Search

OBJECTIVE: Fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) are commonly treated conservatively. Evidence suggests that a period of immobilization of one week or less may lead to some advantages compared to a traditional 3-4 weeks of immobilization. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical and radiological results in the case of early rehabilitation vs. delayed rehabilitation after PHF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In July 2023, a literature search was carried out on the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases to identify all the randomized trials comparing early rehabilitation vs. delayed rehabilitation after PHF. The following data were extracted from each included study: patients’ demographics, study design and level of evidence, follow-up times, treatment groups, evaluation scores adopted, and overall clinical and radiological findings. The quality of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies, including 378 patients and dealing with early vs. delayed rehabilitation in case of conservative treatment of PHF, were included in this study. Early rehabilitation was started within 1 week and consisted mainly of pendulum exercise and progressive passive mobilization. Early rehabilitation was associated with better pain and functional scores within the first 3 months in 3 studies. No difference in pain or function was reported at 6 months or longer follow-up, and no differences in complications rate were observed between early vs. delayed rehabilitation groups. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that early mobilization within one week in case of conservative treatment of PHF leads to improved function recovery and reduced pain, especially in the first months of rehabilitation, without differences at longer follow-up and without increasing complications rate. Reducing immobilization time could accelerate function recovery and regaining independence in daily life activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Douleur et Analgésie is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background and Objective: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a chronic musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the presence of trigger points. Among the treatment options, botulinum toxin injections have been investigated. The aim of this paper was to provide a synthesis of the evidence on intramuscular botulinum toxin injections for upper back MPS. Databases and Data Treatment: A systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library, using the following formula: ("botulinum") AND ("musculoskeletal") AND ("upper back pain") OR ("myofascial pain"). Results: Ten studies involving 651 patients were included. Patients in the control groups received placebo (saline solution) injections, anaesthetic injections + dry needling or anaesthetic injections. The analysis of the trials revealed modest methodological quality: one "Good quality" study, one "Fair" and the other "Poor". No major complications or serious adverse events were reported. Results provided conflicting evidence and did not demonstrate the superiority of botulinum toxin over comparators. Most of the included trials were characterized by a small sample size, weak power analysis, different clinical scores used and non‐comparable follow‐up periods. Even if there is no conclusive evidence, the favourable safety profile and the positive results of some secondary endpoints suggest a potentially beneficial action in pain control and quality of life. Conclusion: The currently available studies show conflicting results. Their overall low methodological quality does not allow for solid evidence of superiority over other comparison treatments. Further insights are needed to properly profile patients who could benefit more from this peculiar injective approach. Significance: The randomized controlled trials included in this review compared using botulinum toxin to treat upper back MPS with placebo or active treatments (e.g., dry needling or anaesthetics) showing mixed results overall. Despite the lack of clear evidence of superiority, our study suggests that the use of botulinum toxin should not be discouraged. Its safety profile and encouraging results in pain control, motor recovery and disability reduction make it an interesting treatment, particularly in the subset of patients with moderate to severe chronic pain and active trigger points. To support the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin, further high‐quality studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Spinal anesthesia with local anesthetics is a viable alternative to general anesthesia in orthopedic surgery, and it is currently considered the standard of care for knee arthroscopy. The use of chloroprocaine may offer several potential advantages over other local anesthetics, including, above all, its rapid onset and short duration of action. The aim of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the post-surgical outcomes of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy using spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine in an outpatient orthopedic setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent elective knee arthroscopy between January 2022 and December 2022 were collected for the present study. Spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine 10 mg/mL was administered in the designated subarachnoid space (L3-L4 in the majority of patients). A dosage of 40 mg was used to obtain a satisfactory sensory and motor block. RESULTS: A total number of 302 patients met the inclusion criteria. No complications were reported during surgery in the present series of patients. None of the patients required bladder catheterization. In 84% of cases, the PADSS (Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System) score at discharge was 10, whereas in 16% of cases, the PADSS score was 9. The mean time from anesthesia induction to first urination was 75±9.4 minutes, while the mean time from the anesthesia induction to the discharge from the hospital was 152±18.5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal chloroprocaine for knee arthroscopy demonstrated a short motor block duration, resulting in a fast time to discharge. These limited data show that chloroprocaine may be safely and effectively applied in outpatient knee arthroscopy procedures. However, more studies, possibly with a randomized design, are required to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aging of population has dramatically broadened the total number of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) performed worldwide. To optimize the number of blood transfusions performed, a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach was introduced, called Patient Blood Management (PBM). The aim of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a PBM protocol applied in a national referral center for joint replacement surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical reports of 9,635 patients undergoing primary THA or TKA, from 2014 to 2019, were screened. The trends of hemoglobin value at admission and at day 4 after surgery were analyzed. Furthermore, the trend of blood bags’ requests and blood transfusions was longitudinally evaluated to assess the efficacy of our PBM protocol and its potential impact in reducing the length of stay in the hospital. RESULTS: In 2014, mean hemoglobin (Hb) levels at postoperative day 4 were 10.3 g/dl and 10.2 g/dl for TKA (unilateral and bilateral, respectively), and in 2019 were 11.3 g/dl and 11.6 g/dl (unilateral and bilateral, respectively, p=0.001). Total requested red blood cell (RBC) transfusions by each surgery over time have decreased for THA (277 in 2014 vs. 120 in 2019, p=0.001). A correlation matrix analysis between Hb level, body mass index (BMI), age, days spent in orthopedic (OR) ward and number of requested transfusions showed that RBC bags transfusions were related to the length of the hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: A timely application of a PBM protocol in the perioperative period of TKA and THA was significantly associated to the reduction of blood transfusions and total length of hospital stay, with clear benefits for both the patients and the hospital. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative joint disease and the leading cause of disability in the adult population worldwide. The knee is the most prevalent site of symptomatic arthritis. Treatment options for OA include drugs, surgery and, more recently, biological treatments. Injectable ortho-biological treatments include autologous and more rarely heterologous preparations employed inside and outside the operating room to assist bone and soft tissue regeneration. Our aim was to analyze the rationale for use of injectable ortho-biological treatments such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and placenta/umbilical cord, in patients with severe OA of the knee (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search in PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases was performed using the following keywords: 'knee osteoarthritis' and 'biological treatment' or 'PRP' or 'adipose' or 'mesenchymal' or 'staminal' or 'stem cells'. Manual research throughout the reference lists of all retrieved articles was further conducted. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles was selected for this systematic review. The rationale for use of each ortho-biological treatment was discussed. The clinical application showed different therapeutic protocols, different follow-up periods, different outcomes analyzed and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not demonstrate uniform beneficial effects for the use of injectable ortho-biological. This prevents any advice for routine application in the treatment of severe knee OA (K-L IV). Further prospective clinical trials with randomization, larger sample size, and preliminary power calculation are needed to justify the use of injectable biologic agents in grade IV knee OA in everyday practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]