Search

Background: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) has been reported to diminish pain levels in intractable chronic headache syndromes of different origin. No reliable objective markers exist to predict ONS responsiveness. This study investigated the predictive value of occipital percutaneous nerve field stimulation (PENS) prior to ONS.Methods: This trial included 12 patients (CCH, CM, PTH, CH) with chronic refractory headache syndromes eligible for ONS. Repetitive PENS (3 × /10 days) was performed and the headache severity/frequency monitored over four weeks before ONS implantation. Further assessment of PENS/ONS outcomes were stimulation-related complications, perception/tolerance stimulation threshold, the Migraine Disability Scale (MIDAS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).Results: All PENS responders benefited from ONS. Of the seven PENS-nonresponders with VAS 6.1(±1.1), six experienced significant pain relief from ONS after three months and one patient failed the PENS/ONS trial (VAS 3.7 (±1.6)); (95% CI 3.6 to 5.7, p < 0.001). The VAS baseline was 8.4 (±0.5) and decreased significantly (50% reduction in severity/frequency) in five patients after PENS, while seven failed to improve (VAS 4.9 (±1.1); (95% CI 2.5 to 4.5, p < 0.001). BDI baseline (from 22.6 (±4.2) to 10.6 (±5.9) (95% CI 7.4 to 16.6, p < 0.001)) and MIDAS baseline (from 143.9 (±14.5) to 72.8 (±28.7) (95% CI 1.17 to 2.3, p < 0.001)) significantly declined after ONS. No PENS/ONS-related complications occurred.Conclusions: Presurgical applied occipital PENS failed to identify ONS responders sufficiently according to our study protocol, thus requiring further specific investigations to determine its predictive usefulness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parkinson's Disease is a neurodegenerative disorder manifesting itself as a hypokinetic movement impairment with postural instability and gait disturbance. In case of failure and/or limited response, deep brain stimulation has been established as an alternative and effective treatment modality. However, a subset of PD patients with gait impairment represents a therapeutic challenge. A systematic review (2000-2023) was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to determine the efficacy, stimulation waveform/parameters, spine level, and outcome measures of spinal cord stimulation using different waveforms in PD patients with and without chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation responsiveness was assessed within the pre-defined follow-up period in three groups (short-term follow-up = 0-3 months; intermediate follow-up = 3-12 months; and long-term follow-up = more than 12 months). In addition, we briefly outline alternative neurostimulation therapies and the most recent developments in closed-loop spinal cord stimulation relevant to PD. In summary, 18 publications and 70 patients from uncontrolled observational trials were included, with low-quality evidence and conflicting findings. First and foremost, the currently available data do not support the use of spinal cord stimulation to treat PD-related gait disorders but have confirmed its usefulness for PD-associated chronic pain.

Objective : Metabolomics has growing importance in the research of inflammatory processes. Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is considered to be, at least in part, of inflammatory nature, but no metabolic analyses yet exist. Therefore, a mass spectrometry untargeted metabolic analysis was performed on hematoma samples from patients with cSDH. Methods : A prospective analytical cross-sectional study on the efficacy of subperiosteal drains in cSDH was performed. Newly diagnosed patients had the option of granting permission for the collection of a hematoma sample upon its removal. The samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to obtain different types of metabolites from diverse biochemical classes. The statistical analysis included data cleaning, imputation, and log transformation, followed by PCA, PLS-DA, HCA, and ANOVA. The postoperative course of the disease was followed for 3 months. The metabolite concentrations in the hematoma fluid were compared based on whether a recurrence of the disease was recorded within this time frame. Results : Fifty-nine samples from patients who were operated on because of a cSDH were gathered. Among those, 8 samples were eliminated because of missing metabolites, and only 51 samples were analyzed further. Additionally, 39 samples were from patients who showed no recurrence over the course of a 3-month follow-up, and 12 samples were from a group with later recurrence. We recorded a noticeable drop (35%) in the concentration of acylcarnitines in the "recurrence group", where 10 of the 22 tested metabolites showed a significant reduction ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, a noticeable reduction in different Acyl-CoA-dehydrogenases was detected (VLCAD-deficiency p < 0.05, MCAD-deficiency p = 0.07). No further changes were detected between both populations. Conclusions : The current study presents a new approach to the research of cSDH. The measurements presented us with new data, which, to date, are without any reference values. Therefore, it is difficult to interpret the information, and our conclusions should be considered to be only speculative. The results do, however, point in the direction of impaired fatty acid oxidation for cases with later recurrence. As fatty acid oxidation plays an important role in inflammatory energy metabolism, the results suggest that inflammatory processes could be aggravated in cases with recurrence. Because our findings are neither proven through further analyses nor offer an obvious therapy option, their implications would not change everyday practice in the management of cSDH. They do, however, present a further possibility of research that might, in the future, be relevant to the therapy.

Previous studies suggest that the topological properties of structural and functional neural networks in glioma patients are altered beyond the tumor location. These alterations are due to the dynamic interactions with large-scale neural circuits. Understanding and describing these interactions may be an important step towards deciphering glioma disease evolution. In this study, we analyze structural and functional brain networks in terms of determining the correlation between network robustness and topological features regarding the default-mode network (DMN), comparing prognostically differing patient groups to healthy controls. We determine the driver nodes of these networks, which are receptive to outside signals, and the critical nodes as the most important elements for controllability since their removal will dramatically affect network controllability. Our results suggest that network controllability and robustness of the DMN is decreased in glioma patients. We found losses of driver and critical nodes in patients, especially in the prognostically less favorable IDH wildtype (IDHwt) patients, which might reflect lesion-induced network disintegration. On the other hand, topological shifts of driver and critical nodes, and even increases in the number of critical nodes, were observed mainly in IDH mutated (IDHmut) patients, which might relate to varying degrees of network plasticity accompanying the chronic disease course in some of the patients, depending on tumor growth dynamics. We hereby implement a novel approach for further exploring disease evolution in brain cancer under the aspects of neural network controllability and robustness in glioma patients.

Despite available, advanced pharmacological and behavioral therapies, refractory chronic facial pain of different origins still poses a therapeutic challenge. In circumstances where there is insufficient responsiveness to pharmacological/behavioral therapies, deep brain stimulation should be considered as a potential effective treatment option. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis including searches on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (2000-2022). The primary endpoint was the change in pain intensity (visual analogue scale; VAS) at a defined time-point of ≤3 months post-DBS. In addition, correlation and regression analyses were performed to identify predictive markers (age, duration of pain, frequency, amplitude, intensity, contact configuration, and the DBS target). A total of seven trials consisting of 54 screened patients met the inclusion criteria. DBS significantly reduced the pain levels after 3 months without being related to a specific DBS target, age, contact configuration, stimulation intensity, frequency, amplitude, or chronic pain duration. Adverse events were an infection or lead fracture (19%), stimulation-induced side effects (7%), and three deaths (unrelated to DBS-from cancer progression or a second stroke). Although comparable long-term data are lacking, the current published data indicate that DBS (thalamic and PVG/PAG) effectively suppresses facial pain in the short-term. However, the low-quality evidence, reporting bias, and placebo effects must be considered in future randomized-controlled DBS trials for facial pain.

An increasing body of experimental evidence implicates a relationship between immunometabolic deterioration and the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD) with a dysregulation of central and peripheral neuroinflammatory networks mediated by circulating adipokines, in particular leptin. We screened the current literature on the role of adipokines in PD. Hence, we searched known databases (PubMed, MEDLINE/OVID) and reviewed original and review articles using the following terms: "leptin/ObR", "Parkinson's disease", "immune-metabolism", "biomarkers" and "neuroinflammation". Focusing on leptin, we summarize and discuss the existing in vivo and in vitro evidence on how adipokines may be protective against neurodegeneration, but at the same time contribute to the progression of PD. These components of the adipose brain axis represent a hitherto underestimated pathway to study systemic influences on dopaminergic degeneration. In addition, we give a comprehensive update on the potential of adjunctive therapeutics in PD targeting leptin, leptin-receptors, and associated pathways. Further experimental and clinical trials are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of action and the value of central and peripheral adipose-immune-metabolism molecular phenotyping in order to develop and validate the differential roles of different adipokines as potential therapeutic target for PD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Huntington's Disease as progressive neurological disorders associated with motor, behavioral, and cognitive impairment poses a therapeutic challenge in case of limited responsiveness to established therapeutics. Pallidal deep brain stimulation and neurorestorative strategies (brain grafts) scoping to modulate fronto-striatal circuits have gained increased recognition for the treatment of refractory Huntington's disease (HD)., Areas Covered: A review (2000-2022) was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library covering clinical trials conceptualized to determine the efficacy and safety of invasive, stereotactic-guided deep-brain stimulation and intracranial brain-graft injection targeting the globus pallidus and adjunct structures (striatum)., Expert Opinion: Stereotactic brain-grafting strategies were performed in few HD patients with inconsistent findings and mild-to-moderate clinical responsiveness with a recently published large, randomized-controlled trial (NCT00190450) yielding negative results. We identified 19 in-human DBS trials (uncontrolled) targeting the globus pallidus internus/externus along with randomized-controlled trial pending report (NCT02535884). We did not detect any significant changes in the UHDRS total score after restorative injections, while in contrast, the use of deep-brain stimulation resulted in a significant reduction of chorea. GPi-DBS should be considered in cases where selective chorea is present. However, both invasive therapies remain experimental and are not ready for the implementation in clinical use.

The human hand possesses a large number of degrees of freedom. Hand dexterity is encoded by the discharge times of spinal motor units (MUs). Most of our knowledge on the neural control of movement is based on the discharge times of MUs during isometric contractions. Here we designed a noninvasive framework to study spinal motor neurons during dynamic hand movements with the aim to understand the neural control of MUs during sinusoidal hand digit flexion and extension at different rates of force development. The framework included 320 high-density surface EMG electrodes placed on the forearm muscles, with markerless 3D hand kinematics extracted with deep learning, and a realistic virtual hand that displayed the motor tasks. The movements included flexion and extension of individual hand digits at two different speeds (0.5 Hz and 1.5 Hz) for 40 seconds. We found on average 4.7±1.7 MUs across participants and tasks. Most MUs showed a biphasic pattern closely mirroring the flexion and extension kinematics. Indeed, a factor analysis method (non-negative matrix factorization) was able to learn the two components (flexion/extension) with high accuracy at the individual MU level ( R=0.87±0.12). Although most MUs were highly correlated with either flexion or extension movements, there was a smaller proportion of MUs that was not task-modulated and controlled by a different neural module (7.1% of all MUs with ). This work shows a noninvasive visually guided framework to study motor neurons controlling the movement of the hand in human participants during dynamic hand digit movements.

Chronic pain (CP) represents a socio-economic burden for affected patients along with therapeutic challenges for currently available therapies. When conventional therapies fail, modulation of the affective pain matrix using reversible deep brain stimulation (DBS) or targeted irreversible thalamotomy by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and magnetic resonance (MR)-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) appear to be considerable treatment options. We performed a literature search for clinical trials targeting the affective pain circuits (thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex [ACC], ventral striatum [VS]/internal capsule [IC]). PubMed, Ovid, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched (1990-2021) using the terms "chronic pain", "deep brain stimulation", "stereotactic radiosurgery", "radioneuromodulation", "MR-guided focused ultrasound", "affective pain modulation", "pain attention". In patients with CP treated with DBS, SRS or MRgFUS the somatosensory thalamus and periventricular/periaquaeductal grey was the target of choice in most treated subjects, while affective pain transmission was targeted in a considerably lower number (DBS, SRS) consisting of the following nodi of the limbic pain matrix: the anterior cingulate cortex; centromedian-parafascicularis of the thalamus, pars posterior of the central lateral nucleus and internal capsule/ventral striatum. Although DBS, SRS and MRgFUS promoted a meaningful and sustained pain relief, an effective, evidence-based comparative analysis is biased by heterogeneity of the observation period varying between 3 months and 5 years with different stimulation patterns (monopolar/bipolar contact configuration; frequency 10-130 Hz; intensity 0.8-5 V; amplitude 90-330 μs), source and occurrence of lesioning (radiation versus ultrasound) and chronic pain ethology (poststroke pain, plexus injury, facial pain, phantom limb pain, back pain). The advancement of neurotherapeutics (MRgFUS) and novel DBS targets (ACC, IC/VS), along with established and effective stereotactic therapies (DBS-SRS), increases therapeutic options to impact CP by modulating affective, pain-attentional neural transmission. Differences in trial concept, outcome measures, targets and applied technique promote conflicting findings and limited evidence. Hence, we advocate to raise awareness of the potential therapeutic usefulness of each approach covering their advantages and disadvantages, including such parameters as invasiveness, risk-benefit ratio, reversibility and responsiveness., (© 2022. The Author(s).)