Search

Your search keyword '"Krajcik S"' showing total 13 results
Start Over Author "Krajcik S"
13 results on '"Krajcik S"'

1. A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: The European union geriatric medicine society (EUGMS) statement

Author

Alvarez, M.N., Annweiler, C., Bernard, P.-L., Beswetherick, N., Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A., Bloch, F., Boddaert, J., Bonnefoy, M., Bousson, V., Bourdel-Marchasson, I., Capisizu, A., Che, H., Clara, J.G., Combe, B., Delignieres, D., Eklund, P., Emmelot-Vonk, M., Freiberger, E., Gauvain, J.-B., Goswami, N., Guldemond, N., Herrero, Á.C., Joël, M.-E., Jónsdóttir, A.B., Kemoun, G., Kiss, I., Kolk, H., Kowalski, M.L., Krajcík, Š., Kutsal, Y.G., Lauretani, F., Macijauskienė, J., Mellingsæter, M., Morel, J., Mourey, F., Nourashemi, F., Nyakas, C., Puisieux, F., Rambourg, P., Ramírez, A.G., Rapp, K., Rolland, Y., Ryg, J., Sahota, O., Snoeijs, S., Stephan, Y., Thomas, E., Todd, C., Treml, J., Adachi, R., Agnusdei, D., Body, J.-J., Breuil, V., Bruyère, O., Burckardt, P., Cannata-Andia, J.B., Carey, J., Chan, D.-C., Chapuis, L., Chevalley, T., Cohen-Solal, M., Dawson-Hughes, B., Dennison, E.M., Devogelaer, J.-P., Fardellone, P., Féron, J.-M., Perez, A.D., Felsenberg, D., Glueer, C., Harvey, N., Hiligsman, M., Javaid, M.K., Jörgensen, N.R., Kendler, D., Kraenzlin, M., Laroche, M., Legrand, E., Leslie, W.D., Lespessailles, E., Lewiecki, E.M., Nakamura, T., Papaioannou, A., Roux, C., Silverman, S., Henriquez, M.S., Thomas, T., Vasikaran, S., Watts, N.B., Weryha, G., Blain, H., Masud, T., Dargent-Molina, P., Martin, F.C., Rosendahl, E., van der Velde, N., Bousquet, J., Benetos, A., Cooper, C., Kanis, J.A., Reginster, J.Y., Rizzoli, R., Cortet, B., Barbagallo, M., Dreinhöfer, K., Vellas, B., Maggi, S., and Strandberg, T.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. European postgraduate curriculum in geriatric medicine developed using an international modified Delphi technique

Author

Roller-Wirnsberger, R., Masud, T., Vassallo, M., Zobl, M., Reiter, R., Van Den Noortgate, N., Petermans, J., Petrov, I., Topinkova, E., Andersen-Ranberg, K., Saks, K., Nuotio, M., Bonin-Guillaume, S., Luttje, D., Mestheneos, E., Szekacs, B., Jonsdottir, A.B., O'Neill, D., Cherubini, A., Macijauskiene, J., Leners, J.C., Fiorini, A., Iersel, M.B. van, Ranhoff, A.H., Kostka, T., Duque, S., Prada, G.I., Davidovic, Mladen, Krajcik, S., Kolsek, M., Del Nozal, J.M., Ekdahl, A.W., Munzer, T., Savas, S., Knight, P., Gordon, A., Singler, K., Roller-Wirnsberger, R., Masud, T., Vassallo, M., Zobl, M., Reiter, R., Van Den Noortgate, N., Petermans, J., Petrov, I., Topinkova, E., Andersen-Ranberg, K., Saks, K., Nuotio, M., Bonin-Guillaume, S., Luttje, D., Mestheneos, E., Szekacs, B., Jonsdottir, A.B., O'Neill, D., Cherubini, A., Macijauskiene, J., Leners, J.C., Fiorini, A., Iersel, M.B. van, Ranhoff, A.H., Kostka, T., Duque, S., Prada, G.I., Davidovic, Mladen, Krajcik, S., Kolsek, M., Del Nozal, J.M., Ekdahl, A.W., Munzer, T., Savas, S., Knight, P., Gordon, A., and Singler, K.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 208089.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS-GMS) recommendations for training in Geriatric Medicine were published in 1993. The practice of Geriatric Medicine has developed considerably since then and it has therefore become necessary to update these recommendations. METHODS: under the auspices of the UEMS-GMS, the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) and the European Academy of Medicine of Ageing (EAMA), a group of experts, representing all member states of the respective bodies developed a new framework for education and training of specialists in Geriatric Medicine using a modified Delphi technique. Thirty-two expert panel members from 30 different countries participated in the process comprising three Delphi rounds for consensus. The process was led by five facilitators. RESULTS: the final recommendations include four different domains: 'General Considerations' on the structure and aim of the syllabus as well as quality indicators for training (6 sub-items), 'Knowledge in patient care' (36 sub-items), 'Additional Skills and Attitude required for a Geriatrician' (9 sub-items) and a domain on 'Assessment of postgraduate education: which items are important for the transnational comparison process' (1 item). CONCLUSION: the current publication describes the development of the new recommendations endorsed by UEMS-GMS, EuGMS and EAMA as minimum training requirements to become a geriatrician at specialist level in EU member states.

Published
2019

5. A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults : the European union geriatric medicine society (EUGMS) statement

Author

Blain, H., Masud, T., Dargent-Molina, P., Martin, F. C., Rosendahl, Erik, van der Velde, N., Bousquet, J., Benetos, A., Cooper, C., Kanis, J. A., Reginster, J. Y., Rizzoli, R., Cortet, B., Barbagallo, M., Dreinhöfer, K., Vellas, B., Maggi, S., Strandberg, T., Alvarez, M. N., Annweiler, C., Bernard, P. -L, Beswetherick, N., Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Bloch, F., Boddaert, J., Bonnefoy, M., Bousson, V., Bourdel-Marchasson, I., Capisizu, A., Che, H., Clara, J. G., Combe, B., Delignieres, D., Eklund, Patrik, Emmelot-Vonk, M., Freiberger, E., Gauvain, J. -B, Goswami, N., Guldemond, N., Herrero, A. C., Joel, M. -E, Jonsdottir, A. B., Kemoun, G., Kiss, I., Kolk, H., Kowalski, M. L., Krajcik, S., Kutsal, Y. G., Lauretani, F., Macijauskiene, J., Mellingsaeter, M., Morel, J., Mourey, F., Nourashemi, F., Nyakas, C., Puisieux, F., Rambourg, P., Ramirez, A. G., Rapp, K., Rolland, Y., Ryg, J., Sahota, O., Snoeijs, S., Stephan, Y., Thomas, E., Todd, C., Treml, J., Adachi, R., Agnusdei, D., Body, J. -J, Breuil, V., Bruyere, O., Burckardt, P., Cannata-Andia, J. B., Carey, J., Chan, D. -C, Chapuis, L., Chevalley, T., Cohen-Solal, M., Dawson-Hughes, B., Dennison, E. M., Devogelaer, J. -P, Fardellone, P., Feron, J. -M, Perez, A. D., Felsenberg, D., Glueer, C., Harvey, N., Hiligsman, M., Javaid, M. K., Jorgensen, N. R., Kendler, D., Kraenzlin, M., Laroche, M., Legrand, E., Leslie, W. D., Lespessailles, E., Lewiecki, E. M., Nakamura, T., Papaioannou, A., Roux, C., Silverman, S., Henriquez, M. S., Thomas, T., Vasikaran, S., Watts, N. B., Weryha, G., Blain, H., Masud, T., Dargent-Molina, P., Martin, F. C., Rosendahl, Erik, van der Velde, N., Bousquet, J., Benetos, A., Cooper, C., Kanis, J. A., Reginster, J. Y., Rizzoli, R., Cortet, B., Barbagallo, M., Dreinhöfer, K., Vellas, B., Maggi, S., Strandberg, T., Alvarez, M. N., Annweiler, C., Bernard, P. -L, Beswetherick, N., Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Bloch, F., Boddaert, J., Bonnefoy, M., Bousson, V., Bourdel-Marchasson, I., Capisizu, A., Che, H., Clara, J. G., Combe, B., Delignieres, D., Eklund, Patrik, Emmelot-Vonk, M., Freiberger, E., Gauvain, J. -B, Goswami, N., Guldemond, N., Herrero, A. C., Joel, M. -E, Jonsdottir, A. B., Kemoun, G., Kiss, I., Kolk, H., Kowalski, M. L., Krajcik, S., Kutsal, Y. G., Lauretani, F., Macijauskiene, J., Mellingsaeter, M., Morel, J., Mourey, F., Nourashemi, F., Nyakas, C., Puisieux, F., Rambourg, P., Ramirez, A. G., Rapp, K., Rolland, Y., Ryg, J., Sahota, O., Snoeijs, S., Stephan, Y., Thomas, E., Todd, C., Treml, J., Adachi, R., Agnusdei, D., Body, J. -J, Breuil, V., Bruyere, O., Burckardt, P., Cannata-Andia, J. B., Carey, J., Chan, D. -C, Chapuis, L., Chevalley, T., Cohen-Solal, M., Dawson-Hughes, B., Dennison, E. M., Devogelaer, J. -P, Fardellone, P., Feron, J. -M, Perez, A. D., Felsenberg, D., Glueer, C., Harvey, N., Hiligsman, M., Javaid, M. K., Jorgensen, N. R., Kendler, D., Kraenzlin, M., Laroche, M., Legrand, E., Leslie, W. D., Lespessailles, E., Lewiecki, E. M., Nakamura, T., Papaioannou, A., Roux, C., Silverman, S., Henriquez, M. S., Thomas, T., Vasikaran, S., Watts, N. B., and Weryha, G.

Abstract

Prevention of fragility fractures in older people has become a public health priority, although the most appropriate and cost-effective strategy remains unclear. In the present statement, the Interest group on falls and fracture prevention of the European union geriatric medicine society (EUGMS), in collaboration with the International association of gerontology and geriatrics for the European region (IAGG-ER), the European union of medical specialists (EUMS), the Fragility fracture network (FFN), the International osteoporosis foundation (IOF) - European society for clinical and economic aspects of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis (ECCEO), outlines its views on the main points in the current debate in relation to the primary and secondary prevention of falls, the diagnosis and treatment of bone fragility, and the place of combined falls and fracture liaison services for fracture prevention in older people.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Proceedings of the EUGMS Full Board workshop, Vienna, March 4th 2015

Author

Vilches-Moraga, A., primary, Roller-Wirnsberger, R., additional, Ekdahl, A.W., additional, Krulder, J.W., additional, Holmerova, I., additional, Knight, P.V., additional, Verdejo-Bravo, C., additional, Dreher, R.M., additional, Lechner, A.J., additional, Szekacs, B., additional, Karaitianos, I.G., additional, Pedersen, S.H., additional, Krajcik, S., additional, Gorjão, C.J., additional, Frühwald, T., additional, Martin, F.C., additional, and Strandberg, T., additional

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. 'Tu' or 'Vous?'. A European qualitative study of dignity and communication with older people in health and social care settings

Author

Woolhead, G., Tadd, W., Boix-Ferrer, J.A., Krajcik, S., Schmid-Pfahler, B., Spjuth, Barbro, Stratton, D., Dieppe, P., Woolhead, G., Tadd, W., Boix-Ferrer, J.A., Krajcik, S., Schmid-Pfahler, B., Spjuth, Barbro, Stratton, D., and Dieppe, P.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the experiences of communication between older people and health and social care providers in six European countries. Methods: Focus groups were carried out with groups of older people (91 focus groups, 391 participants), and health and social care professionals (85 focus groups, 424 participants), in order to gain insights into concepts of good communications. Data collection and analysis continued concurrently according to the method of constant comparison. Results: Different styles of communication between professionals and older people were found to be capable of enhancing or jeopardising dignity. The use of appropriate forms of address, listening, giving people choice, including them, respecting their need for privacy and politeness, and making them feel valued emerged as significant ways to maintain older peoples' sense of self-worth and dignity. Despite being aware of good communication practices, health and social care professionals often failed to implement them. Lack of time, staff, resource scarcity, regulation and bureaucracy were cited as barriers, as was a lack of awareness and effort. Conclusions and practice implications: The findings have important implications for health and social care professionals when they engage with older people. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Published
2006
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. 'Tu' or 'Vous?' A European qualitative study of dignity and communication with older people in health and social care settings.

Author

Woolhead G, Tadd W, Boix-Ferrer JA, Krajcik S, Schmid-Pfahler B, Spjuth B, Stratton D, and Dieppe P

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences of communication between older people and health and social care providers in six European countries. METHODS: Focus groups were carried out with groups of older people (91 focus groups, 391 participants), and health and social care professionals (85 focus groups, 424 participants), in order to gain insights into concepts of good communications. Data collection and analysis continued concurrently according to the method of constant comparison. RESULTS: Different styles of communication between professionals and older people were found to be capable of enhancing or jeopardising dignity. The use of appropriate forms of address, listening, giving people choice, including them, respecting their need for privacy and politeness, and making them feel valued emerged as significant ways to maintain older peoples' sense of self-worth and dignity. Despite being aware of good communication practices, health and social care professionals often failed to implement them. Lack of time, staff, resource scarcity, regulation and bureaucracy were cited as barriers, as was a lack of awareness and effort. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The findings have important implications for health and social care professionals when they engage with older people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2006

12. European postgraduate curriculum in geriatric medicine developed using an international modified Delphi technique.

Author

Roller-Wirnsberger R, Masud T, Vassallo M, Zöbl M, Reiter R, Van Den Noortgate N, Petermans J, Petrov I, Topinkova E, Andersen-Ranberg K, Saks K, Nuotio M, Bonin-Guillaume S, Lüttje D, Mestheneos E, Szekacs B, Jonsdottir AB, O'Neill D, Cherubini A, Macijauskiene J, Leners JC, Fiorini A, van Iersel M, Ranhoff AH, Kostka T, Duque S, Prada GI, Davidovic M, Krajcik S, Kolsek M, Del Nozal JM, Ekdahl AW, Münzer T, Savas S, Knight P, Gordon A, and Singler K

Subjects
Aged, Curriculum, Delphi Technique, Education, Medical, Graduate methods, Education, Medical, Graduate standards, Europe, Geriatrics standards, Humans, Geriatrics education
Abstract

Background: the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS-GMS) recommendations for training in Geriatric Medicine were published in 1993. The practice of Geriatric Medicine has developed considerably since then and it has therefore become necessary to update these recommendations., Methods: under the auspices of the UEMS-GMS, the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) and the European Academy of Medicine of Ageing (EAMA), a group of experts, representing all member states of the respective bodies developed a new framework for education and training of specialists in Geriatric Medicine using a modified Delphi technique. Thirty-two expert panel members from 30 different countries participated in the process comprising three Delphi rounds for consensus. The process was led by five facilitators., Results: the final recommendations include four different domains: 'General Considerations' on the structure and aim of the syllabus as well as quality indicators for training (6 sub-items), 'Knowledge in patient care' (36 sub-items), 'Additional Skills and Attitude required for a Geriatrician' (9 sub-items) and a domain on 'Assessment of postgraduate education: which items are important for the transnational comparison process' (1 item)., Conclusion: the current publication describes the development of the new recommendations endorsed by UEMS-GMS, EuGMS and EAMA as minimum training requirements to become a geriatrician at specialist level in EU member states., (© The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.)

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results