Search

Background: Gender-affirming mastectomy is a fundamental step in the transition process of transmasculine patients following the initiation of hormone replacement therapy. Its perioperative management, however, remains underreported and controversial. In this study, a large series of mastectomies in transmen maintaining hormonal therapy is presented., Methods: Over a 10-year study period, a consecutive series of 180 transmasculine patients undergoing chest masculinizing surgery was evaluated. Demographical and surgical data were collected and analyzed for potential factors influencing outcome., Results: The overall rate of complications was 15.5%. Patients who underwent periareolar incision mastectomy were significantly more likely to develop any type of complication than patients with a sub-mammary incision (28.6% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.045). Hematoma was the most common reason for surgical revision. It occurred significantly more often among the periareolar group (21.4% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.041). Duration and type of hormonal therapy did not differ between patients with or without complications. In a multivariate regression analysis, smoking and type of incision were identified as significant predictors of the all-cause complication rate, whereas the influence of BMI and resection weight diminished after adjusting for confounding factors., Conclusion: There is scarcity of information concerning the influence of perioperative hormonal therapy in patients undergoing chest wall masculinization. The observed complication rates-with special regard to hematoma-were comparable to current reports; yet further research is needed to profoundly evaluate this topic and provide evidence-based recommendations for the perioperative management of HRT of transmasculine patients., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Phalloplasty is a crucial part of female-to-male genital gender-affirming surgery, however, up to date, there is still no standardized phalloplasty technique., Aim: To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of phalloplasties using the free radial forearm flap variations by Chang and Hwang vs by Gottlieb and Levine on a similar number of transgender patients., Methods: Between 2018 and 2020, 45 female to male transgender patients underwent phalloplasty using a neuro-microvascular free radial forearm flap in our department. Twenty patients underwent phalloplasty by the use of the Chang and Hwang design, whereas 25 patients were subjects to a phalloplasty according to Gottlieb and Levine technique. Patients' demographics, procedural characteristics, postoperative complications, and outcome of both groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared with each other., Results: Patients' demographics were similar in both groups. We did not observe relevant differences concerning postoperative complications comparing the two groups, except for the statistically significant lower rate of partial flap necrosis in the Gottlieb and Levine group. No statistically significant risk factors for an increase in complication rate could be identified. Urethral fistulas were the leading cause of revision., Clinical Implication: Optimizing a phalloplasty surgical technique and contributing to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty., Strengths & Limitation: This retrospective study presents the first comparison between the free radial forearm flap phalloplasty by Chang and Hwang and by Gottlieb and Levine performed at the same department on a similar number of transgender patients published so far., Conclusion: The Chang and Hwang design is associated with a lower rate of urologic complications (fistulas, stenosis) while the Gottlieb and Levine design has a statistically significant lower incidence of partial flap necrosis. Future prospective trials are needed to establish the gold standard in phalloplasty. Spennato S, Ederer IA., Borisov K et al. Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty in Female-to-Male Transsexuals - A Comparison Between Gottlieb and Levine's and Chang and Hwang's Technique. J Sex Med 2022;19:661-668., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Background: Mastectomy is an essential part of gender reassignment surgery for female-to-male transgender patients. Available studies indicate high patient satisfaction within this patient group; however, a standardised evaluation procedure is yet to be established., Method: Based on the BREAST-Q questionnaire, we developed a modified version targeting issues concerning FM patients; hence, all questions focussing on the physiology of biologically female patients were removed or tailored to address more specific transgender issues. Post-mastectomy transgender male patients from 1991 until 2017 were contacted and evaluated based on the questionnaire. This questionnaire comprises a total of 57 questions regarding general satisfaction with the ches area, as well as specific questions regarding satisfaction with the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and topics regarding expectations, regrets, self-confidence and sex life after mastectomy., Results: Overall, we found a high level of patient satisfaction after mastectomy. The level of regret was low and all patients