1. Differences between oscillometry measurements obtained by MostGraph-01 and MasterScreen-IOS in patients with asthma.
- Author
-
Harada S, Harada N, Sasano H, Tanabe Y, Kotajima M, Sato Y, Takeshige T, Katsura Y, Ito J, Atsuta R, Kurosawa H, and Takahashi K
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Retrospective Studies, Respiratory Function Tests methods, Respiratory Function Tests instrumentation, Asthma physiopathology, Asthma diagnosis, Oscillometry methods, Oscillometry instrumentation
- Abstract
Background: Oscillometry devices (also termed forced oscillation technique) devices such as MasterScreen-IOS® (Jaeger, Hochberg, Germany) and MostGraph-01® (Chest, Tokyo, Japan) are useful for obtaining physiological assessments in patients with obstructive lung diseases, including asthma. However, as oscillometry measurements have not been fully compared between MasterScreen-IOS® and MostGraph-01® in patients with asthma, it is unknown whether there are differences in the measurements between the devices. This study aimed to determine whether there is any difference in oscillometry measurements obtained using the two devices in patients with asthma., Methods: Oscillometry measurements obtained using MasterScreen-IOS® and MostGraph-01® were retrospectively evaluated in 95 patients with asthma at Juntendo University Hospital between October 2009 and November 2009., Results: There was a strong positive correlation in the measurements between the two devices. However, the values of R5, R20, ALX and Fres were lower when measured with MostGraph-01® than with MasterScreen-IOS®, and vice versa for the values of X5. The results were used in correction equations to convert oscillometry parameters measured using MasterScreen-IOS® to those measured using MostGraph-01®., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report to compare MostGraph-01® and MasterScreen-IOS® devices using practical clinical data obtained in patients with asthma. The values obtained by both devices can be interpreted in a similar way, although there is slight variation. The conversion equations produced in this study may assist to compare the oscillometry measurements obtained by each of the two devices., Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following competing interests: NH reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Novartis, and Sanofi; and grants from AstraZeneca, Daikin, Sanofi, and TOSOH outside the submitted work. KT reports grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyorin, Kyowa Kirin, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Nippon Kayaku, Nippon Shinyaku, Nipro, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shionogi, Taiho, Takeda, Teijin, and Tsumura; and personal fees from Abbott Japan, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyorin, Meiji Seika, Merck, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taiho, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Viatris outside the submitted work. KT has a patent (P6840330) on the method of detecting cells managed by Juntendo University in Japan. HK is one of the holders of the patent related to MostGraph-01®. The royalties are paid to Tohoku University, not to individuals. Lecture fees were paid to HK from Chest Co. Ltd. All other authors have no competing interests. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no additional patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 Harada et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF