Search

In attempts to avoid the side-effects derived from a scald on the peritoneo-serosal surface during intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) for advanced gastric cancer, a randomized study using cimetidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, was carried out on 18 patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cimetidine, 50 mg/kg, was administered intravenously and immediately before IPHP. The background characteristics of the patients and the types of surgical treatment used were almost the same between each group of patients, whether or not cimetidine was given. The perfusion time in the cimetidine and control groups was 123 +/- 9 and 117 +/- 9 min, respectively. The inflow and outflow temperatures of the perfusate were 46.3 +/- 0.4 and 44.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C in the cimetidine group, respectively, whereas in the control group the temperatures were 46.0 +/- 0.3 and 44.1 +/- 0.2 degrees C, respectively. In the nine patients who were given cimetidine, the histamine concentrations in the peripheral blood increased significantly, compared to those in the nine controls; this resulted from the release of histamine into the circulating blood. Higher concentrations of protein were observed in the post-hyperthermic intraperitoneal exudate of the control group for 3-24 h after IPHP and, consequently, post-hyperthermic hypoproteinaemia was remarkable in the control group. These data suggest that when pre-IPHP cimetidine was prescribed for patients with gastric cancer treated with IPHP, the peritoneo-serosal surface was protected from scald injury and the side-effects of IPHP were reduced.

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) for far-advanced gastric cancer, particularly with peritoneal seeding, we investigated the survival times of 59 patients who underwent distal subtotal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, or total gastrectomy combined with concomitant resection of some of the remaining intra-abdominal organs. In all the 30 patients given IPHP, no cancer cells were present posthyperthermically in the lavage from the Douglas pouch. The 30 patients given IPHP lived longer than the 29 patients not given IPHP (p = 0.001), with a 1-year survival rate of 80.4% in the former group compared to 34.2% in the latter. With respect to a comparison of survival time of patients with peritoneal seeding, 7 patients not given IPHP had a 6-month survival rate of 57.1% and did not survive more than 9 months, whereas 20 patients given IPHP had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 78.7% and 45.0%, respectively; here the difference was significant (p = 0.001). The IPHP and control groups without peritoneal metastasis included 10 and 22 patients, respectively, and the 1-year survival rates are 85.4% and 45.3%, respectively. The survival rates of the former exceeded those of the latter, with p = 0.015 by the generalized Wilcoxon test. Thus this combined therapy offers the promise of extended survival for patients with far-advanced gastric cancer.

Since pretreatment with cimetidine results in the prevention of scald injury on the peritoneo-serosal surface caused by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) for advanced gastric cancer, the diverse influence of IPHP on patients who were either given or not given cimetidine was studied both during and after IPHP treatment. Cimetidine 50 mg/kg was injected intravenously into 12 patients immediately prior to IPHP. There were no statistical background differences between the cimetidine and control groups (those not given cimetidine). The inflow and outflow temperatures of the hyperthermic perfusate in the control and cimetidine groups were 46.1 +/- 0.1 degree C and 44.1 +/- 0.1 degree C and 46.3 +/- 0.1 degree C and 44.2 +/- 0.04 degree C, respectively. Either the pre-IPHP hypothermia or IPHP in the control group resulted in a considerable increase in serum noradrenaline and adrenaline. The intravenous administration of cimetidine led to a stransient but moderate drop in the mean blood pressure as well as a delayed appearance of high concentrations of noradrenaline and adrenaline, induced by high concentrations of circulating histamine released with cimetidine. These results suggest that the sympathetic nervous responses were activated either by hypothermia or hyperthermia. The transient hypotension and delayed increases of both serum catecholamines were attributed to a marked increase in circulating histamine, released with the intravenous cimetidine.

We examined the effects of misonidazole (MISO) and recombinant human tumour necrosis factor (rh-TNF) on tumour blood flow in mice given hyperthermic treatments. MISO (500 mg kg-1) or rh-TNF (6 x 10(4) unit kg-1) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) prior to hyperthermia to nude mice bearing a xenoplanted human gastric cancer and tumour blood flow was measured by a hydrogen diffusion method based on polarographic determinations. MISO plus hyperthermia produced a temperature-dependent decrease in blood flow and, at 43.5 degrees C, the flow decreased to 15-30% of control and remained low for up to 24 h. Blood flow following rh-TNF plus hyperthermia was less than that at the same temperatures following MISO plus hyperthermia, and, at 43.5 degrees C, the flow decreased to 10-20% of control and remained low for up to 48 h. Tumour growth delay was closely related to the duration of the decrease in blood flow. Thus, the profound decrease in tumour blood flow following hyperthermia plus MISO or rh-TNF and the consequential tumour regression may well be of potential clinical significance.