Search

Your search keyword '"Kleijn, David"' showing total 739 results
Start Over Author "Kleijn, David"
739 results on '"Kleijn, David"'

2. The Spectral Species Concept in Living Color

Author

Rocchini, Duccio, Santos, Maria J, Ustin, Susan L, Féret, Jean‐Baptiste, Asner, Gregory P, Beierkuhnlein, Carl, Dalponte, Michele, Feilhauer, Hannes, Foody, Giles M, Geller, Gary N, Gillespie, Thomas W, He, Kate S, Kleijn, David, Leitão, Pedro J, Malavasi, Marco, Moudrý, Vítězslav, Müllerová, Jana, Nagendra, Harini, Normand, Signe, Ricotta, Carlo, Schaepman, Michael E, Schmidtlein, Sebastian, Skidmore, Andrew K, Šímová, Petra, Torresani, Michele, Townsend, Philip A, Turner, Woody, Vihervaara, Petteri, Wegmann, Martin, and Lenoir, Jonathan

Subjects
Life Below Water, airborne sensors, biodiversity, ecoinformatics, hyperspectral images, plant optical types, remote sensing, satellite imagery, vegetation communities, Geophysics
Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring is an almost inconceivable challenge at the scale of the entire Earth. The current (and soon to be flown) generation of spaceborne and airborne optical sensors (i.e., imaging spectrometers) can collect detailed information at unprecedented spatial, temporal, and spectral resolutions. These new data streams are preceded by a revolution in modeling and analytics that can utilize the richness of these datasets to measure a wide range of plant traits, community composition, and ecosystem functions. At the heart of this framework for monitoring plant biodiversity is the idea of remotely identifying species by making use of the 'spectral species' concept. In theory, the spectral species concept can be defined as a species characterized by a unique spectral signature and thus remotely detectable within pixel units of a spectral image. In reality, depending on spatial resolution, pixels may contain several species which renders species-specific assignment of spectral information more challenging. The aim of this paper is to review the spectral species concept and relate it to underlying ecological principles, while also discussing the complexities, challenges and opportunities to apply this concept given current and future scientific advances in remote sensing.

Published
2022

5. Pollination deficits and their relation with insect pollinator visitation are cultivar-dependent in an entomophilous crop

Author

Eeraerts, Maxime, Chabert, Stan, DeVetter, Lisa W., Batáry, Péter, Ternest, John J., Verheyen, Kris, Bobiwash, Kyle, Brouwer, Kayla, García, Daniel, Groot, G. Arjen de, Gibbs, Jason, Goldstein, Lauren, Kleijn, David, Melathopoulos, Andony, Miller, Sharron Z., Miñarro, Marcos, Montero-Castaño, Ana, Nicholson, Charlie C., Perkins, Jacquelyn A., Raine, Nigel E., Rao, Sujaya, Reilly, James R., Ricketts, Taylor H., Rogers, Emma, and Isaacs, Rufus

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis

Author

Albrecht, Matthias, Kleijn, David, Williams, Neal M, Tschumi, Matthias, Blaauw, Brett R, Bommarco, Riccardo, Campbell, Alistair J, Dainese, Matteo, Drummond, Francis A, Entling, Martin H, Ganser, Dominik, de Groot, G Arjen, Goulson, Dave, Grab, Heather, Hamilton, Hannah, Herzog, Felix, Isaacs, Rufus, Jacot, Katja, Jeanneret, Philippe, Jonsson, Mattias, Knop, Eva, Kremen, Claire, Landis, Douglas A, Loeb, Gregory M, Marini, Lorenzo, McKerchar, Megan, Morandin, Lora, Pfister, Sonja C, Potts, Simon G, Rundlöf, Sardiñas, Hillary, Sciligo, Amber, Thies, Carsten, Tscharntke, Teja, Venturini, Eric, Veromann, Eve, Vollhardt, Ines MG, Wäckers, Felix, Ward, Kimiora, Westbury, Duncan B, Wilby, Andrew, Woltz, Megan, Wratten, Steve, and Sutter, Louis

Subjects
Ecological Applications, Biological Sciences, Ecology, Environmental Management, Environmental Sciences, Zero Hunger, Agriculture, Bees, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Europe, Flowers, New Zealand, North America, Pest Control, Pollination, Agroecology, agri-environment schemes, bee pollinators, conservation biological control, ecological intensification, farmland biodiversity, floral enhancements, natural pest regulation, pollination reservoirs, sustainable agriculture, wildflower strips, Evolutionary Biology, Ecological applications, Environmental management
Abstract

