept in large group housing systems with announced access through computer-controlled gates

Author: Höne, Ulrike, Schrader, Lars, Hölscher, Richard, Traulsen, Imke, and Krause, E. Tobias
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

35. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Three-point shear correlations and mass aperture moments

Author: Secco, LF, Jarvis, M, Jain, B, Chang, C, Gatti, M, Frieman, J, Adhikari, S, Alarcon, A, Amon, A, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Choi, A, Cordero, J, DeRose, J, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Everett, S, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Krause, E, MacCrann, N, McCullough, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Prat, J, Rollins, RP, Samuroff, S, Sánchez, C, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Troxel, MA, Zeurcher, D, Aguena, M, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Crocce, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Diehl, HT, Doel, P, Eckert, K, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Friedel, D, García-Bellido, J, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Huterer, D, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Maia, MAG, Marshall, JL, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Mohr, JJ, Morgan, R, Muir, J, Paz-Chinchón, F, Pieres, A, Malagón, AA Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Roodman, A, Sanchez, E, Serrano, S, Suchyta, E, Swanson, MEC, Tarle, G, Thomas, D, To, C, and Weller, J
Subjects: Astronomical and Space Sciences, Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics, Quantum Physics, Nuclear & Particles Physics
Abstract: We present high signal-to-noise measurements of three-point shear correlations and the third moment of the mass aperture statistic using the first 3 years of data from the Dark Energy Survey. We additionally obtain the first measurements of the configuration and scale dependence of the four three-point shear correlations which carry cosmological information. With the third-order mass aperture statistic, we present tomographic measurements over angular scales of 4 to 60 arcminutes with a combined statistical significance of 15.0σ. Using the tomographic information and measuring also the second-order mass aperture, we additionally obtain a skewness parameter and its redshift evolution. We find that the amplitudes and scale-dependence of these shear 3pt functions are in qualitative agreement with measurements in a mock galaxy catalog based on N-body simulations, indicating promise for including them in future cosmological analyses. We validate our measurements by showing that B-modes, parity-violating contributions and PSF modeling uncertainties are negligible, and determine that the measured signals are likely to be of astrophysical and gravitational origin.
Published: 2022

36. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios

Author: Sánchez, C, Prat, J, Zacharegkas, G, Pandey, S, Baxter, E, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Krause, E, Lemos, P, Park, Y, Raveri, M, Sanchez, J, Troxel, MA, Amon, A, Fang, X, Friedrich, O, Gruen, D, Porredon, A, Secco, LF, Samuroff, S, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Chen, R, Choi, A, Crocce, M, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Di Valentino, E, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Gatti, M, Giannini, G, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Jarvis, M, Jain, B, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, MacCrann, N, McCullough, J, Muir, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Rosenfeld, R, Rykoff, ES, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troja, A, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Wechsler, RH, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bhargava, S, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, Desai, S, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Evrard, AE, Ferrero, I, and Flaugher, B
Subjects: Particle and High Energy Physics, Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Abstract: Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other systematics or nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios as has been done in the past, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, including the corresponding integration over the power spectrum and the contributions from intrinsic alignments and lens magnification. We perform extensive testing of the small-scale shear-ratio (SR) modeling by studying the impact of different effects such as the inclusion of baryonic physics, nonlinear biasing, halo occupation distribution descriptions and lens magnification, among others, and using realistic N-body simulations of the DES data. We validate the robustness of our constraints in the data by using two independent lens samples with different galaxy properties, and by deriving constraints using the corresponding large-scale ratios for which the modeling is simpler. The results applied to the DES Y3 data demonstrate how the ratios provide significant improvements in constraining power for several nuisance parameters in our model, especially on source redshift calibration and intrinsic alignments. For source redshifts, SR improves the constraints from the prior by up to 38% in some redshift bins. Such improvements, and especially the constraints it provides on intrinsic alignments, translate to tighter cosmological constraints when shear ratios are combined with cosmic shear and other 2pt functions. In particular, for the DES Y3 data, SR improves S8 constraints from cosmic shear by up to 31%, and for the full combination of probes (3×2pt) by up to 10%. The shear ratios presented in this work are used as an additional likelihood for cosmic shear, 2×2pt and the full 3×2pt in the fiducial DES Y3 cosmological analysis.
Published: 2022

37. The Observed Evolution of the Stellar Mass–Halo Mass Relation for Brightest Central Galaxies

Author: Golden-Marx, Jesse B, Miller, CJ, Zhang, Y, Ogando, RLC, Palmese, A, Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Castander, FJ, Costanzi, M, Crocce, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Doel, P, Drlica-Wagner, A, Everett, S, Evrard, AE, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Gerdes, DW, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Hartley, WG, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Hoyle, B, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Kim, AG, Krause, E, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, Marshall, JL, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Mohr, JJ, Morgan, R, Paz-Chinchón, F, Petravick, D, Pieres, A, Malagón, AA Plazas, Prat, J, Romer, AK, Sanchez, E, Santiago, B, Scarpine, V, Schubnell, M, Serrano, S, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Smith, M, Soares-Santos, M, Suchyta, E, Tarle, G, and Varga, TN
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Atomic, Molecular, Nuclear, Particle and Plasma Physics, Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural), Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: We quantify evolution in the cluster-scale stellar mass-halo mass (SMHM) relation's parameters using 2323 clusters and brightest central galaxies (BCGs) over the redshift range 0.03 ≤ z ≤ 0.60. The precision on the inferred SMHM parameters is improved by including the magnitude gap (m gap) between the BCG and fourth-brightest cluster member (M14) as a third parameter in the SMHM relation. At fixed halo mass, accounting for m gap, through a stretch parameter, reduces the SMHM relation's intrinsic scatter. To explore this redshift range, we use clusters, BCGs, and cluster members identified using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey C4 and redMaPPer cluster catalogs and the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer catalog. Through this joint analysis, we detect no systematic differences in BCG stellar mass, m gap, and cluster mass (inferred from richness) between the data sets. We utilize the Pareto function to quantify each parameter's evolution. We confirm prior findings of negative evolution in the SMHM relation's slope (3.5σ), and detect negative evolution in the stretch parameter (4.0σ) and positive evolution in the offset parameter (5.8σ). This observed evolution, combined with the absence of BCG growth, when stellar mass is measured within 50 kpc, suggests that this evolution results from changes in the cluster's m gap. For this to occur, late-term growth must be in the intracluster light surrounding the BCG. We also compare the observed results to IllustrisTNG 300-1 cosmological hydrodynamic simulations and find modest qualitative agreement. However, the simulations lack the evolutionary features detected in the real data.
Published: 2022

38. Cross-correlation of DES Y3 lensing and ACT/${\it Planck}$ thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect I: Measurements, systematics tests, and feedback model constraints

