Search

Context Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are used off-label in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in real-world practice as adjuvant therapies to insulin. There are few real-world data regarding efficacy and safety of this practice. Objective This work aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs and sodium-glucose SGLT2is in the management of T1DM in real-world practice. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all instances of GLP-1RA and/or SGLT2i use greater than 90 days in adult patients with T1DM at a single academic center. We report the clinical and safety outcomes over the duration of use. Results We identified 104 patients with T1DM who ever used a GLP-1RA (76 patients) or SGLT2i (39 patients) for more than 90 days. After 1 year of therapy, GLP-1RA users had statistically significant reductions in weight (90.5 kg to 85.4 kg; P < .001), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (7.7% to 7.3%; P = .007), and total daily dose of insulin (61.8 units to 41.9 units; P < .001). SGLT2i users had statistically significant reductions in HbA1c (7.9% to 7.3%; P < .001) and basal insulin (31.3 units to 25.6 units; P = .003). GLP-1RA users compared to SGLT2i users had greater reduction in weight (P = .027) while HbA1c reduction was comparable between the groups. Over a mean total duration of use of 29.5 months/patient for both groups, more SGLT2i users experienced diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (12.8% vs 3.9%). Therapy was discontinued because of adverse events 26.9% of the time for GLP-1RA users vs 27.7% for SGLT2i users. Conclusion GLP-1RA and SGLT2i use in T1DM is associated with clinically relevant benefits. DKA remains a clinical concern with SGLT2i use, requiring careful patient selection and monitoring, with the risk to benefit ratio of treatment evaluated at an individual level.

Introduction The science of telemedicine has shown great advances over the past decade. However, the field needs to better understand if a change in care delivery from in-person to telehealth as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic will yield durable patient engagement and health outcomes for patients with obesity. The objective of this study was to examine the association of mode of healthcare utilization (telehealth versus in-person) and sociodemographic factors among patients with obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A retrospective medical chart review identified patients with obesity from a university outpatient obesity medicine clinic and a community bariatric surgery practice. Patients completed an online survey (1 June 2020–24 September 2020) to assess changes in healthcare utilization modality during subsequent changes in infection rates in the geographic area. Logistic regression analysis examined the association of mode of healthcare utilization and key sociodemographic characteristics. Results A total of 583 patients (87% female, mean age 51.2 years (standard deviation 13.0), mean body mass index 40.2 (standard deviation 6.7), 49.2% non-Hispanic white, 28.7% non-Hispanic black, 16.4% Hispanic, 7% other ethnicity, 33.1% completed bariatric surgery) were included. Adjusted logistic regression models showed older age was inversely associated with telehealth use (adjusted odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.98) and non-Hispanic black were more likely to use telehealth compared to non-Hispanic white (adjusted odds ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.05–2.81). Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic is impacting access to healthcare among patients with obesity. Telehealth is an emerging modality that can maintain healthcare access during the pandemic, but utilization varies by age and ethnicity in this high-risk population.

Dabrafenib, a BRAF selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been associated with pancreatitis alone, and in combination with trametinib (a MEK pathway inhibitor). We report a case of dabrafenib induced acute pancreatitis in a patient undergoing treatment for metastatic papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). This adverse event has not been previously reported in thyroid cancer patients using dabrafenib. Case: A 61-year-old female with papillary thyroid cancer status post total thyroidectomy with pathology revealing right 7.6cm PTC with extrathyroidal extension and 13/72 metastatic lymph nodes. She received 100mCi of radioactive iodine (RAI). Ten months post-surgery, she underwent revision neck dissection with 3/36 nodes positive for metastatic disease and neck muscle invasion by PTC. Molecular testing demonstrated AKT1 and BRAFV600E mutations. Due to progressive neck and mediastinal tumors, recommendation was to proceed with systemic therapy. Initially started dabrafenib monotherapy; after 3 doses patient developed burning epigastric pain and fever. Examination revealed abdominal tenderness, elevated lipase at 2266 U/L (8-76U/L), mild hyperbilirubinemia and leukocytosis. CT abdomen/pelvis revealed peripancreatic fat stranding consistent with focal acute pancreatitis. No history of alcohol use. Dabrafenib was assessed to be culprit of pancreatitis; with immediate discontinuation of TKI and supportive management patient improved. At present patient is tolerating Lenvatinib therapy. BRAFV600E mutation occurs in 29-83% of thyroid cancers affecting growth, proliferation, survival, migration, and loss of tissue-specific differentiation via the intracellular MEK/ERK pathway1. RAI offers an important treatment modality for thyroid cancer patients, however patients with BRAFV600E are often poor responders or refractory to RAI1. Dabrafenib, a specific BRAFV600E tyrosine kinase inhibitor in combination with trametinib (a MEK inhibitor) is FDA approved for treatment BRAFV600E mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer; furthermore there is evidence on PTC responses including redifferentiation 2. Pancreatitis has been reported in