Search

Rapid pathogen identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria-causing bloodstream infections can improve patients' outcome. In this study, we evaluated the performance of Alfred60AST (Alifax) which provides AST directly on positive blood culture (BC) bottles by light scattering. In a selected group of patients with a clinical suspicion of severe sepsis or at risk for infections with multiresistant organisms, we compared Alfred60AST AST results with traditional AST results (Vitek2 (bioMérieux) or disk diffusion). Discrepancy analysis was performed by Etest (bioMérieux) or broth microdilution. In total, 222 samples were evaluated. On 595 susceptibility determinations, 93.4% showed categorical agreement (CA) with the standard method. Eighty-one percent of isolates showed a 100% categorical agreement (CA) which increased to 84.3% after discrepancy analysis. There were 8 very major discrepancies (VMD), 18 major discrepancies (MD), and 13 minor discrepancies (MiD). Most discrepant results were observed for piperacillin-tazobactam (15.6%) and clindamycin (18.9%). Analysis time was 6–6.5 h for a complete Alfred60AST AST result. In addition, we evaluated the behavior of clinicians in adjusting antibiotic therapy according to the routine AST results. In 37% of all patients, antibiotic therapy was altered after reporting of AST result and adjustment was more frequent for Gram-negative than for Gram-positive isolates. With some improvements, Alfred60AST provides accurate and rapid preliminary AST results for organisms causing bloodstream infections and may have at least a potential clinical benefit in about one-third of patients with severe sepsis, by delivering faster results compared with conventional methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dried blood spots (DBSs) could allow patients to prepare their own samples at home and send them to the laboratory for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressants. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge about the impact of DBS-related preanalytical factors on TDM of tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. Content: Blood spot volume, blood spot inhomogeneity, stability of analytes in DBS and hematocrit (Hct) effects are considered important DBS-related preanalytical factors. In addition, the influence of drying time has recently been identified as a noteworthy preanalytical factor. Tacrolimus is not significantly influenced by these factors. Sirolimus and everolimus are more prone to heat degradation and exhibited variations in recovery which were dependent on Hct and drying time. Summary and outlook: DBS-related preanalytical factors can have a significant impact on TDM for immunosuppressants. Tacrolimus is not significantly influenced by the studied preanalytical factors and is a viable candidate for DBS sampling. For sirolimus and everolimus more validation of preanalytical factors is needed. In particular, drying conditions need to be examined further, as current protocols may mask Hct-dependent effects on recovery. Further validation is also necessary for home-based self-sampling of immunosuppressants as the sampling quality is variable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapid pathogen identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria-causing bloodstream infections can improve patients' outcome. In this study, we evaluated the performance of Alfred60 AST (Alifax) which provides AST directly on positive blood culture (BC) bottles by light scattering. In a selected group of patients with a clinical suspicion of severe sepsis or at risk for infections with multiresistant organisms, we compared Alfred60 AST AST results with traditional AST results (Vitek2 (bioMérieux) or disk diffusion). Discrepancy analysis was performed by Etest (bioMérieux) or broth microdilution. In total, 222 samples were evaluated. On 595 susceptibility determinations, 93.4% showed categorical agreement (CA) with the standard method. Eighty-one percent of isolates showed a 100% categorical agreement (CA) which increased to 84.3% after discrepancy analysis. There were 8 very major discrepancies (VMD), 18 major discrepancies (MD), and 13 minor discrepancies (MiD). Most discrepant results were observed for piperacillin-tazobactam (15.6%) and clindamycin (18.9%). Analysis time was 6-6.5 h for a complete Alfred60 AST AST result. In addition, we evaluated the behavior of clinicians in adjusting antibiotic therapy according to the routine AST results. In 37% of all patients, antibiotic therapy was altered after reporting of AST result and adjustment was more frequent for Gram-negative than for Gram-positive isolates. With some improvements, Alfred60 AST provides accurate and rapid preliminary AST results for organisms causing bloodstream infections and may have at least a potential clinical benefit in about one-third of patients with severe sepsis, by delivering faster results compared with conventional methods.