Search

This text is an exploration of collaborative thinking and writing through theories, methods, and experiences on the topic of the child, children, and childhood. It is a collaborative written text (with 32 authors) that sprang out of the experimental workshop Child Studies Multiple. The workshop and this text are about daring to stay with mess, “un-closure” , and uncertainty in order to investigate the (e)motions and complexities of being either a child or a researcher. The theoretical and methodological processes presented here offer an opportunity to shake the ground on which individual researchers stand by raising questions about scientific inspiration, theoretical and methodological productivity, and thinking through focusing on process, play, and collaboration. The effect of this is a questioning of the singular academic ‘I’ by exploring and showing what a plural ‘I’ can look like. It is about what the multiplicity of voice can offer research in a highly individualistic time. The article allows the reader to follow and watch the unconventional trial-and-error path of the ongoing-ness of exploring theories and methods together as a research community via methods of drama, palimpsest, and fictionary.

OBJECTIVE We investigated the correlation between socioeconomic status and the prescription of Valproic acid (VPA) in women of fertile age in Sweden. METHODS This is a registered-based cohort study including all women living in Sweden aged 18-45 years in the years 2010-2015, with a diagnosis of epilepsy and no intellectual disability (n = 9143). Data were collected from the National Patient Register, the Drug Prescription Register, and the Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labor market studies (LISA). RESULTS Women with only 9 years of school were more often prescribed VPA than women with a University degree (12.9% compared to 10.7% in 2015 [p = 0.015]). Similar differences were seen between the lowest and highest income group (16.6% compared to 12.7% in 2015 [p

Stigma contributes to negative health outcomes and amplifies health disparities in epilepsy. This study aimed to investigate associations of perceived stigma with the country of birth and socioeconomic status (SES).This is a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Participants were recruited consecutively from three demographically different neurology outpatient clinics in the southwest of Sweden. Participants responded to a questionnaire concerning their epilepsy, country of birth, mother tongue, and different SES-variables. The Neuro-QOL stigma scale and the Jacoby stigma scale were applied to assess stigma and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and PROMIS Mental Health scale were applied to assess mental health.In total 161 adults with epilepsy were included in the cohort. The median Neuro-QOL stigma score was 48.3, and was higher among foreign-born than in native-born participants (foreign-born in non-European country 52.3, in other European country 49.8, and in native-born 47.0, p = 0.003). Other factors associated with Neuro-QOL were seizure frequency last year (≥2 seizures 52.4 compared to 1 seizure 50.9 and no seizures 44.3, p 0.001), having had seizures in public (yes 50.9 compared to no 44.7, p = 0.035), HADS depression score ≥11 (57.4 compared to 47.8 for score11 points, p 0.001), HADS anxiety score ≥11 (53.5 compared to 46.8 for score11 points, p 0.001), and lower PROMIS Mental Health score (42.9 for PROMIS 40 compared to 54.4 for PROMIS 60, p 0.01). A stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that having had seizures the last year increased the average Neuro-QOL stigma score with 5.89 and appeared as the most determining factor for the Neuro-QOL stigma score among the variables investigated.It is important that the concerns of foreign-born patients are acknowledged and that the focus of seizure control and the detection and treatment of comorbidities are prioritized in the management of epilepsy and perceived stigma.

Background Foreign-born people with epilepsy carry two mutually independent risk factors for poor health. While epilepsy increases the need for trust and clear communication, minority status presents additional barriers in communication, causing misconceptions, inadequate treatment and increased suffering. Objectives This study aimed to explore experiences of communication in the medical encounter from the perspectives of foreign-born people with epilepsy. Methods A qualitative approach was applied. Twenty semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using manifest and latent content analysis. Results Within the main theme, “Trustful communication in unpredictable terms of life,” three subthemes appeared: “Social struggle overshadowing the epilepsy condition”; “Reliable health consultations as a key to feeling safe” and “Addressing ‘the real problem’ in the medical encounter.” A reduced social network due to migration, together with fears related to epilepsy, seems to increase the need for immediate access to health consultations and the need to be listened to. Patients’ narratives shed light on multiple social, medical and psychological events that may present reasons for the lack of medical adherence or missed booked appointments. Discussion A respectful approach, listening and confirming the normalcy of epilepsy events seem fundamental for trustful communication in the context of epilepsy, regardless of a patient’s culture or country of origin.

This paper is to provide a guidance as to which scrubber system is applied for marine vessels in both environmental and economic perspectives. It performs a comparative analysis for two different types of wet scrubber systems: they are generally referred as "open loop" and "closed loop" systems. Those systems are evaluated via life cycle assessment technique, which is further used for evaluating the global warming, acidification and eutrophication potentials. The economic aspect of the scrubber installation will be estimated by establishing the payback time of the installation costs. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the effect of various economic scenarios on payback times. Research results reveal that the environmental impacts are higher for the closed loop scrubber than open loop scrubber. The open loop scrubber has a marginally shorter payback time under different scenarios; for No EGCS (MGO) case, it was revealed 3.2 years (with open loop) and 3.6 years (with closed loop), and for No EGCS (VLSFO + MGO) case, 5.4 years (with open loop) and 5.9 years (with closed loop).

