Search

BACKGROUND: Very little research has examined the frequency with which women with major depressive disorder experience premenstrual exacerbation (PME) of depression or the characteristics of those who report such worsening. The NIMH Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study provides a unique opportunity to evaluate PME in depressed women seeking treatment in primary care or psychiatric settings. METHOD: This report presents data from the first 1500 participants enrolled in the STAR*D study. Premenopausal women with major depressive disorder were asked if they experienced a worsening of their depressive symptoms 5-10 days prior to menses. Those reporting PME were compared with those reporting no PME with regard to sociodemographic characteristics, course of illness features, symptom presentation, general medical co-morbidity, functional impairment, and quality of life. RESULTS: Of 433 premenopausal women not taking oral contraceptives, 64% reported a premenstrual worsening of their depression. Women who reported PME had a longer duration of their current major depressive episode [30.7 (S.D. = 73.7) months versus 13.5 (S.D. = 13.2) months; p=0.001], as well as greater general medical co-morbidity. Women reporting PME were also more likely to endorse symptoms of leaden paralysis, somatic complaints, gastrointestinal complaints, and psychomotor slowing, and were less likely to endorse blunted mood reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: PME is endorsed by the majority of premenopausal women with major depressive disorder and appears to be associated with a longer duration of depressive episode. PME is a common and important clinical issue deserving of further attention in both research and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Psychosocial outcomes from the Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression with Venlafaxine ER for Two Years (PREVENT) study were evaluated.Methods: Adult outpatients with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD) and response or remission following 6-month continuation treatment with venlafaxine extended release (ER) were randomized to receive venlafaxine ER or placebo for 1 year. Patients without recurrence on venlafaxine ER during year 1 were randomized to venlafaxine ER or placebo for year 2. Psychosocial functioning was assessed using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q), Life Enjoyment Scale-Short Version (LES-S), Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report (SAS-SR) total and individual factors, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (vitality, social functioning, and role function-emotional items), and Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE).Results: At year 1 end, better overall psychosocial functioning was seen among patients randomly assigned to venlafaxine ER (n=129) vs placebo (n=129), with significant differences at end point on SF-36 role function-emotional, Q-LES-Q, and SAS-SR total, and work, house work, social/leisure, and extended-family factor scores (p≤0.05). At year 2 end, significant differences favored venlafaxine ER (n=43) vs placebo (n=40) on SF-36 vitality and role function-emotional, Q-LES-Q, LES-S, LIFE, and SAS-SR total, social/leisure, and extended-family factor scores (p≤0.05).Limitations: Patients with chronic MDD or treatment resistance were excluded and long-term specialist care was a financial incentive for treatment compliance. Discontinuation-related adverse events may have compromised the integrity of the treatment blind.Conclusions: For patients with recurrent MDD, 2 years' maintenance therapy with venlafaxine ER may improve psychosocial functioning vs placebo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Zuranolone is a positive allosteric modulator of both synaptic and extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A receptors and a neuroactive steroid approved in the United States as an oral, once-daily, 14-day treatment course for adults with postpartum depression and under investigation for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). Interim results from the open-label, longitudinal, phase 3 SHORELINE Study (NCT03864614) that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of zuranolone in adults with MDD are reported., Methods: This interim report includes patients who were enrolled and had the opportunity to be on study for up to 1 year between February 2019 and September 2021. Adults aged 18-75 years with MDD diagnosed per DSM-5 criteria and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) total score ≥ 20 received an initial 30-mg or 50-mg 14-day zuranolone course. HAMD-17 responders (≥ 50% reduction from baseline) at Day (D)15 of the initial treatment period were allowed to continue in the study beyond D28 and were followed up for ≤ 1 year, during which repeat treatment courses were permitted. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of the initial and repeat treatment courses through 1 year. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline (CFB) in HAMD-17 total score and need for repeat treatment course(s)., Results: As of September 2021, among patients in the 30-mg (n = 725) and 50-mg (n = 199) Cohorts who received a zuranolone dose, 493 (68.0%) and 137 (68.8%), respectively, reported a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); most patients who experienced TEAEs reported mild/moderate events (30-mg Cohort, 90.9% [448/493]; 50-mg Cohort, 85.4% [117/137]). Mean (standard deviation) CFB HAMD-17 total score at D15 of the initial treatment period was -15.2 (7.1) and -16.0 (6.0) for the 30-mg and 50-mg Cohorts, respectively; similar improvements were observed after repeat treatment courses. The proportion of patients who received only 1 treatment course during their time on study was 42.9% (210/489) in the 30-mg Cohort and 54.8% (80/146) in the 50-mg Cohort; 57.1% (279/489) and 45.2% (66/146) patients, respectively, received 2-5 total treatment courses. The majority of patients who initially responded to zuranolone received ≤ 2 total treatment courses (30-mg Cohort, 68.5% [335/489]; 50-mg Cohort, 79.5% [116/146])., Conclusions: Of patients who experienced TEAEs, most reported mild or moderately severe events, and responders to zuranolone experienced improvements in depressive symptoms with initial and repeat treatment courses., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03864614., (© Copyright 2023 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Human trafficking is one of the largest criminal enterprises in the world, generating an estimated $150 billion in illegal profits annually. Sex trafficking is the most common form of human trafficking, and survivors experience significant physical, emotional, and sexual trauma that places them at increased risk of poor health outcomes. As sex trafficking continues to disproportionately impact the physical and mental health of individuals belonging to marginalized groups, a multidisciplinary approach to combat trafficking will require collaboration between health services, law enforcement, and social services. Therefore, medical professionals should be familiar with screening protocols for trafficking and evidence based, trauma-informed mental health treatment interventions., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose/background: Daily treatment with sertraline improves functional impairment among individuals with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). We do not know whether treatment initiated at symptom onset also improves functional impairment., Methods/procedures: This 3-site, double blind, randomized, clinical trial compared sertraline (25-100 mg) to similar appearing placebo, both administered at symptom onset, for reduction of PMDD symptoms. Ninety participants were allocated to sertraline and 94 participants to placebo. Functional outcomes from the Daily Ratings of the Severity of Problems included (1) reduced productivity or efficiency at work, school, home, or daily routine; (2) interference with hobbies or social activities; and (3) interference with relationships. Items were measured from 1 (no interference) to 6 (extreme interference) and averaged for the final 5 luteal phase days. This secondary analysis examined whether improvement in functional domains was greater for those allocated to sertraline compared with placebo. Second, we used causal mediation analyses to explore whether specific PMDD symptoms mediated functional improvement., Results/findings: Only relationship functioning improved significantly with active treatment between baseline and the end of the second cycle (active group mean [SD] change, -1.39 [1.38]; placebo group mean change, -0.76 [1.20]; β = -0.40; SE, 0.15; P = 0.009). The total effect of treatment on interference was -0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to -0.09; P = 0.011). Given the nonsignificant direct effect (0.11; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.29; P = 0.24) and significant indirect effect (-0.48; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.24; P < 0.001), amelioration of anger/irritability likely mediated reductions in relationship interference., Implications/conclusions: That anger/irritability mediates impairments in relationship functioning has face validity but should be replicated in other data sets., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00536198 ., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This proceeding summarizes a symposium on multidisciplinary management of menopause held on July 30, 2021 as part of the Health of Women 2021 conference. The workshop featured presentations by national experts who provided insights into multidisciplinary approaches to the management of menopause, vasomotor symptoms and genitourinary syndrome of menopause, bone health (including osteoporosis, muscular strength, and mobility), as well as sexual and psychological health during menopause. In this study, we highlight the major points of each presentation and the resultant discussion.

The objective of this analysis was to determine if there are sex differences with esketamine for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Post hoc analyses of three randomized, controlled studies of esketamine in patients with TRD (TRANSFORM-1, TRANSFORM-2 [18-64 years], TRANSFORM-3 [≥ 65 years]) were performed. In each 4-week study, adults with TRD were randomized to esketamine or placebo nasal spray, each with a newly initiated oral antidepressant. Change from baseline to day 28 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score was assessed by sex in pooled data from TRANSFORM-1/TRANSFORM-2 and separately in data from TRANSFORM-3 using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Use of hormonal therapy was assessed in all women, and menopausal status was assessed in women in TRANSFORM-1/TRANSFORM-2. Altogether, 702 adults (464 women) received ≥ 1 dose of intranasal study drug and antidepressant. Mean MADRS total score (SD) decreased from baseline to day 28, more so among patients treated with esketamine/antidepressant vs. antidepressant/placebo in both women and men: TRANSFORM-1/TRANSFORM-2 women-esketamine/antidepressant -20.3 (13.19) vs. antidepressant/placebo -15.8 (14.67), men-esketamine/antidepressant -18.3 (14.08) vs. antidepressant/placebo -16.0 (14.30); TRANSFORM-3 women-esketamine/antidepressant -9.9 (13.34) vs. antidepressant/placebo -6.9 (9.65), men-esketamine/antidepressant -10.3 (11.96) vs. antidepressant/placebo -5.5 (7.64). There was no significant sex effect or treatment-by-sex interaction (p > 0.35). The most common adverse events in esketamine-treated patients were nausea, dissociation, dizziness, and vertigo, each reported at a rate higher in women than men. The analyses support antidepressant efficacy and overall safety of esketamine nasal spray are similar between women and men with TRD. The TRANSFORM studies are registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifiers: NCT02417064 (first posted 15 April 2015; last updated 4 May 2020), NCT02418585 (first posted 16 April 2015; last updated 2 June 2020), and NCT02422186 (first posted 21 April 2015; last updated 29 September 2021))., (© 2021. Janssen Research & Development, LLC.)

Objectives: Cardiovascular disease and stroke risk factor screening and management by primary care providers (PCPs) have a significant impact on their patients' health. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR) cardiovascular disease and stroke risk alert in improving the ability of PCPs to manage risk factors among women and men aged 45 years and older., Methods: PCPs at a tertiary care hospital were randomized. The intervention group received an EHR alert, which calculated the individual patient risk and provided an order set incorporating the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guidelines, whereas the control group used the EHR in the usual manner. Multilevel analysis compared the rate of prescriptions between the intervention and control groups., Results: A total of 23 PCPs were randomized: 12 in the intervention group and 11 in the control group, attending to 7190 patients between September 2016 and January 2017. None of the providers in the intervention group used the programmed order set. Intervention group providers were significantly more likely to prescribe smoking cessation medication to women than to the control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.23-4.57). There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in the rate of other medication prescriptions., Conclusions: As measured by prescriptions for medications, other than those for smoking cessation, the EHR alert was not shown to be successful in increasing the management of high-risk patients. Physicians receiving numerous messages in the EHR may experience alert desensitization.

Background: Postpartum visits are a necessary continuum of medical care for women who are diagnosed with depression during pregnancy. However, postpartum care utilization is typically lower in populations who face adverse events and it is unclear to what extent having depression during pregnancy may compromise postpartum visit follow-up. Our study examined the association between severity of prenatal depression and postpartum care utilization among women on Medicaid. Materials and Methods: Data from a university-based, nonprofit managed care organization (2008-2012) were analyzed ( N  = 846). Prenatal depression severity and postpartum care utilization were determined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, from medical claims records. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was conducted. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: The majority (64.2%) of women received a mild/moderate prenatal depression diagnosis and 52.5% of the total sample attended their postpartum care visit. After adjusting for confounders, we found decreased odds of postpartum care utilization among women with less severe diagnoses. Women with a mild/moderate prenatal depression diagnosis were 12% less likely to attend the postpartum care visit compared with women with a severe prenatal depression diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.65-1.19). However, this finding was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study did not yield evidence of a statistically significant relationship between prenatal depression severity and postpartum visit attendance among a sample of Medicaid beneficiaries. Additional research is needed to assess the association between prenatal depression severity and postpartum care use to enhance continuity of services for Medicaid-insured women into the postpartum period., Competing Interests: No competing financial interests exist., (© Susan G. Kornstein et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)

Objective: To describe clinical characteristics and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) treatment effects, based on gender and age, in adults diagnosed with moderate to severe binge eating disorder (BED)., Methods: Adults diagnosed with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision-defined BED of moderate to severe severity were randomized to 12 weeks of dose-optimized LDX (50 or 70 mg) or placebo in 2 studies (conducted from November 26, 2012, to September 25, 2013 [study 1] and from November 26, 2012, to September 20, 2013 [study 2]). These post hoc analyses pooled data by gender (men vs women) and age (< 40 vs ≥ 40 years) across studies; reported P values are nominal (descriptive and unadjusted)., Results: The pooled safety analysis and full analysis sets included 745 and 724 participants, respectively (men, n = 105 and n = 97; women, n = 640 and n = 627; < 40 years, n = 398 and n = 386; ≥ 40 years, n = 347 and n = 338). Across subgroups, most participants had a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m² (63.0%-75.5%). The mean baseline number of binge eating days/wk was comparable across gender (4.6-4.7) and age (4.6-4.9), as was Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for Binge Eating (Y-BOCS-BE) total score (gender, 20.42-21.70; age, 21.40-21.63). Least squares mean (95% CI) treatment differences nominally favored LDX in all subgroups (all P < .001) for changes from baseline in binge eating days/wk at weeks 11-12 and in Y-BOCS-BE total score at week 12; no interactions by gender or age were reported. Consistent with the overall profile of LDX, across all subgroups LDX was associated with higher frequencies of treatment-emergent adverse events than placebo and with increases in blood pressure and pulse., Conclusions: Across gender and age, participants exhibited comparable clinical characteristics and responses to dose-optimized LDX compared with placebo., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01718483 and NCT01718509., (© Copyright 2019 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

There is a new appreciation of the perimenopause-defined as the early and late menopause transition stages as well as the early postmenopause-as a window of vulnerability for the development of both depressive symptoms and major depressive episodes. However, clinical recommendations on how to identify, characterize and treat clinical depression are lacking. To address this gap, an expert panel was convened to systematically review the published literature and develop guidelines on the evaluation and management of perimenopausal depression. The areas addressed included: (1) epidemiology; (2) clinical presentation; (3) therapeutic effects of antidepressants; (4) effects of hormone therapy; and (5) efficacy of other therapies (e.g., psychotherapy, exercise, and natural health products). Overall, evidence generally suggests that most midlife women who experience a major depressive episode during the perimenopause have experienced a prior episode of depression. Midlife depression presents with classic depressive symptoms commonly in combination with menopause symptoms (i.e., vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance), and psychosocial challenges. Menopause symptoms complicate, co-occur, and overlap with the presentation of depression. Diagnosis involves identification of menopausal stage, assessment of co-occurring psychiatric and menopause symptoms, appreciation of the psychosocial factors common in midlife, differential diagnoses, and the use of validated screening instruments. Proven therapeutic options for depression (i.e., antidepressants, psychotherapy) are the front-line treatments for perimenopausal depression. Although estrogen therapy is not approved to treat perimenopausal depression, there is evidence that it has antidepressant effects in perimenopausal women, particularly those with concomitant vasomotor symptoms. Data on estrogen plus progestin are sparse and inconclusive.

Background: Poor medication adherence is common among individuals with Bipolar Disorder (BD). Understanding the sources of heterogeneity in clinical net benefit (CNB) and how it is related to psychotropic medications can provide new insight into ways to improve adherence., Methods: Data come from the baseline assessments of the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD). Latent class analysis identified groups of CNB, and validity of this construct was assessed using the SF-36. Adherence was defined as taking 75% or more of medications as prescribed. Associations between CNB and adherence were tested using multiple logistic regression adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics., Results: Five classes of CNB were identified: High (24%), Moderately high (12%), Moderate (26%), Moderately low (27%) and Low (12%). Adherence to psychotropic medications did not differ across classes (71% to 75%, χ 2   = 3.43, p = 0.488). Medication regimens differed by class: 57% of the High CNB were taking ≤2 medications, whereas 49% of the Low CNB were taking ≥4. CNB classes had good concordance with the SF-36., Limitations: Missing data limited measures used to define CNB. Participants' perceptions of their illness and treatment were not assessed., Conclusions: This novel operationalization of CNB has construct validity as indicated by the SF-36. Although CNB and polypharmacy regimens are heterogeneous in this sample, adherence is similar across CNB. Studying adherent individuals, despite suboptimal CNB, may provide novel insights into aspects influencing adherence., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

There is a new appreciation of the perimenopause - defined as the early and late menopause transition stages as well as the early postmenopause - as a window of vulnerability for the development of both depressive symptoms and major depressive episodes. However, clinical recommendations on how to identify, characterize and treat clinical depression are lacking. To address this gap, an expert panel was convened to systematically review the published literature and develop guidelines on the evaluation and management of perimenopausal depression. The areas addressed included: 1) epidemiology; 2) clinical presentation; 3) therapeutic effects of antidepressants; 4) effects of hormone therapy; and 5) efficacy of other therapies (eg, psychotherapy, exercise, and natural health products). Overall, evidence generally suggests that most midlife women who experience a major depressive episode during the perimenopause have experienced a prior episode of depression. Midlife depression presents with classic depressive symptoms commonly in combination with menopause symptoms (ie, vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance), and psychosocial challenges. Menopause symptoms complicate, co-occur, and overlap with the presentation of depression. Diagnosis involves identification of menopausal stage, assessment of co-occurring psychiatric and menopause symptoms, appreciation of the psychosocial factors common in midlife, differential diagnoses, and the use of validated screening instruments. Proven therapeutic options for depression (ie, antidepressants, psychotherapy) are the front-line treatments for perimenopausal depression. Although estrogen therapy is not approved to treat perimenopausal depression, there is evidence that it has antidepressant effects in perimenopausal women, particularly those with concomitant vasomotor symptoms. Data on estrogen plus progestin are sparse and inconclusive.

Background: The postpartum care visit (PPCV) plays an important role in ensuring the well-being of mother and infant. This study sought to assess correlates of PPCV attendance among women who are at high risk of nonattendance., Materials and Methods: This study used deidentified medical claims data from Virginia Premier-a nonprofit Managed Care Organization that provides health insurance for Medicaid beneficiaries. The association between various correlates and PPCV attendance was examined using multiple logistic regression analyses., Results: Of the 25,692 women in the study, more than half (50.5%) did not attend a postpartum visit. Racial/ethnic minorities and women receiving the majority of their care at hospitals, Health Departments, or Federally Qualified Health Centers were more likely to attend their postpartum visit. Women who smoked and those who did not attend prenatal care had reduced odds of postpartum visit attendance. Age, education, and delivery method were not found to be significantly associated with PPCV attendance., Conclusions: Our results highlight factors associated with attendance of PPCVs in low income populations. The continued disparity in postpartum care utilization compels additional efforts to improve access to health services across socioeconomic and demographic boundaries.

Sex and gender are critical contributors to overall health and disease, and considering both in research informs the development of prevention strategies and treatment interventions for both men and women. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health sponsored a preconference workshop on this topic at the 24th Annual Women's Health Congress, which was held in Crystal City, VA, in April 2016. The workshop featured presentations by NIH intramural and extramural scientists who presented data on a variety of topics including polycystic kidney disease, vaccine protection, depression, drug addiction, and cardiovascular disease. In this publication, we discuss the major points of each presentation and demonstrate the importance of considering sex and gender in biomedical research.

Background: Flibanserin, a 5-HT 1A agonist and 5-HT 2A antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in premenopausal women. This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of flibanserin treatment on body weight in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with HSDD., Materials and Methods: This analysis included three 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of flibanserin 100 mg each bedtime (qhs) in premenopausal women, a similarly designed study in postmenopausal women, and a 52-week, open-label extension study in premenopausal women., Results: In a pooled analysis of premenopausal women, mean baseline body mass index (BMI) was 27.0 kg/m 2 in the flibanserin group (n = 1227) and 26.8 kg/m 2 in the placebo group (n = 1238). Among patients who completed 24 weeks of treatment, least squares (LS) mean weight change was -1.4 kg in the flibanserin group (n = 1010) and -0.1 kg in the placebo group (n = 1066; p < 0.0001). Weight loss ≥5% from baseline was reported in 21.0% of patients who received flibanserin and 7.8% of patients who received placebo; weight loss ≥10% was reported in 3.8% and 2.0% of patients, respectively. In postmenopausal women, mean baseline BMI was 27.7 kg/m 2 in the flibanserin group (n = 467) and 27.3 kg/m 2 in the placebo group (n = 480). LS mean weight change at week 24 was -1.8 kg in the flibanserin group (n = 385) and -0.1 kg in the placebo group (n = 425; p < 0.0001), with weight loss ≥5% reported in 24.7% and 7.3% of patients, respectively, and weight loss ≥10% reported in 5.2% and 1.7%, respectively. In HSDD patients with >12 months (n = 880) and >18 months (n = 637) of exposure to flibanserin, mean weight change was -1.0 and -1.2 kg, respectively; 25.4% and 26.9% of patients, respectively, experienced weight loss ≥5% from baseline, and 7.8% and 8.4%, respectively, experienced weight loss ≥10%., Conclusions: Women treated with flibanserin for HSDD may experience weight loss.

Background: Some women who use cyclic hormonal contraception (CHC) suffer from premenstrual symptoms; whether their symptoms differ from women who do not use CHC is not clear., Objective: To compare women who use or do not use CHC on perimenstrual symptom timing and change severity., Study Design: We analyzed daily symptom ratings from women who requested participation in (Screened Cohort: 103 used CHC and 387 did not) or were randomized in (Randomized Cohort: 41 used CHC and 211 did not) a clinical trial for premenstrual syndrome. We used effect sizes to compute and compare change scores between cycle phases in four partially overlapping perimenstrual windows defined relative to day 1 of menses [(-6, -1), (-5, 1), (-4, 2), (-3, 3)]. Differences in magnitude of change and timing were estimated using linear mixed-effects models., Results: Both cohorts showed a significant two-way interaction between CHC use and symptom change scores (p < 0.01) and a significant main effect of perimenstrual window (p < 0.0001). Overall menstrual cycle symptom change was greater for the nonhormonal contraception versus hormonal contraception group. In the Screened Cohort, change scores were greater in the nonhormonal group specifically for depression (p = 0.04); anger or irritability (p < 0.01); and physical symptoms (p < 0.01). Mean change scores increased as the window shifted forward toward menses for both cohorts with the largest effect size and greatest group difference for (-4, 2) interval., Conclusions: CHC slightly attenuates menstrual cycle symptom change. The (-4, 2) perimenstrual interval shows the largest change compared with postmenses.

Substantial unmet needs exist regarding the awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of binge-eating disorder (BED). Affecting both men and women and appearing in all ethnic groups, BED is the most prevalent of all the eating disorders in the United States and worldwide. Left untreated, BED causes significant impairment, reduced quality of life, and decreased productivity. Many patients are unaware of the disorder and present for treatment of weight-related issues or comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions. Communication barriers, such as the reluctance of patients to volunteer information about their eating habits and of clinicians to ask potentially sensitive questions, may be overcome with the use of diagnostic criteria along with appropriate assessment questions and screening tools. Early recognition and accurate diagnosis may help mitigate the long-term impact of BED., (© Copyright 2017 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: Review the clinical skills needed to recognize, diagnose, and manage binge-eating disorder (BED) in a primary care setting., Data Sources: A PubMed search of English-language publications (January 1, 2008-December 11, 2014) was conducted using the term binge-eating disorder . Relevant articles known to the authors were also included., Study Selection/data Extraction: Publications focusing on preclinical topics (eg, characterization of receptors and neurotransmitter systems) without discussing clinical relevance were excluded. A total of 101 publications were included in this review., Results: Although BED is the most prevalent eating disorder, it is underdiagnosed and undertreated. BED can be associated with medical (eg, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome) and psychiatric (eg, depression and anxiety) comorbidities that, if left untreated, can impair quality of life and functionality. Primary care physicians may find diagnosing and treating BED challenging because of insufficient knowledge of its new diagnostic criteria and available treatment options. Furthermore, individuals with BED may be reluctant to seek treatment because of shame, embarrassment, and a lack of awareness of the disorder. Several short assessment tools are available to screen for BED in primary care settings. Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy should focus on reducing binge-eating behavior, thereby reducing medical and psychiatric complications., Conclusions: Overcoming primary care physician- and patient-related barriers is critical to accurately diagnose and appropriately treat BED. Primary care physicians should take an active role in the initial recognition and assessment of suspected BED based on case-finding indicators (eg, eating habits and being overweight), the initial treatment selection, and the long-term follow-up of patients who meet DSM-5 BED diagnostic criteria.

