Search

Purpose: Neratinib plus capecitabine (N+C) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in NALA (NCT01808573), a randomized phase III trial comparing N+C with lapatinib + capecitabine (L+C) in 621 patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting. We evaluated correlations between exploratory biomarkers and PFS. Patients and Methods: Somatic mutations were evaluated by next-generation sequencing on primary or metastatic samples. HER2 protein expression was evaluated by central IHC, H-score, and VeraTag/HERmark. p95 expression (truncated HER2) was measured by VeraTag. HRs were estimated using unstratified Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Four hundred and twenty samples had successful sequencing: 34.0% had PIK3CA mutations and 5.5% had HER2 (ERBB2) mutations. In the combined patient populations, PIK3CA mutations trended toward shorter PFS [wild-type vs. mutant, HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64–1.03], whereas HER2 mutations trended toward longer PFS [HR = 1.69 (95% CI, 0.97–3.29)]. Higher HER2 protein expression was associated with longer PFS [IHC 3+ vs. 2+, HR = 0.67 (0.54–0.82); H-score ≥240 versus Conclusions: PIK3CA mutations were associated with shorter PFS whereas higher HER2 expression was associated with longer PFS. Higher HER2 protein expression was also associated with a greater benefit for N+C compared with L+C.

Background Neratinib has efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report outcomes among patients with CNS metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine (N + C) versus lapatinib plus capecitabine (L + C). Materials and Methods NALA was a randomized, active‐controlled trial in patients who received two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens for HER2‐positive MBC. Patients with asymptomatic/stable brain metastases (treated or untreated) were eligible. Patients were assigned to N + C (neratinib 240 mg per day, capecitabine 750 mg/m2 twice daily) or L + C (lapatinib 1,250 mg per day, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily) orally. Independently adjudicated progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and CNS endpoints were considered. Results Of 621 patients enrolled, 101 (16.3%) had known CNS metastases at baseline (N + C, n = 51; L + C, n = 50); 81 had received prior CNS‐directed radiotherapy and/or surgery. In the CNS subgroup, mean PFS through 24 months was 7.8 months with N + C versus 5.5 months with L + C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–1.05), and mean OS through 48 months was 16.4 versus 15.4 months (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59–1.38). At 12 months, cumulative incidence of interventions for CNS disease was 25.5% for N + C versus 36.0% for L + C, and cumulative incidence of progressive CNS disease was 26.2% versus 41.6%, respectively. In patients with target CNS lesions at baseline (n = 32), confirmed intracranial objective response rates were 26.3% and 15.4%, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion These analyses suggest improved PFS and CNS outcomes with N + C versus L + C in patients with CNS metastases from HER2‐positive MBC. Implications for Practice In a subgroup of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from HER2‐positive breast cancer after two or more previous HER2‐directed regimens, the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine was associated with improved progression‐free survival and CNS outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine. These findings build on previous phase II and III studies describing efficacy of neratinib in the prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, and support a role for neratinib as a systemic treatment option in the management of patients with HER2‐positive brain metastases following antibody‐based HER2‐directed therapies., This article reports outcomes among HER2‐positive breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases at baseline from the phase III NALA trial of neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine.

