Search

Abstract Objective There is a general assumption that Muslim women refuse Down syndrome screening, and therefore, many health practitioners do not offer it or briefly discuss it with their participants. This study aims to objectively assess women’s awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward Down Syndrome screening (D.S.S) in a Muslim-majority population. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among attendees of antenatal clinics at a major university hospital in Saudi Arabia, aiming for a sample size of at least 385 Muslim women. A semi-structured questionnaire assessed awareness of different D.S.S. options and the source of that information (2 items), specific knowledge of D.S.S. (14 items), and attitudes (4 items). The knowledge and attitudes scores were calculated using a five-level agreement Likert-type scale. Results Among 434 participants, with an even distribution among all age groups and a majority of a college degree holder or higher (71%), 178 (41.0%) reported awareness of D.S.S. Factors associated with increased awareness were maternal age above 40 or those under 30, nulliparity, and extended family history of fetal congenital anomalies (P-value = 0.03,0.015, and 0.017, respectively). Recognized tests were ultrasound measurement of nuchal translucency (71.9%) and first-trimester serum screening (58.4%). The sources of knowledge were obstetricians (53.9%), followed by family and friends (27.0%). The overall mean ± SD knowledge score was 53.9 ± 8.7 out of 70, and the mean attitude score was 17.4 ± 2.9 out of 20. Having 1 or 2 children is associated with a higher knowledge score, and most participants who reported awareness of D.S.S. (51.7%) had a favorable attitude toward screening. Conclusion Awareness of D.S.S. among Muslim women is associated with favorable attitudes towards testing, contradicting the general assumption and highlighting the need for systematic education to increase awareness and subsequent testing uptake.

Abstract Objectives We aimed to investigate prenatal predictors for ambulation without assistance in children following prenatal repair of open spina bifida (OSB). Methods A systematic search was conducted in three databases until June 2022. We included articles reporting on prenatal repair of open spina bifida (OSB) and ambulation outcomes. The random‐effect model was used. Effect sizes are presented as odds ratio (OR), using the Mantel–Haenszel test, with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Five studies encompassing 460 pregnancies that underwent prenatal repair of OSB of which a total of 234 had data on ambulation and were included. The follow‐up age for all included studies was 30 months. Two studies were open repairs, two were fetoscopic repairs, and one included both open and fetoscopic repairs. Of the 234 included population, ambulation without assistance occurred in 159/234, 68% (95% CI 58, 76), and ambulation with assistance occurred in 75/234, 32% (95% CI 23.6, 41.6). Significant prenatal preoperative predictors that are negatively associated with ambulation without assistance were lateral ventricle (LV) width ≥15 mm (OR: 0.29; 95% CI 0.12, 0.69, I2 = 0.0%; p

Key Clinical Message Plasmapheresis and IVIG use in cases of alloimmunization during pregnancy are effective strategies when severe early fetal anemia is anticipated. Despite no change in antibody titer levels before and after plasmapheresis, clinical response was observed in both fetuses, and both had an excellent obstetrical outcome. Abstract Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn is a potentially lethal complication of alloimmunization, and intrauterine fetal blood transfusion (IUBT) is the standard treatment and care plan for severe fetal anemia. However, IUBT is technically unattainable before 20 weeks of gestation. Plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are the two treatment modalities described in the literature that postpone the need for transfusion until after 20 weeks. Here, we present two cases of alloimmunization (one with anti‐Kell and the other with anti‐D). Both had poor outcomes in previous pregnancies because of the early development of severe fetal anemia and hydrops before 24 weeks of gestation. Both patients underwent three sessions of plasmapheresis before 18 weeks, followed by weekly IVIG infusion, which continued until 23–27 weeks of pregnancy. Antibody titers were measured before and after plasmapheresis. In addition, weekly MCA Doppler was performed to monitor the development of severe fetal anemia requiring blood transfusion, which was diagnosed when the peak systolic velocity (PSV) was 1.5 multiples of the median or more. The first patient underwent IUBT at 24 weeks and the second at 28 weeks, as indicated by the MCA Doppler. Both patients were delivered by cesarean section, the first at 34 weeks and the second at 36 weeks, for different obstetrical indications. Both pregnancies resulted in a live birth. We conclude that the use of plasmapheresis and IVIG in alloimmunization during pregnancy is an effective treatment strategy when severe early fetal anemia is anticipated before 20 weeks of gestation. Despite no change in antibody titer levels before and after plasmapheresis, a clinical response was observed in both fetuses, and both had excellent obstetrical outcomes.