The chronic course of major depressive disorder (MDD) often impedes the ability of patients to achieve full remission. Return of full functioning is a critical goal of antidepressant pharmacotherapy as the presence of residual depressive symptoms is associated with an increased risk of relapse. Treatment guidelines recommend selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or atypical antidepressants as first-line treatment for moderate to severe MDD. Desvenlafaxine, administered as desvenlafaxine succinate, is an serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with MDD at the recommended dose of 50 mg/day. The aim of this integrated analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day compared with placebo in adult outpatients with MDD. The analysis used data from nine fixed-dose, short-term, placebo-controlled studies in adult outpatients diagnosed with MDD who had depressive symptoms for at least 30 days. Data from 4279 and 4317 patients were pooled for the efficacy and safety analyses, respectively. Statistically significant improvements were observed with desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day versus placebo for all efficacy endpoints assessed, including improvements in depressive symptoms, response and remission rates, as well as functional and cognitive outcomes. Treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day was generally safe and well tolerated. The findings of this integrated analysis of data from a large population of patients with MDD confirmed the antidepressant efficacy of both desvenlafaxine doses and add to previous evidence supporting the efficacy of desvenlafaxine.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging to manage due its variable and episodic nature. Post hoc analyses were conducted on five studies (NCT00969709, NCT01377194, NCT00969150, NCT01034462, EudraCT:2006-002404-34) to evaluate the efficacy of levomilnacipran extended-release (ER) in patients with different MDD episode histories., Methods: Adults with MDD were randomized to double-blind treatment with levomilnacipran ER (40-120mg/d) or placebo. Three subgroups were identified: first-episode (n=494); highly recurrent (≥3 major depressive episodes; n=1954); and chronic (current episode duration ≥2 years; n=218). Mean changes from baseline to end of study (Week 8 [US studies], Week 10 [non-US study]) in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD17), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total scores were analyzed in each subgroup. MADRS response, defined as ≥50% total score improvement from baseline to Week 8/10, was also analyzed., Results: Least squares mean differences (LSMDs) between treatment groups indicated significantly greater improvements with levomilnacipran ER versus placebo in MADRS (first-episode, -2.5; highly recurrent, -3.0; chronic, -4.9; all P<.05) and HAMD17 (first-episode, -2.1; highly recurrent, -1.6; chronic, -2.6; all P<.05) total scores. LSMDs for SDS total score were statistically significant in the first-episode and highly recurrent MDD subgroups (both subgroups, -2.3; P<.01). MADRS response rate was significantly higher with levomilnacipran ER versus placebo in all three subgroups (first-episode, 44.5% versus 35.0%; highly recurrent, 44.3% versus 33.5%; 36.8% versus 22.0%; all P<.05)., Limitations: MDD subgroups were defined post hoc; none of the studies were prospectively designed to evaluate outcomes in these subgroups. Other limitations include lack of active comparators and variability of dose/duration due to data being pooled from multiple clinical trials., Conclusions: Results suggest that levomilnacipran ER improves depression symptoms and functional impairment in adult patients with different histories of MDD episodes., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background. Delays in postpartum contraceptive use may increase risk for unintended or rapid repeat pregnancies. The postpartum care visit (PPCV) is a good opportunity for women to discuss family planning options with their health care providers. This study examined the association between PPCV attendance and modern contraceptive use using data from a managed care organization. Methods. Claims and demographic and administrative data came from a nonprofit managed care organization in Virginia (2008-2012). Information on the most recent delivery for mothers with singleton births was analyzed ( N = 24,619). Routine PPCV (yes, no) and modern contraceptive use were both dichotomized. Descriptive analyses provided percentages, frequencies, and means. Multiple logistic regression was conducted and ORs and 95% CIs were calculated. Results. More than half of the women did not attend their PPCV (50.8%) and 86.9% had no modern contraceptive use. After controlling for the effects of confounders, women with PPCV were 50% more likely to use modern contraceptive methods than women with no PPCV (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.31, 1.72). Conclusions. These findings highlight the importance of PPCV in improving modern contraceptive use and guide health care policy in the effort of reducing unintended pregnancy rates., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Women of color face unique health challenges that differ significantly from those of other women and men of color. To bring these issues to light, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health sponsored a preconference workshop at the 23rd Annual Women's Health Congress, which was held in Washington, DC, in April 2015. The workshop featured presentations by NIH intramural and extramural scientists who provided insight on the disparities of a wide range of conditions, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, the risk of HIV infection, and disability in an aging population. In this study, we highlight the major points of each presentation and the ensuing discussion.

The primary objective of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the effect of short-term treatment with desvenlafaxine versus placebo on sexual dysfunction (SD), assessed from Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale scores, in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder. Data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of 50 or 100 mg/day desvenlafaxine for major depressive disorder were pooled. SD status, determined from Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale scores, was assessed at baseline and week 8, last observation carried forward. Subgroup analyses addressed the effects of sex, baseline SD, and antidepressant response. At week 8, last observation carried forward (n=1562), SD rates were 54, 47, and 49% for 50 mg/day desvenlafaxine, 100 mg/day desvenlafaxine, and placebo, respectively [adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) vs. placebo: 1.205 (0.928, 1.564) and 1.129 (0.795, 1.604), respectively]. The treatment by baseline SD interaction approached statistical significance (P=0.0663), mainly driven by poorer scores for desvenlafaxine versus placebo in the 100 mg group. Treatment by sex interactions were not statistically significant. Small but statistically significant treatment by sex interactions were observed for sex drive (P=0.0011) and ease of erection/lubrication (P=0.0151). Although there was no overall effect of desvenlafaxine on SD, a treatment by baseline SD interaction was suggested for 100 mg desvenlafaxine.

Importance: Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are efficacious treatments for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) when given daily or for half of the menstrual cycle during the luteal phase. Preliminary studies suggest that SRI treatment can be shortened to the interval from symptom onset through the beginning of menses., Objective: To determine the efficacy of symptom-onset dosing with the SRI sertraline hydrochloride for treatment of PMDD., Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multisite, parallel-group randomized clinical trial conducted September 1, 2007, to February 29, 2012, at 3 university medical centers. In all, 252 women with PMDD started treatment at symptom onset and continued until the first few days of menses for 6 menstrual cycles. Intent-to-treat analyses were performed February 28, 2014, through April 21, 2015., Interventions: Placebo or sertraline hydrochloride, 50 to 100 mg/d, during the symptomatic interval., Main Outcomes and Measures: Premenstrual Tension Scale (PMTS) score was the primary outcome measure (score range, 0-36; 36 indicates most severe score). Secondary outcome measures included the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-Rated (IDS-C) (score range, 0-84; 84 indicates most severe score), Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) (total and subscale scores; higher scores indicate most severe problems), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales (score range, 1-7; 7 indicates most severe symptoms and least improvement), and Michelson SSRI (Selective SRI) Withdrawal Symptoms Scale scores (range, 0-51; higher scores indicate more severe withdrawal symptoms)., Results: Among the participants, 125 with PMDD were randomized to sertraline, and 127 to placebo. At baseline the mean (SD) PMTS scores for sertaline and placebo were 22.3 (4.8) and 21.4 (4.5), respectively, which declined to 11.7 (6.8) and 12.0 (6.9), respectively; group mean difference, 1.88 (95% CI, 0.01-3.75; P = .06). The mean (SD) estimated difference in IDS-C scores between baseline (35.4 [10.7] for sertraline; 32.8 [10.4] for placebo) and the end point (15.3 [10.7] for sertraline; 17.8 [11.0] for placebo) favored the sertraline group by 5.14 (95% CI, 1.97-8.31) points (P = .02). Compared with the placebo group, those assigned to sertraline showed greater improvement on the total DRSP score (estimated mean difference, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.96-1.25] points; P = .02) and Anger/Irritability DRSP subscale score (1.22 [95% CI, 1.05-1.41] points; P < .01) and were more likely to respond to treatment (77 of 115 patients [67.0%] for sertraline and 65 of 124 [52.4%] for placebo; χ21 = 5.23; P = .02). The mean (SD) number of symptomatic days before treatment diminished over time (sertraline, -0.7 [3.4] days; placebo, -1.0 [3.2] days), with no group differences in symptomatic days or the Michelson SSRI Withdrawal Symptoms Scale., Conclusions and Relevance: Depending on the symptom scale, women with PMDD may or may not benefit from SRI treatment during the interval from the onset of premenstrual symptoms through the first few days of menses. Abrupt treatment cessation was not associated with discontinuation symptoms., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00536198.

Background: Few studies in the literature have examined the efficacy of antidepressant drugs in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. The objective of the current study was to assess the efficacy of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) separately in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder (MDD)., Methods: Data were pooled from two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials enrolling perimenopausal and postmenopausal women (40-70 years old) diagnosed with MDD. Patients were randomly assigned to receive desvenlafaxine 100 to 200 mg/day or placebo (8 weeks) or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day or placebo (10 weeks). The primary efficacy end point for each trial was change from baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) total score at week 8. Secondary end points included change from baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scores. Changes from baseline in continuous variables were analyzed using analysis of covariance with treatment, region, and baseline in the model. All treatment comparisons were carried out separately in perimenopausal or postmenopausal women, in individual studies, and in the pooled population, adjusting for menopausal status and study., Results: A total of 798 patients were included in the full analysis set (perimenopausal, n=252; postmenopausal, n=546). Desvenlafaxine significantly reduced HAM-D17 total scores versus placebo at week 8 in both perimenopausal (-10.3 vs. -6.5; p<0.001) and postmenopausal women (-10.1 vs. -7.6; p<0.001). Significant improvements in SDS and MRS total scores were also observed for desvenlafaxine versus placebo in perimenopausal (p ≤ 0.024) and postmenopausal women (p ≤ 0.009). A significant treatment by menopausal status interaction was observed for SDS only (p=0.036)., Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine demonstrated antidepressant efficacy in both perimenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups of women with MDD., Disclaimer: In September 2011, Pfizer received a Complete Response Letter from the United States Food and Drug Administration on its application for approval to market desvenlafaxine for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. The Complete Response Letter states that the data included in the application are not sufficient to establish an acceptable risk/benefit profile for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in the general population of postmenopausal women, and therefore desvenlafaxine is not approved for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in the United States at this time. This decision does not impact desvenlafaxine's approval for the treatment of MDD in adults.

Background: Physician-patient conversations were examined to identify barriers to effective discussions about binge eating disorder (BED) arising from discrepancies in how physicians and patients communicate about BED., Methods: Conversations between suspected or diagnosed BED patients (n = 38) and psychiatrists (n = 11) were recorded and the transcripts were reviewed for BED-related lexical terms using automated conversation analysis software. Researchers disambiguated multivalent terms and combined similar terms., Results: The results showed that psychiatrists evaluated some diagnostic criteria (e.g., the absence of compensatory behavior) but not others (e.g., eating more rapidly than normal), focused more on symptoms in relation to weight and generally discussed weight-related issues more often than did patients, and asked about the type of food consumed more often than the diagnostic criterion related to the quantity of food consumed. In contrast, patients used terminology that attempted to clarify the relationships between feelings, coping strategies, and compulsion to binge eat when discussing binge eating episodes., Conclusion: These findings suggest that educational materials promoting more effective physician-patient dialogues regarding eating behaviors in general, and BED specifically, may be beneficial. Conversations should highlight the BED diagnostic criteria, assessment of patients' emotions and sense of lack of control, and relationships between body weight and BED.

This article is part of a larger body of work entitled, "The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space." It was developed in response to a recommendation from the 2011 National Academy of Sciences Decadal Survey, "Recapturing a Future for Space Exploration: Life and Physical Sciences for a New Era," which emphasized the need to fully understand sex and gender differences. In this article, our workgroup-consisting of expert scientists and clinicians from academia and the private sector-investigated and summarized the current body of published and unpublished human research performed to date related to sex- and gender-based differences in behavioral adaptations to human spaceflight. This review identifies sex-related differences in: (1) sleep, circadian rhythms, and neurobehavioral measures; (2) personality, group interactions, and work performance and satisfaction; and (3) stress and clinical disorders. Differences in these areas substantially impact the risks and optimal medical care required by space-faring women. To ensure the health and safety of male and female astronauts during long-duration space missions, it is imperative to understand the influences that sex and gender have on behavioral health changes occurring during spaceflight.

