Search

This is a critical review of the feminist science scholarship that aims to differentiate various feminist approaches to using the concepts of sex, gender, race and/or ethnicity in biomedicine and public health research. With a focus on the conceptual and methodological contributions of various feminist science scholars, we identify three distinctly different feminist methodological frameworks that can be used in the practice of science. This is not an exhaustive review, but rather seeks to identify critical patterns in methodologies used by feminist science scholars to delineate the contribution of each framework and build the capacity of biomedicine and public health researchers and policy-makers seeking to integrate the concepts of sex, gender, race, and/or ethnicity into their work., Das Ziel dieser breiten und kritischen Sichtung feministischer Ansätze ist es, unterschiedliche feministische Perspektiven sowie ihre Konzepte von sex, gender und race bzw. Ethnizität insbesondere für die Forschung im Bereich Biomedizin und Public Health nutzbar zu machen. Wir nehmen die konzeptionellen und methodologischen Beiträge verschiedener feministischer Forschungsrichtungen in den Blick und identifizieren drei verschiedene feministisch-methodologische Perspektiven, die genutzt werden können, um Forschung anders zu betreiben. Dies ist kein umfassender Überblick - vielmehr identifizieren wir zentrale Muster in den Methodologien feministischer Forschung, um den Beitrag der einzelnen Richtungen aufzuzeigen. Dies soll Forscher_innen aus Biomedizin und Public Health sowie Entscheidungsträger_innen darin unterstützen, Konzepte von sex, gender, race, bzw. Ethnizität in die eigene Arbeit zu integrieren.

Background In this paper, we argue for Gender as a Sociocultural Variable (GASV) as a complement to Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV). Sex (biology) and gender (sociocultural behaviors and attitudes) interact to influence health and disease processes across the lifespan—which is currently playing out in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study develops a gender assessment tool—the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research—for use in clinical and population research, including large-scale health surveys involving diverse Western populations. While analyzing sex as a biological variable is widely mandated, gender as a sociocultural variable is not, largely because the field lacks quantitative tools for analyzing the influence of gender on health outcomes. Methods We conducted a comprehensive review of English-language measures of gender from 1975 to 2015 to identify variables across three domains: gender norms, gender-related traits, and gender relations. This yielded 11 variables tested with 44 items in three US cross-sectional survey populations: two internet-based (N = 2051; N = 2135) and a patient-research registry (N = 489), conducted between May 2017 and January 2018. Results Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reduced 11 constructs to 7 gender-related variables: caregiver strain, work strain, independence, risk-taking, emotional intelligence, social support, and discrimination. Regression analyses, adjusted for age, ethnicity, income, education, sex assigned at birth, and self-reported gender identity, identified associations between these gender-related variables and self-rated general health, physical and mental health, and health-risk behaviors. Conclusion Our new instrument represents an important step toward developing more comprehensive and precise survey-based measures of gender in relation to health. Our questionnaire is designed to shed light on how specific gender-related behaviors and at

Item does not contain fulltext

Global investment in biomedical research has grown significantly over the last decades, reaching approximately a quarter of a trillion US dollars in 2010. However, not all of this investment is distributed evenly by gender. It follows, arguably, that scarce research resources may not be optimally invested (by either not supporting the best science or by failing to investigate topics that benefit women and men equitably). Women across the world tend to be significantly underrepresented in research both as researchers and research participants, receive less research funding, and appear less frequently than men as authors on research publications. There is also some evidence that women are relatively disadvantaged as the beneficiaries of research, in terms of its health, societal and economic impacts. Historical gender biases may have created a path dependency that means that the research system and the impacts of research are biased towards male researchers and male beneficiaries, making it inherently difficult (though not impossible) to eliminate gender bias. In this commentary, we – a group of scholars and practitioners from Africa, America, Asia and Europe – argue that gender-sensitive research impact assessment could become a force for good in moving science policy and practice towards gender equity. Research impact assessment is the multidisciplinary field of scientific inquiry that examines the research process to maximise scientific, societal and economic returns on investment in research. It encompasses many theoretical and methodological approaches that can be used to investigate gender bias and recommend actions for change to maximise research impact. We offer a set of recommendations to research funders, research institutions and research evaluators who conduct impact assessment on how to include and strengthen analysis of gender equity in research impact assessment and issue a global call for action.

"'Gendered Innovations' integrates sex and gender analysis into all phases of biomedical and health research to assure excellence and quality in outcomes. This article reports on the interdisciplinary, international collaboration that produced: 1) state-of-the-art methods of sex and gender analysis for health and medicine; and 2) case studies to illustrate how gender analysis leads to discovery in biomedicine and better outcomes in health research: osteoporosis research in men, the genetics of sex determination, heart disease in women, stem cell research, animal research, nutrigenomics and degendering knee implants. The article concludes with a short review of policy at the Canadian, US, and European institutes of health, medical curricula, and policies for peer-reviewed journals in relation to reporting sex/gender analysis in research." (Autorenreferat), "'Gendered Innovations' integriert eine Sex und Genderanalyse in alle Phasen der biomedizinischen und Gesundheitsforschung, um Exzellenz und Qualität auf Ergebnisseite zu sichern. Der Beitrag stellt die interdisziplinären internationalen Kooperationsbemühungen dar, in deren Rahmen sowohl zeitgemäße Methoden der geschlechterfokussierten Analyse im Bereich von Gesundheit und Medizin entwickelt als auch Fallstudien durchgeführt wurden: zur Osteoporoseforschung bei Männern, zu genetischen Faktoren der Geschlechtsbestimmung, Herzerkrankungen bei Frauen, Stammzellenforschung, Tierversuchen, Nutrigenomik und zum 'Degendering' bei Knieimplantaten. Der Beitrag schließt mit einem kurzen Blick auf kanadische, US-amerikanische und europäische Gesundheitsinstitute, medizinische Curricula und den Umgang peer-reviewter Zeitschriften mit Forschungsberichten über Sex-/Genderanalysen" (Autorenreferat)

Sex and gender in biomedicine are innovative research concepts of theoretical and clinical medicine that enable a better understanding of health and disease, evidence-based knowledge, effective therapies, and better health outcomes for women and men. Gender Medicine stimulates new ways of doing research: that is to consider sex and gender at all levels of research, from basic research into gene polymorphisms to health behaviour. New research questions have been put forward that focus not on differences per se but on the development of differences. In this book, contributions from the field of neuroscience, addiction research, and organ transplantation exemplify concepts, approaches, methods and results in the field.

Verhalen vertellen of praktijken willen veranderen. De actuele relevantie van sekse en gender

Lichamen en representaties in een risicocultuur

Mainstreaming gender en diversiteit in de gezondheidszorg. Zijn we op weg naar een diversiteitsbewuste gezondheidszorg?

Een aanzet tot richtlijnen voor diversiteitsbewust gezondheids(zorg)onderzoek