Search

The vehicles used for topical dermatological treatments can significantly contribute to treatment effects while also delivering ingredients to maintain skin barrier function and reduce irritation. Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was developed using proprietary polymeric emulsion technology to provide uniform and efficient delivery of the active ingredient as well as improved safety and tolerability compared to higher-dose tazarotene formulations. The lotion vehicle additionally provides rapid and sustained improvements in moisturization and skin barrier function with patient-friendly application and cosmetic properties. Compared with trifarotene 0.005% cream, tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated ∼30% greater spreadability and a lower potential for irritation. In clinical trials and investigator-initiated studies, tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of facial and truncal acne and improved skin oiliness. Facial acne improvements were similar among study participants grouped by sex, race, ethnicity, or age. In a head-to-head study, efficacy was comparable to tazarotene 0.1% cream with approximately half the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events. Tazarotene 0.045% lotion is a beneficial acne treatment option for patients of varying ages, races, ethnicities, and skin types, delivered in a formulation that can be easily used on the face, back, and chest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Formulating a topical medication that does not irritate the skin is an important factor contributing to patient treatment adherence and satisfaction. Many topical prescription products use penetration enhancers (including propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and ethanol) to overcome barrier properties of the skin. However, these excipients may irritate the skin causing tolerability reactions such as burning and stinging, which can reduce patient treatment adherence. Topical roflumilast is a highly potent (Kd∼0.7 nM) phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor formulated as a water-based cream or foam that does not contain penetration enhancers or fragrances. Objective We present prospectively assessed investigator- and patient-rated local tolerability from Phase 3 trials of topical roflumilast for patients with psoriasis (DERMIS-1, DERMIS-2, ARRECTOR), seborrheic dermatitis (SD; STRATUM), and atopic dermatitis (AD; INTEGUMENT-1, INTEGUMENT-2). Methods Patients were randomized to apply topical roflumilast (DERMIS: 0.3% cream; ARRECTOR and STRATUM: 0.3% foam; INTEGUMENT: 0.15% cream) or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks (DERMIS, ARRECTOR, and STRATUM) or 4 weeks (INTEGUMENT). Investigators assessed local tolerability on an 8-point scale (0 [no evidence of irritation] to 7 [strong reaction spreading beyond application site]) in the clinic before investigational product (IP) application. Patients reported local tolerability on a 4-point scale (0 [none: no sensation] to 3 [severe: hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort]) in the clinic 10-15 minutes after IP application. Tolerability was also assessed by reviewing documented adverse events. Results As assessed by investigators, ≥96.5% of patients in the roflumilast-treated groups had no evidence of irritation at the application site across all trials at all timepoints. Patient-rated local tolerability was favorable and improved with treatment: across all trials, 1% of roflumilast-treated patients reported a score of 3 (severe; defined as a "hot tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort") after the first application (day 1) and <1% at each subsequent assessment. Rates of adverse events, including those at the application site, were low for all trials. Conclusions Roflumilast cream and foam formulations demonstrated favorable local tolerability based on investigator- and patient-rated assessments in patients with psoriasis, SD, and AD, including application to sensitive areas such as the face and intertriginous areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using a three-pronged acne treatment approach—combining an antibiotic, antimicrobial agent, and retinoid—may provide greater efficacy than monad or dyad treatments. Herein are the dermal sensitization, irritation, safety, and tolerability results from phase 1 and 2 studies of fixed-dose clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1%/adapalene 0.15% (IDP-126) polymeric mesh gel. Two phases 1, single-blind, vehicle-controlled dermal safety studies were conducted in healthy participants aged ≥18 years. One phase 2 (NCT03170388) double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, and vehicle-controlled study was conducted over 12 weeks in participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne. A total of 1,020 participants (IDP-126 gel, vehicle, or 1 of the 3 dyad gels [phase 2 only]) were included across the 3 studies (safety populations: n = 1,004). In the phase 1 studies, IDP-126 had no confirmed sensitization or contact dermatitis. IDP-126 (deemed "moderately irritating") was significantly less irritating than commercially available BPO 2.5%/adapalene 0.3% gel. The results from these three studies show that the triple-combination IDP-126 had a positive safety profile and was well tolerated in healthy participants and those with moderate-to-severe acne [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT A significant number of patients with moderate-to-severe inflammatory acne are candidates for oral antibiotic therapy. Use of tetracycline for acne has yielded to second-generation molecules doxycycline and minocycline, which [...]

INTRODUCTION Rationale for the Use of Biologics in Psoriasis The term 'biologics' encompasses all therapeutic and diagnostic agents that have been synthesized from living organisms. The Merriam-Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary [...]

ABSTRACT Psoriasis is a chronic, debilitating disease that commonly involves the scalp. Despite a wide range of therapy options, scalp psoriasis remains difficult to treat, highlighting a long-standing unmet need [...]

ABSTRACT Data continue to establish the role of inflammation, not only in the pathogenesis of acne but also in the development of its most devastating sequelum, scarring. Although topical therapy [...]

