Search

Your search keyword '"Kirkpatrick, Ryan H."' showing total 10 results
Start Over Author "Kirkpatrick, Ryan H."
10 results on '"Kirkpatrick, Ryan H."'

5. Non‐suicidal self‐injury among individuals with an eating disorder: A systematic review and prevalence meta‐analysis.

Author

Kirkpatrick, Ryan H., Breton, Edith, Biorac, Aleksandar, Munoz, Douglas P., and Booij, Linda

Subjects
*DIAGNOSIS of eating disorders, *META-analysis, *SYSTEMATIC reviews, *REGRESSION analysis, *RESEARCH funding, *SELF-mutilation
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of non‐suicidal self‐injury across eating disorders (EDs) and within diagnostic categories through systematic review and proportional, or so‐called prevalence, meta‐analysis. Method: Included studies had to contain individuals with a verified diagnosis of an ED. The last literature search was conducted on September 11, 2023, for studies published on or before September 2023 without a restriction on earliest publication year. Results were synthesized and analyzed using the "metaprop" package in R and presented using forest plots. Bias was assessed by a Peters' regression test and funnel plot. Results: 79 studies published between 1985 and 2023 were included encompassing 32,334 individuals with an ED. Importantly, 42 studies were not included in any other meta‐analyses on self‐injury in EDs to date. Overall prevalence of non‐suicidal self‐injury was 34.59% (95%CI = 30.49–38.81). Prevalence in anorexia nervosa restrictive type, binge/purge type, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other specified feeding/eating disorder were 23.19% (95%CI = 16.96–30.03%), 41.98% (95%CI = 32.35–51.91%), 36.97% (95%CI = 30.69–43.46%), 21.21% (95%CI = 14.93–28.12%) and 37.65% (95%CI = 28.59–47.09%), respectively. Prevalence estimations could not be estimated for other ED categories due to lack of a sufficient number of studies. Discussion: Non‐suicidal self‐injury is prevalent across both binge/purge and restrictive EDs. Considering the transdiagnostic nature of self‐injurious behaviors in ED, the results highlight the importance of assessment and monitoring of self‐injury in people with ED, irrespective of specific diagnoses. The method of determining self‐injury varied across studies and may limit this study. Public Significance: This study highlights the prevalence of self‐injury across eating disorders irrespective of diagnosis and within specific EDs. While diagnoses known to exhibit self‐injurious behaviors (e.g., bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa binge/purge subtype) demonstrated the highest prevalence of self‐injury, all diagnoses were found to have a prevalence greater than 20%. These findings suggest the importance of assessing and monitoring all individuals with an eating disorder for the presence of self‐injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Interleaved Pro/Anti-saccade Behavior Across the Lifespan

Author

Yep, Rachel, primary, Smorenburg, Matthew L., additional, Riek, Heidi C., additional, Calancie, Olivia G., additional, Kirkpatrick, Ryan H., additional, Perkins, Julia E., additional, Huang, Jeff, additional, Coe, Brian C., additional, Brien, Donald C., additional, and Munoz, Douglas P., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Physician Scientists Of Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow

Author

Kirkpatrick, Ryan H., Boyd, J. Gordon, Kirkpatrick, Ryan H., and Boyd, J. Gordon

Abstract

While the separate roles of physicians and scientists are well defined, the role of a physician scientist is broad and variable. In today’s society, physician scientists are seen as a hybrid between the two fields and they are, therefore, expected to be key to the translation of biomedical research into clinical care. This article offers a narrative review on physician scientists and endeavours to answer whether there is an ongoing need for physician scientists today. The historical role of physician scientists is discussed and compared with physician scientists of the 21st century. Fundamental differences and similarities between the separate roles of physicians and scientists are examined as well as the current state of bench to bedside research. Finally, the ability of 21st century physician scientists to impact their respective medical and scientific fields in comparison to non-physician scientists will be discussed. This paper speculates as to why numbers of physician scientists are dwindling and uses the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of rapid translational research. Ultimately, we suggest that physician scientists are important and may have the most impact on their field by working to connect bedside and bench rather than simply working separately in the bedside and bench. To do this, physician scientists may need to lead clinical research teams composed of individuals from diverse training backgrounds.

Published
2021

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results