Search

TERC gene amplification was investigated as a possible diagnostic marker for use in routine cytological screening to improve the accuracy of conventional screening procedures in detection of cervical preneoplastic lesions. Cervical smears were screened and classified as low-grade or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL). A fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure using a TERC-specific DNA probe was performed on the same specimens and TERC gene copy number was evaluated. More than two signals per cell were defined as TERC positive. In cervical smears graded after conization as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN 1), no TERC-positive cases were found in either LSIL or HSIL, and no TERC amplification was found in LSIL cases with histological results CIN 1 and CIN 2. Amplifications of the TERC gene first appeared in HSIL cases with CIN 2 histology. In the CIN 3 group, TERC-positive cases were present in both LSIL and HSIL; in these, there were no statistically significant differences between TERC-positive and TERC-negative cases. Statistically significant differences in TERC-positive cases were found between LSIL and HSIL without regard to the CIN grade. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that TERC gene amplifications inevitably lead to a high risk of CIN 3 in both LSIL and HSIL after cytological smear examination. A high CIN grade is not necessarily correlated with TERC amplification, but a positive TERC result certainly demands a high CIN classification.

This study was designed to investigate whether a correlation exists between amplification of the human telomerase gene (human telomerase RNA component [TERC]) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection in 101 women with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN). Eight patients (7.9%) had CIN 1, 24 (23.8%) had CIN 2 and 69 (68.3%) had CIN 3. TERC was amplified in 31.7% of all CIN patients. The difference in frequency of TERC amplification between patients with low-grade CIN (CIN 1) and those with high-grade CIN (CIN 2 and CIN 3) was not significant. HR-HPV infection was detected in 88.1% of all CIN cases and was significantly more frequent in patients with CIN 2 and CIN 3 than in patients with CIN 1. There was no significant difference in the frequency of HR-HPV infection between groups of patients with and without TERC amplification. In conclusion, this study found no correlation between TERC amplification and HR-HPV infection in patients with CIN.

Objective: An organized cervical cancer (CC) screening program was introduced in Slovenia in 2003. With the purpose of clinical audit we analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of CC patients for the period between 2003 and 2005., Study Design: The retrospectively collected data of 450 CC patients were presented at three Advisory Boards of Gynecologic Oncology in Slovenia. They were stratified for stage, tumor characteristics and treatment methods according to gynecologic examination attendance in the last 5 years preceding the diagnosis of CC (attenders vs. nonattenders)., Results: In the period of observation, 242 women (53.8%) visited their gynecologists in the 5-year period prior to diagnosis of CC. Squamous cell carcinoma was present in 378 women (84.0%), adenocarcinoma in 45 (10.0%), adenosquamous carcinoma in 24 (5.3%) and other types in 3 women (0.7%). Attenders were significantly more frequently diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma than nonattenders (chi-square=5.13; P<0.05). Attenders were significantly more frequently diagnosed in stage IA than in stage IB (chi-square=22.35; P<0.01). Similarly, in attenders stage I was significantly more frequent than stage II (chi-square=18.81; P<0.01). Pathologic smears of women with CC in the last 5-year period were most frequently evaluated as Pap II in the years 2003 and 2004 (in 39.1 and 26.4% of women, respectively) and as Pap III (in 27.9% of women) in 2005. Surgery was performed in 282 women (62.7%), radiotherapy in 158 (35.1%), symptomatic therapy in 9 (2.0%) and chemotherapy alone in 1 (0.2%) woman. In attenders, surgery alone was the most frequent treatment method (chi-square=91.18; P<0.01)., Conclusion: Only in attenders a significant redistribution of CC stages in favor of early stages is observed, and in these women more conservative and less extensive treatment methods could be applied.

Purpose of Investigation: From 2003 to 2006 the data on Slovenian cervical cancer patients who regularly attended a gynecologist were gathered. Data were analyzed in order to improve the efficiency of the cervical cancer screening program., Methods: Data on all patients newly diagnosed with cervical cancer were collected at three central clinics in Slovenia. The results are a presentation and comparison of detailed information on some characteristics of cervical cancer patients of the group that regularly visited a gynecologist and of the other group who did not. Data were processed by descriptive epidemiological methods. Mantel-Haenzel chi2 and Fisher's p tests were used to evaluate statistical significance., Results: On average, 55% of patients with cervical cancer underwent a gynecological examination five years before the diagnosis. The patients who regularly attended their gynecologist were, in all age groups, statistically significantly younger, the stage of cervical cancer at diagnosis was statistically significantly lower (p = 0.01) and were, in statistically significantly higher percentage, treated surgically (p < 0.01). From 2003 to 2006, each patient had on average five examinations at her gynecologist within the period of five years to six months before the diagnosis of cervical cancer. The average number of collected smear samples was 3.2., Conclusion: From the results of our analysis, it may be concluded that improvements are needed in Slovenia in the field of screening for and early detection of cervical cancer.

Purpose of Investigation: The data gathered in 2003 on the patients with cervical cancer who regularly attended their gynecologist were analyzed with the purpose of clinical audit., Methods: The data on newly detected patients with cervical cancer in 2003 who regularly attended their gynecologist were gathered simultaneously at three Advisory Boards for Gynecology in Slovenia., Results: Of 149 patients in whom, according to our data, invasive cervical cancer had been diagnosed, 92 (61.7%) patients were examined by a gynecologist in the previous five years. In the majority of these patients, cervical cancer was diagnosed in early, localized disease stage. In the periods of 13-24 and of seven to 12 months before the diagnosis of cervical cancer, almost half the patients had Pap II, and three to six months before diagnosis, 67.6% of patients had Pap II., Conclusion: These results encourage us to proceed with clinical audits to analyze individual cervical cancer cases, including another independent reevaluation of cervical smears in the five-year period before diagnosis. A suitable calendar of refresher training courses on colposcopy, which should be obligatory for all performing this examination method, also needs to be set up.

The value of prospective cytologic diagnosis in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is analysed by means of ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves. Examined was a group of 160 women with subsequent cone biopsies. The result of a prospective cytologic diagnosis in moderate dysplasia, severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ is analysed separately, taking into consideration the particular frequencies in the studied group. The most reliable prospective cytologic diagnosis is in moderate dysplasia, followed by carcinoma in situ a slightly more reliable prospective diagnosis than that in severe dysplasia.