Search

Introduction Prostate cancer is the second most common male cancer worldwide. Its rising incidence and high overtreatment rate drive the search for new prognostic factors. Histopathological variants, such as cribriform pattern (CP), are associated with poorer oncologic outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between CP in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) and postoperative pathological features. Material and methods In this retrospective, single-centre study we analysed the reviewed medical records of 100 men who underwent minimally invasive RP in the years 2017-2019. RP histopathological examination was performed by a single expert pathologist, and preoperative biopsies were assessed by various professionals from different referral centres. Results 48% of men underwent endoscopic RP with limited lymphadenectomy, whereas 52% underwent laparoscopic RP with extended lymphadenectomy. CP in biopsy was present in 6 patients: 3 in each of both groups (6.3% and 5.8%, respectively). Lymph node metastases were present in 50% and 10% of patients with and without CP in biopsy, respectively (p = 0.028). Postoperative histopathological examination revealed CP in 65%. CP in RP was associated with higher International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) (p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (p = 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) (p = 0.001), and positive surgical margin (PSM) (p = 0.004). Thirteen (20%) of the patients with CP in the RP specimen had lymph node metastasis, and none of the patients without CP in the RP specimen had regional LN metastasis. Conclusions The presence of CP in a biopsy specimen and RP is associated with negative postoperative features. Therefore, efforts should be made to increase CP reporting in biopsies because its identification could trigger a more radical surgical approach with extended lymphadenectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In the majority of Western European countries, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic reduction in urooncological surgeries. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on volume and patterns of urooncological surgery in Poland. Material and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 10 urologic centres in Poland. Data regarding major oncological procedures performed after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak (March 15, 2020 - May 31, 2020) were evaluated and compared with data from the respective period in 2019. Results: Between March 15, 2020 and May 31, 2020, a total of 968 oncological procedures were performed in participating centres. When compared to the respective period in 2019 (1063 procedures) the overall number of surgeries declined by 8.9%. The reduction was observed for transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) (20.1%) and partial nephrectomies (PN) (16.5%). Surgical activity considering radical nephrectomy (RN), nephroureterectomy (NU), and radical prostatectomy (RP) remained relatively unchanged, whereas radical cystectomy (RC) burden showed a significant increase (90.9%). Characteristics of patients treated with TURBT, RC, NU, PN, and RN did not differ significantly between the compared periods, whereas RP in the COVID-19 period was performed more frequently in patients with a higher grade group (p = 0.028) and positive digital rectal examination (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Surgical activity for urological cancers in Poland has been maintained during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Polish strategy in the initial period of the COVID-19 crisis mirrors the scenario of hard initial lockdown followed by adaptive lockdown, during which oncological care remained undisrupted and did not require particular priority triage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Recently developed algorithm for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension (ECE) of prostate cancer required validation before being recommended to use. The algorithm assumed that ECE on a particular side was not likely with same side maximum tumor diameter (MTD) <15 mm AND cancerous tissue in ipsilateral biopsy <15% AND PSA <20 ng/mL (both sides condition). The aim of the study was to validate this predictive tool in patients from another department. Material and methods Data of 154 consecutive patients (308 prostatic lateral lobes) were used for validation. Predictive factors chosen in the development set of patients were assessed together with other preoperative parameters using logistic regression to check for their significance. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were calculated for bootstrapped risk-stratified validation dataset. Results Validation cohort did not differ significantly from development cohort regarding PSA, PSA density, Gleason score (GS), MTD, age, ECE and seminal vesicle invasion rate. In bootstrapped data set (n = 200 random sampling) algorithm revealed 70.