Search

ZimnickiPatryk,ZawiślakMagdalena,ZaniukMarcin,KozłowskaMarta,KozyraMagdalena.Assessment on society’s opinion about using psychological and psychiatric help.Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2021;11(5):78-85. eISSN 2391-8306. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2021.11.05.008 https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/JEHS/article/view/JEHS.2021.11.05.008 https://zenodo.org/record/4780106 The journal has had 5 points in Ministry of Science and Higher Education parametric evaluation. § 8. 2) and § 12. 1. 2) 22.02.2019. © The Authors 2021; This article is published with open access at Licensee Open Journal Systems of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author (s) and source are credited. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non commercial license Share alike. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Received: 02.05.2021. Revised: 21.05.2021. Accepted: 21.05.2021. Assessment on society’s opinion about using psychological and psychiatric help Patryk Zimnicki, Magdalena Zawiślak, Marcin Zaniuk, Marta Kozłowska, Magdalena Kozyra Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland Abstract To properly treat diseases related to the human psyche, the help of specialists in psychology or psychiatry is essential. Unfortunately, its use is often negatively perceived by society, which discourages people with mental disorders to use it. It was decided to examine the opinion of society on this issue. For this purpose, we used the original questionnaire " A Survey of public opinion on the use of psychological or psychiatric help", conducted among 238 people. The answers were statistically analyzed. The results of the questionnaire confirm the existence of the problem. In addition, more than 70% of the respondents believe that access to psychological or psychiatric help is not easy. Nearly 60% of the respondents criticized visits to a psychologist or psychiatrist, of which 37.9% were from people close to them. Only half of the respondents decided to use the help of a specialist, and 78% of them felt fear before the visit, associated with the diagnosis (33.6%), the ineffectiveness of therapy (25%), and the opinion of relatives (9.5%). Despite this, only 5.2% experienced a negative perception. The analysis of the literature indicates a large role of stigmatization of people with mental disorders as a factor influencing the occurrence of reluctance to seek help from psychologists or psychiatrists. The influence of gender and age on this state of affairs has also been noted. Increasing social awareness of the positive aspects of seeking help from psychologists or psychiatrists can significantly change public opinion on this issue. This can bring many benefits to people struggling with mental health problems, as well as reduce their fear of visiting a specialist. Keywords: psychologist; psychiatrist; help; fear; stigma

ZawiślakMagdalena,ZaniukMarcin,KozłowskaMarta,ZimnickiPatryk,WujecZuzanna.Telemedicine – assesment of society’s opinion.Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2021;11(5):44-49. eISSN 2391-8306. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2021.11.05.004 https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/JEHS/article/view/JEHS.2021.11.05.004 https://zenodo.org/record/4764303 The journal has had 5 points in Ministry of Science and Higher Education parametric evaluation. § 8. 2) and § 12. 1. 2) 22.02.2019. © The Authors 2021; This article is published with open access at Licensee Open Journal Systems of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author (s) and source are credited. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non commercial license Share alike. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Received: 21.04.2021. Revised: 26.04.2021. Accepted: 15.05.2021. Telemedicine – assesment of society’s opinion Magdalena Zawiślak1, Marcin Zaniuk1, Marta Kozłowska1, Patryk Zimnicki1, Zuzanna Wujec2 1Studenckie Koło Naukowe przy Katedrze i Zakładzie Psychologii, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie 2Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach Abstract During the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to use some safety measures due to decrease spreading of the virus. One of them is introducing teleconsultations as a form of medical consultation. It allows patients to talk with the doctor without visiting the hospital. The aim of the study is to present the society’s opinion on teleconsultations and its most common disadvantages. The method of the study was an online survey, conducted on 68 people, whose answers were statistically analyzed. During the pandemic, 85% of the respondents took part in the teleconsultation. After thay, they rated quality of the teleconsultation form 1 to 5, where 5 was the highest rate. Only 26,8% of them rated their teleconsultation 5, 17,9% - 4, 16,1% - 3, 26,8% - 2 and 12,5% - 1. Most of the respondents decided to took part in the teleconsultation because they needed a prescription (53%). According to respondents’ opinion, the most important advantages of the teleconsultation are: ability to stay home (59,7%), lower risk of infection (35,8%), quick help (22,4%) and ability to have the prescription without going out (73,1%). The most important disadvantages were: lack of ability of physical examination (91%), problems with communication (40,3%), problems with describing their own symptoms (43,3%), problems with contacting a doctor (58,2%) and higher risk of wrong diagnosis (82,1%). Teleconsultations provide patients’ safety, however, they are associated with danger of the wrong diagnosis. Although, most patients (73%) would like to be able to take part in the teleconsultation after the pandemic. Because of that, it is crucial for modern medicine to improve the quality of teleconsultation and to learn, how to communicate with patients during the remote conversations. Keywords: medicine, teleconsultation, pandemic

