1. Invasive versus conservative strategy in acute coronary syndromes: The paradox in women's outcomes
- Author
-
Lina Badimon, Beatrice Ricci, Maria Dorobantu, Raffaele Bugiardini, Zorana Vasiljevic, Davor Miličić, Olivia Manfrini, Božidarka Knežević, Akos Koller, Sasko Kedev, Mirza Dilic, Olivija Gustiene, Edina Cenko, Cenko, Edina, Ricci, Beatrice, Kedev, Sasko, Vasiljevic, Zorana, Dorobantu, Maria, Gustiene, Olivija, Knežević, Božidarka, Miličić, Davor, Dilic, Mirza, Manfrini, Olivia, Koller, Ako, Badimon, Lina, and Bugiardini, Raffaele
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome ,Population ,Context (language use) ,Outcomes ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Coronary Angiography ,Risk Assessment ,Percutaneous intervention ,03 medical and health sciences ,Age Distribution ,Sex Factors ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Sex differences ,Myocardial Revascularization ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Medicine ,Thrombolytic Therapy ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Acute Coronary Syndrome ,Sex Distribution ,education ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Outcome ,Killip class ,education.field_of_study ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Age Factors ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,Conservative strategy ,Surgery ,Europe ,Survival Rate ,Treatment Outcome ,Bypass surgery ,Non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes ,Conventional PCI ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background: We explored benefits and risks of an early invasive compared with a conservative strategy in women versus men after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) using the ISACS-TC database. Methods: From October 2010 to May 2014, 4145 patients were diagnosed as having a NSTE-ACS. We excluded 258 patients managed with coronary bypass surgery. Of the remaining 3887 patients, 1737 underwent PCI (26% women). The primary endpoint was the composite of 30-day mortality and severe left ventricular dysfunction defined as an ejection fraction = 2 at admission as compared with men. In patients who underwent PCI, peri-procedural myocardial injury was not different among sexes (3.1% vs. 3.2%). Women undergoing PCI experienced higher rates of the composite endpoint (8.9% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.002) and 30-day mortality (4.4% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.008) compared with men, whereas those who managed with only routinemedical therapy (RMT) did not show any sex difference in outcomes. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with favorable outcomes (adjusted HR for the composite endpoint: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58-0.91) in patients managed with RMT, but not in those undergoing PCI (adjusted HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.61-1.52). Conclusions: We observed a more favorable outcome in women than men when patients were managed with RMT. Women and men undergoing PCI have similar outcomes. These data suggest caution in extrapolating the results from men to women in an overall population of patients in the context of different therapeutic strategies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF