Search

Despite demonstrating promising outcomes in treating hematologic malignancies, the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell therapy remains limited when applied to solid tumors due to tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Strategies to augment CAR-T cell efficacy against solid tumors have been investigated by ameliorating TIME to a certain extent. In this study, Cabozantinib was utilized in combination with CAR-T cells targeting carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) for the treatment of renal cancer. Our findings indicate that combination therapy with CAIX-CAR-T and Cabozantinib demonstrated synergistic efficacy against an orthotopic xenograft tumor model and a subcutaneous tumor model of renal cell carcinoma in mice. Mechanistically, it was observed that CAR-T cells combined with Cabozantinib led to an increase in the infiltration of tumor-infiltrating T cells, while reducing tumor-associated macrophages and M2 polarization. Additionally, Cabozantinib blocked the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis by decreasing the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells and PD-1 in T cells. Furthermore, Cabozantinib promoted CAR-T cell effector function and reduced T cell exhaustion. This combination therapy represents a novel approach to enhancing CAR-T cell efficacy against solid tumors and holds significant promise for advancing CAR-T cell therapy in clinical settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is standard therapy for patients with intermediate and poor risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI in elderly patients aged >75 years remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of first-line NIVO+IPI treatment in patients aged >75 years with advanced RCC., Patients and Methods: This study included 59 patients with advanced RCC who received NIVO+IPI as first-line therapy between September 2018 and December 2023. Objective response rates (ORRs), along with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients aged <75 years and ≥75 years, to assess survival outcomes., Results: A total of 46 (78.0%) and 13 (22.0%) patients were classified into <75 years and ≥75 years groups, respectively, at NIVO+IPI initiation. The ORRs were 45.7% for <75 years and 53.8% for ≥75 years (p=0.2422). No significant differences in PFS (p=0.0729) were observed between groups. In contrast, patients aged ≥75 years had better OS than those aged <75 years (p=0.0212). However, no significant difference was observed in the OS between the two groups of patients with clear cell histology (p=0.0532). The incidence of immune-related adverse events higher than Grade 3 was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.5016)., Conclusion: NIVO and IPI combination therapy is both safe and efficacious in patients aged ≥75 years with advanced RCC., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is already in the top ten of all types of cancers, with more than 4 %. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a polyphenolic compound extracted from green tea, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of various tumors. However, limited studies have demonstrated the effect of EGCG on RCC and its underlying molecular mechanisms., Methods: After exposure to gradient concentration (0,5,10,20,40,60,80,100 μM) of EGCG, the cell viability of RCC cells was determined by MTT assay. The migration and invasion abilities of RCC cells were investigated by wound healing and transwell assays. The expression levels of proteins involved in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and autophagy were explored by Western blotting assays. The formation of autophagosome was detected by electron microscope and LC3 puncta assays. Nude mouse xenograft model was used as the model system in vivo., Results: In the present study, EGCG significantly inhibited the migration, invasion and EMT of RCC cells in a concentrated manner. Further exploration of its mechanism indicated that autophagy is involved in EGCG-mediated metastasis inhibition and EMT inhibition of RCC cells. In addition, EGCG could significantly up-regulate the transcription factor EB (TFEB) and promotes its nuclear localization. The incorporation of TFEB into the nucleus enhanced the transcriptional levels of molecules associated with autophagy. TFEB knockdown inhibited EGCG-mediated autophagy activation, metastasis and EMT inhibition in RCC cells., Conclusions: In conclusion, these findings demonstrate for the first time that EGCG inhibits migration, invasion, and EMT of RCC by activating TFEB-mediated autophagy. Therefore, the combination of EGCG and TFFB activators or EMT inhibitors is expected to be a promising therapeutic strategy for RCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Poor dissolution of axitinib (AXT) limits its effectiveness through the oral route. The present study investigated, prospective of liquisolid (LS) technology to improve dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of AXT to treat renal cell carcinoma. LS compacts were fabricated with PEG 200, Fujicalin SG, and Aerosil 200 as solvent, carrier, and coat material, respectively. The behavior of LS-systems during tabletting was investigated using Kawakita, Heckel, and Leuenberger analysis. LS compacts were examined for P-XRD, DSC, SEM, and in vitro drug dissolution. For optimization, a 3 2 full factorial design was utilized. Cell line A498 was utilized for in vitro cytotoxicity study. A bioavailability study was performed using rabbits. DSC and P-XRD analysis confirmed the transition of crystalline AXT to its partial amorphization and molecular dispersion. Consequently, LS6 demonstrated a significantly rapid drug dissolution (Q 20 ; >99 %) than the directly compressed tablets (18.05 %). Additionally, 2.03-fold increase in oral bioavailability, and inhibited dose-dependent cell growth with 1.75-fold increased apoptosis rate. Overall, an LS6 compact consisting of 15 % AXT concentration in PEG 200 and a 20 w/w ratio of Fujicalin SG: Aerosil 200 exhibited improved formulation properties, enhanced dissolution rate, and bioavailability. Thus developed potential product may contribute low-cost production with patient-improved survival expectations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The therapeutic benefit of immuno-oncology (IO) therapy for patients with advanced non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear., Patients and Methods: We reviewed clinical data from 93 patients with advanced nccRCC who received first-line systemic therapy including IO combination therapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy at our affiliated institutions. Patients were divided based on the period when the treatment was implemented as the standard of care into the IO and TKI eras. Survival and tumor response outcomes were compared between the IO and TKI eras., Results: Of the 93 patients, 50 (54%) and 43 (46%) were categorized as IO era and TKI era groups, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the IO era than in the TKI era (median PFS: 8.97 vs. 4.96 months, p = 0.0152; median OS: 38.4 vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.0001). After the adjustment using other covariates, the treatment era was an independent factor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.59, p = 0.0235) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.27, p < 0.0001). Objective response and disease control rates was not significantly different between the treatment eras (26% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.268; 62% vs. 62.8%, p = 0.594)., Conclusion: The implementation of IO therapy was significantly associated with longer survival in the nccRCC population. Further studies are needed to establish a more effective treatment strategy in this population using multiple regimens of IO combination therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared., Results: The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8)., Conclusions: In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Takahiro Kimura is a paid consultant/advisor of Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and durable response benefits versus sunitinib (SUN) with long-term follow-up in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report updated analyses with 8 years of median follow-up from CheckMate 214., Patients and Methods: Patients with aRCC (N = 1096) were randomized to NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W × four doses, followed by NIVO (3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W); or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off. The endpoints included OS, independent radiology review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and IRRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate/poor-risk (I/P; primary), intent-to-treat (ITT; secondary), and favorable-risk (FAV; exploratory) patients., Results: With 8 years (99.1 months) of median follow-up, the hazard ratio [HR; 95% confidence interval (CI)] for OS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 0.72 (0.62-0.83) in ITT patients, 0.69 (0.59-0.81) in I/P patients, and 0.82 (0.60-1.13) in FAV patients. PFS probabilities at 90 months were 22.8% versus 10.8% (ITT), 25.4% versus 8.5% (I/P), and 12.7% versus 17.0% (FAV), respectively. ORR with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 39.5% versus 33.0% (ITT), 42.4% versus 27.5% (I/P), and 29.6% versus 51.6% (FAV). Rates of complete response were higher with NIVO+IPI versus SUN in all International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups (ITT, 12.0% versus 3.5%; I/P, 11.8% versus 2.6%; FAV, 12.8% versus 6.5%). The median duration of response (95% CI) with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 76.2 versus 25.1 months [59.1 months-not estimable (NE) versus 19.8-33.2 months] in ITT patients, 82.8 versus 19.8 months (54.1 months-NE versus 16.4-26.4 months) in I/P patients, and 61.5 versus 33.2 months (27.8 months-NE versus 24.8-51.4 months) in FAV patients. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was consistent with previous reports. Exploratory post hoc analyses are reported for FAV patients, those receiving subsequent therapy based on their response status, clinical subpopulations, and adverse events over time., Conclusions: Superior survival, durable response benefits, and a manageable safety profile were maintained with NIVO+IPI versus SUN at 8 years, the longest phase III follow-up for a first-line checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in aRCC., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) face complex treatment decisions and frequently turn to the Internet for treatment information. The content of patient educational websites about mRCC treatment has not been evaluated. This study evaluated the accuracy, readability, and quality of websites about the treatment of mRCC., Methods: A total of 2,700 Internet queries were performed. Across 3 Internet search engines, 25 links of 36 permutations of mRCC keywords and their synonyms were screened for eligibility. Eligible websites were English-language websites containing information about mRCC treatments. Sponsored, social media, provider-facing, and news websites were excluded. Accuracy of eligible websites was evaluated in 2 domains: (1) Completeness by calculating the percentage of mRCC facts included in websites using an investigator-created checklist based on the NCI's RCC Treatment (PDQ®)-patient version, and (2) Correctness by identifying incorrect statements that were inconsistent with guidelines. Websites containing ≥60% of checklist items had a "passing" completeness score. Incorrect statements were tallied and qualitatively categorized. Readability was evaluated using the Fry and SMOG formulae, which calculate reading grade levels. Quality was evaluated using validated instruments that appraise health information quality: QUEST (scored 0-28), which focuses on online information, and DISCERN (scored 16-80), which focuses on treatment choices., Results: Thirty-nine websites were analyzed. Mean completeness score was 30% (range 0%-69%); only 2 (5%) websites had a passing score. Twelve (31%) websites had ≥1 incorrect statement, such as listing homeopathy or hormone therapy as mRCC treatment options, or including outdated statements. Mean readability levels were 11th and 12th grades for the Fry and SMOG methods, respectively. No website had a reading level lower than 9th grade. Mean QUEST score was 19 (range 9-28); authorship, complementarity, and currency items had the lowest scores. Mean DISCERN score was 56 (range 42-76), with 7 (18%) websites rated "excellent", 22 (56%) rated "good", and 10 (26%) rated fair., Conclusions: Many websites about mRCC treatment have incomplete, inaccurate, and unreadable information. Quality is highly variable. Efforts to improve accuracy, readability, and quality are needed to ensure that patients with mRCC can make well-informed treatment decisions and avoid harm from misinformation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing financial interests to report in relation to the work described., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Cardiac toxicity is an adverse event of several classes of anti-cancer drugs. Herein, we present the case of a 52-year-old woman with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), previously treated with debulking surgery, pembrolizumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) in combination with axitinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)), followed by lenvatinib (TKI) and belzutifan (HIF-2α inhibitor), who developed myocarditis proven by cardiac magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy. The case was notable for reporting a not-yet described adverse event during treatment with belzutifan plus lenvatinib, the etiology of which was of unobvious determination given the pre-exposure to pembrolizumab, a known cause of drug-related myocarditis. We surmise that myocarditis was a delayed adverse event related to pembrolizumab (8 months after treatment interruption), although we emphasize that only attentive monitoring of cardiac adverse events of patients exposed to belzutifan and lenvatinib in the context of large clinical trials may rule out any causal implication of these drugs., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been widely investigated in urothelial carcinoma; however, the utility of ICI therapy in the treatment of organ transplant recipients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is unclear. We herein report the first case of a first-line anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy for a kidney transplant patient with mUC., Case Presentation: A 71-year-old woman who received a kidney transplant in 2003 was diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma in 2018. After operation of the tumor, the patient developed local recurrence at the site of the right kidney and bladder and multiple distant metastases in May 2020. Considering the intolerance of chemotherapy and high tumor mutation burden, we administered the anti-PD-1 agent tislelizumab (200 mg every three weeks). Partial response was achieved after two cycles of therapy and sustained until 18th cycles. There were no signs of kidney graft rejection. The immunotherapy was temporarily stopped after the 18th course because of a suspicious immune-related pneumonitis and was continued in December 2021., Conclusions: This case demonstrates the feasibility of safely achieving stable cancer control in a kidney transplant patient with mUC without encountering graft rejection by using single-agent anti-PD-1 treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Renal clear cell cancer (RCC) is a complex disease that is challenging to predict patient outcomes. Despite improvements with targeted therapy, personalized treatment planning is still needed. Artificial intelligence (AI) can help address this challenge by developing predictive models that accurately forecast patient survival periods. With AI-powered decision support, clinicians can provide patients with tailored treatment plans, enhancing treatment efficacy and quality of life. The study analyzed 267 patients with renal clear cell carcinoma, focusing on 26 who received targeted drug therapy. The data was refined by excluding 8 patients without enhanced CT scans. The research team categorized patients into two groups based on their expected lifespan: Group 1 (over 3 years) and Group 2 (under 3 years). The UPerNet algorithm was used to extract features from CT tumor markers, validating their effectiveness. These features were then used to develop an AI-based predictive model trained on the dataset. The developed AI model demonstrated remarkable accuracy, achieving a rate of 93.66% in Group 1 and 94.14% in Group 2. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the potential of AI technology in predicting the survival time of RCC patients undergoing targeted drug therapy. The established prediction model exhibits high predictive accuracy and stability, serving as a valuable tool for clinicians to facilitate the development of more personalized treatment plans for patients. This study highlights the importance of integrating AI technology in clinical decision-making, enabling patients to receive more effective and targeted treatment plans that enhance their overall quality of life., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Wilms' tumor (WT), also known as nephroblastoma, is the predominant form of primary malignant renal cancer. The unfavorable prognoses linked to anaplastic nephroblastoma and recurrent nephroblastoma emphasize the crucial requirement for the exploration of innovative treatment modalities for WT., Methods: Our study conducted one-way Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses using TARGET-WT nephroblastoma data to identify differentially expressed genes in nephroblastoma and evaluate their prognostic relevance. Utilizing the Connectivity Map database, ZSTK474 emerged as a viable therapeutic option for WT. The effect of ZSTK474 on WT and related underlying mechanisms were further investigated through in vitro and in vivo investigations., Results: The in vivo experiment results indicated that ZSTK474 effectively inhibited subcutaneous tumor growth in WT mice. CCK-8 assays revealed two nephroblastoma cell lines exhibited half-inhibitory concentrations of 2μM and 2.51μM for ZSTK474, respectively. ZSTK474 was shown to inhibit the migration and invasion capabilities of WT cells in both Transwell and wound healing assays. Flow cytometry apoptosis and TUNEL assays demonstrated that ZSTK474 induced apoptosis in WT cells. Cell cycle analysis revealed that ZSTK474 led to the induction of G0/G1 phase arrest. Sequencing of ZSTK474-treated WiT49 cells suggested that the impact of ZSTK474 on WT might be mediated by the PI3K/Akt pathway, specifically by inhibiting PIK3R3. Knock-down of PIK3R3 confirmed that ZSTK474 downregulated PIK3R3, reducing Akt phosphorylation, cyclin D and CDK4 levels and elevating P21 expression in nephroblastoma cells. However, current research has limitations, including a lack of understanding of the long-term effects and potential resistance mechanisms of new therapies., Conclusion: This research provides insight into the potential of ZSTK474 and other PI3K inhibitors for treating nephroblastoma., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially clear cell RCC (ccRCC), significantly impacts health, and results in particularly poor outcomes in patients at the advanced stage. Resistance to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a major barrier in effective ccRCC treatment. Herein, we aim to explore how decitabine mediates bridging integrator 1 (BIN1) and spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope protein 1 (SYNE1) to impact resistance of ccRCC to sorafenib., Methods: Employing bioinformatics on datasets GSE64052 and CancerSea, we identified genes linked to TKI resistance, ultimately focusing on SYNE1. We assessed influences of SYNE1 overexpression and BIN1 knockdown via quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot. Assessment of cell viability and apoptosis was accomplished using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assays and flow cytometry. The investigation into the potential interactions between SYNE1 and BIN1, as well as their impacts on sorafenib sensitivity was accomplished by Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) Pull-down., Results: SYNE1 was substantially down-regulated in sorafenib-resistant ccRCC cells, and its overexpression increased sorafenib sensitivity, decreased viability and enhanced apoptosis. Interaction between BIN1 and SYNE1 was confirmed, with BIN1 level lower in resistant cells. BIN1 knockdown reduced the beneficial effects of SYNE1 overexpression on sorafenib sensitivity. Decitabine treatment elevated both SYNE1 and BIN1, while boosting apoptosis and reducing sorafenib resistance., Conclusions: SYNE1 contributes to the modulation of sorafenib resistance in ccRCC cells through interacting with BIN1. Decitabine treatment enhances expressions of these two proteins to improve TKI response, suggesting a potential strategy for counteracting resistance and bettering patient outcomes., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Introduction: The majority of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receive one or more VEGFR TKI agents, alone or in combination with an immune-oncology (IO) agent or an mTOR inhibitor. To date, the cost of adverse events (AEs) common to VEGFR TKIs has not been quantified. This study estimated the potential impact of differences in VEGFR TKI AE profiles on treatment cost efficiency in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting., Methods: Patients with documented mRCC who were treated with VEGFR TKI therapies between Jan 2015 and Mar 2021 were identified using EMR. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to identify the first occurrence of each class effect AE. Patients were matched to 3rd party insurance claims, and costs associated to TKI AEs within 90 days of index event were captured. Average per patient AE cost data was calculated and applied to published incidence data to estimate regimen-specific AE total cost burden within a hypothetical commercial plan for mRCC patients undergoing treatment in the R/R setting., Results: The highest total cost for AE management was attributed to lenvatinib and everolimus use at $13,303, followed closely by sunitinib at $13,092. Tivozanib treatment was associated with the lowest total cost of AE management at $7,523, driven by the relatively lower incidence of certain high-cost AEs., Conclusions: The estimated costs of managing VEGFR TKI class-effect AEs were lowest with tivozanib, and highest with lenvatinib and everolimus, indicating potentially differential healthcare resource burden by TKI regimen. The use of tivozanib in the 3 L + mRCC setting suggests potential costs offsets when compared to other TKI regimens., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Through their involvement in cancer metabolism, alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) reflect the tumor burden and thus could have a prognostic potential for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Therefore, this study investigated the prognostic potential of these parameters in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) under first-line CPI-based therapy. The retrospective study cohort included 82 mRCC patients treated with CPI-based first-line therapy between 2019 and 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rates were evaluated according to baseline levels and early dynamic changes of ALAT, ASAT, GGT and LDH. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were generated to identify independent prognosticators for PFS and OS. High baseline levels and non-normalized kinetics of ALAT, ASAT, GGT and LDH were significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS (p < 0.05), which was also reflected by lower response rates. Combining the four parameters at baseline into a 4-Risk-Score resulted in an enhanced prognostic power, as indicated by a higher C-index of 0.693 for OS compared to the individual parameters (≤ 0.663). Patients with all four risk factors present showed the worst PFS and OS. Overall, baseline levels and early kinetics of the four parameters as well as the 4-Risk-Score were identified as independent prognosticators for PFS and OS by multivariate analysis. As standard laboratory parameters, ALAT, ASAT, GGT and LDH are cost-effective and could be easily used either alone or in combination for therapy monitoring of CPI-treated mRCC patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Tuberous Sclerosis complex (TSC) is a multisystemic neurocutaneous genetic condition with high rates of morbidity and mortality from subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA), renal angiomyolipoma, and renal cyst complications. Everolimus is an inhibitor for mTORC1 and is currently used to treat TSC for its main role in rapidly reducing SEGA volume and seizure burden, although mainly studied in the adult population. It has also been shown to stabilize estimated glomerular filtration rate and reduce renal angiomyolipoma size in the adult population., Case Presentation: This case report illustrates three pediatric patients placed on everolimus for SEGA and seizure control with incidental findings of the disappearance of or decreased burden of cystic kidney disease after everolimus therapy. In one patient, the cyst burden remained stable even after the cessation of everolimus while the SEGA resumed growth., Conclusions: This report demonstrates the utility of everolimus in not only renal angiomyolipomas but also cystic kidney disease particularly in pediatric patients with a promising role in preserving renal function and preventing long term sequelae such as hematuria and hemorrhage from larger renal cysts especially if used early on in disease course., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common origin of pancreatic metastases (PM). Distinct genomic aberrations, favorable prognosis, and clinical observations on high angiogenesis, and succeeding tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity have been reported in PM-ccRCC. However, no functional or single-cell studies have been conducted thus far. We recruited five PM-ccRCC patients and investigated the genomic, single-cell transcriptomic, and drug sensitivity profiles of their patient-derived cells (PDCs). The PM depicted both expected and novel genomic alterations. Further, the transcriptomics differed from both primary and metastatic ccRCC, with upregulations of the PI3K/mTOR and - supporting the clinical observations - angiogenesis pathways. Data integration at pathway level showed that transcriptomics explained drug sensitivities the best. Accordingly, PM-ccRCC PDCs shared sensitivity to many PI3K/mTOR inhibitors. Altogether, we show distinct genomic and transcriptomic signatures in PM-ccRCC, highlight the superiority of transcriptomics in interpreting drug sensitivities, and encourage the use of TKIs and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors in PM-ccRCC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) arises from the renal parenchymal epithelium and is the predominant malignant entity of renal cancer, exhibiting increasing incidence and mortality rates over time. SEC14-like 3 (SEC14L3) has emerged as a compelling target for cancer intervention; nevertheless, the precise clinical implications and molecular underpinnings of SEC14L3 in ccRCC remain elusive., Methods: By leveraging clinical data and data from the TCGA-ccRCC and GEO datasets, we investigated the association between SEC14L3 expression levels and overall survival rates in ccRCC patients. The biological role and mechanism of SEC14L3 in ccRCC were investigated via in vivo and in vitro experiments. Moreover, siRNA-SEC14L3@PDA@MUC12 nanoparticles (SSPM-NPs) were synthesized and assessed for their therapeutic potential against SEC14L3 through in vivo and in vitro assays., Results: Our investigation revealed upregulated SEC14L3 expression in ccRCC tissues, and exogenous downregulation of SEC14L3 robustly suppressed the malignant traits of ccRCC cells. Mechanistically, knocking down SEC14L3 facilitated the ubiquitination-mediated degradation of ribosomal protein S3 (RPS3) and augmented IκBα accumulation in ccRCC. This concerted action thwarted the nuclear translocation of P65, thereby abrogating the activation of the nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) signaling pathway and impeding ccRCC cell proliferation and metastasis. Furthermore, diminished SEC14L3 levels exerted a suppressive effect on NFKB1 expression within the NFκB signaling cascade. NFKB1 functions as a transcriptional regulator capable of binding to the SEC14L3 enhancer and promoter, thereby promoting SEC14L3 expression. Consequently, the inhibition of SEC14L3 expression was further potentiated, thus forming a positive feedback loop. Additionally, we observed that downregulation of SEC14L3 significantly increased the sensitivity of ccRCC cells to sunitinib. The evaluation of SSPM-NPs nanotherapy highlighted its effectiveness in combination with sunitinib for inhibiting ccRCC growth., Conclusion: Our findings not only underscore the promise of SEC14L3 as a therapeutic target but also unveil an SEC14L3/RPS3/NFκB positive feedback loop that curtails ccRCC progression. Modulating SEC14L3 expression to engage this positive feedback loop might herald novel avenues for ccRCC treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The Case A 47-year-old woman with a history of drug-resistant epilepsy during childhood presented to the emergency department with sudden dyspnea and chest pain. Upon admission, her oxygen saturation was 88%. A chest CT scan revealed pulmonary cystic lesions consistent with lymphangioleiomyomatosis and a right spontaneous pneumothorax, which resolved with the placement of a chest tube. Physical examination revealed a hypopigmented macule on the skin of the lumbar region, facial angiofibromas, and periungual fibromas. An abdominal MRI documented multiple bilateral renal tumors that were hypointense on T2-weighted imaging and showed a black boundary artifact, suggestive of fat-poor angiomyolipomas (AMLs). Subsequent percutaneous biopsy of the largest renal tumor confirmed the diagnosis of angiomyolipoma (positive for HMB-45 on immunohistochemistry). The brain MRI revealed subependymal nodules. The pulmonary function tests showed a mild obstructive pattern. Germline genetic testing confirmed the suspected diagnosis, and the patient started oral systemic treatment with everolimus (Afinitor) 10 mg once daily, along with dexamethasone rinses for prophylaxis.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has diverse pathological subtypes, most of which have a poor prognosis. Patients with advanced RCC require systemic therapies for disease control. Although targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown therapeutic efficacy, patients eventually succumb to disease progression. Therefore, additional therapies targeting different pathways are needed to provide more therapeutic options for sequential treatment. Our study explored the biological mechanisms and therapeutic outcomes for NPS-1034, a dual MET/AXL inhibitor, in RCC, both in vivo and in vitro. Our results showed that NPS-1034 can significantly inhibit tumor proliferation and induce cancer cell apoptosis. Besides MET and AXL, known targets of NPS-1034, we identified TNFRSF1A as another target gene inhibited by NPS-1034 via antibody arrays. This was further supported by next-generation sequencing, showing that the TNF signaling pathway is one of the most significant NPS-1034-regulated pathways. Furthermore, one of the identified target genes, GADD45A, responsible for NPS-1034 anticancer properties, was significantly associated with patient survival in RCC. GADD45A expression was significantly upregulated via NPS-1034 and downregulated via TNFRSF1A overexpression. Finally, its therapeutic efficacy was demonstrated in vivo, showing that NPS-1034 significantly alleviated the tumor burden and inhibited cell proliferation in a lung metastatic animal model. In conclusion, we explored the therapeutic mechanism of NPS-1034 and found that it targets not only MET and AXL but also TNFRSF1A. In a lung metastatic animal model, we confirmed that NPS-1034 is a potential candidate for systemic therapy in RCC.

Many developing countries lack access to recommended first-line treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or ICI-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations. As a result, predictive markers are necessary to identify patients who may benefit from single-agent TKIs for long-term response. This study aims to identify such parameters. This was a multi-centre, retrospective study of patients with mRCC who were undergoing first-line treatment with sunitinib or pazopanib. Patients who had been diagnosed with mRCC and had not experienced disease progression for 36 months or more were deemed to have achieved a long-term response. Predictive clinical and pathological characteristics of patients who did not experience long-term disease progression were investigated. A total of 320 patients from four hospitals were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 20-89 years). According to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification, 109 patients were classified as having favourable risk and 211 were in the intermediate-poor risk group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 12.5 months and 76.4 months, respectively. In the long-term responder's group, the median PFS was 78.4 months. Among all patients, prior nephrectomy, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) <1, and the absence of brain metastasis were predictive factors for long-term response. For patients in the favourable risk group, the lack of brain metastasis was a predictor of long-term response. In the intermediate-poor risk group, prior nephrectomy and ECOG PS <1 were predictive factors for long-term response. Some individuals with mRCC may experience a durable response to TKIs. The likelihood of a long-term response can be determined by factors such as nephrectomy, ECOG PS < 1, and the absence of brain metastases.

Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common pediatric kidney cancer treated with standard chemotherapy. However, less-differentiated blastemal type of WT often relapses. To model the high-risk WT for therapeutic intervention, we introduce pluripotency factors into WiT49, a mixed-type WT cell line, to generate partially reprogrammed cells, namely WiT49-PRCs. When implanted into the kidney capsule in mice, WiT49-PRCs form kidney tumors and develop both liver and lung metastases, whereas WiT49 tumors do not metastasize. Histological characterization and gene expression signatures demonstrate that WiT49-PRCs recapitulate blastemal-predominant WTs. Moreover, drug screening in isogeneic WiT49 and WiT49-PRCs leads to the identification of epithelial- or blastemal-predominant WT-sensitive drugs, whose selectivity is validated in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (e.g., panobinostat and romidepsin) are found universally effective across different WT and more potent than doxorubicin in PDXs. Taken together, WiT49-PRCs serve as a blastemal-predominant WT model for therapeutic intervention to treat patients with high-risk WT., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To identify predictive factors of nivolumab sensitivity, peripheral blood NKs and regulatory T-cell (Treg) were evaluated in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) enrolled in the REVOLUTION trial., Experimental Design: Fifty-seven mRCCs being treated with nivolumab, as at least second-line of therapy, and 62 healthy donors were longitudinally evaluated (0-1-3-6-12 months) for peripheral NKs and Tregs, phenotype, and function. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify the independent predictors. The 0.632+ internal cross-validation was used to avoid overfitting. The best cutoff value based on a 3-month clinical response was applied to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS and OS were produced., Results: At pretreatment, mRCCs displayed high frequency of NKp46+NKs, NKp30+NKs, KIR2DL1+NKs, KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs, and PD1+NKs with reduced NK degranulation as well as high frequency of Tregs, PD1+Tregs, Helios+Tregs, and ENTPD1+Tregs. Responder patients, identified as a clinical response after 3 months of treatment, presented at pretreatment significantly low CD3+, high KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs, high PD1+Tregs, and high Helios+Tregs. Upon multivariate analysis, only KIR2DL2/DL3NKs and Helios+Tregs held as independent predictors of nivolumab responsiveness. The KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs >35.3% identified patients with longer OS, whereas the Helios+Tregs >34.3% displayed significantly longer PFS. After 1-month of nivolumab, responder patients showed low CD3+, high NKs, KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs, and ICOS+Tregs. Among these subpopulations, CD3+ and KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs held as independent predictors of nivolumab efficacy. Low CD3+ (≤71%) was significantly associated with longer PFS, whereas high KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs (>23.3%) were associated with both PFS and OS., Conclusions: Pretreatment evaluation of Helios+Tregs/KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs and 1-month posttreatment CD3+/ KIR2DL2/DL3+NKs will predict nivolumab response in mRCCs., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: To assess the impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes, within a large multicenter cohort of Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with Nephroureterectomy., Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis utilizing the Robotic surgery for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Study registry was performed. Baseline, preoperative, perioperative, and pathologic variables of three groups of patients receiving surgery only, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were compared. Categorical and continuous variables among the three subgroups were compared with Chi square and ANOVA tests. The impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes was assessed with the Kaplan Meier method. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival., Results: Overall, 1,994 patients were included. Overall and Clavien grade ≥3 complications rates were comparable among the three subgroups (p = 0.65 and p = 0.92). At Kaplan Meier analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved cancer-specific survival (p = 0.03) and overall survival (p = 0.03) probabilities of patients with cT ≥ 3 tumors and of those with positive cN (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with an improvement of cancer-specific survival in cT ≥ 3 patients (HR 0.44; p = 0.04), and of both cancer-specific survival (HR 0.50; p = 0.03) and overall survival (HR 0.53; p = 0.02) probabilities in positive cN patients., Conclusions: This large multicenter retrospective analysis suggests significant survival benefit in Upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients with either locally advanced or clinically positive nodes disease receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings can be regarded as "hypothesis generating", stimulating future trials focusing on such advanced stages., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Reprogramming of cellular metabolism in tumors promoted the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and established immune-suppressive tumor microenvironments (iTME), leading to drug resistance and tumor progression. Therefore, remodeling the cellular metabolism of tumor cells was a promising strategy to overcome drug-resistant tumors. Herein, CD276 and MTHFD2 were identified as a specific marker and a therapeutic target, respectively, for targeting sunitinib-resistant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and its cancer stem cell (CSC) population. The blockade of MTHFD2 was confirmed to overcome drug resistance via remodeling of folate-nucleotide metabolism. Moreover, the manganese dioxide nanoparticle was proven here by a high-throughput metabolome to be capable of remodeling γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) metabolism in tumor cells to reconstruct the iTME. Based on these findings, engineered CD276-CD133 dual-targeting biomimetic nanovesicle EMφ-siMTHFD2-MnO 2 @Suni was designed to overcome drug resistance and terminate tumor progression of ccRCC. Using ccRCC-bearing immune-humanized NPG model mice, EMφ-siMTHFD2-MnO 2 @Suni was observed to remodel folate-nucleotide and GABA metabolism to deactivate the EMT process and reconstruct the iTME thereby overcoming the drug resistance. In the incomplete-tumor-resection recurrence model and metastasis model, EMφ-siMTHFD2-MnO 2 @Suni reduced recurrence and metastasis in vivo. This work thus provided an innovative approach that held great potential in the treatment of drug-resistant ccRCC by remodeling cellular metabolism.

Competing Interests: DAB reports share options in Elephas (a company involved in diagnostic tumour testing to assess ex-vivo responses to immunotherapy); consulting or personal fees from Cancer Expert Now, Adnovate Strategies, MDedge, CancerNetwork, Catenion, OncLive, Cello Health BioConsulting, PWW Consulting, Haymarket Medical Network, Aptitude Health, ASCO Post and Harborside, Targeted Oncology, Merck, Pfizer, MedScape, Accolade 2nd MD, DLA Piper, AbbVie, Compugen, Link Cell Therapies, Scholar Rock, NeoMorph, Exelixis, AVEO, Eisai, and Elephas; and research support from Exelixis and AstraZeneca, outside of the submitted work. DAB has collaborated with Toni K Choueiri, Laurence Albiges, Rana R McKay, Hans Hammers, Daniel Y C Heng, Bradley A McGregor, and Robert J Motzer, but not in relation to the trial discussed here. DAB acknowledges support from the Department of Defence (KC190128/W81XWH-20-1-0882 and KC220016/HT9425-23-1-0735), the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute (1R37CA279822-01), the Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman Yale Scholar Fund, and the Yale Cancer Center (supported by a National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute research grant P30CA016359). ZAY declares no competing interests.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors are cornerstones of first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma; however, optimal treatment sequencing after progression is unknown. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes of tivozanib-nivolumab versus tivozanib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who have progressed following one or two lines of therapy in the post-ICI setting., Methods: TiNivo-2 is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 190 sites across 16 countries, in Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and progression during or after one to two previous lines of therapy (including one ICI) were randomised 1:1 to tivozanib (0·89 mg per day, orally) plus nivolumab (480 mg every 4 weeks, intravenously) or tivozanib (1·34 mg per day, orally). Randomisation was stratified by immediate previous therapy (ICI or non-ICI) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk category. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to first documentation of objective progressive disease according to RECIST 1·1 or death from any cause, whichever came first, by independent radiology review. Efficacy was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in patients who received one or more doses of the study drug. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04987203) and is active and not recruiting., Findings: From Nov 4, 2021, to June 16, 2023, 343 patients were randomly assigned to tivozanib-nivolumab (n=171) or tivozanib monotherapy (n=172). Median follow-up was 12·0 months. Median PFS was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-7·4) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 7·4 months (5·6-9·2) with tivozanib monotherapy (hazard ratio 1·10, 95% CI 0·84-1·43; p=0·49). Among those with an ICI as their immediate previous therapy (n=244), median PFS was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6-9·6) with tivozanib-nivolumab and 9·2 months (7·4-10·0) with tivozanib monotherapy. With non-ICIs as the most recent therapy, lower median PFS was observed, with no difference between groups (tivozanib-nivolumab 3·7 months [95% CI 2·7-5·4] and with tivozanib monotherapy 3·7 months [1·9-7·2]). Serious adverse events occurred in 54 (32%) of 168 patients receiving tivozanib-nivolumab and 64 (37%) of 171 patients receiving tivozanib monotherapy. One (<1%) treatment-related death occurred (tivozanib group)., Interpretation: These data further support that ICI rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, these data suggest that tivozanib monotherapy has efficacy in the post-ICI setting., Funding: Aveo Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TKC reports institutional and personal paid or unpaid support for research, advisory board participation, consultancy, and honoraria within the past 5 years from Alkermes, Arcus Bio, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Circle Pharma, Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead, HiberCell, IQVIA, Infinity, Ipsen, Jansen, Kanaph, Lilly, Merck, Nikang, Neomorph, Nuscan and Precede Bio, Novartis, Oncohost, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Scholar Rock, Surface Oncology, Takeda, and Tempest and equity in Tempest, Pionyr, Osel, Precede Bio, CureResponse, InnDura Therapeutics, and Primium. LA reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Merck, MSD, Janssen, Eisai, and Amgen and support for travel expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Ipsen, and Pfizer. PB reports grants or contracts from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Exelixis, Ipsen, Merck, Gilead, Janssen, AAA Pharmaceutical, and Bayer; consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, AAA Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, AAA Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; and reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, AAA Pharmaceutical, Eisai, and AstraZeneca. SE reports consulting fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Kephren and support for attending meetings and travel from MSD, Chugai, Pfizer, and Janssen. JM-C reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen, Pfizer, Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas, Eisai, Adacap, Lilly, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Adium, and Asofarma; support for attending meetings and travel from Ipsen, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Ipsen, Pfizer, Astellas, Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD. BG reports research funding grants from AbbVie, Accutar Biotechnology, Arcus Biosciences, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, AVEO Oncology, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eikon Therapeutics, Exelixis, Roche and Genentech, Flare Therapeutics, Harbour BioMed, IDEAYA Biosciences, Janssen, Janux Therapeutics, Jubilant Therapeutics, Kineta, Kinnate BioPharma, Loxo, Mink Therapeutics, Nuvation Bio, Profound Bio, Takeda Therapeutics, Teon Therapeutics, Tmunity Therapeutics, Xencor, and Zenshine and consulting fees from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Adicent Therapeutics, AIQ Global, Amgen, Arcus Biosciences, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, AVEO Oncology, Bayer, Bicycle Therapeutics, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Rondo Therapeutics, Sanofi–Aventis, Seagen, and Xencor. PB reports honoraria from UroToday; consulting or advising fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Eisai, Caris Life Sciences, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Aveo, Merck, Ipson, and Dendreon; speakers bureau funding from AstraZeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Bayer, Pfizer and Astellas, and Merck; and research funding from Exelixis, Aveo, Blue Earth, Pfizer, and Merck. AB reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Cardinal Health, Eisai, and Natera; consulting or advising fees from EMD Serono, Seattle Genetics, and Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer; speakers bureau funds from Eisai; and research funding from Merck, EMD Serono, Natera, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene, Genentech and Roche, and Aveo. MTB reports consulting fees, payment or honoraria, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Bristol Myers Squibb. HM reports honoraria from EMD Serono and Pfizer; research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Arcus Bioscience, Apollomics, Nektar, RevImmune, HUYA Bioscience International, Aveo, Xencor, and Pfizer; and travel accommodations or expenses from Aveo, Seagen, Bayer, and Genentech. RR reports honoraria from Ipsen, MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Advanced Accelerator Applications, and Eisai; consulting or advisory fees from Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Ipsen, and MSD; and travel accommodations or expenses from Ipsen, MSD Oncology, and Janssen. RRM reports consulting or advisory roles for Janssen, Novartis, Tempus, Exelixis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Medivation, Dendreon, Bayer, Sanofi, Merck, Vividion, Calithera, AstraZeneca, Myovant, Caris Life Sciences, Sorrento Therapeutics, Aveo, Seattle Genetics, Telix, Eli Lilly, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Ambrx, Arcus Biosciences, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Eisai, and NeoMorph and research funding from Bayer, Tempus, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Oncternal Therapeutics, and Artera. AC-R reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from OncLive and MJH Life Sciences, ASCO Direct, Exelixis, Medical Oncology Association of Southern California, EPG Health, Eisai Co, Aveo, and Seagen. HH reports grants or contracts for clinical trial support from Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Agenus, Hoosier, and Aveo and advisory consulting fees from Eisai, Aveo, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb. DYCH reports consultancy fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Astellas Pharma, Ipsen, Eisai, and Merck and research funding from Pfizer, Novartis, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Ipsen. EB reports funding for the provision of study materials, medical writing, or article processing charges from Aveo Oncology and stock or stock options from Autolus. KEB reports grants funding from Bristol Myers Squibb–Lung Cancer Foundation of America–International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Aravive, Pionyr, and Arsenal Bio; consulting fees from Aravive, Aveo, Alpine Bioscience, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Adicet, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Eisai, Merck, Nimbus, and Xencor; and honoraria funding from Merck. BAM reports grants to his institution from Aveo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Gilead, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Arcus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Gilead, Lily, and Pfizer; payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Targeted Oncology, Dava Oncology, Aptitude Health, and Curio; and patents planned, issued, or pending with Gilead. RJM reports consulting fees from Aveo, Merck, Exelixis, and Takeda, grants or contracts from Pfizer, Genentech and Roche, Eisai, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Exelixis; and data safety monitoring and advisory board participation fees from Incyte. RI reports no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling is vitally important in tumour development and progression. This study is the first to comprehensively analyse the role of MAPK-family genes in the progression, prognosis, immune-cell infiltration, methylation, and potential therapeutic value drug candidates in ccRCC. We identified a novel prognostic panel of six MAPK-signature genes (MAP3K12, MAP3K1, MAP3K5, MAPK1, MAPK8, MAPK9), and introduced a robust MAPK-signature risk model for predicting ccRCC prognosis. Model construction, evaluation, and external validation using datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database demonstrated its stability, as well as high sensitivity and specificity. Enrichment analysis suggested the participation of immune-mediated mechanism in MAPK dysregulation in ccRCC. Immune-infiltration analysis confirmed the relationship and revealed that the MAPK-signature risk model might stratify immunotherapy response in ccRCC, which was verified in drug sensitivity analysis and validated in external ccRCC immunotherapy dataset (GSE67501). Potential therapeutic drug predictions for key MAPKs using DSigDB, Network Analyst, CTD, and DGIdb were subsequently verified by molecular docking with AutoDock Vina and PyMol. Mendelian randomization further demonstrated the possibilities of the MAPK-signature genes as targets for therapeutic drugs in ccRCC. Methylation analysis using UALCAN and MethSurv revealed the participation of epigenetic modifications in dysregulation and survival difference of MAPK pathway in ccRCC. Among the key MAPKs, MAP3K12 exhibited the highest significance, indicating its independent prognostic value as single gene in ccRCC. Knockout and overexpression validation experiments in vitro and in vivo found that MAP3K12 acted as a promoter of tumour progression in RCC, suggesting a pivotal role for MAP3K12 in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of RCC cells. Our findings proposed the potential of MAPK-signature genes as biomarkers for prognosis and therapy response, as well as targets for therapeutic drugs in ccRCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interest exists. The authors declared that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The potential benefit of neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib in cases with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVC-TT) remains unclear. NEOTAX was a phase 2 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant toripalimab plus axitinib in patients with ccRCC and IVC-TT (ChiCTR2000030405). The primary endpoint was the down-staging rate of IVC-TT level. Secondary endpoints included change in TT length, response rate, percentage change in surgical approach, surgical morbidity, progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and biomarker analyses. In all, 25 patients received study treatment, 44.0% (11/25) patients had a reduction in thrombus level, and none experienced an increase in Mayo level. The median change in tumor thrombus length was -2.3 cm (range: -7.1 to 1.1 cm). Overall, 61.9% (13/21) patients experienced changes in surgical strategy compared with planned surgery, three patients experienced major complications. The median PFS was 25.3 months (95% CI: 17.0-NE). The 1-year PFS was 89.1% (95% CI: 62.7-97.2). No any of grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse event was identified. Biopsy samples of non-responders exhibited increased T cytotoxic cell infiltration, but these cells were predominantly PD-1 positive. Biopsy samples of responders exhibited lower T helper cells, however, their subtype, regulatory T cells remained unchanged. In surgical samples of the TT, non-responders exhibited increased CD8T&#95;01&#95;GZMK&#95;CXCR4 subset T cells. NEOTAX met preset endpoints proving that toripalimab in combination with axitinib downstages IVC-TT in a significant proportion of patients leading to simplification in the procedure of surgery., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Advanced (Stage IV) prostate and renal cancer have poor prognosis, and several therapies have been developed, but many are very costly. This study investigated drug regimens used in patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma and calculated the monthly cost of each., Methods: We surveyed first-line drugs administered to patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cancer at Japan Clinical Oncology Group affiliated centers from April 2022 to March 2023. Drug costs were calculated according to drug prices in September 2023. Individual drug costs were calculated or converted to 28-day costs., Results: A total of 700 patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer were surveyed. Androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was the most common regimen (56%). The cost of androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was 10.6-30.8-fold compared with conventional treatments. A total of 137 patients with Stage IV renal cancer were surveyed. Among them, 91% of patients received immune-oncology drug-based regimen. All patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥500 000 Japanese yen, and 80.4% of patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥1 million Japanese yen, of combination treatments. The cost of immune-oncology drug-based regimen was 1.2-3.1-fold that of TKI alone., Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a survey of first-line drug therapy in untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma stratified by age and treatment costs. Our results show that most Japanese patients received state-of-the-art, effective treatments with high financial burden., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) is caused by loss of function mutations in fumarate hydratase (FH) and results in an aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma with limited treatment options. Loss of FH leads to accumulation of fumarate, an oncometabolite that disrupts multiple cellular processes and drives tumor progression. High levels of fumarate inhibit alpha ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, including the ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes, and can lead to global DNA hypermethylation. Here, we report patterns of hypermethylation in FH-mutant cell lines and tumor samples are associated with the silencing of nicotinate phosphoribosyl transferase (NAPRT), a rate-limiting enzyme in the Preiss-Handler pathway of NAD+ biosynthesis, in a subset of HLRCC cases. NAPRT is hypermethylated at a CpG island in the promoter in cell line models and patient samples, resulting in loss of NAPRT expression. We find that FH-deficient RCC models with loss of NAPRT expression, as well as other oncometabolite-producing cancer models that silence NAPRT, are extremely sensitive to nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase inhibitors (NAMPTi). NAPRT silencing was also associated with synergistic tumor cell killing with PARP inhibitors and NAMPTis, which was associated with effects on PAR-mediated DNA repair. Overall, our findings indicate that NAPRT silencing can be targeted in oncometabolite-producing cancers and elucidates how oncometabolite-associated hypermethylation can impact diverse cellular processes and lead to therapeutically relevant vulnerabilities in cancer cells. Implications: NAPRT is a novel biomarker for targeting NAD+ metabolism in FH-deficient HLRCCs with NAMPTis alone and targeting DNA repair processes with the combination of NAMPTis and PARP inhibitors., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most prevalent kidney neoplasm; bone metastasis (BM) develops in 35% to 40% of metastatic patients and results in substantial morbidity and mortality, as well as medical costs. A key feature of ccRCC is the loss of function of the von Hippel-Lindau protein, which enhances angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor release. Consequently, antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) emerged as a treatment for ccRCC. However, limited data about their efficacy in BM is available, and no systematic comparisons have been performed. We developed mouse models of bone and lung ccRCC tumors and compared their anticancer efficacy, impact on mouse survival, and mechanisms of action, including effects on tumor cells and both immune and nonimmune (blood vessels and osteoclasts) bone stromal components. This approach elucidates the efficacy of TKIs in ccRCC bone tumors to support rational interrogation and development of therapies., Significance: TKIs showed different efficacy in synchronous bone and lung metastases and did not eradicate tumors as single agents but induced extensive reprogramming of the BM microenvironment. This resulted in a significant decrease in neoangiogenic blood vessels, bone remodeling, and immune cell infiltration (including CD8 T cells) with altered spatial distribution., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a cancer that is often already in an advanced stage at the time of initial diagnosis. Although urothelial carcinoma of the upper and lower urinary tracts both originate from the urothelium and have similar genetic alterations, there are significant differences in their distribution. In localized high-risk UTUC, radical nephroureterectomy is the gold standard therapy. In metastatic UTUC, major changes are emerging in sequential therapy due to the investigation of new classes of drugs. In addition to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy, new substances such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and FGFR inhibitors are used., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Integrated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now the recommended first-line therapy to manage renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Proteasome 26S subunit non-ATPase 2 (PSMD2) overexpression in tumors has been correlated with tumor progression. Currently, mRCC lacks an established biomarker for the combination of ICI+TKI., Methods: This study involved RNA sequencing of RCC patients from two cohorts treated with ICI+TKI (ZS-MRCC and JAVELIN-Renal-101). We utilized immunohistochemistry alongside flow cytometry, aiming at assessing immune cell infiltration and functionality in high-risk localized RCC samples. Response and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated relying upon RECIST criteria., Results: PSMD2 was significantly overexpressed in advanced RCC and among non-responders to ICI+TKI therapy. Overexpressed PSMD2 was correlated with poor PFS in the ZS-MRCC and JAVELIN-101 cohorts. Multivariate Cox analysis validated PSMD2 as an independent PFS predictor. PSMD2 overexpression was related to a reduction in CD8 + T cells, especially GZMB + CD8 + T cells, besides an increase in PD1 + CD4 + T cells. Additionally, tumors with high PSMD2 levels showed enhanced T cell exhaustion levels and a higher regulatory T cell presence. A Machine Learning (ML) model based on PSMD2 expression and other screened factors was subsequently developed to predict the effectiveness of ICI+TKI., Conclusions: Elevated PSMD2 expression is linked to resistance and decreased PFS in mRCC patients undergoing ICI+TKI therapy. High PSMD2 levels are also associated with impaired function and increased exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. An ML model incorporating PSMD2 expression could potentially identify patients who may have a higher likelihood of benefiting from ICI+TKI., (© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

In this study we evaluated outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received immunotherapy before surgery. We found that receiving immunotherapy combinations before surgery can offer patients benefits in reducing tumor size and improving disease control., Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has improved outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, the timing of surgical intervention for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is still controversial for this group of patients., Patients and Methods: We identified patients with mRCC receiving IO-based therapies and undergoing CN. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent upfront CN and those who underwent deferred CN. Pathologic and radiographic features along with clinical outcomes were systematically collected. Comparisons were performed using Chi-square test, paired t-Test or Mann-Whitney-U test. Progression Free survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Fifty-one patients with mRCC were included, with a median follow-up of 21 months. 38 (74.5%) patients received IO-based therapies prior to CN, while 13 (25.5%) patients underwent up-front CN. IO-based therapies reduced median tumor size from pretreatment 10 cm to 8.6 cm post-treatment when given prior to CN. IO-TKI had a trend toward higher tumor shrinkage (-2.3 vs -1.2 cm). Pathologic T downstaging occurred in 42% (n=16) of patients, 11% (n=4) of whom had pT0 disease. Thrombus downstaging occurred in 13% (n=6) of patients, all with either partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in metastases. PFS (HR=0.7, 95% CI 0.29-1.98, p=0.58) and OS (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.13-1.57, p=0.21) were not statistically significant between 2 cohorts., Conclusions: IO-based therapies, particularly IO-TKIs, resulted in pathologic necrosis and reductions in tumor size prior to deferred CN. PFS and OS were similar for patients who received either upfront IO-based therapy or after CN., Competing Interests: Disclosure James Brugarolas: Advisory board/consultant: Eisai, Johnson and Johnson, Exelixis, Telix. ayal Kapur: Advisory board/consultant: ClearNano. Hans Hammers: Advisory board/consultant-ARMO Biosciences, Inc., Bayer AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Exelixis, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc.,Pfizer, Inc., Novartis International AG, and Surface Oncology, Inc.; PI/research funding-Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck & Co., Inc., ararvive,Surface Oncology,NGM Biopharmaceutical. Qian Qin: Advisory board/consultant – Exelixis. Solomon Woldu: Advisory Role/consultant: Urogen pharma. Yair Lotan: Advisory role/Consultant: Nanorobotics, Photocure, Astra Zeneca, Merck, Fergene, Abbvie, Nucleix, Ambu, Seattle Genetics, Hitachi, Ferring Research, verity pharmaceutics, virtuoso surgical, Stimit, Urogen, Vessi medical, CAPs medical, Xcures, BMS, Nonagen, Aura Biosciences, Inc., Convergent Genomics, Pacific Edge, Pfizer, Phinomics Inc, CG oncology, Uroviu, On target lab, Promis Diagnostics, Valar labs, Uroessentials. Jeffrey Cadeddu: Advisory Role/consultant: DeepQure, Distalmotion, Ownership: Levita Mganetics, EtiraRx, Onconanno. Tian Zhang: PI/research funding – Research support (to UTSW) from CPRIT, Merck, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Tempus, ALX Oncology, Janux Therapeutics, Exelixis, FBD Biologics, Guardant, OncoC4; Consulting/advisory relationships: Merck, Exelixis, Sanofi-Aventis, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Amgen, BMS, Seagen, Eisai, Aveo, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Gilead, Novartis, EMD Serono, Aravive, MJH Associates, Vaniam, Aptitude Health, Peerview, eChinaHealth., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A useful biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has not yet been established. This study aims to investigate whether inflammatory markers are associated with the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy before and during treatment., Methods: Data from patients with advanced clear cell RCC who received a combination treatment of nivolumab plus ipilimumab were retrospectively analyzed. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 weeks after treatment initiation. The correlation between these inflammatory markers and the patient's prognosis was investigated., Results: Eighty-four patients were identified. The multivariate analysis identified NLR at week 3, CRP at week 6, and NLR and CRP at week 9 as the consistent predictor associated with poor overall survival (OS) at each time point. The survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that an NLR of ≥ 2.4 at week 3, CRP of ≥ 1.4 mg/dL at week 6, and NLR of ≥ 4.8 and CRP of ≥ 1.0 mg/dL at week 9 were associated with worse OS (hazard ratios (HR) = 5.70, P = 0.008, HR = 3.23, P = 0.004, HR = 7.38, P < 0.001 and HR = 3.55, P = 0.002)., Conclusions: Both NLR and CRP were considered useful biomarkers for understanding the prognosis during nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy. Furthermore, an NLR of ≥ 4.8 and CRP of ≥ 1.0 mg/dL at week 9 are helpful in reconsidering treatment continuation., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Abstract: Targeted immunotherapy became the most advanced approach for cancer treatment. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) expressed on activated T cells can reverse immune suppression and cause T-cell activation. Nivolumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody that is a fully human immunoglobulin G4, blocks PD-1 and promotes antitumor immunity. Cabozantinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. As a result of enhancing immune response in normal tissues, immune-related adverse events can occur. Thyroid dysfunction is a common form of immune-related adverse event and seen on 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans post therapy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have revolutionized the management of first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) by improving patient survival. Large phase 3 randomized trials assessing ICI-based combinations have reported complete response (CR) rates of 10% to 18% in the first-line setting. However, there is a scarcity of data about the effect of treatment of residual disease regarding CR rates improvement., Materials and Methods: We included retrospectively all consecutive mRCC patients treated in first-line setting at the Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe with an ICI-based combination involving ICI or TKI, either alone or with added local treatment of residual disease. Patients were characterized according to IMDC risk. Radiologic response was defined according to RECIST v1.1., Results: We enrolled 80 mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combinations between May 2015 and May 2022. The median age was 63 years. Regarding IMDC risk, there were 12 favourable (15%), 50 intermediate (63%), and 18 poor-risk (22%) patients. Forty-seven patients (59%) received ICI + ICI, 24 (30%) received ICI + TKI, and 9 (11%) received another ICI-based therapy. In total, 8 achieved CR (10%), 36 patients (45%) achieved partial response, 23 (29%) achieved stable disease and 12 achieved progressive disease (15%) as the best response with systemic therapy alone. By adding local treatment of residual disease, 11 additional patients (14%) achieved radiological NED. Residual disease resected sites included kidney (n = 6), lymph nodes (n = 5), lung metastases (n = 2) and liver metastases (n = 1)., Conclusions: The resection of residual disease after first-line ICI-based therapy is associated with improved CR rate (CR + NED) in patients with mRCC. These results need to be validated in prospective trial., Patient Summary: In recent years, the advent of immunotherapy has radically changed the management of patients with metastatic kidney cancer. Approximately 10% to 18% of these patients using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations no longer have detectable disease on CT scans (complete response). There are currently few data on the use of treatment of residual disease to increase the number of patients in complete response. In this retrospective study, the complete response rate with ICI-based treatment was 10%. When local treatment was added, the number of patients with a complete response increased to 24%. This strategy could increase the number of patients with a prolonged complete response in the future., Competing Interests: Disclosures Fabien Moinard-Butot certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: F. Moinard-Butot has served in advisory roles for BMS. T. Tricard has received travel and accommodation expenses from Janssen. RL. Cazzato has received travel and accommodation expenses from Medtronic, Ipsen and QUANTUM SURGICAL. L. Pierard has received travel and accommodation expenses from Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Eli lilly and company, MUNDI PHARMA. V. Lindner reports speaker services for AstraZeneca, Ipsen; and has received travel and accommodation expenses from Ipsen, MSD and Pfizer. S. Martin has served in advisory roles for BMS. M. Burgy has served in advisory roles for Lilly; reports speaker services for BMS and MSD; has received travel and accommodation expenses from Pfizer, Ipsen and MUNDIPHARMA. G. Malouf has served in advisory roles for BMS, MSD and Ipsen; has received travel and accommodation expenses from MSD, Ipsen and BMS. H. Lang reports speaker services for Johnson & Johnson, Astellas pharma. P. Barthélémy has served in advisory roles for Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen Cilag, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Gilead Sciences and Pfizer and reports speaker services for AstraZeneca and Seagen. M. Oriel, V. Gaillard, P. Werle, C. Schuster, C. Roy, A. Anthony, C. Bigot, P. Boudier and A. Fritsch have any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Efficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies., Design, Setting and Participants: Patients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany., Interventions: Cabozantinib was administered as a standard of care., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized., Results and Limitations: About 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study., Conclusions: Cabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure VG: Compensated lectures: AstraZeneca, Astellas, BMS, EISAI, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, ONO Pharmaceutical, Novartis/AAA. Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS; EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Cureteq, Debiopharm, Gilead, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech. Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer. Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Janssen, Pfizer MB: RR: Advisory Board: Apogepha,Ipsen, Merck .Pfizer Travel support: Janssen, Pfizer GN: compensated lectures: Roche Pharma, MEDAC, Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Merck, Janssen-Cilag, Astellas; Advisory Boards: Roche Pharma, Sanofi, BMS, Merck Serono, Pfizer, MEDAC, Ipsen, Janssen, Travel support:Roche Pharma, Pfizer, Merck, Janssen, maunscript writing: Pfizer, BMS, Merck MJS: Compensated lectures: Astellas, Apogepha, Bayer, BMS, EISAI, Hexal, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, Medac, MSD, Janssen-Cilag. Advisory board: BMS, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen-Cilag. Congress: Apogepha, Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Pfizer. Research Grants: Gilead, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, QED, MSD. FA: none, MM: none, MC: none, MOZ: none AW: Compensated lectures: AIO, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, iOMEDICO Advisory Board: BMS;Gilead, Lilly Merck, MSD, Pfizer,Janssen Research Grant: AIO, iOMEDICO AH: none JC: none CD: Compensated lectures from Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Advisory Board: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen. Travel support: Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen and Bayer HT: none, MS: none, DS: none PI: Compensated lectures: AstraZeneca, BMS, EISAI, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis/AAA. Advisory Board: Apogepha, BMS; EISAI, EUSA Pharm, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Oncorena, PCI Biotech. Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer. Travel support: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Merck, Pfizer, (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The mTOR inhibitor everolimus has been approved as a sequential or second-line therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the development of drug resistance limits its clinical applications. This study aims to address the challenge of everolimus resistance and provide new insights into the treatment of advanced RCC. Here, the cytotoxicity of the DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) inhibitor SGI-1027 in inducing cell vacuolation and methuosis is discovered and demonstrated for the first time. Additionally, SGI-1027 exerts synergistic effects with everolimus, as their combination suppresses the growth, migration, and invasion of renal cancer cells. Mechanistically, apoptosis and GSDME-dependent pyroptosis triggered by lysosomal membrane permeability (LMP) are observed. The upregulation of GSDME expression and increased lysosomal activity in renal cancer cells provide a therapeutic window for the combination of these two drugs to treat renal cancer. The combination treatment exhibits effective anti-tumor activity and is well tolerated in a subcutaneous tumor model. Overall, this study validates and reveals the specific cytotoxicity property of SGI-1027 and its potent synergistic effect with everolimus, offering new insights into advanced RCC therapy and everolimus-resistance overcoming., (© 2024 The Author(s). Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.)

Background: Genetic variants of UGT1A1, involved in glucuronidation and clearance of bilirubin, are associated with reduced bilirubin metabolization and drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia. We studied the impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on drug-induced isolated hyperbilirubinemia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with pazopanib, cabozantinib, and axitinib., Methods: We genotyped the UGT1A1*28 TA6/TA6-TA6/TA7-TA7/TA7 polymorphism and correlated with median baseline, on-treatment and peak bilirubin levels during therapy, incidence of grade-1- or -2 (G1/2)-hyperbilirubinemia and time-to-G1-hyperbilirubinemia., Results: Of the 66 patients treated with pazopanib, 29 received axitinib and 28 cabozantinib upon progression. Median baseline bilirubin was higher in TA7/TA7-carriers versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers at start of pazopanib (P < .0001), cabozantinib (P < .0001), and axitinib (P = .007). During pazopanib therapy, median bilirubin increased 1.4-fold in TA7/TA7+TA6/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6-carriers. On cabozantinib, bilirubin increased 1.5-fold in TA7/TA7-carriers but not in TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers. Axitinib did not increase bilirubin in any genotype. Peak bilirubin in TA7/TA7- versus TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers was higher on pazopanib (P < .0001) or cabozantinib (P < .0001). With pazopanib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 57% of TA7/TA7- and 12% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P = .0009) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 36% and 6% of the patients, respectively (P = .004). On cabozantinib, G1-hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 100% of TA7/TA7- and 5% of TA6/TA6+TA6/TA7-carriers (P < .0001) and G2-hyperbilirubinemia in 33% and 0% of the patients, respectively (P = .04). On axitinib, no correlation between the genotypes and G1/2-hyperbilirubinemia was observed., Conclusion: We validate the previously described impact of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism on isolated bilirubin increase on pazopanib. We report for the first time that cabozantinib also interferes with UGT1A1 and causes isolated bilirubin increase., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab is indicated for many types of cancers; however, several patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We herein report a case of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in a 63-year-old woman with stage IV left clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Our patient developed CRS while taking prednisolone, 43 days after the start of ipilimumab and nivolumab administration. The patient was treated with steroid pulse therapy, which improved the symptoms of shock and respiratory failure. Increased vascular permeability and relative adrenal insufficiency are considered to be the main pathogeneses. The early administration of high-dose steroids is crucial as a replacement for corticosteroids.

Background and Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) herald a transformative era in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) treatment, amid acknowledged sex-based disparities in these cancers. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify sex-specific differences in the efficacy of ICI/ADC monotherapy or combination therapies for RCC and TCC survival, in metastatic and adjuvant settings., Methods: A systematic search was conducted up to October 2023 for English articles on ICIs and ADCs as systemic therapies (ICIs in first-line and adjuvant treatment for RCC, ICIs and ADCs in first- and second-line treatment for TCC). Randomised clinical trials were considered. The primary objective was overall survival (OS) of ICIs and ADCs between males and females. The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, overall response rate, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by sex via odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals compared with controls. Log ORs were used for creating a frequentist NMA. This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023468632)., Key Findings and Limitations: Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Females had an advantage for RCC-adjuvant treatment for atezolizumab (log OR [SE] = -0.57 ± 0.25, p = 0.024) in OS. Males showed a survival advantage in TCC second-line treatment for ADC-Nectin 4 (log OR [SE] = 0.65 ± 0.28, p = 0.02). No other significant results were shown., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: The NMA revealed gender-specific variations in ICI and ADC responses for RCC and TCC, offering insights for personalised cancer care and addressing disparities in cancer care and outcomes., Patient Summary: In this systematic review, we looked at the sex differences for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) for antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In our analysis, female and male sex has better overall survival for adjuvant and second-line therapies for RCC and TCC, respectively. Urgent research on gender-specific cancer therapies is imperative., (Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA) is an oral, potent hypoxia-inducible factor-2α inhibitor, recently approved in the United States for the treatment of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and other VHL disease-associated neoplasms. Safety and efficacy were investigated in two clinical studies: a Phase 1 dose escalation/expansion study in solid tumors and RCC and a Phase 2 study in VHL-RCC. A population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate belzutifan exposures to facilitate exposure-response (E-R) analyses for efficacy and safety endpoints. Relationships between exposure and efficacy (overall response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, best overall tumor size response, and other endpoints), safety outcomes (Grade ≥3 anemia, Grade ≥3 hypoxia, and time to first dose reduction/dose interruption), and pharmacodynamic biomarkers (erythropoietin [EPO] and hemoglobin [Hgb]) were evaluated using various regression techniques and time-to-event analyses. Efficacy E-R was generally flat with non-significant positive trends with exposure. The safety E-R analyses demonstrated a lack of relationship for Grade ≥3 hypoxia and a positive relationship for Grade ≥3 anemia, with incidences also significantly dependent on baseline Hgb. Exposure-dependent reductions in EPO and Hgb were observed. Based on the cumulative benefit-risk assessment in VHL disease-associated neoplasms using E-R, no a priori dose adjustment is recommended for any subpopulation. These analyses supported the benefit-risk profile of belzutifan 120 mg once daily dosing in patients with VHL-RCC for labeling and the overall development program., (© 2024 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Introduction: The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Total 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as "no concomitant PPIs (PPI-)" if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as "concomitant PPIs (PPI+)" if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given., Results: Eighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI- and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI- (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI- (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI- (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found., Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use., Competing Interests: Disclosure CP acted as a consultant and/or a speaker for Angelini Pharma, Biorek, BMS, Eisai, General Electric, Ipsen, Medendi, and MSD, and as a protocol steering committee member for BMS, Eisai, and MSD. MR received honoraria as a speaker/consultant by Astra Zeneca, MSD, BMS, Janssen, Merck and Gilead. MDR received fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Bio-Rad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and Ipsen; RD reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead, and EUSA Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)