WójcikPiotr, Rogowska Monika, Chyćko Małgorzata, Tomczyk Jan, Sobstyl Anna, Krasowska Danuta, Kozłowska Marta, WieteskaMałgorzata. Influence of vegetarian diet on human body. Journal of Education, Health and Sport.2020;10(9):739-746. eISSN 2391-8306. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2020.10.09.089 https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/JEHS/article/view/JEHS.2020.10.09.089 https://zenodo.org/record/4051555 The journal has had 5 points in Ministry of Science and Higher Education parametric evaluation. § 8. 2) and § 12. 1. 2) 22.02.2019. © The Authors 2020; This article is published with open access at Licensee Open Journal Systems of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author (s) and source are credited. This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non commercial license Share alike. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted, non commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. Received: 22.09.2020. Revised: 24.09.2020. Accepted: 26.09.2020. Influence of vegetarian diet on human body Piotr Wójcik1, Monika Rogowska2, Małgorzata Chyćko1, Jan Tomczyk1, Anna Sobstyl1, Danuta Krasowska1, Marta Kozłowska1, Małgorzata Wieteska1 Student Research Circle at the Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Research Methodology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland Students' Scientific Society at Chair and Department of Public Health Corresponding author: Piotr Wójcik; piotrek1444@gmail.com ORCID ID and e-mail: Piotr Wójcik: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-3701; piotrek1444@gmail.com Monika Rogowska: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-3701; m.rogowska98@gmail.com Małgorzata Chyćko: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1515-6038; malgorzatachycko@gmail.com Jan Tomczyk: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-3819; jantomczyk8@gmail.com Anna Sobstyl: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0330-574266ty; sobstyl.anna@onet.pl Małgorzata Wieteska: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1566-7559; malgosia.wieteska@onet.eu Danuta Krasowska: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3015-1120, dana.krasowska@gmail.com Marta Kozłowska: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-508X, m.kozlowska.med@gmail.com Abstract All over the world there aremore vegetarians than in previous years due to many reasons. One of them is positive influence on health what is shown in thelatest research. The aim of the article is to review the influence of vegetarian diet on frequent diseases such as: hypertension, obesity,osteoporosis. An analysis of scientific papers from Pubmed and Google Scholar was performed, which most accurately described the issue of impact vegetarian diet on human health. The following keywords have been used in the search:Vegetarian,hypertension, obesity,osteoporosis:vegetarian,hypertension, obesity,osteoporosis. The researchers shown than vegetarians have lover systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure by 10 and 5 mmHg, they also lower overall mortality by 10-15%, risk of heart failure and by ~40%, stroke by~35% and coronary events by 20%. Vegetarians also have statistically lower body mass index. What’s more in this diet is more energy efficient thanks too low food energy density and helps keeping leptin on adequate level. Research has shown than vegetarians have lower mineral bone density than non-vegetarian, although some studies has shown that risk of fractures in vegetarians and non-vegetarians was not affected by diet alternation. Based on the results of the studies above vegetarian diet contributes to lower blood pressure and preventing from cardiovascular diseases. It helps to avoid obesity and to get rid of weights also doesn’t have negative impact on osteoporosis. Keywords: Vegetarian,hypertension, obesity,osteoporosis

The book focuses on normative convergences and divergences within East Asia and between East Asia and the West on democratic and humanitarian institutions. The authors conducted comparative studies on issues of democracy and human rights in China, Japan, Taiwan and ASEAN countries, spanning both national and international levels. The book is addressed to both professionals and wider readership with interest in the development of democracy and human rights in East Asia. Marek Gawron