Search

Performing online monitoring for short horizon data is a challenging, though cost effective benefit. Self-starting methods attempt to address this issue adopting a hybrid scheme that executes calibration and monitoring simultaneously. In this work, we propose a Bayesian alternative that will utilize prior information and possible historical data (via power priors), offering a head-start in online monitoring, putting emphasis on outlier detection. For cases of complete prior ignorance, the objective Bayesian version will be provided. Charting will be based on the predictive distribution and the methodological framework will be derived in a general way, to facilitate discrete and continuous data from any distribution that belongs to the regular exponential family (with Normal, Poisson and Binomial being the most representative). Being in the Bayesian arena, we will be able to not only perform process monitoring, but also draw online inference regarding the unknown process parameter(s). An extended simulation study will evaluate the proposed methodology against frequentist based competitors and it will cover topics regarding prior sensitivity and model misspecification robustness. A continuous and a discrete real data set will illustrate its use in practice. Technical details, algorithms, guidelines on prior elicitation and R-codes are provided in appendices and . Short production runs and online phase I monitoring are among the best candidates to benefit from the developed methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Agent-based models (ABMs) are a powerful class of computational models widely used to simulate complex phenomena in many different application areas. However, one of the most critical aspects, poorly investigated in the literature, regards an important step of the model credibility assessment: solution verification. This study overcomes this limitation by proposing a general verification framework for ABMs that aims at evaluating the numerical errors associated with the model. A step-by-step procedure, which consists of two main verification studies (deterministic and stochastic model verification), is described in detail and applied to a specific mission critical scenario: the quantification of the numerical approximation error for UISS-TB, an ABM of the human immune system developed to predict the progression of pulmonary tuberculosis. Results provide indications on the possibility to use the proposed model verification workflow to systematically identify and quantify numerical approximation errors associated with UISS-TB and, in general, with any other ABMs., (© 2021 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)