Background: The development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases presents a considerable challenge in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) due to the limited availability of evidence-based treatments. Up to 50% of patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) MBC develop CNS metastases during the course of their disease. Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity against CNS metastases in HER2+ MBC in two phase 2 studies (NEfERT-T, TBCRC 022) and one phase 3 study (NALA); significant benefits for predefined CNS endpoints were reported in NEfERT-T and confirmed in NALA. Here we present an exploratory analysis of patients from NALA with CNS involvement at enrollment. Methods: NALA was an international, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, phase 3 study in patients with HER2+ MBC who had received ≥2 lines of HER2-directed therapy in the metastatic setting (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01808573). Patients with asymptomatic metastatic brain disease managed with stable doses of corticosteroids for ≥14 days prior to randomization were eligible, whereas patients with symptomatic or unstable brain metastases were excluded. Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to neratinib (N; 240 mg qd po) + capecitabine (C; 750 mg/m2 bid po) or lapatinib (L; 1250 mg qd po) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid po). Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS disease was a secondary endpoint. CNS disease at baseline was defined as patients with treated or untreated disease in the ‘brain’ assessed by investigator at enrollment. CNS imaging was not mandatory at screening. Results: Of the 621 patients enrolled in NALA, 101 (16%) had documented baseline CNS disease and 520 (74%) had no CNS disease at baseline. Patients with CNS disease had a lower performance status and were more likely to have hormone receptor-negative disease than those with no CNS disease; no major imbalances of baseline characteristics were noted between treatment arms. Overall, 78 (77%) patients had previously received CNS radiation [whole brain, n=59 (58%); stereotactic, n=17 (17%); unknown, n=2 (2%)], and 5 (5%) patients had undergone CNS surgery. Median treatment duration was 5.7 (IQR 2.8-8.5) months for N, and 3.5 (IQR 2.1-6.9) months for L. PFS, OS, and cumulative incidence of interventions for symptomatic CNS disease are summarized in the table. No new safety signals were detected. Conclusions: Regardless of the status of CNS metastases at baseline, patients appeared to have better outcomes in the N+C arm compared with the L+C arm. Table. Efficacy outcomes in patients with and without CNS disease at baselineIntention-to-treat (n=621)CNS metastases at baseline – Yes (n=101)CNS metastases at baseline – No (n=520)N+C (n=307)L+C (n=314)N+C (n=51)L+C (n=50)N+C (n=256)L+C (n=264)PFSaHazard ratio (95% CI)0.76 (0.63–0.93)0.66 (0.41–1.05)0.76 (0.62–0.94)P-value0.00590.07410.0099Restricted mean PFSb, months8.86.67.85.59.06.9Difference, months2.22.32.1OSHazard ratio (95% CI)0.88 (0.72–1.07)0.90 (0.59–1.38)0.85 (0.68–1.06)P-value0.20860.63520.1517Restricted mean OSb, months24.022.216.415.425.623.6Difference, months1.71.02.0Incidence of CNS interventionOverall cumulative incidencec, %22.7629.1940.1347.7919.1624.65P-value0.0430.4300.067aCentrally confirmed; bRestriction prespecified as 24 months for PFS, and 48 months for OS; c % requiring intervention for CNS disease (competing risk model) Citation Format: Cristina Saura, Larisa Ryvo, Sara Hurvitz, William Gradishar, Beverly Moy, Suzette Delaloge, Sung-Bae Kim, Mafalda Oliveira, Maureen Trudeau, Ming-Shen Dai, Barbara Haley, Ron Bose, Luciana Landeiro, Judith Bebchuk, Aimee Frazier, Kiana Keyvanjah, Richard Bryce, Adam Brufsky. Impact of neratinib on outcomes in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with central nervous system disease at baseline: Findings from the phase 3 NALA trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-09.

To evaluate the effects of multiple doses of loperamide on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral dose of neratinib. This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Twenty healthy adult subjects received an oral dose of neratinib 240 mg daily on Days 1–4 of Period 1 followed by a 7-day washout. In Period 2, oral neratinib 240 mg was administered with loperamide 4 mg followed by two further doses of loperamide 2 mg 8 and 16 h later on Days 1–4. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 72 h following each neratinib dose. Safety was monitored throughout the study. A median tmax of ~ 6 h was observed for neratinib during both periods. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution were similar for Periods 1 and 2: mean CLss/F 308.2 and 322.1 L/h; mean Vzτ/F 7995 and 10,318 L, respectively. The half-life of neratinib increased in the presence of loperamide from 18.0 to 22.2 h. Mean exposure was within the same range without and with loperamide administration: Cmax 61.2 ng/mL and 49.5 ng/mL; AUClast 1086 ng h/mL and 1153 ng h/mL, and AUCtau 779 ng h/mL and 745 ng h/mL, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mainly mild in intensity, with the most frequent events being diarrhea (45%) and constipation (35%). Neratinib administered alone and concomitantly with multiple oral doses of loperamide is generally safe and well tolerated. Loperamide has minimal effects on neratinib pharmacokinetic parameters.

Health-related quality of life; Metastatic breast cancer; Neratinib Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud; Cáncer de mama metastásico; Neratinib Qualitat de vida relacionada amb la salut; Càncer de mama metastàtic; Neratinib Purpose To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study. Methods In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan–Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points. Results Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63–1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32–2.23]). Conclusion In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC. This work was supported by Puma Biotechnology Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA [no grant number is applicable]. Puma Biotechnology Inc. funded the provision of editorial support provided by CMD Consulting and Miller Medical Communications.

Purpose: Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated systemic efficacy and intracranial activity in various stages of HER2+ breast cancer. NALA was a phase III randomized trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of neratinib + capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib + capecitabine (L+C) in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients who had received ≥2 HER2-directed regimens. Descriptive analysis results of the Asian subgroup in the NALA study are reported herein.Methods: 621 centrally-assessed HER2+ mBC patients were enrolled, 202 of whom were Asian. Those with stable, asymptomatic brain metastases (BM) were eligible for study entry. Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240mg qd) + C (750mg/m2 bid, day 1-14) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to L (1250mg qd) + C (1000mg/m2 bid, day 1-14) in 21-day cycles. Co-primary endpoints were centrally-assessed progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included time to intervention for central nervous system (CNS) disease, objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, and safety.Results: 104 and 98 Asian patients were randomly assigned to receive N+C or L+C, respectively. Median PFS of N+C and L+C was 7.0 and 5.4 months (P=0.0014), respectively. Overall cumulative incidence of intervention for CNS disease was lower with N+C (27.9 versus 33.8%; P=0.039). Both median OS (23.8 versus 18.7 months; P=0.185) and DoR (11.1 versus 4.2 months; PConclusion: Consistent with the efficacy profile observed in the overall study population, Asian patients with HER2+ mBC, who had received ≥2 HER2-directed regimens, may also benefit from N+C. No new safety signals were noted. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01808573

Càncer de coll uterí; Assaig clínic; Mutant HER2 Cáncer de cuello uterino; Ensayo clínico; Mutante HER2 Cervical cancer; Clinical trial; HER2 mutant Objective: Somatic HER2 mutations occur in ~5% of cervical cancers and are considered oncogenic and associated with poor prognosis. Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in multiple HER2-mutant cancers. SUMMIT is a phase II basket trial investigating the efficacy and safety of neratinib in solid tumors. Methods: Patients with HER2-mutant, persistent, metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer with disease progression after platinum-based treatment for advanced/recurrent disease received oral neratinib 240 mg/day with mandatory loperamide prophylaxis during cycle 1. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included: response duration (DOR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); safety. Results: Sixteen eligible patients were enrolled; 10 (62.5%) had endocervical adenocarcinoma. The most common HER2 mutation was S310F (63% of patients). Three of 12 RECIST-measurable patients had confirmed partial responses (ORR 25%; 95%CI 5.5-57.2%); 3 had stable disease ≥16 weeks (CBR 50%; 95%CI 21.1-78.9%). DOR for responders were 5.6, 5.9, and 12.3 months. Median PFS was 7.0 months (95%CI 0.7-18.3 months); median OS was 16.8 months (95%CI 4.1-NE months). Diarrhea (75%), nausea (44%), and decreased appetite (38%) were the most common adverse events. One patient (6%) reported grade 3 diarrhea. There were no grade 4 events, and no diarrhea-related treatment discontinuations. Conclusions: Neratinib monotherapy showed evidence of activity in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-mutant cervical cancer, with no new safety signals. Given the few effective options for cervical cancer after platinum-based therapy failure, neratinib warrants further investigation in this molecularly defined patient population. This work was supported by Puma Biotechnology Inc . 10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 2150, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

PURPOSE NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01808573 ) is a randomized, active-controlled, phase III trial comparing neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), plus capecitabine (N+C) against lapatinib, a reversible dual TKI, plus capecitabine (L+C) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with ≥ 2 previous HER2-directed MBC regimens. METHODS Patients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1:1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS A total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+C, n = 307; L+C, n = 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P = .0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P = .2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+C versus L+C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P = .043). ORRs were N+C 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+C 26.7% (95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P = .1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P = .0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+C 83% v L+C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups. CONCLUSION N+C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+C. No new N+C safety signals were observed.

