Search

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, with multiple underlying inflammatory pathways and structural airway abnormalities that impact disease persistence and severity. Recent progress has been made in developing targeted asthma therapeutics, especially for subjects with eosinophilic asthma. However, there is an unmet need for new approaches to treat patients with severe and exacerbation-prone asthma, who contribute disproportionately to disease burden. Extensive deep phenotyping has revealed the heterogeneous nature of severe asthma and identified distinct disease subtypes. A current challenge in the field is to translate new and emerging knowledge about different pathobiologic mechanisms in asthma into patient-specific therapies, with the ultimate goal of modifying the natural history of disease. Here, we describe the Precision Interventions for Severe and/or Exacerbation-Prone Asthma (PrecISE) Network, a groundbreaking collaborative effort of asthma researchers and biostatisticians from around the United States. The PrecISE Network was designed to conduct phase II/proof-of-concept clinical trials of precision interventions in the population with severe asthma, and is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Using an innovative adaptive platform trial design, the PrecISE Network will evaluate up to 6 interventions simultaneously in biomarker-defined subgroups of subjects. We review the development and organizational structure of the PrecISE Network, and choice of interventions being studied. We hope that the PrecISE Network will enhance our understanding of asthma subtypes and accelerate the development of therapeutics for severe asthma.

Background: The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) test is a point-of-care test that is used in the assessment of asthma. Objective: To provide evidence-based clinical guidance on whether FENO testing is indicated to optimize asthma treatment in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered. Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to form a consensus document regarding a single question relevant to the use of FENO. The question was selected from three potential questions based on the greatest perceived impact on clinical practice and the unmet need for evidence-based answers related to this question. The panel performed systematic reviews of published randomized controlled trials between 2004 and 2019 and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members evaluated and approved the recommendations. Main Results: After considering the overall low quality of the evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation for FENO-based care. In patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered, we suggest that FENO is beneficial and should be used in addition to usual care. This judgment is based on a balance of effects that probably favors the intervention; the moderate costs and availability of resources, which probably favors the intervention; and the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in daily practice. Conclusions: Clinicians should consider this recommendation to measure FENO in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered based on current best available evidence.

BackgroundRelative enlargement of the pulmonary artery (PA) on chest CT imaging is associated with respiratory exacerbations in patients with COPD or cystic fibrosis. We sought to determine whether similar findings were present in patients with asthma and whether these findings were explained by differences in ventricular size.MethodsWe measured the PA and aorta diameters in 233 individuals from the Severe Asthma Research Program III cohort. We also estimated right, left, and total epicardial cardiac ventricular volume indices (eERVVI, eELVVI, and eETVVI, respectively). Associations between the cardiac and PA measures (PA-to-aorta [PA/A] ratio, eERVVI-to-eELVVI [eRV/eLV] ratio, eERVVI, eELVVI, eETVVI) and clinical measures of asthma severity were assessed by Pearson correlation, and associations with asthma severity and exacerbation rate were evaluated by multivariable linear and zero-inflated negative binomial regression.ResultsAsthma severity was associated with smaller ventricular volumes. For example, those with severe asthma had 36.1 mL/m2 smaller eETVVI than healthy control subjects (P = .003) and 14.1 mL/m2 smaller eETVVI than those with mild/moderate disease (P = .011). Smaller ventricular volumes were also associated with a higher rate of asthma exacerbations, both retrospectively and prospectively. For example, those with an eETVVI less than the median had a 57% higher rate of exacerbations during follow-up than those with eETVVI greater than the median (P = .020). Neither PA/A nor eRV/eLV was associated with asthma severity or exacerbations.ConclusionsIn patients with asthma, smaller cardiac ventricular size may be associated with more severe disease and a higher rate of asthma exacerbations.Trial registryClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01761630; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

The Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial demonstrated that long-term supplemental oxygen did not reduce time to hospital admission or death for patients who have stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and resting and/or exercise-induced moderate oxyhemoglobin desaturation, nor did it provide benefit for any other outcome measured in the trial. Nine months after initiation of patient screening, after randomization of 34 patients to treatment, a trial design amendment broadened the eligible population, expanded the primary outcome, and reduced the goal sample size. Within a few years, the protocol underwent minor modifications, and a second trial design amendment lowered the required sample size because of lower than expected treatment group crossover rates. After 5.5 years of recruitment, the trial met its amended sample size goal, and 1 year later, it achieved its follow-up goal. The process of publishing the trial results brought renewed scrutiny of the study design and the amendments. This article expands on the previously published design and methods information, provides the rationale for the amendments, and gives insight into the investigators' decisions about trial conduct. The story of the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial may assist investigators in future trials, especially those that seek to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term oxygen therapy. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00692198).

Mepolizumab is a therapy for severe asthma. We have little knowledge of the characteristics of people in the US that discontinue mepolizumab in clinical care. To investigate the real-world efficacy and time to clinical discontinuation of mepolizumab, we evaluated individuals with asthma started on mepolizumab at the Cleveland Clinic. We hypothesized that individuals that discontinue mepolizumab have more severe and uncontrolled asthma at baseline. Between 2016 and 2022, patients who started on mepolizumab consented to be assessed over 18 months. At baseline, a questionnaire including demographic and medical history was collected. Laboratory findings such as ACT score, FENO (Fractional Excretion of Nitric Oxide), and spirometry were recorded. At the conclusion of the observation period, the participants were divided into two categories: Group A and Group B. Group B [N = 28] discontinued mepolizumab (p < 0.05) at an average of 5.8 months (SD 4.2 months). Group A [N = 129] stayed on the therapy for at least 1 year. A participant with an ACT score less than 13 has an odds ratio of 6.64 (95% CI, 2.1 − 26.0) of discontinuing mepolizumab therapy. For a male, the odds of discontinuing mepolizumab therapy is 3.39 (95% CI, 1.1–11.2). In this real-world study, we find that high eosinophil count may not be adequate in screening which individuals will benefit from mepolizumab. Up to 17% of patients fail therapy within 6 months, with male sex and low ACT score increasing risk of mepolizumab discontinuation at Cleveland Clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify features related to management of patients prior to referral from primary care physicians (PCPs) to pulmonologists and allergists. This is an analysis of patient claims data from Symphony Health (2013–2018). To characterize referrals, a longitudinal cohort included 12 months with no asthma claims prior to the index date, followed by 36 months of observation. We also assessed a cross-sectional cohort for 12 months at the end of the observational period to characterize disease control and treatment patterns. Referral was defined as the first appearance of a claim from an allergist or pulmonologist for a patient's initial visit for asthma. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. The majority of patients with asthma were managed by PCPs (60%), followed by pulmonologists (16%) and allergists (8%). Forty-three percent had uncontrolled asthma. Only 8% were referred to specialists within the first 24 months after initial diagnosis, of which 76% were seen by pulmonologists and 24% by allergists. Referrals resulted in treatment change in 55%–68% of the cases. Patients who received a referral were more likely to be on oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or have more hospitalizations/ED visits. About one-third of the patients managed by PCPs received intermittent and/or chronic OCS prior to referral, which may be an indication of uncontrolled disease. The referral patterns in this analysis illustrate underutilization of specialists in the consultation and management of patients with uncontrolled asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extensive interdependencies exist between dietary intake, metabolic dysregulation, and asthma; however, the dietary pattern in adults with asthma remains unknown. To evaluate the association between dietary patterns and asthma ER visits and explore the effect of the interaction between race and diet on asthma. Using NHANES data, we compared dietary patterns between adults with asthma with and without asthma-related emergency room (ER) visits in the previous year, and between subjects of different races. The 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) was used to assess alignment between dietary patterns and the 2015–2020 Dietary Guideline for Americans. Among 1681 individuals included in the study, 193 reported asthma-related ER visit. Patients with asthma had low fruit and vegetable intake, and a low mean (SE) HEI-2015 score [52.6 (0.53)]. Individuals with asthma-related ER visits had lower vegetable consumption compared to those without (median 0.61 vs. 0.85 cup equivalents). Furthermore, non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) reported lower amount of vegetable (median cup equivalent 0.58 vs. 0.89) and fruit intake (0.17 vs. 0.39) and had a lower HEI-2015 score (49.9 vs. 52.9) comparing to non-Hispanic Whites. No association was discovered between dietary patterns and ER visits in multivariable analysis, or significant interactions between diet and race in predicting the need for ER visits. Dietary patterns in adult with current asthma are frequently misaligned with current dietary guidelines. Patients with asthma-related ER visits and of NHB race had lower vegetable consumption; however, the associations disappeared in multivariable analysis. The impact of diet on asthma is not straightforward and deserves further investigation. Supplemental data for this article is available online at at . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Issue: As U.S. healthcare systems plan for future physician workforce needs, the systemic impacts of climate change, a worldwide environmental and health crisis, have not been factored in. The current focus on increasing the number of trained physicians and optimizing efficiencies in healthcare delivery may be insufficient. Graduate medical education (GME) priorities and training should be considered in order to prepare a climate-educated physician workforce. Evidence: We used a holistic lens to explore the available literature regarding the intersection of future physician workforce needs, GME program priorities, and resident education within the larger context of climate change. Our interinstitutional, transdisciplinary team brought perspectives from their own fields, including climate science, climate and health research, and medical education to provide recommendations for building a climate-educated physician workforce. Implications: Acknowledging and preparing for the effects of climate change on the physician workforce will require identification of workforce gaps, changes to GME program priorities, and education of trainees on the health and societal impacts of climate change. Alignment of GME training with workforce considerations and climate action and adaptation initiatives will be critical in ensuring the U.S. has a climate-educated physician workforce capable of addressing health and healthcare system challenges. This article offers a number of recommendations for physician workforce priorities, resident education, and system-level changes to better prepare for the health and health system impacts of climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biologic therapies are emerging as an option to treat a subset of patients with severe asthma, however no direct comparison between these agents has been conducted. Furthermore, heterogeneity of outcomes in clinical trials makes it difficult to compare these agents and traditional therapies. The extent to which this heterogeneity exists has major implications for evidence-based decisions and is yet to be fully reported. We conducted a literature search to examine outcomes currently being used in clinical trials for asthma. The Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for clinical trials of asthma interventions. We limited our search to phase 2 through 4 clinical trials in adults, as early-phase trials tend to have pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic endpoints as primary outcomes. Interventions for acute exacerbations were excluded. We identified 117 studies and subsequently identified 111 outcomes. The most prevalent outcomes were asthma control and symptom severity, FEV1, and change in ACQ scale. Twenty patient-reported outcomes instruments were identified and de-facto standard asthma outcomes and PROs were under-reported in examined literature. Existing quality of life tools did not capture the day-to-day experience or the unique treatment burden from oral corticosteroids for patient with severe asthma. Compounding the absence of trials directly comparing therapies, the significant variation we identified in outcome definitions and measurement create hurdles to effectively compare traditional and biologic therapies. With the growing number of clinical trials evaluating advanced therapies such as biologics, a wide range of primary and secondary outcomes are evaluated. A core outcome set created by relevant stakeholders is needed to collectively evaluate pooled outcomes in order to allow more meaningful comparisons of asthma therapies and to incorporate the patient experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Recently, it has been shown that increasing body mass index (BMI) in asthma is associated with reduced exhaled NO. Our objective in this study was to determine if the BMI-related changes in exhaled NO differ across asthmatics and controls, and to determine if these changes are related to increased airway oxidative stress and systemic levels of leptin and adiponectin. Methods Observational study of the association of BMI, leptin, and adiponectin with exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and exhaled 8-isoprostanes in 67 non-smoking patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma during baseline conditions and 47 controls. Measurements included plasma levels of leptin, adiponectin, exhaled breath condensates for 8-isoprostanes, exhaled NO, pulmonary function tests, and questionnaires regarding asthma severity and control. Results In asthmatics, BMI and the ratio of leptin to adiponectin were respectively associated with reduced levels of exhaled NO (β = -0.04 [95% C.I. -0.07, -0.1], p < 0.003) and (β = -0.0018 [95% C.I. -0.003, -0.00034], p = 0.01) after adjusting for confounders. Also, BMI was associated with increased levels of exhaled 8-isoprostanes (β = 0.30 [95% C.I. 0.003, 0.6], p = 0.03) after adjusting for confounders. In contrast, we did not observe these associations in the control group of healthy non-asthmatics with a similar weight distribution. Conclusion In adults with stable moderate to severe persistent asthma, but not in controls, BMI and the plasma ratio of leptin/adiponectin is associated with reduced exhaled NO. Also, BMI is associated with increased exhaled 8-isoprostanes. These results suggest that BMI in asthmatics may increase airway oxidative stress and could explain the BMI-related reductions in exhaled NO.