Floral plantings are promoted to foster ecological intensification of agriculture through provisioning of ecosystem services. However, a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of different floral plantings, their characteristics and consequences for crop yield is lacking. Here we quantified the impacts of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control (18 studies) and pollination services (17 studies) in adjacent crops in North America, Europe and New Zealand. Flower strips, but not hedgerows, enhanced pest control services in adjacent fields by 16% on average. However, effects on crop pollination and yield were more variable. Our synthesis identifies several important drivers of variability in effectiveness of plantings: pollination services declined exponentially with distance from plantings, and perennial and older flower strips with higher flowering plant diversity enhanced pollination more effectively. These findings provide promising pathways to optimise floral plantings to more effectively contribute to ecosystem service delivery and ecological intensification of agriculture in the future.

Published
2020

13. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production.

Author

Dainese, Matteo, Martin, Emily A, Aizen, Marcelo A, Albrecht, Matthias, Bartomeus, Ignasi, Bommarco, Riccardo, Carvalheiro, Luisa G, Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca, Gagic, Vesna, Garibaldi, Lucas A, Ghazoul, Jaboury, Grab, Heather, Jonsson, Mattias, Karp, Daniel S, Kennedy, Christina M, Kleijn, David, Kremen, Claire, Landis, Douglas A, Letourneau, Deborah K, Marini, Lorenzo, Poveda, Katja, Rader, Romina, Smith, Henrik G, Tscharntke, Teja, Andersson, Georg KS, Badenhausser, Isabelle, Baensch, Svenja, Bezerra, Antonio Diego M, Bianchi, Felix JJA, Boreux, Virginie, Bretagnolle, Vincent, Caballero-Lopez, Berta, Cavigliasso, Pablo, Ćetković, Aleksandar, Chacoff, Natacha P, Classen, Alice, Cusser, Sarah, da Silva E Silva, Felipe D, de Groot, G Arjen, Dudenhöffer, Jan H, Ekroos, Johan, Fijen, Thijs, Franck, Pierre, Freitas, Breno M, Garratt, Michael PD, Gratton, Claudio, Hipólito, Juliana, Holzschuh, Andrea, Hunt, Lauren, Iverson, Aaron L, Jha, Shalene, Keasar, Tamar, Kim, Tania N, Kishinevsky, Miriam, Klatt, Björn K, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Krewenka, Kristin M, Krishnan, Smitha, Larsen, Ashley E, Lavigne, Claire, Liere, Heidi, Maas, Bea, Mallinger, Rachel E, Martinez Pachon, Eliana, Martínez-Salinas, Alejandra, Meehan, Timothy D, Mitchell, Matthew GE, Molina, Gonzalo AR, Nesper, Maike, Nilsson, Lovisa, O'Rourke, Megan E, Peters, Marcell K, Plećaš, Milan, Potts, Simon G, Ramos, Davi de L, Rosenheim, Jay A, Rundlöf, Maj, Rusch, Adrien, Sáez, Agustín, Scheper, Jeroen, Schleuning, Matthias, Schmack, Julia M, Sciligo, Amber R, Seymour, Colleen, Stanley, Dara A, Stewart, Rebecca, Stout, Jane C, Sutter, Louis, Takada, Mayura B, Taki, Hisatomo, Tamburini, Giovanni, Tschumi, Matthias, Viana, Blandina F, Westphal, Catrin, Willcox, Bryony K, Wratten, Stephen D, Yoshioka, Akira, Zaragoza-Trello, Carlos, Zhang, Wei, and Zou, Yi

Subjects
Humans, Crops, Agricultural, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Pest Control, Biological, Agriculture, Pollination, Crop Production, Crops, Agricultural, Pest Control, Biological
Abstract

Human land use threatens global biodiversity and compromises multiple ecosystem functions critical to food production. Whether crop yield-related ecosystem services can be maintained by a few dominant species or rely on high richness remains unclear. Using a global database from 89 studies (with 1475 locations), we partition the relative importance of species richness, abundance, and dominance for pollination; biological pest control; and final yields in the context of ongoing land-use change. Pollinator and enemy richness directly supported ecosystem services in addition to and independent of abundance and dominance. Up to 50% of the negative effects of landscape simplification on ecosystem services was due to richness losses of service-providing organisms, with negative consequences for crop yields. Maintaining the biodiversity of ecosystem service providers is therefore vital to sustain the flow of key agroecosystem benefits to society.

