Search

Objectif: Résumer les données probantes actuelles et formuler des recommandations pour la surveillance prénatale du bien-être fœtal afin de détecter les facteurs de risque périnatal et toute potentielle décompensation fœtale et de permettre une intervention rapide en prévention de la morbidité et la mortalité périnatales., Population Cible: Personnes enceintes avec ou sans facteurs maternels, fœtaux ou gravidiques associés à des risques périnataux et à la décompensation fœtale., Options: Utiliser des examens prénataux par technologie de base et/ou avancée en fonction des facteurs de risque de décompensation fœtale. RéSULTATS: La reconnaissance précoce de toute décompensation fœtale potentielle permet d'intervenir de façon à favoriser l'adaptation fœtale pour maintenir le bien-être ou à accélérer l'accouchement. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Chez les personnes enceintes ayant des facteurs de risque périnatal confirmés, la surveillance du bien-être fœtal contribue à réduire le risque d'issue défavorable. Compte tenu du taux élevé de faux positifs, la surveillance du bien-être fœtal peut augmenter le risque d'interventions inutiles, ce qui peut avoir des effets nuisibles, dont l'anxiété parentale, l'accouchement prématuré ou assisté et l'utilisation accrue des ressources de soins de santé. L'optimisation des protocoles de surveillance d'après des pratiques fondées sur des données probantes peut améliorer les issues périnatales et réduire les effets nuisibles. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données Medline, PubMed, Embase et Cochrane Library, de leur création jusqu'à janvier 2022, à partir de termes MeSH et de mots clés liés à la grossesse, à la surveillance fœtale, aux mouvements fœtaux, à la mortinaissance, aux complications de grossesse et à l'échographie fœtale. Le présent document est un résumé des données probantes et non pas une revue méthodologique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les membres de l'équipe de soins qui prodiguent des soins ou donnent de l'information aux patientes en obstétrique, notamment les spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle, les obstétriciens, les médecins de famille, les sages-femmes, les infirmières, les infirmières praticiennes et les radiologistes. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To summarize the current evidence and to make recommendations for antenatal fetal health surveillance (FHS) to detect perinatal risk factors and potential fetal decompensation in the antenatal period and to allow for timely intervention to prevent perinatal morbidity and/or mortality., Target Population: Pregnant individuals with or without maternal, fetal, or pregnancy-associated perinatal risk factors for antenatal fetal decompensation., Options: To use basic and/or advanced antenatal testing modalities, based on risk factors for potential fetal decompensation., Outcomes: Early identification of potential fetal decompensation allows for interventions that may support fetal adaptation to maintain well-being or expedite delivery., Benefits, Harms, and Costs: Antenatal FHS in pregnant individuals with identified perinatal risk factors may reduce the chance of adverse outcomes. Given the high false-positive rate, FHS may increase unnecessary interventions, which may result in harm, including parental anxiety, premature or operative birth, and increased use of health care resources. Optimization of surveillance protocols based on evidence-informed practice may improve perinatal outcomes and reduce harm., Evidence: Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2022, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and key words related to pregnancy, fetal monitoring, fetal movement, stillbirth, pregnancy complications, and fetal sonography. This document represents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review., Validation Methods: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations)., Intended Audience: All health care team members who provide care for or education to obstetrical patients, including maternal fetal medicine specialists, obstetricians, family physicians, midwives, nurses, nurse practitioners, and radiologists., Summary Statements: RECOMMENDATIONS., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

There is currently a shortage of fetal scalp electrodes because of a recent recall due to concerns about the breakage of the electrode tip with possible injury to the neonate. Although the recall is presumably intended to improve safety, the resulting shortage of fetal scalp electrodes poses risks to patients because of inadequate fetal heart rate monitoring in cases where an adequate signal cannot be obtained with external fetal monitoring and/or when maternal heart rate artifact cannot be resolved by repositioning of transducers and application of a maternal pulse oximeter., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectif: Améliorer les issues périnatales et réduire au minimum le risque d'erreurs chez les fournisseurs en améliorant leurs connaissances sur les stratégies de détection des artéfacts de la fréquence cardiaque maternelle per partum et sur les modes d'intervention lorsque de tels artéfacts sont soupçonnés., Population Cible: Toutes les parturientes., Options: L'artéfact de la fréquence cardiaque maternelle peut être détecté à l'aide de caractéristiques cliniques ou de la technologie. On peut évaluer l'artéfact de la fréquence cardiaque maternelle soupçonné en posant une électrode de cuir chevelu fœtal (option à privilégier) ou en recourant à la surveillance fœtale externe optimisée par l'échographie au chevet (solution de rechange). RéSULTATS: Les artéfacts de la fréquence cardiaque maternelle per partum non détectés augmentent le risque que des rythmes anormaux ou atypiques de la fréquence cardiaque fœtale passent inaperçus, ce qui augmente le risque d'issues périnatales défavorables. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'artéfact de la fréquence cardiaque maternelle non détecté peut entraîner de graves issues périnatales défavorables (encéphalopathie hypoxo-ischémique, mort fœtale et mort néonatale) et des issues maternelles défavorables (césarienne injustifiée ou accouchement assisté). Ces issues peuvent être évitées par la détection rapide d'un tel artéfact. Le coût de la détection précoce des artéfacts de fréquence cardiaque maternelle est relativement faible (utilisation accrue des électrodes de cuir chevelu fœtal et de l'échographie au chevet avec évaluations supplémentaires par le fournisseur de soins). La réduction des événements périnataux défavorables engendre des économies considérables. Les risques sont : faux positifs d'artéfact de la fréquence cardiaque maternelle; accélération inutile de l'accouchement lorsque l'état du fœtus est normal, mais qu'on ne peut le déterminer de façon fiable; et les rares complications associées à l'utilisation accrue des électrodes de cuir chevelu fœtal. DONNéES PROBANTES: Deux recherches ont été effectuées dans PubMed. La première a été réalisée pour répertorier les articles publiés entre le 1 er janvier 1970 et le 25 novembre 2021 à partir des termes MeSH fetal monitoring et artifacts (38 articles); la deuxième, pour répertorier les articles publiés au cours de la même période à partir des termes MeSH fetal monitoring et maternal heart rate (841 articles). MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To improve perinatal outcomes and minimize provider error by increasing awareness of strategies to detect intrapartum maternal heart rate artefact and to respond when such artefact is suspected., Target Population: All pregnant patients during labour., Options: Maternal heart rate artefact may be detected based on clinical features or through technology. Suspected maternal heart rate artefact may be assessed by applying a fetal scalp electrode (preferred) or through external fetal monitoring, augmented by point-of-care sonography (alternative)., Outcomes: Unrecognized intrapartum maternal heart rate artefact increases the risk that abnormal/atypical fetal heart rate patterns will go undetected and, hence, the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes., Benefits, Harms, and Costs: Unrecognized maternal heart rate artefact can lead to adverse perinatal outcomes (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, fetal death, and neonatal death) and adverse maternal outcomes (unnecessary cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery). Timely recognition of such artefact may avoid these adverse outcomes. The costs of early recognition of maternal heart rate artefact are relatively small: increased use of fetal scalp electrodes and point-of-care sonography, as well as additional assessments by the health care provider. The cost savings are significant, as a result of lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Potential harms are false-positive diagnoses of maternal heart rate artefact, expediting delivery unnecessarily when the fetal status cannot be reliably determined but is normal, and the rare complications associated with increased use of fetal scalp electrodes., Evidence: Two PubMed searches were completed. The first was for articles published between January 1, 1970, and November 25, 2021, using the medical subject headings (MeSH) "fetal monitoring" and "artifacts" (38 articles). The second was for articles published during the same period using the MeSH "fetal monitoring" and "maternal heart rate" (841 articles)., Validation Methods: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations)., Intended Audience: All health care providers involved in obstetrical care., Summary Statements: RECOMMENDATIONS., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Health care team training and simulation-based education are important for preparing obstetrical services to meet the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Priorities for training are identified in two key areas. First, the impact of infection prevention and control protocols on processes of care (e.g., appropriate and correct use of personal protective equipment, patient transport, preparation for emergency cesarean delivery with the potential for emergency intubation, management of simultaneous obstetric emergencies, delivery in alternate locations in the hospital, potential for increased decision-to-delivery intervals, and communication with patients). And second, the effects of COVID-19 pathophysiology on obstetrical patients (e.g., testing and diagnosis, best use of modified obstetric early warning systems, approach to maternal respiratory compromise, collaboration with critical care teams, and potential need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation). However, such training is more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the requirements for social distancing. This article outlines strategies (spatial, temporal, video-recording, video-conferencing, and virtual) to effectively engage in health care team training and simulation-based education while maintaining social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic., (Copyright © 2020 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Maternal heart rate artefact is a signal processing error whereby the fetal heart rate is masked by the maternal pulse, potentially leading to danger by failure to recognize an abnormal fetal heart rate or a pre-existing fetal death. Maternal heart rate artefact may be exacerbated by autocorrelation algorithms in modern fetal monitors due to smooth transitions between maternal and fetal heart rates rather than breaks in the tracing. In response, manufacturers of cardiotocography monitors recommend verifying fetal life prior to monitoring and have developed safeguards including signal ambiguity detection technologies to simultaneously and continuously monitor the maternal and fetal heart rates. However, these safeguards are not emphasized in current cardiotocography clinical practice guidelines, potentially leading to a patient safety gap., Methods: The United States Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was reviewed for records with event type "Death" for the time period March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2019, in combination with search terms selected to capture all cases reported involving cardiotocography devices. Records were reviewed to determine whether maternal heart rate artefact was probable and/or whether the report contained a recommendation from the device manufacturer regarding maternal heart rate artefact., Results: Forty-seven cases of perinatal mortality were identified with probable maternal heart rate artefact including 14 with antepartum fetal death prior to initiation of cardiotocography, 14 with intrapartum fetal death or neonatal death after initiation of cardiotocography, and 19 where the temporal relationship between initiation of cardiotocography and death cannot be definitively established from the report. In 29 cases, there was a recommendation from the manufacturer regarding diagnosis and/or management of maternal heart rate artefact., Conclusions: This case series indicates a recurring problem with undetected maternal heart rate artefact leading to perinatal mortality and, in cases of pre-existing fetal death, healthcare provider confusion. In response, manufacturers frequently recommend safeguards which are found in their device's instructions for use but not in major intrapartum cardiotocography guidelines. Cardiotocography guidelines should be updated to include the latest safeguards against the risks of maternal heart rate artefact. An additional file summarizing key points for clinicians is included.

The objective of this randomized, controlled trial was to assess whether voluntary participation in a proctored, proficiency-based, virtual reality robotic suturing curriculum using the da Vinci(®) Skills Simulator™ improves robotic suturing performance. Residents and attending surgeons were randomized to participation or non-participation during a 5 week training curriculum. Robotic suturing skills were evaluated before and after training using an inanimate vaginal cuff model, which participants sutured for 10 min using the da Vinci(®) Surgical System. Performances were videotaped, anonymized, and subsequently graded independently by three robotic surgeons. 27 participants were randomized. 23 of the 27 completed both the pre- and post-test, 13 in the training group and 10 in the control group. Mean training time in the intervention group was 238 ± 136 min (SD) over the 5 weeks. The primary outcome (improvement in GOALS+ score) and the secondary outcomes (improvement in GEARS, total knots, satisfactory knots, and the virtual reality suture sponge 1 task) were significantly greater in the training group than the control group in unadjusted analysis. After adjusting for lower baseline scores in the training group, improvement in the suture sponge 1 task remained significantly greater in the training group and a trend was demonstrated to greater improvement in the training group for the GOALS+ score, GEARS score, total knots, and satisfactory knots.

Introduction: Pelvic lymphadenectomy is a key component of the surgical treatment of several gynecologic cancers and involves mastery of complex anatomic relationships. Our aim was to demonstrate that the anatomy relevant to robotic pelvic lymphadenectomy can be modeled using low-cost techniques, thereby enabling simulation focused on surgical dissection, a task that integrates technical skills and anatomic knowledge., Methods: A model of pelvic lymphadenectomy was constructed through experimentation with several different materials and a number of prototypes. In the final version, blood vessels were simulated by rubber tubing stented with wire and lymph nodes by cotton balls. Adipose and areolar tissue were simulated by a gelatin solution poured into the model and then allowed to cool and semisolidify. Three gynecologic oncologists and 2 gynecologic oncology fellows dissected the model using the surgical robot (da Vinci Surgical System) and completed a structured questionnaire. Five additional gynecologic oncologists assessed the model at a national conference., Results: The model received high ratings for face and content validity. Median ratings were almost all 4 of 5 or higher (range, 3-5). Participants who dissected the model (n = 5) unanimously rated it as "useful for training throughout residency and fellowship.", Conclusions: A novel low-cost inanimate model of pelvic lymphadenectomy has been developed and rated highly for face and content validity. This model may permit more regular simulation sessions compared with alternatives such as cadaveric dissection and animal laboratories, thereby complementing them and facilitating distributed practice.

Introduction: Low-cost laparoscopic box trainers built using home computers and webcams may provide residents with a useful tool for practice at home. This study set out to evaluate the image quality of low-cost laparoscopic box trainers compared with a commercially available model., Methods: Five low-cost laparoscopic box trainers including the components listed were compared in random order to one commercially available box trainer: A (high-definition USB 2.0 webcam, PC laptop), B (Firewire webcam, Mac laptop), C (high-definition USB 2.0 webcam, Mac laptop), D (standard USB webcam, PC desktop), E (Firewire webcam, PC desktop), and F (the TRLCD03 3-DMEd Standard Minimally Invasive Training System). Participants observed still image quality and performed a peg transfer task using each box trainer. Participants rated still image quality, image quality with motion, and whether the box trainer had sufficient image quality to be useful for training., Results: Sixteen residents in obstetrics and gynecology took part in the study. The box trainers showing no statistically significant difference from the commercially available model were A, B, C, D, and E for still image quality; A for image quality with motion; and A and B for usefulness of the simulator based on image quality. The cost of the box trainers A-E is approximately $100 to $160 each, not including a computer or laparoscopic instruments., Conclusions: Laparoscopic box trainers built from a high-definition USB 2.0 webcam with a PC (box trainer A) or from a Firewire webcam with a Mac (box trainer B) provide image quality comparable with a commercial standard.