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI) 58.8-83.0%), 49.9% specificity (95%CI: 42.0-57.7%), 83.9% negative predictive value (NPV; 95%CI: 76.1-91.4%) and 31.1% positive predictive value (PPV; 95%CI: 19.6-39.7%). When limiting analysis to high-risk patients (Gleason score >7) the algorithm improved its performance: sensitivity 91%, specificity 47%, PPV 53%, NPV 89%. Conclusions Analyzed algorithm is useful for identifying prostate lobes without ECE and deciding on ipsilateral nerve-sparing technique during radical prostatectomy, especially in patients with GS >7. Due to significant number of false positives in case of: MTD =15 mm OR cancer in biopsy =15% OR PSA =20 ng/mL additional evaluation is necessary to aid decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3.0-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in preoperative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) and its influence on the extent of resection during endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP) among cancer risk groups.Material and Methods: The data of 154 patients with PCa in whom mpMRI was performed prior to ERP between 2011 and 2015 were included. The initial decision whether to perform neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing surgery was based on EAU guidelines. mpMRI images were reevaluated prior to prostatectomy to modify the surgical template. Imaging was compared with pathological reports to investigate the diagnostic performance of mpMRI.Results: The surgical template was modified in 69 (44.8%) patients after reevaluation of mpMRI. More preserving NVB sparing was attempted in 17 (11.0%) men, in whom NVB would have been resected if mpMRI had not been available. More aggressive NVB resection was performed in 52 (33.8%) men, in whom innervation would have been spared if basing solely based on guidelines. Among all PCa risk groups mpMRI had an impact on the surgical template with more aggressive surgery in 63.0% and 33.3% of men in the low- and intermediate-risk group, respectively, and more preserving in 21.4% of the high-risk patients. The change in extent of resection was not correlated with a higher risk of positive surgical margins (p = 0.196).Conclusions: Preoperative mpMRI exerts a significant impact on decision making concerning the extent of resection during ERP irrespective of the PCa risk group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) was mainly developed for the purposes of prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, its widespread use suggests that it may play a role in a preoperative workup prior to endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP)., Aim: To evaluate the prognostic value of PI-RADS in predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) and its influence on surgical planning of ERP., Material and Methods: The analysis involved data of 154 consecutive prostate cancer patients, in whom multiparametric 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was performed before ERP. Standard descriptive assessment of mpMRI images was compared with the PI-RADS system with respect to prostate cancer staging and subsequent potential surgical template adjustment., Results: PI-RADS significantly outperformed the standard way of mpMRI reporting in staging (AUC = 0.615 vs. 0.552, p = 0.036) with PI-RADS 5 established as the best threshold. After reevaluation of imaging, the initial surgical plan was modified based on mpMRI in terms of feasibility and extent of neurovascular bundle preservation during ERP on 96 (31.2%) sides, while on the remaining 212 (68.8%) sides the templates were left unchanged. Decisions based on mpMRI were not associated with increased risk of a positive surgical margin (PSM)., Conclusions: The PI-RADS outperforms the standard staging method using mpMRI and may assist the decision-making process regarding the extent of resection during ERP without increasing the risk of PSM., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 3.0-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in preoperative staging of prostate cancer (PCa) and its influence on the extent of resection during endoscopic radical prostatectomy (ERP) among cancer risk groups., Material and Methods: The data of 154 patients with PCa in whom mpMRI was performed prior to ERP between 2011 and 2015 were included. The initial decision whether to perform neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing surgery was based on EAU guidelines. mpMRI images were reevaluated prior to prostatectomy to modify the surgical template. Imaging was compared with pathological reports to investigate the diagnostic performance of mpMRI., Results: The surgical template was modified in 69 (44.8%) patients after reevaluation of mpMRI. More preserving NVB sparing was attempted in 17 (11.0%) men, in whom NVB would have been resected if mpMRI had not been available. More aggressive NVB resection was performed in 52 (33.8%) men, in whom innervation would have been spared if basing solely based on guidelines. Among all PCa risk groups mpMRI had an impact on the surgical template with more aggressive surgery in 63.0% and 33.3% of men in the low- and intermediate-risk group, respectively, and more preserving in 21.4% of the high-risk patients. The change in extent of resection was not correlated with a higher risk of positive surgical margins ( p = 0.196)., Conclusions: Preoperative mpMRI exerts a significant impact on decision making concerning the extent of resection during ERP irrespective of the PCa risk group.