Search

The advent of targeted therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, adoptive T-cell therapies, and antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) dramatically changed the treatment landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) over the last two decades. Rituximab was the first one approved. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells are currently approved as second-line treatment in patients with DLBCL refractory to first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Polatuzumab, a CD79b-targeting ADC, is approved as first-line treatment in high-risk patients in combination with chemo-immunotherapy. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are a novel category of drugs that are also changing the treatment paradigm of patients with DLBCL. They are engineered to bind to two different targets at the same time. To date, two BsAbs (glofitamab and epcoritamab) are approved as monotherapy in third-line treatment in DLBCL. Combination strategies with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and ADCs are currently under investigation with encouraging results in first-line or subsequent lines of treatment. In the following review, we focus on the structure of BsAbs, the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, and the mechanisms of resistance to BsAbs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of cancer patients has dramatically changed over the past decades with the advent of monoclonal antibodies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and innovative T-cell therapy. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have also revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Several ADCs have already been approved in hematology and clinical oncology, such as trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma. The efficacy of ADCs is limited by the emergence of resistance due to different mechanisms, such as antigen-related resistance, failure of internalization, impaired lysosomal function, and other mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the clinical data that contributed to the approval of T-DM1, T-DXd, SG, and EV. We also discuss the different mechanisms of resistance to ADCs, as well as the ways to overcome this resistance, such as bispecific ADCs and the combination of ADCs with immune-checkpoint inhibitors or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The administration ofex vivo-expanded Natural Killer (NK) cells in leukemia therapy is still challenging, in part due to the difficulty to generate in sufficient quantities fully mature and functional NK cells and Identification of surface markers indicative of NK maturation and functionality is therefore needed. Here, based on the analysis of surface receptors ofex vivo-expanded NK cells, we identified CD94 as a surface marker correlating with high lytic potential against leukemic cell lines and immunological synapse formation. CD94-positiveex vivo-expanded NK cells displayed higher expression of NKG2 receptors and the adhesion molecule LFA-1, as compared with their CD94-negative counterparts. We also tested thein vivoanti-leukemic capacity ofex vivo-expanded NK cells against patient-derived acute myeloid leukemia cells. Although no anti-leukemic effect was detected, we noticed that only CD94-positiveex vivo-expanded NK cells were detected in leukemic mice at the end of the 2-week treatment. Moreover, flow cytometry analysis showed a subpopulation harboring CD94 (NK) and CD34 (leukemic cells) double staining, indicative of conjugate formation. Therefore surface expression of CD94 onex vivo-differentiated NK cells emerged as an indicator ofin vitroandin vivokiller cell functionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]