Search

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) onset and perifoveal posterior vitreous detachment using OCT data. Design: Retrospective study. Participants: A total of 742 patients with FTMH or impending macular hole (MH) in ≥ 1 eye, as determined by ophthalmoscopy and OCT. Methods: Macular holes were staged using OCT results. Patients with the posterior vitreous membrane clearly detected in the OCT images and vitreoretinal adhesion size ≤ 1500 μm—eyes with MH stages 1–3—were included in the study. The contralateral eyes were also included in the analyses if they showed the focal type of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) (i.e., vitreoretinal adhesion ≤ 1500 μm). The distance between the posterior vitreous membrane and the surface of the retina was defined as the posterior vitreous separation height (PVSH). Using the OCT images, PVSHs of each eye in 4 directions (nasal, temporal, superior, and inferior) at 1 mm from the center of the MH or fovea were calculated. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were PVSHs according to the MH stage and VMA, the relationship of the foveal inner tear with PVSH, and the likelihood of a foveal inner tear based on the direction. Results: The PVSH trends in each of the 4 directions were as follows: VMA

Purpose: To define the role of optociliary shunt vessels (OSVs) in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) using OCT angiography (OCTA) with macular parameters. Design: Retrospective, observational, consecutive case series. Participants: Forty-one eyes in 38 consecutive patients with CRVO were analyzed in this study. Methods: Optic disc and macula were imaged by swept-source OCTA (3 × 3 mm) as well as by high-quality fundus photography. Main Outcome Measures: We compared macular vessel density (VD) and visual acuity between eyes in which OSVs developed and those in which they did not. Furthermore, we measured the diameter of the OSVs and analyzed the correlation with macular VD and visual acuity. Results: Optociliary shunt vessels were found in 25 eyes (61%). Central retinal vein occlusion with OSVs did not show any statistical difference compared with CRVO without OSVs in either macular VD of the total retina (0.31 ± 0.07 and 0.26 ± 0.09, respectively; P = 0.0937) or final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (0.30 ± 0.43 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] and 0.59 ± 0.54 logMAR, respectively; P = 0.0705). The mean OSV diameter was 71 ± 30 μm in CRVO with OSV. The diameter of the OSVs was correlated positively with superficial VD (r = 0.443; P = 0.027), deep VD (r = 0.494; P = 0.012), and total VD (r = 0.491; P = 0.013). Furthermore, the OSV diameter was also negatively correlated with BCVA (logMAR) at the final visit (r = –0.531; P = 0.006). Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the diameter of the OSVs was associated with macular VD and visual acuity in patients with CRVO. The development of large OSVs on the optic disc may be a good indicator of the maintenance of blood flow in the macula.