Search

The role of respiratory superinfections in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia remains unclear. We investigated the prevalence of early- and late-onset superinfections in invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to our department of intensive care medicine between March 2020 and November 2020. Of the 102 cases, 74 (72.5%) received invasive ventilation and were tested for viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens on Days 0-7, 8-14, and 15-21 after the initiation of mechanical ventilation. Approximately 45% developed one or more respiratory superinfections. There was a clear correlation between the duration of invasive ventilation and the prevalence of coinfecting pathogens. Male patients with obesity and those suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or diabetes mellitus had a significantly higher probability to develop a respiratory superinfection. The prevalence of viral coinfections was high, with a predominance of the herpes simplex virus (HSV), followed by cytomegalovirus. No respiratory viruses or intracellular bacteria were detected in our cohort. We observed a high coincidence between Aspergillus fumigatus and HSV infection. Gram-negative bacteria were the most frequent pathogen group. Klebsiella aerogenes was detected early after intubation, while Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were related to a prolonged respiratory weaning.

Introduction: Hypoxic liver injury (HLI) is a frequent and life-threatening complication occurring in up to 10 % of critically ill patients. Heart failure and age were previously identified as risk factors for occurrence of HLI. However, there is a lack of data on incidence of HLI and its clinical implications on outcome in very old (≥ 90 years) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate occurrence, clinical characteristics and outcome of HLI in critically ill patients ≥ 90 years. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive critically ill patients ≥ 90 years admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care university hospital in Hamburg, Germany. Clinical course and laboratory were analysed from all patients. HLI was defined according to established criteria as elevation of aminotransferase levels (> 20-fold upper limit of normal). Predictors of HLI, occurrence, clinical course and outcome were assessed and compared to patients without HLI. Results: In total, 1065 critically ill patients ≥ 90 years were included. During the ICU stay, 3% (n = 35) developed HLI. Main causes of HLI were cardiogenic shock (51%, n = 18), septic shock (23%, n = 8) and cardiac arrest (20%, n = 7). Presenting characteristics including age, gender and BMI were comparable between patients with and without HLI. The admission cause was primary medical (HLI: 49% vs. No-HLI: 34%, p = 0.07), surgical – planned (9% vs. 38%, p < 0.001) and surgical – emergency (43% vs. 28%, p = 0.06). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the updated CCI was median 2 (1 – 3) and 2 (1 – 2) points in patients with and 1 (0 – 2) and 1 (0 – 2) in patients without HLI (p < 0.01 and p = 0.08). Patients with HLI presented with higher SAPS II (55 vs. 36 points p < 0.001) score on admission and required mechanical ventilation (66% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), vasopressor therapy (91% vs. 40%, p < 0.001), renal replacement therapy (20% vs. 2%, p < 0.001) and parenteral nutrition (29% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). The ICU-mortality and hospital mortality in patients with HLI was 66% (n = 23) and 83% (n = 29) compared with 17% (n = 170) and 28% (n = 292) in patients without HLI, respectively (both p < 0.001). Regression analysis identified SAPS II [OR 1.05, 95% CI (1.02 – 1.07); p < 0.001] and vasopressor therapy [OR 9.21, 95% CI (2.58 – 32.86); p < 0.01] as factors significantly associated with new-onset of HLI. Occurrence of HLI was independently associated with mortality [HR 2.23, 95% CI (1.50 – 3.30); p < 0.001]. Discussion/Conclusion: HLI is an uncommon but not rare condition in critically ill patients aged ≥ 90 years. Occurrence of HLI is associated with high mortality and mainly caused by cardiogenic or septic shock. HLI may serve as early prognostic marker in critically ill patients aged ≥ 90 years.

Aims Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 is associated with adverse outcome. However, it is unclear whether cell-specific consequences are associated with cardiac SARS-CoV-2 infection. Therefore, we investigated heart tissue utilizing in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and RNA-sequencing in consecutive autopsy cases to quantify virus load and characterize cardiac involvement in COVID-19. Methods and results In this study, 95 SARS-CoV-2-positive autopsy cases were included. A relevant SARS-CoV-2 virus load in the cardiac tissue was detected in 41/95 deceased (43%). Massive analysis of cDNA ends (MACE)-RNA-sequencing was performed to identify molecular pathomechanisms caused by the infection of the heart. A signature matrix was generated based on the single-cell dataset ‘Heart Cell Atlas’ and used for digital cytometry on the MACE-RNA-sequencing data. Thus, immune cell fractions were estimated and revealed no difference in immune cell numbers in cases with and without cardiac infection. This result was confirmed by quantitative immunohistological diagnosis. MACE-RNA-sequencing revealed 19 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with a q-value, Graphical Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effect of hypothermic temperature control after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) on mortality and functional outcome as compared with normothermia.An investigator initiated, open-label, blinded-outcome-assessor, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hypothermic temperature control (32-34°C) for 24 h with normothermia after IHCA in 11 hospitals in Germany. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality after 180 days. Secondary end points included in-hospital mortality and favorable functional outcome using the Cerebral Performance Category scale after 180 days. A Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2 was defined as a favorable functional outcome.A total of 1055 patients were screened for eligibility and 249 patients were randomized: 126 were assigned to hypothermic temperature control and 123 to normothermia. The mean age of the cohort was 72.6±10.4 years, 64% (152 of 236) were male, 73% (166 of 227) of cardiac arrests were witnessed, 25% (57 of 231) had an initial shockable rhythm, and time to return of spontaneous circulation was 16.4±10.5 minutes. Target temperature was reached within 4.2±2.8 hours after randomization in the hypothermic group and temperature was controlled for 48 hours at 37.0°±0.9°C in the normothermia group. Mortality by day 180 was 72.5% (87 of 120) in hypothermic temperature control arm, compared with 71.2% (84 of 118) in the normothermia group (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.79-1.40];Hypothermic temperature control as compared with normothermia did not improve survival nor functional outcome at day 180 in patients presenting with coma after IHCA. The HACA in-hospital trial (Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest in-hospital) was underpowered and may have failed to detect clinically important differences between hypothermic temperature control and normothermia.URL: https://www.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00457431.

Was ist neu? Charakteristiken und Ursachen des präklinischen und innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstands Eine große dänische Studie verglich die Charakteristiken von mehr als 12 000 Patienten mit präklinischem oder innerklinischem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand. Interessanterweise zeigten sich zwischen den beiden Gruppen eine ähnliche Demografie sowie eine ähnliche Anzahl an Vorerkrankungen. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass sich Unterschiede vor allem durch die Charakteristiken des Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstands erklären lassen. Dies ist vor allem im Hinblick auf die derzeit noch unzureichende Studienlage zum innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand interessant. Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand auf der Intensivstation Etwa die Hälfte der innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstände ereignet sich auf der Intensivstation. Zwei kürzlich publizierte Studien befassten sich genauer mit dem Vorkommen, den Ursachen sowie der Prognose von Patienten mit Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand auf der Intensivstation. COVID-19 und Auswirkung auf den innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand Mehrere Studien zeigten während der COVID-19-Pandemie eine höhere Inzidenz von präklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillständen mit schlechterer Prognose. Aktuell ist unklar, wie oft hospitalisierte Patienten mit COVID-19 einen innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand erleiden. Publizierte Arbeiten zeigten eine sehr eingeschränkte Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit. Als führende Ursache zeigte sich überwiegend ein hypoxisch getriggerter Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand mit nicht schockbaren EKG-Rhythmen (Asystolie/PEA). Eine kardiale Ursache fand sich nur selten. Aufgrund der schlechten Prognose wurde von einigen Autoren sogar die Sinnhaftigkeit von Reanimationsmaßnahmen bei COVID-19-Patienten diskutiert.

COVID-19-associated ARDS (C-ARDS) is mentioned to express higher analgosedation needs, in comparison to ARDS of other etiologies. The objective of this monocentric retrospective cohort study was to compare the analgosedation needs between C-ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS (non-C-ARDS) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Data were collected from the electronic medical records of all adult patients treated with C-ARDS in our Department of Intensive Care Medicine between March 2020 and April 2022. The control group included patients treated with non-C-ARDS between the years 2009 and 2020. A sedation sum score was created in order to describe the overall analgosedation needs. A total of 115 (31.5%) patients with C-ARDS and 250 (68.5%) with non-C-ARDS requiring VV-ECMO therapy were included in the study. The sedation sum score was significantly higher in the C-ARDS group (p < 0.001). COVID-19 was significantly associated with analgosedation in the univariable analysis. By contrast, the multivariable model did not show a significant association between COVID-19 and the sum score. The year of VV-ECMO support, BMI, SAPS II and prone positioning were significantly associated with sedation needs. The potential impact of COVID-19 remains unclear, and further studies are warranted in order to evaluate specific disease characteristics linked with analgesia and sedation.

