Search

Introduction: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a therapeutic option for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT); however, its benefit over conservative medical management has not been proven. Whether the current patient selection practices are appropriate for EVT is unclear. Methods: This was a nationwide study of the 2016–2020 National Inpatient Sample database. Adult CVT patients and EVT treatments were identified. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, CVT risk factors, and CVT manifestations were identified. Presence of radiographic signs of advanced and severe CVT (venous infarction, cerebral edema, and intracranial hemorrhage) was recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes were good discharge outcomes and in-hospital mortality, respectively. Results: A total of 17,130 CVT patients were identified, and 56.7% had good discharge outcomes, while 4.6% died during hospitalization. 945 (5.5%) received EVT, and EVT patients were more likely to have cerebral infarction (35.4 vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001), edema (35.4 vs. 20.1%, p < 0.001), and hemorrhage (37.6 vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustments, EVT for patients without infarction, edema, or hemorrhage was moderately associated with higher odds of good outcomes (OR 1.86 [95% CI 0.98–3.53], p = 0.059) and resulted in zero deaths. However, with the increasing burden of radiographic signs of advanced CVT measured by the cumulative presence of infarction, edema, and hemorrhage, EVT was associated with decreasing odds of good outcomes and increasing odds of in-hospital mortality compared to medical management (interaction p = 0.046 and 0.029, respectively). Conclusions: EVT may lead to higher rates of favorable hospitalization outcomes in patients who have not yet developed overt parenchymal manifestations of backpressure changes; presence of infarction, edema, and hemorrhage may diminish the short-term effectiveness of EVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a poorly understood phenomenon, and whether it is associated with clinical detriment is unclear. Methods: This was an explorative analysis of a national database of real-world hospitalizations in the United States. Patients who underwent EVT were included. Patients were divided into SAH and non-SAH groups, and hospitalization outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression models. Regression models were also used to identify significant predictors for post-EVT SAH, and significant modulators of SAH's association with hospitalization outcomes were also assessed. Results: A total of 99,219 EVT patients were identified; 6174 (6.2%) had SAH. Overall, SAH was independently associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (21.5% vs. 10.6%, adjusted OR 2.53 [95%CI 2.23–2.87], p < 0.001) and lower odds of routine discharge to home with self-care (18.2% vs. 28.0%, aOR 0.58 [95%CI 0.52–0.65], p < 0.001). Distal/medium vessel occlusion (DMVO), coagulopathy, angioplasty or stenting, concurrent intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), and female sex were associated with higher odds of SAH. DMVO was associated with particularly heightened risk of death (31.8% vs. 7.9%, aOR 6.99 [95%CI 2.99 to 16.3], p < 0.001), which was an effect size significantly larger than other sites of vascular occlusion (interaction p > 0.05). Conclusion: SAH is an uncommon but likely clinically detrimental post-EVT complication. DMVO, coagulopathy, angioplasty or stenting, concurrent IPH, and female sex were independently associated with higher odds of post-EVT SAH. SAH associated with DMVO-EVT may be particularly harmful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Large vessel recanalization (LVR) before endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute large vessel ischemic strokes is a poorly understood phenomenon. Better understanding of predictors for LVR is important for optimizing stroke triage and patient selection for bridging thrombolysis. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients presenting to a comprehensive stroke center for EVT treatment were identified from 2018 to 2022. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use, and LVR before EVT were recorded. Factors independently associated with different rates of LVR were identified, and a prediction model for LVR was constructed. Results 640 patients were identified. 57 (8.9%) patients had LVR before EVT. A minority (36.4%) of LVR patients had significant improvements in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Independent predictors for LVR were identified and used to construct the 8-point HALT score: hyperlipidemia (1 point), atrial fibrillation (1 point), location of vascular occlusion (internal carotid: 0 points, M1: 1 point, M2: 2 points, vertebral/basilar: 3 points), and thrombolysis at least 1.5 hours before angiography (3 points). The HALT score had an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.90, P<0.001) for predicting LVR. LVR before EVT occurred in only 1 of 302 patients (0.3%) with low (0-2) HALT scores. Conclusions IVT at least 1.5 hours before angiography, site of vascular occlusion, atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia are independent predictors for LVR. The 8-point HALT score proposed in this study may be a valuable tool for predicting LVR before EVT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]