Introduction Formulating a topical medication that does not irritate the skin is an important factor contributing to patient treatment adherence and satisfaction. Many topical prescription products use penetration enhancers (including propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, and ethanol) to overcome barrier properties of the skin. However, these excipients may irritate the skin causing tolerability reactions such as burning and stinging, which can reduce patient treatment adherence. Topical roflumilast is a highly potent (Kd~0.7 nM) phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor formulated as a water-based cream or foam that does not contain penetration enhancers or fragrances. Objectives: We present prospectively assessed investigator- and patient-rated local tolerability from Phase 3 trials of topical roflumilast for patients with psoriasis (DERMIS-1, DERMIS-2, ARRECTOR) seborrheic dermatitis (SD; STRATUM), and atopic dermatitis (AD; INTEGUMENT-1, INTEGUMENT-2). Methods: Patients were randomized to apply topical roflumilast (DERMIS: 0.3% cream; ARRECTOR and STRATUM: 0.3% foam; INTEGUMENT: 0.15% cream) or vehicle once daily for 8 weeks (DERMIS, ARRECTOR, and STRATUM) or 4 weeks (INTEGUMENT). Investigators assessed local tolerability on an 8-point scale (0 [no evidence of irritation] to 7 [strong reaction spreading beyond application site]) in the clinic before investigational product (IP) application. Patients reported local tolerability on a 4-point scale (0 [none: no sensation] to 3 [severe: hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort]) in the clinic 10-15 minutes after IP application. Tolerability was also assessed by reviewing documented adverse events. Results: As assessed by investigators, =96.5% of patients in the roflumilast-treated groups had no evidence of irritation at the application site across all trials at all timepoints. Patient-rated local tolerability was favorable and improved with treatment: across all trials, 1% of roflumilast-treated patients reported a score of 3 (severe; defined as a "hot tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort") after the first application (day 1) and <1% at each subsequent assessment. Rates of adverse events, including those at the application site, were low for all trials. Conclusions: Roflumilast cream and foam formulations demonstrated favorable local tolerability based on investigator- and patientrated assessments in patients with psoriasis, SD, and AD, including application to sensitive areas such as the face and intertriginous areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT This 12-week, single-center, investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel-design study assessed the safety and efficacy of tretinoin microsphere gel 0.04% delivered by pump (TMG PUMP) to tazarotene cream 0.05% (TAZ) in mild-to-moderate [...]

ABSTRACT Combination therapy has become the standard for the management of acne, particularly for moderate-to-severe cases. Among these combinations, those regimens containing benzoyl peroxide (BPO), clindamycin and a retinoid have [...]

ABSTRACT Introduction: Psoriasis is one of several systemic diseases that presents chiefly with cutaneous symptoms and has the potential to negatively impact patients' overall health and quality of life. Physicians [...]

ABSTRACT Background: Psoriasis is a common, chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease with predominantly skin and joint manifestations. Patients with psoriasis also have an elevated risk of developing cardiovascular disease and recent [...]

Topical retinoids are recommended for acne treatment, but their use may be limited by irritation or dermatitis. Herein is an overview of the dermal sensitization, safety, tolerability, and participant satisfaction data from phase-1, -2, and -3 studies of lower-dose tazarotene 0.045% polymeric emulsion lotion. Two phase-1, single-blind, vehicle-controlled dermal safety studies were conducted in healthy participants aged ≥18 years. One phase-2 (NCT02938494) and two phase-3 studies (NCT03168334; NCT03168321) were double-blind, randomized, and vehicle-controlled over 12 weeks in participants aged ≥9 years (≥12 years, phase-2) with moderate-to-severe acne. A total of 2029 participants (tazarotene 0.045% lotion or vehicle) were included across the 5 studies (safety populations: n = 1982). In the phase-1 studies, tazarotene had a low potential for irritancy/contact dermatitis and did not induce sensitization. In all studies, tazarotene lotion was well tolerated and had a positive safety profile. In addition, tazarotene lotion reduced the severity of hyperpigmentation and erythema and participants preferred it more than previous acne treatments. The results from these five studies show that the tolerability, safety, and patient satisfaction of topical tazarotene 0.045% lotion, combined with its efficacy, make it an important option for the treatment of acne. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Background: Efalizumab therapy and narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy have different mechanisms of action; combined therapy may be more effective than either treatment alone in treating moderate to severe [...]

Abstract Background: Second-intention healing (SIH) is a common and acceptable method of wound care following Mohs micrographic surgery. Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a topical trolamine/sodium alginate [...]

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess compatibility of tretinoin 0.05% acne lotion with foundation makeup. DESIGN: This was a single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Participants were randomized to apply tretinoin 0.05% lotion to either the right or left side of the face before applying full-face foundation makeup. SETTING: Participants were enrolled at a single center in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Female individuals aged 18 to 50 years who used facial foundation makeup ≥5 days per week were included. MEASUREMENTS: Investigator-assessed grading for foundation coverage and participant evaluations of makeup appearance were conducted at post-makeup application (Post-Makeup) and Hour 6 (6H) timepoints. Antera 3D® images were taken for skin texture roughness analysis and tolerability evaluations were performed at baseline, post-tretinoin application, Post-Makeup, and 6H timepoints. RESULTS: A total of 30 participants were enrolled and 29 completed the study. There were no significant differences between tretinoin treated and untreated sides for any outcomes of investigator-assessed grading of foundation (percentage coverage, blotchiness, overall coverage, skin tone evenness, visual smoothness). There was a small but statistically significant worsening in percent coverage at 6H versus Post-Makeup on the untreated side, but not the treated side. As rated by participants, even/full coverage and skin smoothness were significantly better on the tretinoin-lotion treated versus the untreated side. Three-dimensional imaging showed there were no significant differences in skin roughness between the treated and untreated sides. Participants reported overall satisfaction with the tretinoin lotion-treated side. CONCLUSION: Tretinoin 0.05% lotion did not interfere with facial makeup application or wearability and was well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]