Background: Desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) for anxious depression was assessed in a post hoc analysis., Methods: Data were pooled from patients randomly assigned to desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day or placebo in seven double-blind, fixed-dose studies in adults with major depressive disorder. Patients with "anxious depression" had baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, anxiety-somatization factor (HAM-D17 A/S) scores ≥7. Primary end point was change in HAM-D17 scores from baseline at week 8 (last observation carried forward), evaluated using analysis of covariance with treatment, study, and baseline value as covariates., Results: A total of 1873/2706 (69%) patients were identified as "anxious depressed". Desvenlafaxine significantly improved HAM-D17 total scores versus placebo in anxious (adjusted mean [95% CI] -1.72 [-2.35, -1.09]; p < 0.001) and nonanxious (-1.48 [-2.40, -0.57]; p = 0.002) populations, with no significant treatment-by-anxiety interaction. Response and remission rates (HAM-D17 ) were significantly higher with desvenlafaxine compared with placebo in both populations. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 78% and 69% (desvenlafaxine versus placebo, respectively) of anxious depressed patients and by 77% and 68% of nonanxious patients., Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day significantly improved depressive symptoms compared with placebo in major depressive disorder patients with clinically relevant anxiety symptoms. Improvement in the HAM-D17 total score was similar for anxious/nonanxious groups., (Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objective: This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day for treating major depressive disorder in perimenopausal versus postmenopausal women enrolled in a 10-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study., Methods: Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women (40-70 y) diagnosed with major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to receive desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day or placebo. Changes from baseline in the primary efficacy variable (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D17] score, week 8) and in other secondary efficacy variables (Sheehan Disability Scale and Menopause Rating Scale) were analyzed using analysis of covariance with treatment, region, and baseline in the model. Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale was analyzed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Response and remission rates were evaluated using logistic regression with treatment, region, and baseline HAM-D17 in the model., Results: Of 426 women (desvenlafaxine, n = 216; placebo, n = 210) included in this analysis, 135 (32%) were perimenopausal and 291 (68%) were postmenopausal at baseline. In both subgroups, improvement from baseline in HAM-D17 scores was significantly greater for desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day than for placebo. Menopause status and time since menopause did not significantly affect HAM-D17 total score. The drug-placebo difference in Sheehan Disability Scale scores was significant in perimenopausal women (-9.3 vs. -5.1, P < 0.001) but not in postmenopausal women (-8.8 vs. -8.1). Menopause Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale scores were significantly improved with desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women., Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day is effective in treating depression in both perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Placebo response on measures of functional impairment is lower in perimenopausal women than in postmenopausal women, resulting in a greater apparent treatment benefit with desvenlafaxine among perimenopausal women.

Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic and debilitating condition often characterized by inadequate treatment. Notwithstanding the availability of more than a dozen first-line agents across disparate classes (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), the majority of individuals with MDD do not achieve and sustain a recovered state. A substantial percentage of MDD patients require a treatment change due to poor efficacy or tolerability., Areas Covered: This review focuses on recent (≤ 5 years) literature describing the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine , one of the more recently approved antidepressant drugs. Published papers identified via PubMed search and congress presentations were included. Results from short-term, placebo-controlled, MDD trials and randomized withdrawal trials, as well as post hoc analyses in patient subgroups, are reviewed., Expert Opinion: Desvenlafaxine has been shown to be an effective antidepressant with a favorable safety and tolerability profile in the general MDD population and in important patient subgroups. It has several notable differences from other serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and those differences suggest populations in which it may have the most clinical benefit.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of sex and menopausal status on acute-, continuation-, and maintenance-phase treatment outcomes in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD)., Method: This was a secondary analysis of data from the Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression With Venlafaxine for Two Years (PREVENT) trial, a multiphase, multicenter, double-blind study in which adult outpatients with recurrent MDD (by DSM-IV criteria) were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of acute-phase venlafaxine extended release (ER) (75-300 mg/d) or fluoxetine (20-60 mg/d). Patients achieving response or remission had 6 months of continuation-phase treatment. Responding or remitting patients in the venlafaxine ER group were randomly assigned to venlafaxine ER or placebo for 2 consecutive 12-month maintenance phases; fluoxetine-treated patients continued receiving fluoxetine. The outcome measures for this analysis were acute- and continuation-phase response and remission rates (as measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and time to depression recurrence in the maintenance phases according to sex and menopausal status at baseline., Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 781 patients in the venlafaxine ER group (65% women) and 266 patients in the fluoxetine group (61% women); 64% of all women were premenopausal, and 25% were postmenopausal (5% perimenopausal; not analyzed). At acute-phase end, remission rates in the venlafaxine ER vs fluoxetine groups were 44% vs 47% in men, 51% vs 52% in women, 50% vs 52% in premenopausal women, and 52% vs 55% in postmenopausal women. At continuation-phase end, remission rates in the venlafaxine ER vs fluoxetine groups were 71% vs 74% in men, 72% vs 67% in women, 72% vs 69% in premenopausal women and 71% vs 63% in postmenopausal women. Response rates were consistent with these findings. Based on a Cox proportional hazards model, sex was not a significant predictor of recurrence during the first or second maintenance phase (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.233; P = .3712 and HR = 1.103; P = .8075, respectively), and neither was menopausal status at acute-phase baseline (HR = 0.941; P = .8234 and HR = 0.531; P = .2065, respectively)., Conclusions: In this study of patients with recurrent MDD, treatment outcomes with venlafaxine ER and fluoxetine did not differ on the basis of sex or menopausal status. Our confidence in these findings is limited by the lack of a placebo arm during the acute and continuation phases and by the small sample sizes for subgroup analyses in the maintenance phases., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00046020., (© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: Evaluate the 8-week efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine at the recommended dose of 50 mg/d in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder (MDD) based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision., Method: This phase 4, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted from June 30, 2010, to June 8, 2011. Patients received placebo or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (1:1 ratio; n = 217 in each group). The primary outcome measure was the change at week 8 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) total score. Secondary outcome measures included change in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity (VAS-PI)., Results: At end point, compared to placebo, desvenlafaxine was associated with a significantly greater decrease in HDRS17 total scores (last-observation-carried-forward analysis; adjusted mean change from baseline -9.9 vs -8.1, respectively; P = .004) and significant improvements on the CGI-I (P < .001), MADRS (P = .002), SDS (P = .038), and VAS-PI (P < .001). Improvements on the SDS and VAS-PI reached significance by week 2. Desvenlafaxine was generally safe and well tolerated., Conclusions: Short-term treatment with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d was effective for the treatment of MDD in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, with significant benefits on pain and functional outcomes evident as early as week 2. The safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine were consistent with data in other populations., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01121484., (© Copyright 2013 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: To determine the incidence, clinical and demographic correlates, and relationship to treatment outcome of self-reported premenstrual exacerbation of depressive symptoms in premenopausal women with major depressive disorder who are receiving antidepressant medication., Method: This post-hoc analysis used clinical trial data from treatment-seeking, premenopausal, adult female outpatients with major depression who were not using hormonal contraceptives. For this report, citalopram was used as the first treatment step. We also used data from the second step in which one of three new medications were used (bupropion-SR [sustained release], venlafaxine-XR [extended release], or sertraline). Treatment-blinded assessors obtained baseline treatment outcomes data. We hypothesized that those with reported premenstrual depressive symptom exacerbation would have more general medical conditions, longer index depressive episodes, lower response or remission rates, and shorter times-to-relapse with citalopram, and that they would have a better outcome with sertraline than with bupropion-SR., Results: At baseline, 66% (n=545/821) of women reported premenstrual exacerbation. They had more general medical conditions, more anxious features, longer index episodes, and shorter times-to-relapse (41.3 to 47.1 weeks, respectively). Response and remission rates to citalopram, however, were unrelated to reported premenstrual exacerbation. Reported premenstrual exacerbation was also unrelated to differential benefit with sertraline and bupropion-SR., Conclusions: Self-reported premenstrual exacerbation has moderate clinical utility in the management of depressed patients, although it is not predictive of overall treatment response. Factors that contribute to a more chronic or relapsing course may also play a role in premenstrual worsening of major depressive disorder (MDD).

Background: Menopausal status and use of hormonal contraception or menopausal hormone therapy (HT) may affect treatment response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This report evaluates whether menopausal status and use of hormonal contraceptives or menopausal HT affect outcome in women treated with citalopram., Methods: In the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, 896 premenopausal and 544 postmenopausal women were treated with citalopram for 12-14 weeks. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were used in adjusted analysis of the effect of menopausal status and use of hormonal contraceptives or menopausal HT on outcomes. Remission was defined as final Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 (HRSD(17)) ≤7 or Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR(16)) score ≤5 and response as ≥50% decrease from the baseline QIDS-SR(16) score., Results: Premenopausal and postmenopausal women differed in multiple clinical and demographic baseline variables but did not differ in response or remission rates. Premenopausal women taking hormonal contraceptives had significantly greater unadjusted remission rates on the HRSD(17) and the QIDS-SR(16) than women not taking contraception. Response and remission rates were not different between postmenopausal women taking vs. not taking HT. Adjusted results showed no significant difference in any outcome measure across menopause status in women who were not taking contraception/HT. There were no significant differences in adjusted results across HT status in premenopausal or postmenopausal women., Conclusions: In this study, citalopram treatment outcome was not affected by menopausal status. Hormonal contraceptives and HT also did not affect probability of good outcome.

Objective: Return of functional ability is a central goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder. We conducted two trials with the same protocol that was designed to assess functioning after 8 Weeks of treatment with duloxetine., Methods: The a priori primary outcome was improvement in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) item 7 (work/activities). Secondary outcomes included improvement in depressive symptoms assessed by the HAMD Maier subscale, and improvement in functioning assessed by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale (SASS). Patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine 60 mg/day (Trial I, n = 257; Trial II, n = 261) or placebo (Trial I, n = 127; Trial II, n = 131). Changes from baseline were analyzed using a mixed-effects model repeated measures approach., Results: At Week 8, duloxetine was superior to placebo in improving HAMD work/activities (p < 0.001) in Trial II, but not Trial I (p = 0.051), and Maier scores (p < 0.01) in both trials. At Week 12, duloxetine was superior to placebo on improving SASS scores in both trials, and the SDS in Trial II., Conclusion: Treatment with duloxetine was associated with significant improvement in depressive symptoms compared with placebo, but improvement in HAMD work/activities was inconsistent at 8 weeks., (Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Both the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD(17)) and 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician-rated (IDS-C(30) ) contain a subscale that assesses anxious symptoms. We used classical test theory and item response theory methods to assess and compare the psychometric properties of the two anxiety subscales (HRSD(ANX) and IDS-C(ANX)) in a large sample (N = 3453) of outpatients with non-psychotic major depressive disorder in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study. Approximately 48% of evaluable participants had at least one concurrent anxiety disorder by the self-report Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ). The HRSD(ANX) and IDS-C(ANX) were highly correlated (r = 0.75) and both had moderate internal consistency given their limited number of items (HRSD(ANX) Cronbach's alpha = 0.48; IDS-C(ANX) Cronbach's alpha = 0.58). The optimal threshold for ascribing the presence/absence of anxious features was found at a total score of eight or nine for the HRSD(ANX) and seven or eight for the IDS-C(ANX) . It would seem beneficial to delete item 17 (loss of insight) from the HRSD(ANX) as it negatively correlated with the scale's total score. Both the HRSD(ANX) and IDS-C(ANX) subscales have acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to identify anxious features for clinical or research purposes., (Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: The clinical effects of antidepressant combinations vs. monotherapy as initial treatment for major depression with melancholic features (MDD-MF) are unknown., Methods: Outpatients with chronic or recurrent major depression (MDD) were randomized to initial treatment with escitalopram+placebo (the MONO condition), bupropion-sustained release+escitalopram, or venlafaxine-extended release+mirtazapine (the COMB conditions) in the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) trial. Secondary data analyses were conducted to compare demographic and clinical characteristics, and contrast clinical responses according to drug treatment, in patients with MDD-MF (n=124) and non-melancholic MDD (n=481)., Results: While numerically lower, remission rates in MDD-MF did not differ significantly from those with non-melancholic MDD either at 12 (33.1% vs. 41.0%, aOR 1.16, p=0.58) or 28 (39.5% vs. 46.8%, aOR=1.02, p=0.93) weeks of treatment. Remission rates did not differ significantly between combination and monotherapy groups in either MDD-MF or non-melancholic MDD patients at either time point. Similar conclusions were reached for response rates, premature study discontinuation, and self-rated depression symptom severity., Limitations: This is a secondary analysis of data from the CO-MED trial, which was not designed to address differential treatment response in melancholic and non-melancholic MDD., Conclusions: We found no evidence of differential remission or response rates to antidepressant combination or monotherapy between melancholic/non-melancholic MDD patients, or according to antidepressant treatment group, after 12 and 28 weeks. Melancholic features may not be a valid predictor of more favorable response to antidepressant combination therapy as initial treatment., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)