Purpose Epilepsy has well-documented associations with low income and low education levels, but the impact of a patient’s socioeconomic standing (SES) on the effects of epilepsy have been less studied. Method We performed a register-based cross-sectional study and asked if SES was associated with more severe epilepsy or limited access to care in Sweden, where health care is universal, and if socioeconomic outcomes (employment and income) differed for persons with epilepsy (PWE) with different levels of educational attainment. The study cohort consisted of all adult patients with an epilepsy diagnosis in the Swedish patient register in 2000–2015 (n = 126,406) and controls (n = 379,131) matched for age, gender, and place of birth. Results Somatic and psychiatric comorbidities were more common in PWE, while education and income levels were lower. Among PWE, hospitalizations were more common in persons with lower income or education. Having at least one prescription written by a neurologist in the study period was more common in the high-income and high-education groups. Finally, although low educational attainment was associated with low levels of income and inversely associated with employment in both persons with epilepsy and controls, regression analyses demonstrated that these associations were much more noticeable in cases than controls. Conclusions We conclude that both the severity and consequences of epilepsy are greater in persons of low SES, even in a country with universal health care. This indicates that universal access may not be sufficient to mitigate socioeconomic inequity in epilepsy.

Objectives To investigate the meaning of stigma among first-generation immigrants with epilepsy in Sweden. Methods Data were collected by individual face-to-face interviews with 25 first-generation immigrants with epilepsy from 18 different countries. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed systematically using a hermeneutic approach. Results Multiple aspects of stigma were associated with epilepsy, immigration, and socioeconomic deprivation. The main theme “It is a fight to be appreciated as a person and member of society” illuminated the meaning of stigma in the struggle with a negative self-image and strategies to build self-confidence. The seizure-related fears were amplified by language barriers and a lack of knowledge of the healthcare system that obstructed access to health care. Few close relatives nearby or misconceptions of epilepsy in the family resulted in a lack of support. The stigma of being an immigrant and of socioeconomic deprivation resulted in feelings of being unvalued by the society in addition to feelings of being unvalued in relationships and at work because of epilepsy. The social isolation experienced as a result of immigration was increased due to the presence of perceived stigma due to epilepsy which led people to stay at home in order to conceal their epilepsy. At the same time, to inform others about their epilepsy could reduce seizure-related fears. Employment appeared as a symbol of being a capable person and helped participants gain self-confidence. Conclusions Barriers to access health care and the exposure to multiple stigma can result in increased seizure-related fears, social isolation, and a lack of support for immigrants with epilepsy. In the context of epilepsy and immigration, stigma was intricately connected to how people perceived themselves as capable and contributing members of society. To reduce the negative influence of stigma, employment appeared vital to build self-confidence and break social isolation. Investigating the patient’s experience of stigma may provide healthcare professionals with valuable information on the need for support and priorities in epilepsy management. Public efforts to increase knowledge about epilepsy also among first-generation immigrants would be valuable.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen free radicals (OFRs), platelet activating factor (PAF), cell adhesion molecules, and transmigration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes through the gut barrier are probably all essential in the development of gut barrier dysfunction following intestinal ischemia and reperfusion (I/R). Pretreatment and early treatment of I/R with the OFRs-scavenger (NAC), the PAF inhibitor lexipafant, and monoclonal antibodies against the adhesion molecule PECAM-1 (anti-PECAM-1-Mab) have been reported to be effective in the prevention or recovery of gut barrier dysfunction and result in a decrease in cytokine levels. Less is known about the effect of treatment inserted during the late stage of I/R. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential therapeutic value of single or combination therapy with NAC, lexipafant, and anti-PECAM-1-MAb administered late during intestinal I/R in the rat. METHODS: NAC, lexipafant, and anti-PECAM-1-MAb were administrated, alone or in combination, after 3 h of reperfusion following 40 min of superior mesenteric arterial ischemia in the rat. Intestinal endothelial and epithelial barrier permeability, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), and protease inhibitor levels were evaluated after 12 h of reperfusion. RESULTS: Intestinal endothelial and epithelial permeability significantly increased in rats with I/R and saline treatment. Proteolytic activity in plasma was indicated by low levels of the three measured plasma protease inhibitors. Intestinal mucosal MPO content increased significantly. These changes were, to different degrees, reduced by late inserted treatment with NAC, lexipafant, or anti-PECAM-1-MAb. Alterations in systemic levels of IL-1 beta paralleled the changes found in gut barrier permeability and leukocyte trapping. Systemic antithrombin III levels and increased barrier permeability in remote organs were partly restored, especially by multimodal therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NAC, lexipafant, and/or monoclonal antibodies against PECAM-1, inserted at a later stage of I/R, reduced the severity of I/R-associated intestinal dysfunction and decreased the systemic concentrations of IL-1 beta, local leukocyte recruitment (MPO), and partly restored plasma protease inhibitor levels. (Less)