Search

Objectives: The NEMA performance measurement standard (NEMA NU 2-2012) for PET scanners provides guidelines on how to assess the performance of Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Three different state of the art PET systems were installed at Uppsala University Hospital between years 2014-2016 and independent NEMA standard tests were performed. The aim of this study was to compare system performance of the three scanners. Methods: Three commercially available scanners from GE-healthcare (SIGNA PET/MR; Discovery IQ PET/CT; Discovery MI PET/CT) were evaluated. The SIGNA and MI systems are based on LYSO crystals and digital SiPMs, whereas the IQ uses BGO crystals and regular PMTs. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate statistics, count rate accuracy and image quality were assessed according to the NEMA NU 2-2012 standards. In addition to the NEMA standard test, recovery was assessed for different reconstructions using the NEMA image quality phantom at a contrast of 4:1 in all spheres, and a triple line insert phantom. These tests were performed on all three scanners in a single session, avoiding differences due to variability in phantom preparation. Results: Full width of half maximum (FWHM) of the spatial resolution (radial/tangential/axial) reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) at 1,10 and 20 cm from the centre of FOV is illustrated in figure 1A for each system. The average sensitivity, Peak NECR, scatter fraction and count rate accuracy of each system is presented in table 1. The average image contrast recovery coefficients of SIGNA, IQ and MI varied between 45, 40 and 56 % (10 mm sphere) to 74, 72 and 84 % (22 mm sphere) respectively. The average image contrast recovery coefficients is presented in figure 1B. The lung error for SIGNA, IQ and MI were 2.7, 18 and 5.2 % respectively. Using reconstruction settings recommended for clinical use (Signa: TOF-OSEM, 2 iterations/28 subsets, 5 mm post-filter; IQ: OSEM, 4/12, 4 mm; MI: TOF-OSEM, 3/16, 5 mm, a