Search

Background: Hip fractures are a common and debilitating condition, particularly among older adults. Loss of muscle mass and strength is a common consequence of hip fractures, which further contribute to functional decline and increased disability. Assessing changes in individual thigh muscles volume in follow-up patients can provide valuable insights into the quantitative recovery process and guide rehabilitation interventions. However, accurately measuring anatomical individual thigh muscle volume can be challenging due to various, labor intensive and time-consuming. Materials and Methods: This study aimed to evaluate differences in thigh muscle volume in followed-up hip fracture patients computed tomography (CT) scans using an AI based automatic muscle segmentation model. The study included a total of 18 patients at Gyeongsang National University, who had undergone surgical treatment for a hip fracture. We utilized the automatic segmentation algorithm which we have already developed using UNETR (U-net Transformer) architecture, performance dice score = 0.84, relative absolute volume difference 0.019 ± 0.017%. Results: The results revealed intertrochanteric fractures result in more significant muscle volume loss (females: −97.4 cm3, males: –178.2 cm3) compared to femoral neck fractures (females: −83 cm3, males: −147.2 cm3). Additionally, the study uncovered substantial disparities in the susceptibility to volume loss among specific thigh muscles, including the Vastus lateralis, Adductor longus and brevis, and Gluteus maximus, particularly in cases of intertrochanteric fractures. Conclusions: The use of an automatic muscle segmentation model based on deep learning algorithms enables efficient and accurate analysis of thigh muscle volume differences in followed up hip fracture patients. Our findings emphasize the significant muscle loss tied to sarcopenia, a critical condition among the elderly. Intertrochanteric fractures resulted in greater muscle volume deformities, especially in key muscle groups, across both genders. Notably, while most muscles exhibited volume reduction following hip fractures, the sartorius, vastus and gluteus groups demonstrated more significant disparities in individuals who sustained intertrochanteric fractures. This non-invasive approach provides valuable insights into the extent of muscle atrophy following hip fracture and can inform targeted rehabilitation interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Latissimus dorsi muscle flaps are widely utilized in breast reconstruction. Several methods have been introduced. Objectives The aim was to compare the outcomes of robot-assisted breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi muscle flap following partial mastectomy with the outcomes of conventional and endoscopic-assisted techniques. Methods In this prospective single-institution study, Korean females diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent partial mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap from March 2020 to December 2021 were included. The outcomes of surgery and patient satisfaction utilizing the conventional, endoscopic-assisted, and robot-assisted techniques were compared. Results In total, 57 patients were included in this study, among whom 20 underwent conventional reconstruction, and 17 and 20 patients underwent endoscopic and robotic surgery, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 methods in postoperative opioid analgesic dosage (P =.459), hospitalization period (P =.225), or the average total amount of donor site drainage during hospitalization (P =.175). With regard to patient satisfaction after surgery, especially regarding the donor site scar, the conventional method showed a significantly lower score than the other 2 techniques. Conclusions Robot-assisted breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi muscle flap after partial mastectomy showed higher patient satisfaction than that for the conventional open method. Because robotic surgery is more convenient than the endoscopic technique, it is potentially a good alternative to conventional open or endoscopic surgery. Level of Evidence: 4 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]