1. Opportunities to Increase Science of Diversity and Inclusion in Clinical Trials: Equity and a Lack of a Control
- Author
-
Joseph‐Kevin Igwe, Tenzin Yeshi Wangdak Yuthok, Erin Cruz, Adrienne Mueller, Roy Hao Lan, Cati Brown‐Johnson, Muhammed Idris, Fatima Rodriguez, Kira Clark, Latha Palaniappan, Melvin Echols, Paul Wang, Anekwe Onwuanyi, Priscilla Pemu, and Eldrin F. Lewis
- Subjects
cardiology ,clinical trials ,diversity ,equity ,health disparities ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
The United States witnessed a nearly 4‐fold increase in personal health care expenditures between 1980 and 2010. Despite innovations and obvious benefits to health, participants enrolled in clinical trials still do not accurately represent the racial and ethnic composition of patients nationally or globally. This lack of diversity in cohorts limits the generalizability and significance of results among all populations and has deep repercussions for patient equity. To advance diversity in clinical trials, robust evidence for the most effective strategies for recruitment of diverse participants is needed. A major limitation of previous literature on clinical trial diversity is the lack of control or comparator groups for different strategies. To date, interventions have focused primarily on (1) community‐based interventions, (2) institutional practices, and (3) digital health systems. This review article outlines prior intervention strategies across these 3 categories and considers health policy and ethical incentives for substantiation before US Food and Drug Administration approval. There are no current studies that comprehensively compare these interventions against one another. The American Heart Association Strategically Focused Research Network on the Science of Diversity in Clinical Trials represents a multicenter, collaborative network between Stanford School of Medicine and Morehouse School of Medicine created to understand the barriers to diversity in clinical trials by contemporaneous head‐to‐head interventional strategies accessing digital, institutional, and community‐based recruitment strategies to produce informed recruitment strategies targeted to improve underrepresented patient representation in clinical trials.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF