Search

Revitalization has emerged as an innovative treatment approach for immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of revitalization, focusing on its principles, clinical protocols and outcomes. The article highlights the importance of thorough diagnosis and assessment of the pulp and peri-apical condition to determine the suitability of revitalization. Various factors influencing the success of revitalization, such as the use of scaffolds, growth factors and stem cells, are discussed. Additionally, a case that was treated with a PRP scaffold is also presented. Overall, revitalization shows promise in promoting pulp regeneration and improving treatment outcomes in selected cases of pulp necrosis. CPD/Clinical Relevance: To introduce research-based knowledge to GDPs about the procedure and prognosis of tooth revitalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the knowledge of medical doctors about osteonecrosis who prescribe radiotherapy and bisphosphonates and dentists who receive these patients with such risk factors. Methods: This cross sectional multicenter study was carried out from 15th October 2021 to 20th November 2021 in different set-ups of Pakistan. A validated and piloted questionnaire was sent to dental and non-dental doctors working in different set-ups of Pakistan through email. All data was analyzed in SPSS version 22 with p value <0.05 being significant. Results: A total of 400 completed responses were received. Only 58% and 67% of the participants were actively educating their patients regarding the hazards of bisphosphonate and radiotherapy, respectively whereas only 45% of the medical doctors referred their patients to dentists before prescribing bisphosphonates and/or radiotherapy. Although the medical doctors had a statistically better knowledge of the definition of osteonecrosis, overall both the dental and non-dental doctors performed poorly regarding answering the questions pertaining to definition, clinical features and risk factors. The dental doctors also showed a poor performance for more technical and in depth questions that was statistically related to lesser work experience, working in a tertiary care facility and previous exposure to such patients. Conclusion: The inadequate awareness of dentists and physicians about the prevention and management of osteonecrosis of jaw is alarming. Efforts should be undertaken to raise the knowledge of dentists and physicians in this regard. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]