Published
2019

16. Seminatural areas act as reservoirs of genetic diversity for crop pollinators and natural enemies across Europe

Author

Ortego, Joaquín, Albrecht, Matthias, Báldi, András, Bilde, Trine, Craig, Sean Birk Bek, Herrera, José M., Hood, Amelia S.C., Kleijn, David, Maurer, Corina, Molina, Francisco P., Öckinger, Erik, Potts, Simon G., Settepani, Virginia, Thomsen, Philip Francis, Trillo, Marina, Vajna, Flóra, Velado-Alonso, Elena, Bartomeus, Ignasi, Ortego, Joaquín, Albrecht, Matthias, Báldi, András, Bilde, Trine, Craig, Sean Birk Bek, Herrera, José M., Hood, Amelia S.C., Kleijn, David, Maurer, Corina, Molina, Francisco P., Öckinger, Erik, Potts, Simon G., Settepani, Virginia, Thomsen, Philip Francis, Trillo, Marina, Vajna, Flóra, Velado-Alonso, Elena, and Bartomeus, Ignasi

Abstract

Despite increasing recognition of the importance of the multiple dimensions of biodiversity, including functional or genetic diversity as well as species diversity, most conservation studies on ecosystem service-providing insects focus on simple diversity measures such as species richness and abundance. In contrast, relatively little is known about the genetic diversity and resilience of pollinators or natural enemies of crop pests to population fragmentation and local extinction. The genetic diversity and demographic dynamics of remnant populations of beneficial insects in agricultural areas can be a useful indicator proving additional insights into their conservation status, but this is rarely evaluated. Although gene flow between agricultural and seminatural areas is key to maintaining genetic diversity, its extent and directionality remain largely unexplored. Here, we apply a pan-European sampling protocol to quantify genetic diversity and structure and assess gene flow between agricultural and nearby seminatural landscapes in populations of two key ecosystem service-providing insect species, the lady beetle Coccinella septempunctata, an important predator of aphids and other crop pests, and the bee pollinator Andrena flavipes. We show that A. flavipes populations are genetically structured at the European level, whereas populations of C. septempunctata experience widespread gene flow across the continent and lack any defined genetic structure. In both species, we found that there is high genetic connectivity between populations established in croplands and nearby seminatural areas and, as a consequence, they harbor similar levels of genetic diversity. Interestingly, demographic models for some regions support asymmetric gene flow from seminatural areas to nearby agricultural landscapes. Collectively, our study demonstrates how seminatural areas can serve as genetic reservoirs of both pollinators and natural enemies for nearby agricultural landscapes, acting as

Published
2024

17. Analyzing the relative importance of habitat quantity and quality for boosting pollinator populations in agricultural landscapes

Author

Fijen, Thijs P.M., Bishop, Gabriella A., Ganuza, Cristina, Scheper, Jeroen, Kleijn, David, Fijen, Thijs P.M., Bishop, Gabriella A., Ganuza, Cristina, Scheper, Jeroen, and Kleijn, David

Abstract

To increase pollinator populations, international policy targets minimum levels of seminatural habitat cover, but it is unknown whether improving the quality of existing habitats could bring similar benefits without the need of reducing cropland area. Using data we collected in 26 Italian agricultural landscapes during the entire flying season, we explored the relative importance of habitat quantity (seminatural habitat cover) and quality (flower availability) on pollinator densities in seminatural habitats. We obtained transect-based counts and estimated the effect of habitat quantity (proportion of seminatural habitat) and quality (flower cover and richness) on wild bee and hoverfly densities. We used the relationships revealed in the data to simulate pollinator population sizes in landscapes with varying habitat quantity and quality. Wild bee densities were only related to flower availability, whereas hoverfly densities were additionally related to seminatural habitat cover. We found that in complex agricultural landscapes (above 15% seminatural habitat cover), improving habitat quality increased pollinator populations more effectively than increasing habitat quantity. However, increasing habitat quantity was by far the most effective approach for boosting pollinator populations in simple landscapes.

Published
2024

18. Willingness of rural and urban citizens to undertake pollinator conservation actions across three contrasting European countries

Author

Geppert, Costanza, Franceschinis, Cristiano, Fijen, Thijs P.M., Kleijn, David, Scheper, Jeroen, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Thiene, Mara, Marini, Lorenzo, Geppert, Costanza, Franceschinis, Cristiano, Fijen, Thijs P.M., Kleijn, David, Scheper, Jeroen, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Thiene, Mara, and Marini, Lorenzo

Abstract

Over the last two decades, ecological and conservation studies on pollinator insects have increased significantly. However, scientific evidence alone is not enough to translate knowledge into policy and into changes in behaviour. To reduce the gap between scientific knowledge on conservation actions and their actual uptake, one should understand the socio-psychological drivers of people's willingness to undertake these actions. Here, we investigated the socio-psychological factors influencing individual behaviour in favour of conservation interventions for pollinators in rural versus urban environments across three European countries: Germany, Italy and the Netherlands. We administered an online questionnaire to 4541 respondents stratified by nationality, environment, age and gender. Despite regional differences in socio-cultural and economic conditions, individuals from Germany, Italy and the Netherlands living in both rural or urban environments shared similar socio-psychological drivers to protect pollinators. People intended to take action to protect pollinators when they felt morally obliged to, when their social environment supported pollinator protection, when they believed their individual behaviour had an impact, and when they engaged frequently in outdoor activities. Interestingly, specific values held towards pollinators, such as their right to exist, seemed much more important predictors of activating norms that promote conservation actions compared to increasing general environmental concern. In all countries, among the conservation actions, the most likely to be implemented was planting flowers, while one of the most unlikely was participating in monitoring activities. Synthesis and applications. People from three contrasting European countries living in both rural and urban landscapes were mostly driven by the same socio-psychological factors to help pollinator insects. Therefore, our results offer several practical recommendations to promote pollinat

Published
2024

19. Arthropod predator identity and evenness jointly shape the delivery of pest control services

Author

Mei, Zulin, Scheper, Jeroen, Kleijn, David, Mei, Zulin, Scheper, Jeroen, and Kleijn, David

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maximizing the effectiveness of natural pest control requires a detailed understanding of how service delivery is affected by natural enemy community diversity and composition. Many studies have investigated the effects of natural enemy abundance and species richness on pest control. Studies examining the effects of evenness and species identity are fewer and have produced inconsistent results. Here we test the effects of arthropod predator community evenness and species identity on natural pest control by exposing aphid (Sitobion avenae) colonies in experimental cages to arthropod predator communities that had the same abundance and species richness but differed in evenness and dominant species. RESULTS: We found that the identity of the most dominant species in the arthropod predator community predominantly drove the pest control efficiency. However, additional to the effects of species identity, we also found a causal positive relationship between the evenness of arthropod predator communities and the suppression of pest growth. CONCLUSION: Our results provide support for the hypothesis that ecosystem service provision is generally a function of the abundance and efficiency of the most dominant species of the service-providing groups. This could partly explain why management practices aiming at promoting abundance of natural enemies often have mixed effects on pest control. Our results also demonstrate that diversity components such as evenness have important additional effects. However, in real-world ecosystems these effects may be obscured because evenness is generally confounded with abundance or species richness in natural enemy predator communities.

Published
2024

24. Corrigendum: Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation.

Author

Kleijn, David, Winfree, Rachael, Bartomeus, Ignasi, Carvalheiro, Luísa G, Henry, Mickaël, Isaacs, Rufus, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Kremen, Claire, M'Gonigle, Leithen K, Rader, Romina, Ricketts, Taylor H, Williams, Neal M, Adamson, Nancy Lee, Ascher, John S, Báldi, András, Batáry, Péter, Benjamin, Faye, Biesmeijer, Jacobus C, Blitzer, Eleanor J, Bommarco, Riccardo, Brand, Mariëtte R, Bretagnolle, Vincent, Button, Lindsey, Cariveau, Daniel P, Chifflet, Rémy, Colville, Jonathan F, Danforth, Bryan N, Elle, Elizabeth, Garratt, Michael PD, Herzog, Felix, Holzschuh, Andrea, Howlett, Brad G, Jauker, Frank, Jha, Shalene, Knop, Eva, Krewenka, Kristin M, Le Féon, Violette, Mandelik, Yael, May, Emily A, Park, Mia G, Pisanty, Gideon, Reemer, Menno, Riedinger, Verena, Rollin, Orianne, Rundlöf, Maj, Sardiñas, Hillary S, Scheper, Jeroen, Sciligo, Amber R, Smith, Henrik G, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Thorp, Robbin, Tscharntke, Teja, Verhulst, Jort, Viana, Blandina F, Vaissiére, Bernard E, Veldtman, Ruan, Ward, Kimiora L, Westphal, Catrin, and Potts, Simon G

Published
2016

25. Correction: Corrigendum: Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

Author

Kleijn, David, Winfree, Rachael, Bartomeus, Ignasi, Carvalheiro, Luísa G, Henry, Mickaël, Isaacs, Rufus, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Kremen, Claire, M’Gonigle, Leithen K, Rader, Romina, Ricketts, Taylor H, Williams, Neal M, Adamson, Nancy Lee, Ascher, John S, Báldi, András, Batáry, Péter, Benjamin, Faye, Biesmeijer, Jacobus C, Blitzer, Eleanor J, Bommarco, Riccardo, Brand, Mariëtte R, Bretagnolle, Vincent, Button, Lindsey, Cariveau, Daniel P, Chifflet, Rémy, Colville, Jonathan F, Danforth, Bryan N, Elle, Elizabeth, Garratt, Michael PD, Herzog, Felix, Holzschuh, Andrea, Howlett, Brad G, Jauker, Frank, Jha, Shalene, Knop, Eva, Krewenka, Kristin M, Le Féon, Violette, Mandelik, Yael, May, Emily A, Park, Mia G, Pisanty, Gideon, Reemer, Menno, Riedinger, Verena, Rollin, Orianne, Rundlöf, Maj, Sardiñas, Hillary S, Scheper, Jeroen, Sciligo, Amber R, Smith, Henrik G, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Thorp, Robbin, Tscharntke, Teja, Verhulst, Jort, Viana, Blandina F, Vaissiére, Bernard E, Veldtman, Ruan, Ward, Kimiora L, Westphal, Catrin, and Potts, Simon G

Subjects
Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Crop and Pasture Production
Abstract

Nature Communications 6: Article number: 7414 (2015); Published: 16 June 2015; Updated: 18 February 2016. The authors inadvertently omitted Kimiora L. Ward, who managed and contributed data, from the author list. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Published
2016

28. Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation.

Author

Kleijn, David, Winfree, Rachael, Bartomeus, Ignasi, Carvalheiro, Luísa G, Henry, Mickaël, Isaacs, Rufus, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Kremen, Claire, M'Gonigle, Leithen K, Rader, Romina, Ricketts, Taylor H, Williams, Neal M, Lee Adamson, Nancy, Ascher, John S, Báldi, András, Batáry, Péter, Benjamin, Faye, Biesmeijer, Jacobus C, Blitzer, Eleanor J, Bommarco, Riccardo, Brand, Mariëtte R, Bretagnolle, Vincent, Button, Lindsey, Cariveau, Daniel P, Chifflet, Rémy, Colville, Jonathan F, Danforth, Bryan N, Elle, Elizabeth, Garratt, Michael PD, Herzog, Felix, Holzschuh, Andrea, Howlett, Brad G, Jauker, Frank, Jha, Shalene, Knop, Eva, Krewenka, Kristin M, Le Féon, Violette, Mandelik, Yael, May, Emily A, Park, Mia G, Pisanty, Gideon, Reemer, Menno, Riedinger, Verena, Rollin, Orianne, Rundlöf, Maj, Sardiñas, Hillary S, Scheper, Jeroen, Sciligo, Amber R, Smith, Henrik G, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Thorp, Robbin, Tscharntke, Teja, Verhulst, Jort, Viana, Blandina F, Vaissière, Bernard E, Veldtman, Ruan, Ward, Kimiora L, Westphal, Catrin, and Potts, Simon G

Subjects
Animals, Bees, Crops, Agricultural, Conservation of Natural Resources, Biodiversity, Pollination, Crops, Agricultural
Abstract

There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.

