Search

Background: Esophageal cancer is quite prevalent worldwide and usually carries a poor prognosis. Histologically, although squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma predominate, small cell carcinoma (SmCC) cases have been reported. Overall, there is a paucity of literature regarding this variant. In this article, we aim to highlight this uncommon entity of carcinoma esophagus and share our experience of SmCC patients seen over a decade at our institute. Method: Records of patients with SmCC histology from 2010 to 2020 were assessed. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, treatment received, and outcomes were taken into consideration. Results were analyzed statistically using SPSS version 22. Results: Fourteen patients (nine males and five females) with a median age of 57 years (range: 35-72 years) were analyzed. The majority of the patients 10/14 (71.4%) received palliative radiotherapy of either 30Gy/10 fractions or 35Gy/15 fractions. Only 1/14 (7.14%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Overall, partial response was noted in all 11 patients (78.6%) who received treatment. The average median survival was 5 months (range: 1-11 months). Conclusion: Although the small sample size of the study prevents us from drawing a firm conclusion, we propose national and international collaborative prospective studies for framing definitive oncologic management strategies for this rare histological variant of esophageal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is a well-established modality for treating malignancies, but its role in treatment of benign lesions has not been well explored. Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of a 7-year data regarding the benefit and the safety profile of RT for treating benign tumors in our institute. Materials and Methods: Data of 23 patients who received RT for benign tumors from January 2015 to April 2022 were retrieved, and a retrospective analysis was conducted. All the pertinent demographic data, treatment and follow-up data were retrieved. The most common presentations were nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, vertebral hemangioma, paraganglioma, and others. The most common sites of occurrence were head and neck (43%) and paravertebral region (22%). Volumetric modulated arc therapy was the most commonly employed RT technique (39%), followed by three-dimensional conformal RT (34%) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (26%). The median RT dose delivered was 36 Gy (range: 20-54 Gy). Results: The median follow-up duration was 53 months (range: 3-120 months). Nine (39%) patients had progressive disease with a median time to progression of 8 months (range: 1-30 months). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 70 months, while the 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 97%, 88%, and 62%, respectively. Four patients (17%) died, all due to disease progression. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates was 97%, 85%, and 50%, respectively. The rate of radiation-induced cancer (RIC) was 0% as none of the patients had developed RIC secondary to radiation. Conclusion: RT is a safe and an effective option to manage benign tumors either in an adjuvant setting or in inoperable patients requiring definitive treatment, as well as in a setting to alleviate symptoms, providing excellent survival benefits. However, further prospective studies with much higher sample size are required to establish the absolute benefit and to estimate the risk of RIC, which will further direct for a better utilization of RT in treating benign tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We undertook a prospective planning study to describe the delineation of ileal conduit (IC) loop on radiotherapy planning computed tomography (RTP CT) scan as an organ at risk (OAR) and its sparing using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during adjuvant irradiation of bladder malignancies. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with bladder malignancy needing adjuvant radiotherapy postoperatively and having normal renal function underwent delayed phase RTP CT from June 2020 to March 2021, with certain modifications (Foley's catheter through stoma, additional delayed scans). We identified the course of ureters, external stoma, IC, and uretero-ileal (right and left) anastomotic sites. VMAT plans were generated. Results: A step-by-step description is given. Genitourinary OARs include kidneys, ureters, uretero-ileal anastomoses, and IC. The contrast on delayed scan opacifies ureters and IC. IC can be seen three-dimensionally as a structure with two fixed ends (blind proximal end anterior to the right sacroiliac joint and the open distal end over the right anterior abdominal wall in parasagittal location) and a 15-20 cm hanging intraabdominal loop that lies adjacent to the right iliac vessels. For prescription doses (PD) of 50.4 gray and 54 gray, respectively, VMAT plan achieved IC dose maximum to less than PD and V50 lower than 10 cc. Stoma sparing traditionally used as a surrogate for IC sparing is insufficient due to the variable intraabdominal location of IC loop. Conclusions: Delineation of IC as an OAR is feasible with slight modifications in the RTP protocols. VMAT (or other forms of intensity modulated radiation therapy) can help IC sparing and should be considered when it lies in close proximity to target volumes and the risk of additional morbidity is considerable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]