Search

Objective: Women treated for high-grade cervical disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or grade 3 [CIN2/3]) face a significant risk of developing post-treatment disease. Therefore, in most European countries, they are monitored by cytologic testing at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment Although testing for high-risk types of the human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in the follow-up seems to be a valuable supplementary method, its use is not yet fully explored. Methods: Besides reviewing the literature, we completed a long-term follow-up study describing the cumulative risk for CIN2/3 or cancer (CIN2+) of different hrHPV and cytology test results after treatment. Conclusions: High-risk HPV testing improves the sensitivity to detect posttreatment CIN2/3 (relative sensitivity = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.25), but the highest sensitivity (95%, 95% CI = 91%-98%) is reached by performing cotesting (both cytology and hrHPV). The CIN2+ risk after a single negative cotesting result taken 6 months after treatments was similar to the risk after 3 consecutive negative cytologic test results (5-y CIN2+ risk being 3.0% [95% CI = 1.5%-6.1%] and 2.9% [95% CI = 1.2%-7.1%], respectively). Women who test negative for cotesting at both 6 and 24 months after treatment have a minimal risk of developing CIN3+ in the next 5 years (0.0%, 95% CI = 0.0%-3.0%). Recommendations: We propose a new posttreatment surveillance protocol, consisting of combined testing with both cytology and hrHPV at 6 and 24 months after treatment. After 2 negative cotesting results, women should be retested after 5 years.

Objective To investigate the agreement between conventional colposcopic impression, dynamic spectral imaging (DSI) colposcopy and histology, for human papillomavirus type 16-positive (HPV16(+)) and non-16 high-risk (hr) HPV + women. Design Prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical trial. Setting Three colposcopy clinics in the Netherlands. Population Women (n = 177) aged 18 years or over with an intact cervix, referred for colposcopy. Methods The colposcopist graded the lesion by using the DSI colposcope as a regular video colposcope. Subsequently the DSI impression was displayed and biopsies were taken from all abnormal areas as well as from a random (normal) site. A cervical smear was taken for HPV typing. Main outcome measures Histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (CIN2(+)), positive for HPV16 or for any other hrHPV type. Results The DSI colposcope identified more CIN2(+) cervical lesions among HPV16(+) women than in non-16 hrHPV(+) women (P = 0.032 regardless of final histology and P = 0.009 among women with CIN2(+)). Consequently, the sensitivity of the DSI colposcope for detecting CIN2(+) lesions was higher in HPV16(+) women than in non-16 hrHPV(+) women (97% versus 74%, P = 0.009). No such differences were seen for the colposcopist impression. In addition, mainly smaller cervical lesions are missed by the col Conclusions The sensitivity of DSI colposcopy for CIN2(+) is higher in HPV16(+) than in non-16 hrHPV(+) women. Furthermore, regardless of HPV16 status, the sensitivity of DSI for CIN2(+) is higher than that of the colposcopist, probably because colposcopists tend to miss smaller cervical lesions.

Objective To validate the dynamic spectral imaging (DSI) colposcope's colour-coded map in discriminating high- from low-grade cervical lesions and non-neoplastic tissue. Design Prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical trial. Setting The colposcopy clinics of three Dutch hospitals. Population Women of 18 years or over with an intact cervix, referred for colposcopy. Methods During a 3-minute image acquisition phase, the DSI colposcope was used as a regular video colposcope: the colposcopist located and graded potential lesions based on conventional colposcopic criteria. Subsequently, a colour-coded map was calculated and displayed, representing localisation and severity of the cervical lesion. Biopsies were collected from all atypical sites, as identified by digital mapping and/or conventional colposcopy. Furthermore, one additional biopsy was taken. Main outcome measures Histologically confirmed high-grade cervical disease (CIN2+). Results In total 275 women were included in the study: 183 women were analysed in the 'according-to-protocol' (ATP) cohort and 239 women in the 'intention-to-treat' (ITT) cohort. In the ATP cohort, the sensitivity of DSI colposcopy to identify women with high-grade (CIN2+) lesions was 79% (95% CI 70-88) and the sensitivity of conventional colposcopy was 55% (95% CI 44-65) (P = 0.0006, asymptotic McNemar test). When the DSI colour-coded map was combined with conventional colposcopy, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI 82-95). Conclusions DSI colposcopy has a significantly higher sensitivity to detect cervical lesions than conventional colposcopy. If the colour-coded map is combined with conventional colposcopic examination, the sensitivity increases further.