Search

Erectile dysfunction (ED) impacts the wellness and quality of life of millions of Canadians. An evaluation focused on the identification of reversible and irreversible underlying factors is recommended for patients presenting with ED. Through a shared decision-making model framework, the goal of ED treatment is to improve functional outcomes and enhance sexual satisfaction while minimizing adverse effects associated with treatment. Given that ED is assessed and treated by multiple different types of health practitioners, the purpose of this guideline is to provide the best available evidence to facilitate care delivery through a Canadian lens. After a narrative review of ED assessment and treatment for general readership, five key clinical questions relating to priority areas of ED are assessed using the GRADE and evidence-to-decision-making frameworks.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of 'spin' (i.e., reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results by positively reflecting negative findings or downplaying potential harms) strategies and level of spin in urological observational studies and whether the use of spin has changed over time. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify observational studies comparing therapeutic interventions in the top five urology journals and major urological subspecialty journals, published between 2000 and 2001, 2010 and 2011, and 2020 and 2021. Results: A total of 235 studies were included. Spin was identified in 81% of studies, with a median of two strategies per study. The most commonly used strategies were inadequate implication for clinical practice (30%), causal language or causal claim (29%), and use of linguistic spin (29%). Moderate to high levels of spin were found in 55% of conclusions. From 2000 to 2020, the average number of strategies used has significantly decreased each decade (H = 27.459, P < 0.001), and the median level of spin in conclusions was significantly lower in studies published in the 2020s and 2010s than in the 2000s (H = 11.649, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Our results suggest that 81% of urological observational studies comparing therapeutic interventions contained spin. Over the past two decades, the use of spin has significantly declined, but this remains an area for improvement, with 70% of included studies published in the 2020s employing spin. Medical writing should scrupulously avoid words or phrases that are not supported by data in the manuscript. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To present a narrative review of fundamental information needed to manage postoperative complications in patients who have undergone genital gender‐affirming surgery (GAS). Methods: A narrative review was performed using the following keywords: 'gender‐affirming surgery', 'complications', 'emergency', 'postoperative'. Articles were included after being reviewed by two primary authors for relevance. Four clinicians with significant experience providing both primary and ongoing urological care to patients after GAS were involved in article selection and analysis. Results: The most common feminising genital GAS performed is a vaginoplasty. The main post‐surgical complications seen by urologists include wound healing complications, voiding dysfunction, postoperative bleeding, vaginal stenosis, acute vaginal prolapse and graft loss, rectovaginal fistula, and urethrovaginal fistula. The most common masculinising genital GAS options include metoidioplasty and phalloplasty. Complications for these surgeries include urethral strictures, urethral fistulae, and urethral diverticula. Penile implants may also accompany phalloplasties and their complications include infection, erosion, migration, and mechanical failure. Conclusion: Genital GAS is increasing, yet there are still many barriers that individuals face not only in accessing the surgeries, but in receiving follow‐up care critical for optimal outcomes. Improved education and training programmes would be helpful to identify and manage postoperative complications. Broader cultural level changes are also important to ensure a safe, gender‐inclusive environment for all patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: "Spin" refers to a form of language manipulation that positively reflects negative findings or downplays potential harms. Spin has been reported in randomized controlled trials of other surgical specialties, which can lead to the recommendation of subpar or ineffective treatments. The goal of this study was to characterize spin strategies and severity in statistically nonsignificant urology randomized controlled trials. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and Embase for the top 5 urology journals, major urology subspecialty journals, and high-impact nonurology journals from 2019 to 2021 was conducted. Statistically nonsignificant randomized controlled trials with a defined primary outcome were included. Screening, data extraction, and spin assessment were performed in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers. Results: From the database search of 4,339 studies, 46 trials were included for analysis. Spin was identified in 35 studies (76%), with the majority of abstracts (n = 26, 57%) and main texts (n = 35, 76%) containing some level of spin. "Obscuring the statistical nonsignificance of the primary outcome and focusing on statistically significant secondary results" was the most frequently used strategy in abstracts, while "other" strategies not previously defined were the most commonly used strategies in main texts. Moderate or high spin severity was identified in 21 (46%) abstract and 22 (48%) main text conclusions. Conclusions: Overall, our results suggest that 76% of statistically nonsignificant urology randomized controlled trials contained some level of spin. Readers and writers should be aware of common spin strategies when interpreting nonsignificant results and critically appraise the significance of results when making decisions for clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]