While several studies have described the clinical course of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), direct comparisons with patients with seasonal influenza are scarce. We compared 166 patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between February 27 and June 14, 2020, and 255 patients with seasonal influenza diagnosed during the 2017–18 season at the same hospital to describe common features and differences in clinical characteristics and course of disease. Patients with COVID-19 were younger (median age [IQR], 59 [45–71] vs 66 [52–77]; P

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), an emerging virus, has caused a global pandemic. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to high hospitalization rates worldwide. Little is known about the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and high mortality rates have been proposed. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, characteristics and outcome of IHCA during the pandemic in comparison to an earlier period. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data prospectively recorded during 3-month-periods 2019 and 2020 at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). All consecutive adult patients with IHCA were included. Clinical parameters, neurological outcomes and organ failure/support were assessed. Results During the study period hospital admissions declined from 18,262 (2019) to 13,994 (2020) (− 23%). The IHCA incidence increased from 4.6 (2019: 84 IHCA cases) to 6.6 (2020: 93 IHCA cases)/1000 hospital admissions. Median stay before IHCA was 4 (1–9) days. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both periods. IHCA location shifted towards the ICU (56% vs 37%, p p = 0.05) and defibrillation were more frequent in the pandemic period (20% vs 35%, p p Conclusion Hospital admissions declined during the pandemic, but a higher incidence of IHCA was observed. IHCA in patients with COVID-19 was a common finding. Compared to patients with non-COVID-19-related respiratory failure, the outcome was improved.

ZUSAMMENFASSUNGIm Dezember 2019 kam es zur Ausbreitung von SARS-CoV-2, welches zu einer weltweiten Pandemie führte. Neben den Einschränkungen im täglichen Alltag sah sich die Medizin mit bisher nicht dagewesenen Problemen konfrontiert. In einigen Ländern führte ein rasanter Anstieg an SARS-CoV-2 bzw. Erkrankungen mit COVID-19 zu einer Überforderung der Gesundheitssysteme, unter anderem aufgrund eines Mangels an Intensivbetten und Beatmungsgeräten. In der Intensivmedizin bestanden initial große Unsicherheiten bezüglich des Einsatzes von nichtinvasiven Beatmungsformen aufgrund der potenziellen Aerosolbelastung. Ca. 5 % der infizierten Patienten mussten zur weiteren Therapie auf die Intensivstation aufgenommen werden, im Regelfall aufgrund einer schweren Pneumonie. Es kann sich im Verlauf der Erkrankung das Vollbild eines akuten Lungenversagens ausbilden, welches mit einer hohen Mortalität vergesellschaftet ist. Da es sich bei COVID-19 um eine gänzlich unerforschte virale Erkrankung handelt, war die Erforschung der Todesursache und die Charakterisierung von Organschäden sehr wichtig. Mehrere Obduktionsstudien konnten zeigen, dass es bei Patienten mit COVID-19 zu einem vermehrten Auftreten von venösen und arteriellen Thrombosen kommt. Neben klassischen Lungenembolien kommt es auch zur Ausbildung von Mikrothromben in der pulmonalen Endstrombahn. Zudem ließ sich eine Neoangiogenese nachweisen, die bisher im Rahmen des diffusen Alveolarschadens bei pathologischen Untersuchungen noch nicht beschrieben wurde.

Infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) results in respiratory syndromes but also in vascular complications such as thromboembolism (TE). In this regard, immunothrombosis, resulting from inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 infected tissues, has been described. Data on TE in COVID-19 are mainly based on clinical observational and/or incomplete autopsy studies. The true burden of TE and the relevance of genetic predisposition, however, have not been resolved.Here, we report on a consecutive cohort of 100 fully autopsied patients deceased by SARS-CoV-2 infections during the first wave of the pandemic (March to April 2020). We investigated the localization of TE, potential clinical risk factors, and the prothrombotic gene mutations, factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A, in postmortem blood or tissue samples.TE was found in 43/100 autopsies. 93 % of TE events were venous occlusions, with 23 patients having pulmonary thromboembolism (PT) with or without lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Of these, 70 % showed PT restricted to (sub)segmental arteries, consistent with in situ immunothrombosis. Patients with TE had a significantly higher BMI and died more frequently at an intensive care unit. Hereditary thrombophilia factors were not associated with TE.Our autopsy results show that a significant proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients suffer from TE, affecting predominantly the venous system. Orthotopic peripheral PT was the most frequent finding. Hereditary thrombophilia appears not to be a determinant for TE in COVID-19. However, obesity and the need for intensive care increase the risk of TE in these patients.