Author: Gatti, M., Pandey, S., Baxter, E., Hill, J. C., Moser, E., Raveri, M., Fang, X., DeRose, J., Giannini, G., Doux, C., Huang, H., Battaglia, N., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Becker, M., Campos, A., Chang, C., Chen, R., Choi, A., Eckert, K., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferte, A., Harrison, I., Maccrann, N., Mccullough, J., Myles, J., Alsina, A. Navarro, Prat, J., Rollins, R. P., Sanchez, C., Shin, T., Troxel, M., Tutusaus, I., Yin, B., Abbott, T., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bernstein, G., Bertin, E., Bolliet, B., Bond, J. R., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Calabrese, E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, DeVicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Dunkley, J., Evrard, A. E., Ferraro, S., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Garcıa-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Herner, K., Hincks, A. D., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hughes, J. P., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lokken, M., Madhavacheril, M. S., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Mcmahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Moodley, K., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Nati, F., Niemack, M. D., Page, L., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Pieres, A., Malagon, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schaan, E., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sheldon, E., Sherwin, B. D., Sifon, C., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Spergel, D., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Tucker, D. L., Varga, T. N., Weller, J., Wilkinson, R. D., Wollack, E. J., and Xu, Z.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a tomographic measurement of the cross-correlation between thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (tSZ) maps from ${\it Planck}$ and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and weak galaxy lensing shears measured during the first three years of observations of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). This correlation is sensitive to the thermal energy in baryons over a wide redshift range, and is therefore a powerful probe of astrophysical feedback. We detect the correlation at a statistical significance of $21\sigma$, the highest significance to date. We examine the tSZ maps for potential contaminants, including cosmic infrared background (CIB) and radio sources, finding that CIB has a substantial impact on our measurements and must be taken into account in our analysis. We use the cross-correlation measurements to test different feedback models. In particular, we model the tSZ using several different pressure profile models calibrated against hydrodynamical simulations. Our analysis marginalises over redshift uncertainties, shear calibration biases, and intrinsic alignment effects. We also marginalise over $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$ using ${\it Planck}$ or DES priors. We find that the data prefers the model with a low amplitude of the pressure profile at small scales, compatible with a scenario with strong AGN feedback and ejection of gas from the inner part of the halos. When using a more flexible model for the shear profile, constraints are weaker, and the data cannot discriminate between different baryonic prescriptions., Comment: submitted to PRD
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

39. Cross-correlation of DES Y3 lensing and ACT/${\it Planck}$ thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich Effect II: Modeling and constraints on halo pressure profiles

Author: Pandey, S., Gatti, M., Baxter, E., Hill, J. C., Fang, X., Doux, C., Giannini, G., Raveri, M., DeRose, J., Huang, H., Moser, E., Battaglia, N., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Becker, M., Campos, A., Chang, C., Chen, R., Choi, A., Eckert, K., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferte, A., Harrison, I., Maccrann, N., Mccullough, J., Myles, J., Alsina, A. Navarro, Prat, J., Rollins, R. P., Sanchez, C., Shin, T., Troxel, M., Tutusaus, I., Yin, B., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Bolliet, B., Bond, J. R., Brooks, D., Calabrese, E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Dunkley, J., Evrard, A. E., Ferraro, S., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Herner, K., Hincks, A. D., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hughes, J. P., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lokken, M., Madhavacheril, M. S., Maia, M. A. G., Mcmahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Moodley, K., Morgan, R., Nati, F., Niemack, M. D., Page, L., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Pieres, A., Malagon, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schaan, E., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Sherwin, B. D., Sifon, C., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Spergel, D., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Varga, T. N., Weller, J., Wollack, E. J., and Xu, Z.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: Hot, ionized gas leaves an imprint on the cosmic microwave background via the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich (tSZ) effect. The cross-correlation of gravitational lensing (which traces the projected mass) with the tSZ effect (which traces the projected gas pressure) is a powerful probe of the thermal state of ionized baryons throughout the Universe, and is sensitive to effects such as baryonic feedback. In a companion paper (Gatti et al. 2021), we present tomographic measurements and validation tests of the cross-correlation between galaxy shear measurements from the first three years of observations of the Dark Energy Survey, and tSZ measurements from a combination of Atacama Cosmology Telescope and ${\it Planck}$ observations. In this work, we use the same measurements to constrain models for the pressure profiles of halos across a wide range of halo mass and redshift. We find evidence for reduced pressure in low mass halos, consistent with predictions for the effects of feedback from active galactic nuclei. We infer the hydrostatic mass bias ($B \equiv M_{500c}/M_{\rm SZ}$) from our measurements, finding $B = 1.8\pm0.1$ when adopting the ${\it Planck}$-preferred cosmological parameters. We additionally find that our measurements are consistent with a non-zero redshift evolution of $B$, with the correct sign and sufficient magnitude to explain the mass bias necessary to reconcile cluster count measurements with the ${\it Planck}$-preferred cosmology. Our analysis introduces a model for the impact of intrinsic alignments (IA) of galaxy shapes on the shear-tSZ correlation. We show that IA can have a significant impact on these correlations at current noise levels., Comment: 22 pages, 13 figures. Comments welcome
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

40. Galaxy Morphological Classification Catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with Convolutional Neural Networks

Author: Cheng, Ting-Yun, Conselice, Christopher J., Aragón-Salamanca, Alfonso, Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bluck, A. F. L., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Choi, A., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and To, C.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: We present in this paper one of the largest galaxy morphological classification catalogues to date, including over 20 million of galaxies, using the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Monochromatic $i$-band DES images with linear, logarithmic, and gradient scales, matched with debiased visual classifications from the Galaxy Zoo 1 (GZ1) catalogue, are used to train our CNN models. With a training set including bright galaxies ($16\le{i}<18$) at low redshift ($z<0.25$), we furthermore investigate the limit of the accuracy of our predictions applied to galaxies at fainter magnitude and at higher redshifts. Our final catalogue covers magnitudes $16\le{i}<21$, and redshifts $z<1.0$, and provides predicted probabilities to two galaxy types -- Ellipticals and Spirals (disk galaxies). Our CNN classifications reveal an accuracy of over 99\% for bright galaxies when comparing with the GZ1 classifications ($i<18$). For fainter galaxies, the visual classification carried out by three of the co-authors shows that the CNN classifier correctly categorises disky galaxies with rounder and blurred features, which humans often incorrectly visually classify as Ellipticals. As a part of the validation, we carry out one of the largest examination of non-parametric methods, including $\sim$100,000 galaxies with the same coverage of magnitude and redshift as the training set from our catalogue. We find that the Gini coefficient is the best single parameter discriminator between Ellipticals and Spirals for this data set., Comment: 23 pages, 15 figures. Accepted by MNRAS
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

41. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement

Author: Rosell, A. Carnero, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Crocce, M., Elvin-Poole, J., Porredon, A., Ferrero, I., Mena-Fernandez, J., Cawthon, R., De Vicente, J., Gaztanaga, E., Ross, A. J., Sanchez, E., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Asorey, J., Avila, S., Brandao-Souza, A., Camacho, H., Chan, K. C., Ferte, A., Muir, J., Riquelme, W., Rosenfeld, R., Cid, D. Sanchez, Hartley, W. G., Weaverdyck, N., Abbott, T., Aguena, M., Sahar, A., Annis, J., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D., Calcino, J., Carollo, D., Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, Davis, T., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Everett, S., Evrard, A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D., Giannantonio, T., Glazebrook, K., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S., Hollowood, D., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., James, D., Kim, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lewis, G., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Maia, M., Malik, U., Marshall, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J., Moller, A., Morgan, R., Ogando, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Percival, W., Pieres, A., Malagon, A. Plazas, Roodman, A., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sharp, R., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Tucker, B., Tucker, D., Uddin, S., Varga, T. N., and Collaboration, DES
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: In this paper we present and validate the galaxy sample used for the analysis of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation signal (BAO) in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y3 data. The definition is based on a colour and redshift-dependent magnitude cut optimized to select galaxies at redshifts higher than 0.5, while ensuring a high quality photometric redshift determination. The sample covers $\approx 4100$ square degrees to a depth of $i = 22.3 \ (AB)$ at $10\sigma$. It contains 7,031,993 galaxies in the redshift range from $z$= 0.6 to 1.1, with a mean effective redshift of 0.835. Photometric redshifts are estimated with the machine learning algorithm DNF, and are validated using the VIPERS PDR2 sample. We find a mean redshift bias of $z_{\mathrm{bias}} \approx 0.01$ and a mean uncertainty, in units of $1+z$, of $\sigma_{68} \approx 0.03$. We evaluate the galaxy population of the sample, showing it is mostly built upon Elliptical to Sbc types. Furthermore, we find a low level of stellar contamination of $\lesssim 4\%$. We present the method used to mitigate the effect of spurious clustering coming from observing conditions and other large-scale systematics. We apply it to the DES Y3 BAO sample and calculate sample weights that are used to get a robust estimate of the galaxy clustering signal. This paper is one of a series dedicated to the analysis of the BAO signal in the DES Y3 data. In the companion papers, Ferrero et al. (2021) and DES Collaboration (2021), we present the galaxy mock catalogues used to calibrate the analysis and the angular diameter distance constraints obtained through the fitting to the BAO scale, respectively. The galaxy sample, masks and additional material will be released in the public DES data repository upon acceptance., Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 24 pages, 24 figures
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

42. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: A 2.7% measurement of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation distance scale at redshift 0.835

Author: DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Asorey, J., Avila, S., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Brandao-Souza, A., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Calcino, J., Camacho, H., Rosell, A. Carnero, Carollo, D., Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chan, K. C., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Eckert, K., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Glazebrook, K., Gomes, D., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kokron, N., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lewis, G. F., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Malik, U., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Myles, J., Möller, A., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Percival, W. J., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, B. E., Tucker, D. L., Tutusaus, I., Uddin, S. A., Varga, T. N., Weller, J., and Wilkinson, R. D.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present angular diameter measurements obtained by measuring the position of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in an optimised sample of galaxies from the first three years of Dark Energy Survey data (DES Y3). The sample consists of 7 million galaxies distributed over a footprint of 4100 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1.1$ and a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. The sample selection is the same as in the BAO measurement with the first year of DES data, but the analysis presented here uses three times the area, extends to higher redshift and makes a number of improvements, including a fully analytical BAO template, the use of covariances from both theory and simulations, and an extensive pre-unblinding protocol. We used two different statistics: angular correlation function and power spectrum, and validate our pipeline with an ensemble of over 1500 realistic simulations. Both statistics yield compatible results. We combine the likelihoods derived from angular correlations and spherical harmonics to constrain the ratio of comoving angular diameter distance $D_M$ at the effective redshift of our sample to the sound horizon scale at the drag epoch. We obtain $D_M(z_{\rm eff}=0.835)/r_{\rm d} = 18.92 \pm 0.51$, which is consistent with, but smaller than, the Planck prediction assuming flat \lcdm, at the level of $2.3 \sigma$. The analysis was performed blind and is robust to changes in a number of analysis choices. It represents the most precise BAO distance measurement from imaging data to date, and is competitive with the latest transverse ones from spectroscopic samples at $z>0.75$. When combined with DES 3x2pt + SNIa, they lead to improvements in $H_0$ and $\Omega_m$ constraints by $\sim 20\%$, Comment: 24 pages, 10 figures, matches version accepted by PRD
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

43. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy mock catalogs for BAO analysis

Author: Ferrero, I., Crocce, M., Tutusaus, I., Porredon, A., Blot, L., Fosalba, P., Rosell, A. Carnero, Avila, S., Izard, A., Elvin-Poole, J., Chan, K. C., Camacho, H., Rosenfeld, R., Sanchez, E., Tallada-Crespí, P., Carretero, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Gaztanaga, E., Andrade-Oliveira, F., De Vicente, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Ross, A. J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Ferté, A., Brandao-Souza, A., Fang, X., Krause, E., Gomes, D., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Kind, M. Carrasco, Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Percival, W. J., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Tucker, D. L., and Varga, T. N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: The calibration and validation of scientific analysis in simulations is a fundamental tool to ensure unbiased and robust results in observational cosmology. In particular, mock galaxy catalogs are a crucial resource to achieve these goals in the measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) in the clustering of galaxies. Here we present a set of 1952 galaxy mock catalogs designed to mimic the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 BAO sample over its full photometric redshift range $0.6
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