Published
2015

30. From research to action: enhancing crop yield through wild pollinators

Author

Garibaldi, Lucas A, Carvalheiro, Luísa G, Leonhardt, Sara D, Aizen, Marcelo A, Blaauw, Brett R, Isaacs, Rufus, Kuhlmann, Michael, Kleijn, David, Klein, Alexandra M, Kremen, Claire, Morandin, Lora, Scheper, Jeroen, and Winfree, Rachael

Subjects
Life Below Water, Ecology
Abstract

Recent evidence highlights the value of wild-insect species richness and abundance for crop pollination worldwide. Yet, deliberate physical importation of single species (eg European honey bees) into crop fields for pollination remains the mainstream management approach, and implementation of practices to enhance crop yield (production per area) through wild insects is only just beginning. With few exceptions, studies measuring the impacts of pollinator-supporting practices on wild-insect richness and pollination service success - particularly in relation to long-term crop yield and economic profit - Are rare. Here, we provide a general framework and examples of approaches for enhancing pollinator richness and abundance, quantity and quality of pollen on stigmas, crop yield, and farmers' profit, including some benefits detected only through long-term monitoring. We argue for integrating the promotion of wild-insect species richness with single-species management to benefit farmers and society.

Published
2014

31. Synthesis of highbush blueberry pollination research reveals region‐specific differences in the contributions of honeybees and wild bees

Author

Eeraerts, Maxime, primary, DeVetter, Lisa W., additional, Batáry, Péter, additional, Ternest, John J., additional, Mallinger, Rachel, additional, Arrington, Matthew, additional, Benjamin, Faye E., additional, Blaauw, Brett R., additional, Campbell, Joshua W., additional, Cavigliasso, Pablo, additional, Daniels, Jaret C., additional, de Groot, G. Arjen, additional, Ellis, James D., additional, Gibbs, Jason, additional, Goldstein, Lauren, additional, Hoffman, George D., additional, Kleijn, David, additional, Melathopoulos, Andony, additional, Miller, Sharron Z., additional, Montero‐Castaño, Ana, additional, Naranjo, Shiala M., additional, Nicholson, Charlie C., additional, Perkins, Jacquelyn A., additional, Rao, Sujaya, additional, Raine, Nigel E., additional, Reilly, James R., additional, Ricketts, Taylor H., additional, Rogers, Emma, additional, and Isaacs, Rufus, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. International scientists formulate a roadmap for insect conservation and recovery

Author

Harvey, Jeffrey A., Heinen, Robin, Armbrecht, Inge, Basset, Yves, Baxter-Gilbert, James H., Bezemer, T. Martijn, Böhm, Monika, Bommarco, Riccardo, Borges, Paulo A. V., Cardoso, Pedro, Clausnitzer, Viola, Cornelisse, Tara, Crone, Elizabeth E., Dicke, Marcel, Dijkstra, Klaas-Douwe B., Dyer, Lee, Ellers, Jacintha, Fartmann, Thomas, Forister, Mathew L., Furlong, Michael J., Garcia-Aguayo, Andres, Gerlach, Justin, Gols, Rieta, Goulson, Dave, Habel, Jan-Christian, Haddad, Nick M., Hallmann, Caspar A., Henriques, Sérgio, Herberstein, Marie E., Hochkirch, Axel, Hughes, Alice C., Jepsen, Sarina, Jones, T. Hefin, Kaydan, Bora M., Kleijn, David, Klein, Alexandra-Maria, Latty, Tanya, Leather, Simon R., Lewis, Sara M., Lister, Bradford C., Losey, John E., Lowe, Elizabeth C., Macadam, Craig R., Montoya-Lerma, James, Nagano, Christopher D., Ogan, Sophie, Orr, Michael C., Painting, Christina J., Pham, Thai-Hong, Potts, Simon G., Rauf, Aunu, Roslin, Tomas L., Samways, Michael J., Sanchez-Bayo, Francisco, Sar, Sim A., Schultz, Cheryl B., Soares, António O., Thancharoen, Anchana, Tscharntke, Teja, Tylianakis, Jason M., Umbers, Kate D. L., Vet, Louise E. M., Visser, Marcel E., Vujic, Ante, Wagner, David L., WallisDeVries, Michiel F., Westphal, Catrin, White, Thomas E., Wilkins, Vicky L., Williams, Paul H., Wyckhuys, Kris A. G., Zhu, Zeng-Rong, and de Kroon, Hans

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Inconsistent responses of carabid beetles and spiders to land-use intensity and landscape complexity in north-western Europe

Author

Mei, Zulin, primary, Scheper, Jeroen, additional, Bommarco, Riccardo, additional, de Groot, Gerard Arjen, additional, Garratt, Michael P.D., additional, Hedlund, Katarina, additional, Potts, Simon G., additional, Redlich, Sarah, additional, Smith, Henrik G., additional, Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, additional, van der Putten, Wim H., additional, van Gils, Stijn, additional, and Kleijn, David, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results