Neratinib is an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting HER2 (ERBB2) and EGFR (ERBB). It is being clinically evaluated for the treatment of breast and other solid tumors types as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapies. In support of several phase I/II clinical trials investigating neratinib combinations, we developed and validated a novel LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of neratinib in 100μL of human plasma with a stable isotopic internal standard. Analytes were extracted from plasma using protein precipitation and evaporation of the resulting supernatant followed by resuspension. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity UPLC BEH Shield RP18 column and a gradient methanol-water mobile phase containing 10% ammonium acetate. An ABI 4000 mass spectrometer and electrospray positive mode ionization were used for detection. The assay was linear from 2 to 1,000ng/mL and proved to be accurate (98.9-106.5%) and precise (

Background: The FDA approved neratinib (N), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with capecitabine (C) for patients with HER2+ advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting based on the NALA clinical study, where N+C significantly improved PFS vs. lapatinib (L)+C. Characterizing HRQoL associated with this regimen can help inform treatment decision-making for these patients. The objective of this analysis was to characterize HRQoL among patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer from the NALA clinical study. Methods: NALA was a multinational, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical study of N+C vs. L+C in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens. From May 2013 to July 2017, patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd) + C (750 mg/m2 bid 14d/21d) with loperamide prophylaxis during the first cycle, or to L (1250 mg qd) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid 14d/21d). HRQoL, a prespecified secondary endpoint of the NALA study, was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23 at baseline and every 6 weeks (±3 days) until the end of treatment (data collection through treatment cycle 19, 12.5 months). The QLQ-C30 summary and global health status scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and the systemic therapy side-effects scores range from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Patients were included in the analysis for a particular scale if they had a baseline assessment and at least 1 follow-up assessment. For these analyses, a change of ≥10 points was considered to be clinically meaningful. Descriptive statistics summarized observed scores and changes from baseline, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for time-to-deterioration (TTD) of ≥10 points and mixed models estimated the change over time for 7 prespecified scales: QLQ-C30 summary score, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation and diarrhea, and the EORTC QLQ-BR23 systemic therapy side effects subscale. No adjustments for multiplicity were performed. Results: 621 patients from 28 countries were randomized (307 N+C; 314 L+C). The mean completion rate of the QLQ-C30 over the course of the study was 91% for both treatment arms. Discontinuation due to any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was lower in the N+C vs. L+C arm (14% vs. 18%). At baseline, the mean (SD) QLQ-C30 summary scores were 79.8 (14.1) for N+C and 79.9 (15.7) for L+C. After 19 treatment cycles, the mean (SD) QLQ-C30 summary scores were similar to baseline scores: 81.8 (16.7) for N+C and 81.3 (15.3) for L+C. There were no differences in TTD of ≥10 points for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the HR for N+C vs. L+C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63-1.40). All prespecified HRQoL subscales had similar statistically non-significant results for TTD with the exception of diarrhea (HR=1.71; 95% CI 1.32-2.23). The mixed models analyzing change in HRQoL from baseline did not demonstrate persistent declines nor meaningful differences between the treatment arms. Conclusion: In these results from the NALA study, among patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, at study end and throughout most of the study, there were no differences observed between the two treatment arms in HRQoL scores. HRQoL was sustained over the study period despite the early transient presence of diarrhea in some patients. Discontinuation due to any TEAE was lower in the N+C vs. the L+C arm. These results may help guide healthcare providers, patients and carers in selection of optimal treatment for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Beverly Moy, Mafalda Oliveira, Cristina Saura, William Gradishar, Sung-Bae Kim, Adam Brufsky, Sara Hurvitz, Larisa Ryvo, Daniele Fagnani, Nancy Chan, Sujith R Kalmadi, Paula Silverman, Suzette Delaloge, Richard Bryce, Kiana Keyvanjah, Judith Bebchuk, Bo Zhang, Nina Oestreicher, Ron Bose. Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life (HRQoL) while improving progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-02.

Aims To evaluate the effect of lansoprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, on the absorption, pharmacokinetics, and safety of neratinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy subjects. Methods This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence study. Fifteen healthy adult subjects received a single oral dose of neratinib 240 mg (Period 1), followed by a washout period, then oral lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for 7 days and a single dose of neratinib 240 mg on Day 5 (Period 2). Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed for 72 h following each neratinib dose. Plasma neratinib concentration–time data were analysed using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios for AUC0–t, AUC0–inf, and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for neratinib plus lansoprazole vs. neratinib were used to assess the magnitude of the drug–drug interaction if the 90% confidence intervals were outside 80.00–125.00%. Results Neratinib geometric least-squares mean (LSM) Cmax was reduced from 84.5 ng ml−1 with neratinib alone to 24.5 ng ml−1 with neratinib plus lansoprazole. The extent of exposure to neratinib was also decreased: geometric LSM AUC0–t was 1478 ng ml−1 h with neratinib vs. 426 ng ml−1 h with neratinib plus lansoprazole, and geometric LSM AUC0–inf was 1557 ng ml−1 h vs. 542 ng ml−1 h, respectively. Mean t½ was similar with both treatments (approximately 14 h). Geometric mean ratios 90% confidence intervals for AUC0–t, AUC0–inf and Cmax fell outside the prespecified equivalence range (80.0–125.0%). Treatment-emergent adverse events, all mild, were reported by five (33%) subjects. Conclusions Coadministration of lansoprazole with neratinib reduced the rate and extent of neratinib exposure in healthy subjects.

1002 Background: NALA (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01808573) is a multinational, randomized, open-label, phase III trial of neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]) + capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib (a reversible dual TKI) + capecitabine (L+C) in patients with stage IV HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received ≥2 prior HER2-directed regimens for MBC. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to N (240 mg qd po) + C (750 mg/m2 bid po) or L (1250 mg qd po) + C (1000 mg/m2 bid po). Co-primary endpoints were centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS; objective response rate (ORR); duration of response (DoR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); time to intervention for symptomatic metastatic central nervous system (CNS) disease; safety; and patient-reported health outcomes. Results: 621 patients were randomized (307 to N+C; 314 to L+C). The risk of disease progression or death was reduced by 24% with N+C vs L+C (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.63–0.93; p = 0.006); 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 47.2% vs 37.8% and 28.8% vs 14.8% for N+C vs L+C, respectively. OS rates at 6 and 12 months were 90.2% vs 87.5% and 72.5% vs 66.7% for N+C vs L+C, respectively (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07; p = 0.2086). ORR in patients with measurable disease at screening was improved with N+C vs L+C (32.8% vs 26.7%; p = 0.1201), as was CBR (44.5% vs 35.6%; p = 0.0328) and DoR (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.33–0.74; p = 0.0004). Time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease (overall cumulative incidence 22.8% vs 29.2%; p = 0.043) was delayed with N+C vs L+C. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between arms, but there was a higher rate of grade 3 diarrhea with N+C vs L+C (24.4% vs 12.5%). TEAEs leading to neratinib/lapatinib discontinuation were lower with neratinib (10.9%) than with lapatinib (14.5%). Conclusions: N+C significantly improved PFS with a trend towards improved OS vs L+C. N+C also resulted in a delayed time to intervention for symptomatic CNS disease. Tolerability was similar between the two arms, with no new safety signals observed. Clinical trial information: NCT01808573.

Background Sunitinib inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), platelet-derived growth factor receptors, and stem cell factor receptor (KIT). The ability of soluble (s)KIT, VEGF-A, sVEGFR-2, and sVEGFR-3 to predict clinical outcome was analyzed in 61 patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a phase II study of sunitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00078000). Methods Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins were measured at baseline and during treatment with sunitinib 50 mg/day (4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off treatment). Baseline concentrations and maximal percent change during the first two treatment cycles were stratified by median values and evaluated for correlation with median time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). This latter fixed time period was chosen to avoid bias accruing from patients who were on study for longer periods of time. Results TTP was significantly longer in patients having median or higher maximal percent sKIT change compared with patients with less than the median change (21.7 vs. 7.9 weeks; p Conclusions This exploratory analysis suggests that changes in sKIT and possibly VEGF-A early during sunitinib treatment may be predictive of clinical outcome in MBC.