Introduction: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from the removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption. Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 µg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg), interleukin-6 (IL-6) ≥500 ng/L, and an indication for renal replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18–24 h. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min ≥24 h). Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N = 12) or SMT (N = 12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p = 0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p = 0.551). Median IL-6 levels were 2,269 (IQR 948–3,679) and 3,747 (1,301–5,415) ng/L in the HT and SMT groups at baseline, respectively (p = 0.378). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) versus 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.640). Twenty-eight-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p = 1.0). During the treatment period of 5 days, 6/12 (50%) of the SMT patients died, in contrast to 1/12 (8%) in the HT group. Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend toward clinical improvement within the intervention period. In selected patients, HT might be an option for stabilization before transfer and further therapeutic decisions. This finding warrants further investigation in larger trials.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents a viable therapy option for patients with refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Currently, veno-venous (vv) ECMO is frequently used in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). VV-ECMO was also frequently utilised during the influenza pandemic and experience with this complex and invasive treatment has increased worldwide since. However, data on comparison of clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with COVID-19 and influenza-related severe ARDS treated with vv-ECMO are scarce. This is a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients treated with vv/(veno-arterial)va-ECMO between January 2009 and January 2021 at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany. All patients with confirmed COVID-19 or influenza were included. Patient characteristics, parameters related to ICU and vv/va-ECMO as well as clinical outcomes were compared. Mortality was assessed up to 90 days after vv/va-ECMO initiation. Overall, 113 patients were included, 52 (46%) with COVID-19 and 61 (54%) with influenza-related ARDS. Median age of patients with COVID-19 and influenza was 58 (IQR 53–64) and 52 (39–58) years (p < 0.001), 35% and 31% (p = 0.695) were female, respectively. Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3 (1–5) and 2 (0–5) points in the two groups (p = 0.309). Median SAPS II score pre-ECMO was 27 (24–36) vs. 32 (28–41) points (p = 0.009), and SOFA score was 13 (11–14) vs. 12 (8–15) points (p = 0.853), respectively. Median P/F ratio pre-ECMO was 64 (46–78) and 73 (56–104) (p = 0.089); pH was 7.20 (7.16–7.29) and 7.26 (7.18–7.33) (p = 0.166). Median days on vv/va-ECMO were 17 (7–27) and 11 (7–20) (p = 0.295), respectively. Seventy-one percent and sixty-nine percent had renal replacement therapy (p = 0.790). Ninety-four percent of patients with COVID-19 and seventy-seven percent with influenza experienced vv/va-ECMO-associated bleeding events (p = 0.004). Thirty-four percent and fifty-five percent were successfully weaned from ECMO (p = 0.025). Ninety-day mortality was 65% and 57% in patients with COVID-19 and influenza, respectively (p = 0.156). Median length of ICU stay was 24 (13–44) and 28 (16–14) days (p = 0.470), respectively. Despite similar disease severity, the use of vv/va-ECMO in ARDS related to COVID-19 and influenza resulted in similar outcomes at 90 days. A significant higher rate of bleeding complications and thrombosis was observed in patients with COVID-19.

Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 have gained attention due to their links to clinical outcomes and their potential long-term sequelae1. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) displays tropism towards several organs, including the heart and kidney. Whether it also directly affects the liver has been debated2,3. Here we provide clinical, histopathological, molecular and bioinformatic evidence for the hepatic tropism of SARS-CoV-2. We find that liver injury, indicated by a high frequency of abnormal liver function tests, is a common clinical feature of COVID-19 in two independent cohorts of patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Using autopsy samples obtained from a third patient cohort, we provide multiple levels of evidence for SARS-CoV-2 liver tropism, including viral RNA detection in 69% of autopsy liver specimens, and successful isolation of infectious SARS-CoV-2 from liver tissue postmortem. Furthermore, we identify transcription-, proteomic- and transcription factor-based activity profiles in hepatic autopsy samples, revealing similarities to the signatures associated with multiple other viral infections of the human liver. Together, we provide a comprehensive multimodal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 liver tropism, which increases our understanding of the molecular consequences of severe COVID-19 and could be useful for the identification of organ-specific pharmacological targets.

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA loads in patient specimens may act as a clinical outcome predictor in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods We evaluated the predictive value of viral RNA loads and courses in the blood compared with the upper and lower respiratory tract loads of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Daily specimen collection and viral RNA quantification by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction were performed in all consecutive 170 COVID-19 patients between March 2020 and February 2021 during the entire intensive care unit (ICU) stay (4145 samples analyzed). Patients were grouped according to their 90-day outcome as survivors (n=100) or nonsurvivors (n=70). Results In nonsurvivors, blood SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads were significantly higher at the time of admission to the ICU (P=.0009). Failure of blood RNA clearance was observed in 33/50 (66%) of the nonsurvivors compared with 12/64 (19%) survivors (P Conclusions Blood SARS-CoV-2 load is an important independent outcome predictor and should be further evaluated for treatment allocation and patient monitoring.