44. The Observed Evolution of the Stellar Mass - Halo Mass Relation for Brightest Central Galaxies

Author: Golden-Marx, Jesse B., Miller, C. J., Zhang, Y., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Castander, F. J., Constanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., de Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kim, A. G., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Paz-Chinchon, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagon, A. A. Plazas, Prat, J., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Santiago, B., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., and Varga, T. N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: We quantify evolution in the cluster scale stellar mass - halo mass (SMHM) relation's parameters using 2323 clusters and brightest central galaxies (BCGs) over the redshift range $0.03 \le z \le 0.60$. The precision on inferred SMHM parameters is improved by including the magnitude gap ($\rm m_{gap}$) between the BCG and fourth brightest cluster member (M14) as a third parameter in the SMHM relation. At fixed halo mass, accounting for $\rm m_{gap}$, through a stretch parameter, reduces the SMHM relation's intrinsic scatter. To explore this redshift range, we use clusters, BCGs, and cluster members identified using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey C4 and redMaPPer cluster catalogs and the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer catalog. Through this joint analysis, we detect no systematic differences in BCG stellar mass, $\rm m_{gap}$, and cluster mass (inferred from richness) between the datsets. We utilize the Pareto function to quantify each parameter's evolution. We confirm prior findings of negative evolution in the SMHM relation's slope (3.5$\sigma$) and detect negative evolution in the stretch parameter (4.0$\sigma$) and positive evolution in the offset parameter (5.8$\sigma$). This observed evolution, combined with the absence of BCG growth, when stellar mass is measured within 50kpc, suggests that this evolution results from changes in the cluster's $\rm m_{gap}$. For this to occur, late-term growth must be in the intra-cluster light surrounding the BCG. We also compare the observed results to Illustris TNG 300-1 cosmological hydrodynamic simulations and find modest qualitative agreement. However, the simulations lack the evolutionary features detected in the real data., Comment: 21 pages, 12 Figures, 3 Tables. Submitted to ApJ on July 1
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

45. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Galaxy-halo connection from galaxy-galaxy lensing

Author: Zacharegkas, G., Chang, C., Prat, J., Pandey, S., Ferrero, I., Blazek, J., Jain, B., Crocce, M., DeRose, J., Palmese, A., Seitz, S., Sheldon, E., Hartley, W. G., Wechsler, R. H., Dodelson, S., Fosalba, P., Krause, E., Park, Y., Sánchez, C., Alarcon, A., Amon, A., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Davis, C., Diehl, H. T., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferté, A., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Evrard, A. E., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Muir, J., Ogando, R. L. C., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Sanchez, E., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Wilkinson, R. D.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: Galaxy-galaxy lensing is a powerful probe of the connection between galaxies and their host dark matter halos, which is important both for galaxy evolution and cosmology. We extend the measurement and modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal in the recent Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmology analysis to the highly nonlinear scales ($\sim 100$ kpc). This extension enables us to study the galaxy-halo connection via a Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) framework for the two lens samples used in the cosmology analysis: a luminous red galaxy sample (redMaGiC) and a magnitude-limited galaxy sample (MagLim). We find that redMaGiC (MagLim) galaxies typically live in dark matter halos of mass $\log_{10}(M_{h}/M_{\odot}) \approx 13.7$ which is roughly constant over redshift ($13.3-13.5$ depending on redshift). We constrain these masses to $\sim 15\%$, approximately $1.5$ times improvement over previous work. We also constrain the linear galaxy bias more than 5 times better than what is inferred by the cosmological scales only. We find the satellite fraction for redMaGiC (MagLim) to be $\sim 0.1-0.2$ ($0.1-0.3$) with no clear trend in redshift. Our constraints on these halo properties are broadly consistent with other available estimates from previous work, large-scale constraints and simulations. The framework built in this paper will be used for future HOD studies with other galaxy samples and extensions for cosmological analyses., Comment: 32 pages, 21 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

46. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples

Author: Rodríguez-Monroy, M, Weaverdyck, N, Elvin-Poole, J, Crocce, M, Rosell, A Carnero, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Avila, S, Bechtol, K, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Camacho, H, Cawthon, R, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Dodelson, S, Everett, S, Fang, X, Ferrero, I, Ferté, A, Friedrich, O, Gaztanaga, E, Giannini, G, Gruendl, RA, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huff, EM, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, MacCrann, N, Mena-Fernández, J, Muir, J, Pandey, S, Park, Y, Porredon, A, Prat, J, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Rozo, E, Rykoff, ES, Sanchez, E, Cid, D Sanchez, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Tabbutt, M, To, C, Wagoner, EL, Wechsler, RH, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Amon, A, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Baxter, E, Bertin, E, Bhargava, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Choi, A, Conselice, C, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, March, M, Marshall, JL, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miller, CJ, Miquel, R, Mohr, JJ, Morgan, R, Palmese, A, Paz-Chinchón, F, Pieres, A, Malagón, AA Plazas, Roodman, A, Scarpine, V, Serrano, S, and Smith, M
Subjects: Nuclear and Plasma Physics, Physical Sciences, cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, dark energy, large-scale structure of the Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: In this work, we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, maglim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redmagic algorithm. maglim/redmagic sample contains over 10 million/2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six/five photometric redshift bins spanning the range z [0.20, 1.05]/z [0.15, 0.90]. Both samples cover 4143 °2 over which we perform our analysis blind, measuring the angular correlation function with an S/N ∼63 for both samples. In a companion paper, these measurements of galaxy clustering are combined with the correlation functions of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing of each sample to place cosmological constraints with a 3 × 2pt analysis. We conduct a thorough study of the mitigation of systematic effects caused by the spatially varying survey properties and we correct the measurements to remove artificial clustering signals. We employ several decontamination methods with different configurations to ensure the robustness of our corrections and to determine the systematic uncertainty that needs to be considered for the final cosmology analyses. We validate our fiducial methodology using lognormal mocks, showing that our decontamination procedure induces biases no greater than 0.5σ in the (ωm, b) plane, where b is the galaxy bias.
Published: 2022

47. Lensing without borders – I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy–galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys

Author: Leauthaud, A, Amon, A, Singh, S, Gruen, D, Lange, JU, Huang, S, Robertson, NC, Varga, TN, Luo, Y, Heymans, C, Hildebrandt, H, Blake, C, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Annis, J, Bertin, E, Bhargava, S, Blazek, J, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Cawthon, R, Choi, A, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Eckert, K, Everett, S, Evrard, AE, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, García-Bellido, J, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Hartley, WG, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Jain, B, James, DJ, Jarvis, M, Joachimi, B, Kannawadi, A, Kim, AG, Krause, E, Kuehn, K, Kuijken, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lima, M, MacCrann, N, Maia, MAG, Makler, M, March, M, Marshall, JL, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miquel, R, Miyatake, H, Mohr, JJ, Moraes, B, More, S, Surhud, M, Morgan, R, Myles, J, Ogando, RLC, Palmese, A, Paz-Chinchón, F, Malagón, AA Plazas, Prat, J, Rau, MM, Rhodes, J, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Roodman, A, Ross, AJ, Samuroff, S, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, E, Scarpine, V, Schlegel, DJ, Schubnell, M, Serrano, S, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sifón, C, Smith, M, Speagle, JS, Suchyta, E, and Tarle, G
Subjects: Space Sciences, Particle and High Energy Physics, Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: Lensing without borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals (Δς) across different data sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of Δς using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3σ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with zL > 0.43 and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4σ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognized galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At zL > 0.54, amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets that are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15 per cent (25 per cent) ruled out in three lens bins at 68 per cent (95 per cent) confidence at z < 0.54. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30 per cent level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the 'lensing is low' effect at z < 0.54. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses.
Published: 2022

48. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

Author: Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Alarcon, A, Allam, S, Alves, O, Amon, A, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Annis, J, Avila, S, Bacon, D, Baxter, E, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Bhargava, S, Birrer, S, Blazek, J, Brandao-Souza, A, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Chen, A, Chen, R, Choi, A, Conselice, C, Cordero, J, Costanzi, M, Crocce, M, da Costa, LN, da Silva Pereira, ME, Davis, C, Davis, TM, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Desai, S, Di Valentino, E, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dodelson, S, Doel, P, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Evrard, AE, Fang, X, Farahi, A, Fernandez, E, Ferrero, I, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Hoyle, B, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Jarvis, M, Jeffrey, N, Jeltema, T, Kovacs, A, Krause, E, Kron, R, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Leget, P-F, Lemos, P, Liddle, AR, Lidman, C, and Lima, M
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Abstract: We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure using the full 5000 deg2 of imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Data Release 1. We perform an analysis of large-scale structure combining three two-point correlation functions (3×2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions, galaxy-galaxy lensing. To achieve the cosmological precision enabled by these measurements has required updates to nearly every part of the analysis from DES Year 1, including the use of two independent galaxy clustering samples, modeling advances, and several novel improvements in the calibration of gravitational shear and photometric redshift inference. The analysis was performed under strict conditions to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results and tests of the robustness of our results to this decision. We model the data within the flat ΛCDM and wCDM cosmological models, marginalizing over 25 nuisance parameters. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude S8=0.776-0.017+0.017 and matter density ωm=0.339-0.031+0.032 in ΛCDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; S8=0.775-0.024+0.026, ωm=0.352-0.041+0.035, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter w=-0.98-0.20+0.32 in wCDM. These constraints correspond to an improvement in signal-to-noise of the DES Year 3 3×2pt data relative to DES Year 1 by a factor of 2.1, about 20% more than expected from the increase in observing area alone. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed p=0.13-0.48. We find better agreement between DES 3×2pt and Planck than in DES Y1, despite the significantly improved precision of both. When combining DES 3×2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find p=0.34. Combining all of these datasets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of S8=0.812-0.008+0.008, ωm=0.306-0.005+0.004, h=0.680-0.003+0.004, and mν
Published: 2022

49. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

Author: DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bhargava, S., Birrer, S., Blazek, J., Brandao-Souza, A., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, A., Chen, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, Davis, C., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Fernandez, E., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Jeltema, T., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McCullough, J., Melchior, P., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Myles, J., Nadathur, S., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nichol, R. C., Ogando, R. L. C., Omori, Y., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tabbutt, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, D. L., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Walker, A. R., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^{+0.017}_{-0.017}$ and matter density $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.339^{+0.032}_{-0.031}$ in $\Lambda$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^{+0.026}_{-0.024}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.352^{+0.035}_{-0.041}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^{+0.32}_{-0.20}$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.306^{+0.004}_{-0.005}$, $h=0.680^{+0.004}_{-0.003}$, and $\sum m_{\nu}<0.13 \;\mathrm{eV\; (95\% \;CL)}$ in $\Lambda$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.302^{+0.006}_{-0.006}$, $h=0.687^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, and $w=-1.031^{+0.030}_{-0.027}$ in $w$CDM. (abridged), Comment: See https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ for the full DES Y3 3x2pt cosmology release. Matches version accepted in PRD
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

50. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations

Author: DeRose, J., Wechsler, R. H., Becker, M. R., Rykoff, E. S., Pandey, S., MacCrann, N., Amon, A., Myles, J., Krause, E., Gruen, D., Jain, B., Troxel, M. A., Prat, J., Alarcon, A., Sánchez, C., Blazek, J., Crocce, M., Giannini, G., Gatti, M., Bernstein, G. M., Zuntz, J., Dodelson, S., Fang, X., Friedrich, O., Secco, L. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Choi, A., Harrison, I., Cordero, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., McCullough, J., Cawthon, R., Chen, A., Alves, O., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Diehl, H. T., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Fosalba, P., Huang, H., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Sanchez, J., Sheldon, E., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Chang, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Eckert, K., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Giannantonio, T., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Varga, T. N., and Zhang, Y.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the $3\times2$-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the non-linear matter power spectrum, non-linear galaxy bias and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties., Comment: 29 pages, 10 figures, see this URL for the full DES Y3 cosmology release: https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Region

Database

Publisher

3,067 results on '"Krause, E."'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources