1. An assessment of phytoplankton primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean from satellite ocean color/in situ chlorophyll-a based models
- Author
-
Patricia A. Matrai, Timothy J Smyth, Bernard Gentili, Frédéric Mélin, Takahiko Kameda, Younjoo Lee, David Antoine, Ichio Asanuma, Toru Hirawake, Michele Scardi, Zhongping Lee, Mathieu Ardyna, Christian Katlein, Toby K. Westberry, Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs, Marcel Babin, Simon Bélanger, Sang Heon Lee, Kevin R. Turpie, Shilin Tang, Emmanuel Devred, Vincent S. Saba, Mar Fernández-Méndez, Kirk Waters, Sung-Ho Kang, Maxime Benoît‐Gagné, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), Laboratoire d'océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), Observatoire océanologique de Villefranche-sur-mer (OOVM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Takuvik Joint International Laboratory ULAVAL-CNRS, Université Laval [Québec] (ULaval)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université du Québec à Rimouski (UQAR), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Norwegian Polar Institute, Hokkaido University [Sapporo, Japan], KIOST, Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (AWI), European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC), Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata [Roma], Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), Plymouth Marine Laboratory, NASA, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University (OSU), Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Université Laval [Québec] (ULaval)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,In situ ,Chlorophyll a ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Settore BIO/07 ,Arctic Ocean ,model skill assessment ,net primary productivity ,ocean color model ,remote sensing ,subsurface chlorophyll‐a maximum ,Oceanography ,Atmospheric sciences ,Biogeosciences ,01 natural sciences ,Remote Sensing ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Oceanography: Biological and Chemical ,Forum for Arctic Modeling and Observational Synthesis (FAMOS): Results and Synthesis of Coordinated Experiments ,Geochemistry and Petrology ,Phytoplankton ,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous) ,14. Life underwater ,Arctic Region ,Research Articles ,[SDU.STU.OC]Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Oceanography ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Arctic and Antarctic oceanography ,Primary production ,Model Verification and Validation ,The arctic ,Sea surface temperature ,Oceanography: General ,Geophysics ,chemistry ,13. Climate action ,Space and Planetary Science ,Ocean color ,Chlorophyll ,Environmental science ,Antarctica ,Geographic Location ,Computational Geophysics ,Research Article - Abstract
We investigated 32 net primary productivity (NPP) models by assessing skills to reproduce integrated NPP in the Arctic Ocean. The models were provided with two sources each of surface chlorophyll‐a concentration (chlorophyll), photosynthetically available radiation (PAR), sea surface temperature (SST), and mixed‐layer depth (MLD). The models were most sensitive to uncertainties in surface chlorophyll, generally performing better with in situ chlorophyll than with satellite‐derived values. They were much less sensitive to uncertainties in PAR, SST, and MLD, possibly due to relatively narrow ranges of input data and/or relatively little difference between input data sources. Regardless of type or complexity, most of the models were not able to fully reproduce the variability of in situ NPP, whereas some of them exhibited almost no bias (i.e., reproduced the mean of in situ NPP). The models performed relatively well in low‐productivity seasons as well as in sea ice‐covered/deep‐water regions. Depth‐resolved models correlated more with in situ NPP than other model types, but had a greater tendency to overestimate mean NPP whereas absorption‐based models exhibited the lowest bias associated with weaker correlation. The models performed better when a subsurface chlorophyll‐a maximum (SCM) was absent. As a group, the models overestimated mean NPP, however this was partly offset by some models underestimating NPP when a SCM was present. Our study suggests that NPP models need to be carefully tuned for the Arctic Ocean because most of the models performing relatively well were those that used Arctic‐relevant parameters., Key Points The models reproduced primary productivity better using in situ chlorophyll‐a than satellite valuesThe models performed well in low‐productivity seasons and in sea ice‐covered/deep‐water regionsNet primary productivity models need to be carefully tuned for the Arctic Ocean
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF