Search

Background: Mandibular defects resulting from oncological treatment pose significant aesthetic and functional challenges due to the involvement of bone and soft tissues. Immediate reconstruction is crucial to address complications such as malocclusion, mandibular deviation, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) changes, and soft tissue retraction. These issues can lead to functional impairments, including difficulties in chewing, swallowing, and speech. The fibula flap is widely used for mandibular reconstruction due to its long bone segment and robust vascular supply, though it may not always provide adequate bone height for optimal dental rehabilitation. This systematic review aims to determine if the double-barreled fibula flap (DBFF) configuration is a viable alternative for mandibular reconstruction and to evaluate the outcomes of dental implants placed in this type of flap. Materials and Methods: This study adhered to the Cochrane Collaboration criteria and PRISMA guidelines and was registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols Database (INPLASY2023120026). We included clinical studies published in English, Spanish, or French that focused on adult patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy followed by DBFF reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. Data sources included Medline/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and manual searches. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction captured variables such as publication year, patient demographics, number of implants, follow-up duration, flap survival, implant failure, and aesthetic outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI appraisal tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: A total of 17 clinical studies were included, evaluating 245 patients and 402 dental implants. The average patient age was 43.7 years, with a mean follow-up period of 34.3 months. Flap survival was high, with a 98.3% success rate and only four flap losses. The implant failure rate was low at 1.74%. Esthetic outcomes were varied, with only three studies using standardized protocols for evaluation. The overall certainty of evidence for flap survival was moderate, low for implant failure, and very low for aesthetics due to the subjective nature of assessments and variability in reporting. Conclusions: The primary limitations of the evidence included in this review are the observational design of the studies, leading to an inherent risk of bias, inconsistency in reporting methods, and imprecision in outcome measures. Additionally, the subjective nature of aesthetic evaluations and the variability in assessment tools further limit the reliability of the findings. The DBFF technique demonstrates excellent outcomes for mandibular reconstruction, with high flap survival and low implant failure rates, making it a viable option for dental rehabilitation. However, the evidence for aesthetic outcomes is less certain, highlighting the need for more rigorous and standardized research. This review supports the DBFF as a good alternative for mandibular reconstruction with successful dental implant integration, although further studies are needed to enhance the reliability of aesthetic evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Desmoid tumors are rare, benign, but locally aggressive fibromatoses that pose significant therapeutic challenges, particularly when located in the head and neck region. This report details the case of an extensive cervical desmoid tumor dependent on the levator scapulae muscle and involving the vertebral artery managed through surgical resection and intraoperative navigation. A 45-year-old male presented with a slowly growing cervical mass. Imaging revealed an 83x68x40 mm mass in the right lateral paravertebral space, dependent on the levator scapulae muscle and involving the vertebral artery. Biopsy confirmed a low-grade fusocellular myofibroblastic neoplasm consistent with a desmoid tumor. Given the poor prognosis associated with the symptomatic mass, surgical resection was performed using Brainlab intraoperative navigation (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). The procedure was successful, with preservation of vital structures and no evidence of recurrence postoperatively. Desmoid tumors in the head and neck region, though rare, require precise diagnostic and therapeutic approaches due to their aggressive nature and proximity to critical anatomical structures. The use of intraoperative navigation, in this case, facilitated accurate tumor resection, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. Pathological analysis revealed a CTNNB1 gene mutation, specifically the S45P variant, which is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating advanced surgical techniques and genetic analysis, in the management of complex desmoid tumors. Intraoperative navigation proved invaluable in achieving successful surgical outcomes, underscoring its potential utility in similar cases. Continued follow-up is essential, given the potential for recurrence associated with desmoid tumors., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Ruiz de León et al.)