Search

Background and Objective: Both bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (BLVR‐EBV) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are effective treatments for improving exercise capacity and patient‐reported outcomes in patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). According to current recommendations, all BLVR‐EBV patients should have undergone PR first. Our aim was to study the effects of PR both before and after BLVR‐EBV compared to BLVR‐EBV alone. Methods: We included patients with severe COPD who were eligible for BLVR‐EBV and PR. Participants were randomized into three groups: PR before BLVR‐EBV, PR after BLVR‐EBV or BLVR‐EBV without PR. The primary outcome was change in constant work rate cycle test (CWRT) endurance time at 6‐month follow‐up of the PR groups compared to BLVR‐EBV alone. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6‐minute walking test, daily step count, dyspnoea and health‐related quality of life. Results: Ninety‐seven participants were included. At 6‐month follow‐up, there was no difference in change in CWRT endurance time between the PR before BLVR‐EBV and BLVR‐EBV alone groups (median: 421 [IQR: 44; 1304] vs. 787 [123; 1024] seconds, p = 0.82) or in any of the secondary endpoints, but the PR after BLVR‐EBV group exhibited a smaller improvement in CWRT endurance time (median: 107 [IQR: 2; 573], p = 0.04) and health‐related quality of life compared to BLVR‐EBV alone. Conclusion: The addition of PR to BLVR‐EBV did not result in increased exercise capacity, daily step count or improved patient‐reported outcomes compared to BLVR‐EBV alone, neither when PR was administered before BLVR‐EBV nor when PR was administered after BLVR‐EBV. Our findings suggest that a combination of pulmonary rehabilitation and bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (BLVR‐EBV) may not provide additional benefits compared to BLVR‐EBV alone at a group‐level. Future challenges lie in selecting patients for whom a combined rehabilitation trajectory would be beneficial. See relatededitorial [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Endobronchial valve (EBV) treatment has been shown to be beneficial for patients with severe emphysema. The forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was found to be significantly higher compared to baseline for up to 3 years after treatment although the magnitude of improvement gradually decreases over time. So far, it has not been investigated whether this treatment decelerates the decline in lung function. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the lung function decline before and after EBV treatment. Methods: We included patients who were treated with EBVs in our hospital, of whom pre-treatment spirometry results were available (at least 4 measurements within at least 2 years before treatment) and who had an annual FEV1 measurement up to 3 years after treatment. Results: In total, 45 patients were included (73% female, FEV1: 28 ± 7% of predicted, residual volume: 232 ± 32% of predicted) who had a mean pre-treatment FEV1 decline of −64 mL/year. Mean FEV1 "decline" after treatment was +13 mL/year, since FEV1 was still above the baseline level at 3-year follow-up. However, the FEV1 decline between 1 and 3 years of follow-up was not significantly different compared to the pre-treatment decline (−73 mL/year, p = 0.179). Conclusions: Our results show that the EBV treatment does not influence the progression of disease in terms of lung function decline. However, the treatment does improve the FEV1 up to a level that is still comparable 3 years after treatment with the baseline level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has a great impact on numberless aspects of our society. In our bronchoscopic lung volume reduction interventional program, we work with severe COPD patients on a daily basis. Objectives: We were interested in the prevalence and outcome of COVID-19, impact of the pandemic on daily life, and the vaccination coverage in our severe COPD patients who have been treated with one-way endobronchial valves. Method: A questionnaire, which consisted of questions related to the infection rate, treatment, and outcome of COVID-19 infections; feelings of anxiety related to the pandemic; adherence to preventive measures; and willingness to be vaccinated; was sent to our patients in June 2021. Results: The questionnaire was sent to 215 patients, and the response rate was 100%. The vaccination rate was 97% in our surveyed population. The majority of patients (63%) indicated that they were quite or very anxious to get infected with COVID-19. Twenty-five (11.5%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, with none of these patients having been vaccinated at the time of infection. The infection rate reported in this study is comparable to that of the general Dutch population. However, the hospital admission rate and mortality rates are higher. Conclusions: Our results show that the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in severe COPD patients treated with endobronchial valves was comparable with the general population; however, the hospital admission and mortality rates were worse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using one-way endobronchial valves (EBVs) is a valid therapy for severe emphysema patients. However, alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT)-deficient patients were excluded from the majority of clinical trials investigating this intervention. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EBV treatment in patients with AAT deficiency (AATD) or a reduced AAT level. Method: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients treated with EBV with confirmed AATD or with a reduced AAT serum level at the University Medical Center Groningen between 2013 and 2021. Baseline and 6-month follow-up assessment included chest CT, pulmonary function measurement, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Results: In total, 53 patients were included, 30 patients in the AATD group (AAT <0.6 g/L or confirmed ZZ phenotype) and 23 patients in the reduced AAT group (AAT 0.6–1 g/L). In both groups, all response variables improved significantly after treatment. There was a median increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 105 mL (12% relative) and 280 mL (31% relative) in the AATD and reduced AAT groups, respectively. 6MWD increased by 62 min and 52 min, and SGRQ decreased by 12.5 patients and 18.7 patients, respectively. A pneumothorax occurred in 10% and 13% of patients, and no patients died. Conclusions: EBV treatment in patients with emphysema and AATD or a reduced AAT level is feasible and results in significant improvements in pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life and has an acceptable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]