would repeat mastectomy if needed., Conclusion: For most transgender males, mastectomy plays an essential role in gender reassignment surgery, overall leading to an improved quality of life for this patient population., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Post-bariatric patients present a surgical challenge within abdominoplasty because of residual obesity and major comorbidities. In this study, we analyzed complications following abdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients and evaluated potential risk factors associated with these complications., Objectives: The authors sought to determine the complications and risk factors following abdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients., Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent abdominoplasty was performed from January 2009 to December 2018 at our institution. Variables analyzed were sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, surgical technique, operative time, resection weight, drain output, and complications., Results: A total of 406 patients were included in this study (320 female and 86 male) with a mean age of 44.4 years and a BMI of 30.6 kg/m2. Abdominoplasty techniques consisted of traditional (64.3%), fleur-de-lis technique (27.3%), and panniculectomy without umbilical displacement (8.4%). Overall complications recorded were 41.9%, the majority of these being wound-healing problems (32%). Minor and major complications were found in 29.1% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. A BMI value of ≥30 kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk for wound-healing problems (P = 0.001). The frequency of total complications was significantly related to age (P = 0.007), BMI (P = 0.004), and resection weight (P = 0.001). Abdominoplasty technique tended to influence total complications., Conclusions: This study demonstrates in a fairly large sample of post-bariatric patients (n = 406) that abdominoplasty alone can be performed safely, with an acceptable complication rate. Age, BMI, and resection weight are shown to be significant risk factors for total complications. The role of surgical technique needs to be evaluated further., Level of Evidence: 4., (© 2020 The Aesthetic Society. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Wound-healing disorders are common complications in bilateral reduction mammaplasty. Traditional electrosurgical devices generate large amounts of thermal energy, often causing extensive thermal-related collateral tissue damage. This study aimed to retrospectively analyse the operative performance of a novel low-thermal plasma dissection device (pulsed electron avalanche knife-PEAK PlasmaBlade™) compared with traditional electrosurgery. Twenty patients with breast hypertrophy were randomly treated with PEAK PlasmaBlade™ on one breast and conventional electrosurgery on the other. Primary outcome measures were resection weight, drain duration, total drainage volume, and drain output on the first postoperative day. Breasts treated with PEAK PlasmaBlade™ had significantly higher resection weights (728.0 ± 460.1 g vs 661.6 ± 463.4 g; P = .038), significantly lower drain output on the first postoperative day (15.9 ± 15.2 mL vs 27.6 ± 23.5 mL; P = .023), and significantly lower drain durations (2.8 ± 1.0 days vs 3.3 ± 1.0 days; P = .030). Mean total drainage volume was lower where breast reduction was performed with PEAK PlasmaBlade™, but this difference was not significant. No major complications occurred, but wound-healing disorders were documented in almost one-third of the patients (35.0%, n = 7). The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ seems to be superior to conventional electrosurgery for bilateral reduction mammaplasty in terms of tissue damage and wound healing., (© 2020 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Subcutaneous mastectomy, the first step in sexual reassignment surgery of female-to-male transsexuals, is associated with high rates of complication and revision surgery. Also, conventional electrosurgery and the associated thermal tissue damage may compromise outcome. This retrospective randomised clinical study evaluated the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in comparison with conventional electrosurgery. A total of 17 female-to-male transsexuals undergoing mastectomy were randomised to PEAK PlasmaBlade on one breast side and to monopolar electrosurgery on the other side of the same patient. Wounds of 17 patients were examined histologically for acute thermal injury. Significantly less total volume of drain output (58.8 ± 37.4 mL vs 98.5 ± 76.4 mL; P = .012) was found on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side compared with the electrosurgery side. Duration of drain was significantly shorter on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side (2.5 ± 0.7 days vs 3.2 ± 0.6 days; P = .010). Furthermore, the PEAK PlasmaBlade side showed fewer thermal damages (41.2% vs 82.4%; P = .039) and thermal injury depth from PEAK PlasmaBlade side was less (3170 vs 4060 μm). PEAK PlasmaBlade appears to be superior to monopolar electrosurgery for mastectomy in female-to-male transsexuals, because it demonstrated less thermal tissue damage, less total volume of drain output, and shorter duration of drain, resulting in faster wound healing., (© 2020 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of a single-center series of penile reconstruction using the radial free forearm flap in rare indications., Materials and Methods: From April 1993 until September 2016, 23 nontranssexual patients underwent phallic reconstruction by the use of a neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap in our clinic. Patient-specific characteristics, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated and interpreted., Results: The indications for surgery were: disorders of sex development (34.8%), reconstruction after oncologic surgery (34.8%), automutilation (8.7%), iatrogenic (8.7%), microphallus (8.7%), and 1 case of priapism (4.3%). Two patients (8.7%) had a total flap necrosis and 2 patients (8.7%) had a partial flap necrosis; 3 out of these 4 patients were heavy smokers. Urinary fistulae and strictures were frequent but were successfully managed by urologists in all cases. There was no statistically significant correlation between smoking, comorbidities, number of venous anastomoses, and complications., Conclusion: In departments experienced in microsurgery, the goals of penile reconstruction could also be achieved in patients with rare indications by the use of the neuromicrovascular free radial forearm flap. Despite the high rate of postoperative complications, penile reconstruction with the free radial forearm flap yields satisfying results. An intensive cooperation between the plastic-reconstructive team and the urological team is a prerequisite to achieve the best surgical result., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Post-bariatric patients undergoing abdominoplasty have a relatively high risk of complications due to residual obesity and major comorbidities. Also, conventional electrosurgery and the associated thermal tissue damage may compromise outcomes. This retrospective randomised clinical study evaluated the effect of low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK [pulsed electron avalanche knife] PlasmaBlade) in comparison with conventional electrosurgery. A total of 52 post-bariatric patients undergoing abdominoplasty were randomised to PEAK PlasmaBlade (n = 26) and to monopolar electrosurgery (n = 26). Wounds of 20 patients per group were examined histologically for acute thermal injury depth. In PEAK PlasmaBlade incisions, acute thermal damage was significantly reduced compared with standard of care (40% vs 75%; P = .035). Also, acute thermal injury depth from PEAK PlasmaBlade was less than that from electrosurgery (2780 μm vs 4090 μm). Significantly less total complication rate (30.8% vs 69.2%; P = .012) was found by PEAK PlasmaBlade compared with electrosurgery. Moreover, the PEAK PlasmaBlade showed less than half as many wound healing problems (19.2% vs 46.2%; P = .075), far fewer secondary bleeding (7.7% vs 30.8%; P = .075), and no seroma compared with four seroma with the standard of care (0% vs 15.4%; P = .11). PEAK PlasmaBlade appears to be superior to traditional monopolar electrosurgery for post-bariatric abdominoplasty, because it demonstrated significantly less tissue damage, less total complication rate, and fewer postoperative seroma resulting in faster wound healing., (© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Thigh lift is a procedure used within the aesthetic as well as the post-bariatric field of surgery as it focuses on reducing excess lipodermal tissue within the medial thigh area. Depending on the specific area of excess tissue, common thigh lifting procedures include horizontal (H) and combined horizontal and vertical (HV) tissue reduction., Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was the analysis of outcome of H and HV thigh lift procedures, including evaluation of comorbidities and complications., Subjects and Methods: Over a 16-year period, all thigh lift procedures performed at our department were assessed for comorbidities and outcome through our hospital documentation system., Results: A total of 151 thigh lifts have been performed over 16 years. Of which, 124 were performed using the HV technique and 27 thigh lifts were performed using H tissue excision only. Of all the patients, 9 of 10 were female, the overall average age was 43 years. Approximately 48% of the HV group of patients had previously undergone bariatric surgery, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.3 kg/m 2 for this group. Around 19% of the H patient population had previously undergone bariatric surgery. This group had a mean BMI of 25.1kg/m 2 . Wound-associated problems occurred in 48%, for these patients, surgical revision was necessary for 12%. Remaining excess tissue was an issue for 20% of all patients, for this reason, 14% needed revision surgery. Age was found to be a significant cofactor for wound-associated complications ( P = 0.02) and nicotine abuse for scar-related problems ( P = 0.032)., Conclusion: The rate of overall complication for thigh lifts is high, although surgical revision rate is low. Remaining excess tissue and wound-associated problems are most common, possibly reflecting a too restrictive and radical surgical approach, respectively. Increasing BMI increases the risk for development of complications., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery.)

