Pei Loo Ow, Angel Garcia, Lesley Samuel, Rajarshi Roy, Adam McGeoch, D. Fyfe, W Saku, Simon Aird Grumett, Jonathan Nicoll, Jo Dent, Tom Samuel Waddell, Jo Webster, Christine Allmark, Tania Tillett, Colin Askill, Justin S. Waters, C. Handforth, Erica Beaumont, Vallipuram Vigneswaran, Sharon Ruddock, Nick Wadd, Syed Zubair, Kinnari Patel, Vanessa Potter, Daniel Propper, Olwyn Williams, Marc Jones, Kamalnayan Guptal, Peter Hall, Gareth Griffiths, Joseph Mano, Juan W. Valle, Sheela Rao, David A Cairns, Go Trial Investigators, Eszter Katona, Nick Maisey, Chris Twelves, Daniel Swinson, Nicholas Reed, Heike I. Grabsch, Joanne Askey, Jonathan Wadsley, Tom Roques, Sue Cheeseman, Stephen Falk, Louise Medley, Arshad Jamil, Emma Cattell, Victori Kunene, Matthew R. Sydes, Charles Candish, Claire Hobbs, Rebecca Herbertson, Jo Parkinson, Nicholas S. Reed, Louise Brook, Zuzana Stokes, Mohammed Khan, Ann Crossley, Elin Jones, George Bozas, Sebastian Cummins, Anirban Chatterjee, Michael Bennet, Helen Marshall, Pavel Bezecny, David Sherriff, Matthew T. Seymour, Lauren Gorf, Galina Velikova, Jean Gall, Kamposioras Konstantinos-Velios, Sally Clive, Eleanor James, Fiona Collinson, Dunca Wilkins, Simon Lord, Julia Brown, Serena Hilman, A. Robinson, Richard Ellis, Alaaeldin Shablak, Russell D Petty, Sherif Raouf, Helen Howard, RS: GROW - R2 - Basic and Translational Cancer Biology, and Pathologie
Importance: Older and/or frail patients are underrepresented in landmark cancer trials. Tailored research is needed to address this evidence gap. Objective: The GO2 randomized clinical trial sought to optimize chemotherapy dosing in older and/or frail patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer, and explored baseline geriatric assessment (GA) as a tool for treatment decision-making. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, noninferiority, open-label randomized trial took place at oncology clinics in the United Kingdom with nurse-led geriatric health assessment. Patients were recruited for whom full-dose combination chemotherapy was considered unsuitable because of advanced age and/or frailty. Interventions: There were 2 randomizations that were performed: CHEMO-INTENSITY compared oxaliplatin/capecitabine at Level A (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2on day 1, capecitabine 625 mg/m 2twice daily on days 1-21, on a 21-day cycle), Level B (doses 0.8 times A), or Level C (doses 0.6 times A). Alternatively, if the patient and clinician agreed the indication for chemotherapy was uncertain, the patient could instead enter CHEMO-BSC, comparing Level C vs best supportive care. Main Outcomes and Measures: First, broad noninferiority of the lower doses vs reference (Level A) was assessed using a permissive boundary of 34 days reduction in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio, HR = 1.34), selected as acceptable by a forum of patients and clinicians. Then, the patient experience was compared using Overall Treatment Utility (OTU), which combines efficacy, toxic effects, quality of life, and patient value/acceptability. For CHEMO-BSC, the main outcome measure was overall survival. Results: A total of 514 patients entered CHEMO-INTENSITY, of whom 385 (75%) were men and 299 (58%) were severely frail, with median age 76 years. Noninferior PFS was confirmed for Levels B vs A (HR = 1.09 [95% CI, 0.89-1.32]) and C vs A (HR = 1.10 [95% CI, 0.90-1.33]). Level C produced less toxic effects and better OTU than A or B. No subgroup benefited from higher doses: Level C produced better OTU even in younger or less frail patients. A total of 45 patients entered the CHEMO-BSC randomization: overall survival was nonsignificantly longer with chemotherapy: median 6.1 vs 3.0 months (HR = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.32-1.48], P =.34). In multivariate analysis in 522 patients with all variables available, baseline frailty, quality of life, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were independently associated with OTU, and can be combined in a model to estimate the probability of different outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This phase 3 randomized clinical trial found that reduced-intensity chemotherapy provided a better patient experience without significantly compromising cancer control and should be considered for older and/or frail patients. Baseline geriatric assessment can help predict the utility of chemotherapy but did not identify a group benefiting from higher-dose treatment. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN44687907.