1. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions
- Author
-
Tomohisa Iwai, Hiroshi Yamauchi, Wasaburo Koizumi, Long Rong, Shiro Miyazawa, Hidehiko Kikuchi, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Maya Watanabe, Mitsuhiro Kida, and Kousuke Okuwaki
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Submucosal tumor ,Gastroenterology ,Solid mass ,Diagnostic accuracy ,Endoscopic ultrasonography ,medicine.disease ,digestive system diseases ,Surgery ,body regions ,Needle size ,Fine-needle aspiration ,medicine ,Pancreatic mass ,Upper gastrointestinal ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
Aim: A number of potential variables are associated with the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid lesions. Methods: Patients with such lesions who underwent EUS-FNA between January 2009 and December 2010 were studied retrospectively. Needles of 22, 25 and 19 gauge were used. The associations between the EUS-FNA results and factors such as mass location, mass size, needle size, number of needle passes, combined histologic-cytologic analysis and final diagnosis were analyzed. Results: A total of 170 EUS-FNA procedures were performed in 158 patients with upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid lesions. The overall accuracy of EUS-FNA was 86.5% (147/170). The diagnostic accuracy with three or more needle passes was higher than with less than 3.0 needle passes (90.0%, 108/120 vs 78.0%, 39/50; P
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF