Background: Keratoconus is a bilateral, yet asymmetric disease. In rare cases, the second eye may show no signs of tomographic changes. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical characteristics in tomographically regular keratoconus fellow eyes., Materials and Methods: This retrospective, consecutive case series analyzed 916 eyes of 458 patients who presented to our keratoconus clinic between November 2020 and October 2022. Primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), tomographic Scheimpflug analysis using Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), and biomechanical assessment using Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Tomographic changes were assessed via analysis of the anterior and posterior curvature, K-max, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), the Belin/Ambrosio Deviation Display (BAD-D), and the ABCD-Grading. Biomechanical changes were analyzed using Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and Tomographic Biomechanical Index (TBI)., Results: Of 916 eyes, 34 tomographically regular fellow eyes (7.4%) were identified and included in the analysis. Overall, the mean BCVA was - 0.02 ± 0.13 logMAR. Tomographic analysis showed mean K-max of 43.87 ± 1.21 D, mean TCT of 532 ± 23 µm, and mean BAD-D of 1.02 ± 0.43. Biomechanical analysis demonstrated mean CBI of 0.28 ± 0.26 and mean TBI of 0.34 ± 0.30. While normal CBI-values were observed in 16 (47%) of 34 eyes, only 13 eyes (38%) showed a regular TBI and only 7 eyes (21%) showed regular TBI and CBI. The sensitivity of CBI and TBI to detect a tomographically normal keratoconus fellow eye was 53% and 62%, respectively., Conclusion: A highly asymmetric corneal ectasia with regular tomographic finding in a fellow eye is rare among keratoconus patients. In such cases, a biomechanical analysis may be useful in detecting early signs of corneal ectasia. In our analysis, the TBI showed high sensitivity for detecting a biomechanical abnormality in tomographically regular fellow eyes., Competing Interests: R. K. berichtet über Forschungszuschüsse und Vortragshonorare von Alcon, Hoya, PhysIOL, Rayner, 1stQ und Johnson & Johnson, Vortragshonorare von Kowa, Ophtec, Teleon, Santen, Acufocus, Bauch & Lomb und Reisestipendien von Alcon, Teleon, Johnson & Johnson, Rayner und 1stQ. G. U. A. berichtet über Forschungsstipendien, Reisestipendien und Vortragshonorare von Alcon, Hoya, Kowa, SIFI, Forschungsstipendien und Vortragshonorare von Johnson & Johnson und Santen sowie Forschungsstipendien von Zeiss, PhysIOL und Acufocus. T. M. Y. erhält Vortragshonorare von Alcon. Alle anderen Autoren geben keine Interessenkonflikte an./R. K. reports research grants and lecture fees from Alcon, Hoya, PhysIOL, Rayner, 1stQ and Johnson & Johnson, lecture fees from Kowa, Ophtec, Teleon, Santen, Acufocus, Bauch & Lomb and travel grants from Alcon, Teleon, Johnson & Johnson, Rayner and 1stQ. G. U. A. reports research grants, travel grants and lecture fees from Alcon, Hoya, Kowa, SIFI, research grants and lecture fees from Johnson & Johnson and Santen and research grants from Zeiss, PhysIOL and Acufocus. T. M. Y. receives lecture fees from Alcon. All other authors indicate no conflicts of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)