Search

Your search keyword '"Kienlin, Simone"' showing total 40 results
Start Over Author "Kienlin, Simone"
40 results on '"Kienlin, Simone"'

4. Co-production of a systematic review on decision coaching: a mixed methods case study within a review.

Author

Jull, Janet, Smith, Maureen, Carley, Meg, Stacey, Dawn, Graham, Ian D., The Cochrane Decision Coaching Review Team, Boland, Laura, Dun, Sandra, Dwyer, Andrew A., Finderup, Jeanette, Kasper, Jürgen, Kienlin, Simone, Köpke, Sascha, Légaré, France, Lewis, Krystina, Rahn, Anne Christin, Rutherford, Claudia, and Zhao, Junqiang

Subjects
CAREGIVERS, RESEARCH personnel
Abstract

Background: Co-production is a collaborative approach to prepare, plan, conduct, and apply research with those who will use or be impacted by research (knowledge users). Our team of knowledge users and researchers sought to conduct and evaluate co-production of a systematic review on decision coaching. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods case study within a review to describe team co-production of a systematic review. We used the Collaborative Research Framework to support an integrated knowledge translation approach to guide a team through the steps in co-production of a systematic review. The team agreed to conduct self-study as a study within a review to learn from belonging to a co-production research team. A core group that includes a patient partner developed and conducted the study within a review. Data sources were surveys and documents. The study coordinator administered surveys to determine participant preferred and actual levels of engagement, experiences, and perceptions. We included frequency counts, content, and document analysis. Results: We describe co-production of a systematic review. Of 17 team members, 14 (82%) agreed to study participation and of those 12 (86%) provided data pre- and post-systematic review. Most participants identified as women (n = 9, 75.0%), researchers (n = 7, 58%), trainees (n = 4, 33%), and/or clinicians (n = 2, 17%) with two patient/caregiver partners (17%). The team self-organized study governance with an executive and Steering Committee and agreed on research co-production actions and strategies. Satisfaction for engagement in the 11 systematic review steps ranged from 75 to 92%, with one participant who did not respond to any of the questions (8%) for all. Participants reported positive experiences with team communication processes (n = 12, 100%), collaboration (n = 12, 100%), and negotiation (n = 10–12, 83–100%). Participants perceived the systematic review as co-produced (n = 12, 100%) with collaborative (n = 8, 67%) and engagement activities to characterize co-production (n = 8, 67%). Participants indicated that they would not change the co-production approach (n = 8, 66%). Five participants (42%) reported team logistics challenges and four (33%) were unaware of challenges. Conclusions: Our results indicate that it is feasible to use an integrated knowledge translation approach to conduct a systematic review. We demonstrate the importance of a relational approach to research co-production, and that it is essential to plan and actively support team engagement in the research lifecycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Determinants of practice for providing decision coaching to facilitate informed values-based decision-making: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review

Author

Berger-Höger, Birte, primary, Lewis, Krystina B, additional, Cherry, Katherine, additional, Finderup, Jeanette, additional, Gunderson, Janet, additional, Kaden, Jana, additional, Kienlin, Simone, additional, Rahn, Anne C, additional, Sikora, Lindsey, additional, Stacey, Dawn, additional, Steckelberg, Anke, additional, and Zhao, Junqiang, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Additional file 1 of Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review

Author

Zhao, Junqiang, Jull, Janet, Finderup, Jeanette, Smith, Maureen, Kienlin, Simone Maria, Rahn, Anne Christin, Dunn, Sandra, Aoki, Yumi, Brown, Leanne, Harvey, Gillian, and Stacey, Dawn

Abstract

Additional file 1: Appendix A: Demographic of executive and stakeholder group members. Appendix B: Initial program theory. Appendix C: Relevance rating checklist. Appendix D: Data extraction form.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Opplæring i samvalg til sykepleiere i en master- og videreutdanning.

Author

Kienlin, Simone, Amro, Amin, Øverlie, Anne, and Kasper, Jürgen

Abstract

Copyright of Norwegian Journal of Clinical Nursing / Sykepleien Forskning is the property of Sykepleien Forskning and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions

Author

Jull, Janet, additional, Köpke, Sascha, additional, Smith, Maureen, additional, Carley, Meg, additional, Finderup, Jeanette, additional, Rahn, Anne C, additional, Boland, Laura, additional, Dunn, Sandra, additional, Dwyer, Andrew A, additional, Kasper, Jürgen, additional, Kienlin, Simone Maria, additional, Légaré, France, additional, Lewis, Krystina B, additional, Lyddiatt, Anne, additional, Rutherford, Claudia, additional, Zhao, Junqiang, additional, Rader, Tamara, additional, Graham, Ian D, additional, and Stacey, Dawn, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Interventions to Improve Trainers' Learning and Behaviors for Educating Health care Professionals Using Train-the-Trainer Method

Author

Poitras, Marie-Eve, primary, Bélanger, Emilie, additional, Vaillancourt, Vanessa T., additional, Kienlin, Simone, additional, Körner, Mirjam, additional, Godbout, Isabelle, additional, Bernard-Hamel, Joelle, additional, O'Connor, Sarah, additional, Blanchette, Patricia, additional, Khadhraoui, Lobna, additional, Sawadogo, Jasmine, additional, Massougbodji, José, additional, Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon, additional, Gallani, Maria-Cecilia, additional, Stacey, Dawn, additional, and Légaré, France, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions

Author

Jull, Janet, Koepke, Sascha, Smith, Maureen, Carley, Meg, Finderup, Jeanette, Rahn, Anne C., Boland, Laura, Dunn, Sandra, Dwyer, Andrew A., Kasper, Jurgen, Kienlin, Simone Maria, Legare, France, Lewis, Krystina B., Lyddiatt, Anne, Rutherford, Claudia, Zhao, Junqiang, Rader, Tamara, Graham, Ian D., Stacey, Dawn, Jull, Janet, Koepke, Sascha, Smith, Maureen, Carley, Meg, Finderup, Jeanette, Rahn, Anne C., Boland, Laura, Dunn, Sandra, Dwyer, Andrew A., Kasper, Jurgen, Kienlin, Simone Maria, Legare, France, Lewis, Krystina B., Lyddiatt, Anne, Rutherford, Claudia, Zhao, Junqiang, Rader, Tamara, Graham, Ian D., and Stacey, Dawn

Abstract

Background Decision coaching is non -directive support delivered by a healthcare provider to help patients prepare to actively participate in making a hea[th decision. 'Healthcare providers' are considered to be aEl people who are engaged in actions whose primary intent is to protect and improve health (e.g. nurses, doctors, pharmacists, social workers, health support vvorkers such as peer health workers). Little is known about the effectiveness of decision coaching. Objectives To determine the effects of decision coaching (I) for people facing healthcare decisions for themselves or a family member (P) compared to (C) usual care or evidence -based intervention only, on outcomes (0) related to preparation for decision making, decisional needs and potential adverse effects. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CI NAHL (Ebsco), Nursing and Allied Health Source (ProQuest), and Web of Science from database inception to June 2021. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where the intervention was provided to adults or children preparing to make a treatment or screening healthcare decision for themselves or a family member. Decision coaching was defined as: a) delivered individually by a healthcare provider who istrained or using a protocol; and b) providing non -directive support and preparing an adult or child to participate in a healthcare decision. Comparisons included usual care or an alternate intervention. There were no language restrictions. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data on characteristics of the intervention(s) and outcomes. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion to reach consensus. We used the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the measures of treatment effect and, where possible, sy

Published
2021

26. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions

Author

Jull, Janet, primary, Köpke, Sascha, additional, Boland, Laura, additional, Coulter, Angela, additional, Dunn, Sandra, additional, Graham, Ian D, additional, Hutton, Brian, additional, Kasper, Jürgen, additional, Kienlin, Simone Maria, additional, Légaré, France, additional, Lewis, Krystina B, additional, Lyddiatt, Anne, additional, Osaka, Wakako, additional, Rader, Tamara, additional, Rahn, Anne C, additional, Rutherford, Claudia, additional, Smith, Maureen, additional, and Stacey, Dawn, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

27. Additional file 4: of The development and feasibility of a personal health-optimization system for people with bipolar disorder

Author

Eiring, Øystein, Nytrøen, Kari, Kienlin, Simone, Khodambashi, Soudabeh, and Nylenna, Magne

Abstract

Questionnaire and answers. SUS scores. The questionnaire used in the summative test and the answers. The answers relate to a 5-points Likert scale where the categories “strongly agree” and “agree”, and the categories “strongly disagree” and disagree”, are aggregated. (DOCX 89 kb)

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Additional file 8: of The development and feasibility of a personal health-optimization system for people with bipolar disorder

Author

Eiring, Øystein, Nytrøen, Kari, Kienlin, Simone, Khodambashi, Soudabeh, and Nylenna, Magne

Abstract

User interface examples. Examples of user interfaces in the system. SUS: system usability scale; SD: standard deviation. Page 1. The patient’s treatment plan, and two panels presenting adherence to medicines and lifestyle measures the last week. Page 2. Panels showing results over time allow patients and clinicians to inspect the results of treatment and a number of variables on the patient’s health. In this example, how the patient is doing is compared to her diary for those days and to alcohol use. The timespan can be up to 1 year. Current treatment and switches in treatment are shown at the top. Page 3. The uppermost panel presents a ranking of treatment options, dynamically modified based on the relative importance of the outcomes entered by the patients. The lower panel allows direct comparison of what to expect from all treatment options, selected from drop-down menus. Page 4. The Statistics page presents all results for any given treatment plan for the time it was in use. (PDF 790 kb)

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Additional file 5: of The development and feasibility of a personal health-optimization system for people with bipolar disorder

Author

ØYstein Eiring, NytrøEn, Kari, Kienlin, Simone, Khodambashi, Soudabeh, and Nylenna, Magne

Abstract

System usability scale.doc. pdf,.xls,.txt,.pptx (including name and a URL of an appropriate viewer if format is unusual). The System Usability Scale. The System Usability Scale applied in this study. (DOCX 86Â kb)

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

32. Additional file 7: of The development and feasibility of a personal health-optimization system for people with bipolar disorder

Author

Eiring, Øystein, Nytrøen, Kari, Kienlin, Simone, Khodambashi, Soudabeh, and Nylenna, Magne

Abstract

Module uses. Use of the system modules in different contexts. The first figure shows which modules of the system are integrated using MCDA, the second modules relevant in n = 1 trials, the third the modules relevant in one-off decisions as opposed to ongoing follow-up, and the forth the modules relevant when the system is used without predefined evidence. (PDF 1978 kb)

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. Clean care is safer care

Author

Kienlin, Simone Maria and Stårvik, Trine Lise

Subjects
håndhygiene, smittevern, isolering, barneavdelinger, RS-virus, infeksjoner, gastroenteritt, VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Nursing science: 808, forebygging, hygiene, smittekjeder, smitte, somatiske sykehus, infeksjonskontrollprogrammer
Abstract

Bachelor i sykepleie, 2012 Problemstilling: Hvordan bryte smittekjeden på en barneavdeling? Avgrensing og presisering av oppgaven: Barneavdelinger kan være en arena for smittespredning, således finnes det mange muligheter og utfordringer for å forhindre spredning av smitte. Vi har beskrevet infeksjonskontrollprogrammet i oppgaven, men på grunn av oppgavens omfang velger vi å begrense oss til tiltakene håndhygiene, alminnelig renhold og veiledning i smitteprofylakse for bryte smittekjeden, selv om vi ser klart at det finnes flere andre tiltak man er avhengig av. Innenfor dette vektlegger vi hvordan man forebygger smitte ved riktig håndtering av leker på avdelingen, samt veiledning av pårørende og deres barn. For å vise til noen eksempler på smittsomme infeksjoner har vi valgt å ta med informasjon om RS-virus og gastroenteritt. Et infeksjonskontrollprogram omfatter registrering av helsetjenesteassosierte infeksjoner, under dette registreres ikke RS-virus og gastroenteritt som en slik infeksjon. Men fordi smitten skjer under et sykehusopphold regnes det likevel som en slik infeksjon, selv om det ikke blir registrert (Helsedepartementet, 2004). Selv om påvist infeksjon med både RS-virus og gastroenteritt krever et isoleringsregime velger vi å begrense oss til ikke å utdype hva isoleringen innebærer for både barnet og de pårørende. Når det gjelder alderen på barna har vi valgt ut aldersgruppen 3 til 6 år. Vi har valgt denne alderen fordi vi ville skrive om barn man kan kommunisere med på en slik måte at de kan veiledes i enkelte ting. Samtidig som de er så små at de er avhengig av foreldrene sine.

Published
2012

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results