Search

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders are linked to prolonged concussion symptoms. However, the association of premorbid anxiety/depression symptoms with postconcussion return-to-play timelines and total symptom burden is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of self-reported premorbid anxiety/depression symptoms in collegiate student-athletes with (1) recovery times until asymptomatic, (2) return-to-play, and (3) postconcussion symptom burden. STUDY DESIGN: Athletes in the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium completed baseline concussion assessments (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool [SCAT3] and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18]). Athletes were tested postinjury at

CONTEXT: The King-Devick (K-D) test is used to identify oculomotor impairment after concussion. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the K-D test over time has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To (1) examine the sensitivity and specificity of the K-D test at 0 to 6 hours postinjury, 24 to 48 hours postinjury, the beginning of a return-to-play (RTP) protocol (asymptomatic), unrestricted RTP, and 6 months postconcussion and (2) compare outcomes between athletes with and those without concussion across confounding factors (sex, age, sport contact level, academic year, learning disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, migraine history, concussion history, and test administration mode). DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional design. SETTING: Multiple institutions in the Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 320 athletes with a concussion (162 men, 158 women; age = 19.80 ± 1.41 years) were compared with 1239 total collegiate athletes without a concussion (646 men, 593 women; age = 20.31 ± 1.18 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We calculated the K-D test time difference (in seconds) by subtracting the baseline from the most recent time. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy across time points. We identified cutoff scores and corresponding specificity at both the 80% and 70% sensitivity levels. We repeated ROC with AUC analyses using confounding factors. RESULTS: The K-D test predicted positive results at the 0- to 6-hour (AUC = 0.724, P < .001), 24- to 48-hour (AUC = 0.701, P < .001), RTP (AUC = 0.640, P < .001), and 6-month postconcussion (AUC = 0.615, P < .001) tim points but not at the asymptomatic time point (AUC = 0.513, P = .497). The 0- to 6-hour and 24- to 48-hour time points yielded 80% sensitivity cutoff scores of -2.6 and -3.2 seconds (ie, faster), respectively, but 46% and 41% specificity, respectively. The K-D test had a better AUC when administered using an iPad (AUC = 0.800, 95% CI = 0.747, 0.854) compared with the spiral-bound card system (AUC = 0.646, 95% CI = 0.600, 0.692; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of the K-D test was greatest at 0 to 6 hours and 24 to 48 hours postconcussion but declined across subsequent postconcussion time points. The AUCs did not differentiate between groups across confounding factors. Our negative cutoff scores indicated that practice effects contributed to improved performance, requiring athletes to outperform their baseline scores.

ObjectiveTo examine the association between estimated age at first exposure (eAFE) to American football and clinical measures throughout recovery following concussion.MethodsParticipants were recruited across 30 colleges and universities as part of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium. There were 294 NCAA American football players (age 19 ± 1 years) evaluated 24-48 hours following concussion with valid baseline data and 327 (age 19 ± 1 years) evaluated at the time they were asymptomatic with valid baseline data. Participants sustained a medically diagnosed concussion between baseline testing and postconcussion assessments. Outcome measures included the number of days until asymptomatic, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) composite scores, Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) total score, and Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) subscores. The eAFE was defined as participant's age at the time of assessment minus self-reported number of years playing football.ResultsIn unadjusted regression models, younger eAFE was associated with lower (worse) ImPACT Visual Motor Speed (R 2 = 0.031, p = 0.012) at 24-48 hours following injury and lower (better) BSI-18 Somatization subscores (R 2 = 0.014, p = 0.038) when the athletes were asymptomatic. The effect sizes were very small. The eAFE was not associated with the number of days until asymptomatic, other ImPACT composite scores, BESS total score, or other BSI-18 subscores.ConclusionEarlier eAFE to American football was not associated with longer symptom recovery, worse balance, worse cognitive performance, or greater psychological distress following concussion. In these NCAA football players, longer duration of exposure to football during childhood and adolescence appears to be unrelated to clinical recovery following concussion.

BackgroundIdentifying separate dimensions of concussion symptoms may inform a precision medicine approach to treatment. It was previously reported that a bifactor model identified distinct acute postconcussion symptom dimensions.PurposeTo replicate previous findings of a bifactor structure of concussion symptoms in the Concussion Assessment Research and Education (CARE) Consortium sample, examine measurement invariance from pre- to postinjury, and evaluate whether factors are associated with other clinical and biomarker measures.Study designCohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.MethodsCollegiate athletes were prospectively evaluated using the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 (SCAT-3) during preseason (N = 31,557); 2789 were followed at

Introduction Military service members (SMs) are exposed to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) in combat and training that are purported to adversely affect brain health, including cognition, behavior, and function. Researchers have reported that RHI from blast-related exposure may affect both vestibular and ocular function, which in turn may be related to symptomology. As such, an examination of the effects of RHI on exposed military SMs should incorporate these domains. To date, researchers have not compared groups of exposed special operations forces (SOF) operators on combined clinical vestibular/ocular and eye-tracker-based outcomes. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to compare participant-reported symptoms and performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool with performance on the computerized RightEye tracking system between SOF operators exposed to blast-related RHI and healthy controls without blast-related exposure. In addition, the study aimed to compare subgroups of snipers and breachers exposed to RHI to controls on the preceding metrics, as well as identify a subset of individual (demographic) factors, participant-reported symptoms, and performance metrics on VOMS and RightEye that best identify SOF operators exposed to RHI from unexposed controls. Materials and Methods The study involved a cross-sectional design including 25 Canadian SOF SMs comprised of breachers (n  = 9), snipers (n  = 9), and healthy, unexposed controls (n  = 7). The former 2 groups were combined into an RHI group (n  = 18) and compared to controls (n  = 7). Participants provided demographics and completed a self-reported concussion-related symptom report via the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2, the VOMS, and RightEye computerized eye-tracking assessments. Independent samples t -tests and ANOVAs were used to compare the groups on the outcomes, with receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to identify predictors of blast exposure. This study was approved by the Defence Research Development Canada Human Research Ethics Committee and the Canadian Forces Surgeon General/Special Forces Command. Results The results from t -tests supported group differences for age (P  = .012), participant-reported symptoms (P  = .006), and all VOMS items (P range = <.001-.02), with the RHI group being higher than healthy controls on all variables. ANOVA results supported group differences among snipers, breachers, and controls for age (P  = .01), RightEye saccades (P  = .04), participant-reported total symptom severity (P  = .03), and VOMS total scores (P  = .003). The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses supported age (AUC = 0.81), Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 participant-reported total symptom severity (AUC = 0.87), and VOMS total scores (AUC = 0.92) as significant predictors of prior blast exposure. Conclusions Participant-reported concussion symptoms, VOMS scores, and age were useful in identifying SOF operators exposed to RHI from controls. RightEye metrics were not useful in differentiating RHI groups from controls. Differences between snipers and breachers warrant further research. Overall, the findings suggest that VOMS may be a useful tool for screening for the effects of exposure to RHI in SOF operators. Future investigations should be conducted on a larger sample of military SMs, consider additional factors (e.g. RHI exposure levels, medical history, and sex), and include additional assessment domains (e.g. balance, cognitive, and psychological). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening Tool (CP Screen) self-report concussion symptom inventory is often administered at weekly intervals. However, 1-week reliable change indices (RCIs) for clinical cutoffs and the test–retest reliability of the CP Screen are unknown. To document RCI cutoff scores and 1-week test–retest reliability for each profile and modifier of the CP Screen for men and women. Case series. A large US university. One hundred seventy-three healthy college students. Participants completed 2 administrations of the CP Screen 7 days apart. The CP Screen items yielded 5 clinical profiles and 2 modifiers. Spearman ρ coefficients (rs), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), single measures, and unbiased estimates of reliability (UERs) were used to assess test-retest reliability. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed differences across time. Reliable change index values and cutoff scores are provided at 90%/95% CIs. All analyses were performed for the total sample and separately for men and women. Reliable change index cutoffs for clinically significant change (increase/decrease) at a 90% CI for men were as follows: ocular, vestibular >2/>4; anxiety/mood, cognitive/fatigue, and migraine >3/>3; sleep >4/>6; and neck >2/>2. Reliable change index cutoffs for clinically significant change (increase/decrease) at a 90% CI for women were as follows: anxiety/mood ≥2/≥4; cognitive/fatigue, migraine, ocular, vestibular, and sleep ≥3/≥3; and neck ≥1/≥1. Correlations for the CP Screen ranged from 0.51 (migraine) to 0.79 (anxiety/mood) for the total sample, from 0.48 (migraine) to 0.84 (vestibular) for men, and from 0.51 (migraine) to 0.77 (ocular) for women. Test-retest indices for each profile and modifier were moderate to good for the total sample (ICC, 0.64–0.82; UER, 0.79–0.90), men (ICC, 0.60–0.87; UER, 0.76–0.94), and women (ICC, 0.64–0.80; UER, 0.78–0.89). The CP Screen is reliable and stable across a 1-week interval, and established RCIs for men and women can help identify meaningful change throughout recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This retrospective cohort study aims to examine concussion incidence rates (IR) in collegiate soccer players and compare IRs based on risk factors including sex, competition level, games/practices, history of concussion, and playing position. Collegiate soccer players were recruited (n = 2,471) from 23 institutions from the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium. Incidence rates for concussion per 1000 athlete exposures (AEs) were calculated across the 2015–16/2016–17 seasons. Incidence rates (IR) comparing risk factor groups were also calculated. A total of 162 concussions occurred during the study, for an IR of 0.08/1000 AEs. Females were more likely to have a concussion than males overall (IR = 1.47) and were more likely to have a concussion in games (IR = 1.42) and practices (IR = 2.91). Concussions were more likely during competition compared to practice (IR = 2.53), and less likely in Division III, compared to Divisions I and II, χ2 = 6.5, p >.05. In the concussed group, male sex was associated with 2.47 times higher odds of playing defender and 2.29 times higher odds of a collision mechanism. Results confirm previous findings that females and game exposures have higher concussion IR than males and practice exposures. Findings also supported sex differences in IRs based on exposure type, position, and mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Understanding the behavioral and neural underpinnings of the post-concussion recovery of working memory function is critically important for improving clinical outcomes and adequately planning return-to-activity decisions. Previous studies provided inconsistent results due to small sample sizes and the use of a mixed population of participants who were at different post-injury time points. We aimed to examine working memory recovery during the first 6 months post-concussion in adolescents. Methods: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to scan 45 concussed adolescents [CONCs] at baseline (<10 days post-concussion) and at 6 months post-concussion. Healthy control adolescents [HCs; n = 32] without a history of concussion were scanned once. During the scans, participants performed one-back and two-back working memory tasks with letters as the stimuli and angry, happy, neutral, and sad faces as distractors. Results: All affected adolescents were asymptomatic and cleared to return to activity 6 months after concussion. Working memory recovery was associated with faster and more accurate responses at 6 months vs. baseline (p-values < 0.05). It was also characterized by significant difficulty-related activation increases in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left orbitofrontal cortex (LOFC) at 6 months vs. baseline. Although the activation differences between one-back and two-back were comparable between HCs and CONCs at 6 months, HCs had more pronounced activation in the LIFG than concussed adolescents. Conclusions: Post-concussion recovery is associated with significant performance improvements in speed and accuracy, as well as the normalization of brain responses in the LIFG and LOFC during the n-back task. The observed patterns of LOFC activation might reflect compensatory strategies to distribute neural processing and reduce neural fatigue post-concussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]