Background: Mastectomy in male transgender patients is an important (and often the first) step toward physical manhood. At our department, mastectomies in transgender patients have been performed for several decades., Methods: Recorded data were collected and analyzed for all male transgender patients undergoing mastectomy over a period of 24 years at our department., Results: In total, 268 gender-reassigning mastectomies were performed. Several different mastectomy techniques (areolar incision, n=172; sub-mammary incision, n=96) were used according to patients' habitus and breast features. Corresponding to algorithms presented in the current literature, certain breast qualities were matched with a particular mastectomy technique. Overall, small breasts with marginal ptosis and good skin elasticity allowed small areolar incisions as a method of access for glandular removal. In contrast, large breasts and those with heavy ptosis or poor skin elasticity often required larger incisions for breast amputation. The secondary correction rate (38%) was high for gender reassignment mastectomy, as is also reflected by data in the current literature. Secondary correction frequently involved revision of chest wall recontouring, suggesting inadequate removal of the mammary tissue, as well as scar revision, which may reflect intense traction during wound healing (36%). Secondary corrections were performed more often after using small areolar incision techniques (48%) than after using large sub-mammary incisions (21%)., Conclusions: Choosing the suitable mastectomy technique for each patient requires careful individual evaluation of breast features such as size, degree of ptosis, and skin elasticity in order to maximize patient satisfaction and minimize secondary revisions.

Postoperative wound-healing problems are relatively high in post-bariatric body-contouring procedures, partly because of electrosurgery and the associated thermal tissue damage. This study is a retrospective randomised evaluation of the effect of a low-thermal plasma dissection device (PEAK PlasmaBlade, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in comparison with conventional electrosurgery. A total of 24 patients undergoing upper arm or medial thigh lifting were randomised to PEAK PlasmaBlade on one side and to monopolar electrosurgery on the other side of the same patient. Wounds of 10 patients were examined histologically for acute thermal injury depth. Significantly lower total volume of drain output (61,1 ± 70,2 mL versus 95,1 ± 176,0 mL; P = .04) was found on the PEAK PlasmaBlade side compared with the electrosurgery side. Furthermore, the PEAK PlasmaBlade side showed fewer seromas (no case of seroma versus three seromas in the electrosurgery group) and less thermal damage (40% versus 70%; P = .26). Acute thermal injury depth from the PEAK PlasmaBlade was less than from monopolar electrosurgery (425 ± 171 μm versus 686 ± 1037 μm; P = .631). PEAK PlasmaBlade appears to be superior to traditional monopolar electrosurgery for post-bariatric body-contouring procedures because it demonstrated less tissue damage, lower total volume of drain output, and fewer postoperative seromas resulting in faster wound healing., (© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of surgical quality on the prognosis of rectal carcinoma patients who underwent preoperative long-term chemoradiation and TME surgery., Methods: In a total of 314 patients, four quality indicators, including plane of surgery, pathological circumferential resection margin (pCRM), intraoperative local tumour cell dissemination and anastomotic leakage, were analysed with respect to locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis and overall survival., Results: In 260 (82.8 %) of the patients, all four quality indicators were fulfilled. In 30 (9.6 %) of the patients, at least one quality indicator was not fulfilled; in 24 (7.6 %) of the patients, the data were not complete. Locoregional recurrence was significantly increased in patients who underwent surgery in the muscularis propria plane, who had a pCRM ≤ 1 mm or who experienced local tumour cell dissemination. In patients who had at least one quality indicator that was not fulfilled (suboptimal surgical quality), the 5-year rate of locoregional recurrence in those patients was 23.1 % compared to 4.8 % in patients who underwent optimal surgery (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, suboptimal surgery (hazard ratio (HR) 3.9; P = 0.020), abdominoperineal excision (HR 4.7; P = 0.003) and poor regression of primary tumours (HR 8.5; P < 0.001) were identified as independent prognostic factors for locoregional recurrence. In contrast to type of surgical treatment, ypT, ypN and regression grade, the quality of surgery did not significantly influence distant metastasis or overall survival., Conclusions: Even after preoperative chemoradiation, the surgical quality still has a strong impact on local control in patients with rectal carcinoma.