Infection and sepsis are a main cause of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Besides bacteria, molds play a role. Voriconazole (VRC) is recommended but its pharmacokinetics (PK) may be altered by ACLF. Because ACLF patients often suffer from concomitant acute renal failure, we studied the PK of VRC in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) with ACLF and compared it to PK of VRC in critically ill patients with RRT without concomitant liver failure (NLF). In this prospective cohort study, patients received weight-based VRC. Pre- and post-dialysis membrane, and dialysate samples obtained at different time points were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. An integrated dialysis pharmacometric model was used to model the available PK data. The recommended, 50% lower, and 50% higher doses were analyzed by Monte-Carlo simulation (MCS) for day 1 and at steady-state with a target trough concentration (TC) of 0.5–3mg/L. Fifteen patients were included in this study. Of these, 6 patients suffered from ACLF. A two-compartment model with linear clearance described VRC PK. No difference for central (V1) or peripheral (V2) volumes of distribution or clearance could be demonstrated between the groups. V1 was 80.6L (95% confidence interval: 62.6–104) and V2 106L (65–166) with a body clearance of 4.7L/h (2.87–7.81) and RRT clearance of 1.46L/h (1.29–1.64). MCS showed TC below/within/above target of 10/74/16% on day 1 and 9/39/52% at steady-state for the recommended dose. A 50% lower dose resulted in 26/72/1% (day 1) and 17/64/19% at steady-state and 7/57/37% and 7/27/67% for a 50% higher dose. VRC pharmacokinetics are not significantly influenced by ACLF in critically ill patients who receive RRT. Maintenance dose should be adjusted in both groups. Due to the high interindividual variability, therapeutic drug monitoring seems inevitable.

Hypoxic liver injury (HLI) is a frequent and life-threatening complication in critically ill patients that occurs in up to ten percent of critically ill patients. However, there is a lack of data on HLI following cardiac arrest and its clinical implications on outcome. Aim of this study was to investigate incidence, outcome and functional outcome of patients with HLI after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).We conducted an analysis of a cardiac arrest registry data over a 7-year period. All patients with non-traumatic OHCA and IHCA with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) treated at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital were included in the study. HLI was defined according to established criteria. Predictors of HLI, occurrence, clinical and neurological outcome were assessed using multivariable regression.Out of 1068 patients after IHCA and OHCA with ROSC, 219 (21%) patients developed HLI. Rate of HLI did not differ significantly in IHCA and OHCA patients. Multivariate regression analysis identified time-to-ROSC [OR 1.18, 95% CI (1.01-1.38); p 0.05], presence of cardiac failure [OR 2.57, 95% CI (1.65-4.01); p 0.001] and Charlson comorbidity index [OR 0.83, 95% CI (0.72-0.95); p 0.01] as independent predictors for occurrence of HLI. Good functional outcome was significantly lower in patients suffering from HLI after 28-days (35% vs. 48%, p 0.001) and 1-year (34% vs. 44%, p 0.001). Occurrence of HLI was associated with unfavourable neurological outcome [OR 1.74, 95% CI (1.16-2.61); p 0.01] in multivariate regression analysis.New onset of HLI is a frequent finding after IHCA and OHCA. HLI is associated with increased mortality, unfavourable neurological and overall outcome.

Background Neuron-specific-enolase (NSE) is frequently used to predict the neurologic outcome in persistently unconscious patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, its predictive value is unclear in the setting of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (ECMO). Aim of this project is to evaluate the predictive value of NSE in ECMO patients. Methods NSE was measured after 24, 48, and 72 h in post-CPR ECMO patients. Neurologic status was evaluated using the best Cerebral Performance Categories Score (CPC) during the hospital stay. Patients who deceased within the first 24 h and patients who were awake during the first 24 h were excluded. ROC curves were calculated to assess the discriminative ability of single NSE measurements. Trajectories of serial NSE values were investigated using latent class mixed models. Results The derivation cohort consisted of 65 patients, 30-day all-cause mortality was 47.7% and a poor neurological outcome with a CPC score of 4–5 was seen 30.7%. NSE measurement after 48 h showed the best discrimination for poor neurological outcome (AUC of 0.87 in the ROC curve; cut-off value of 70 μg/L). Specificity was highest if using serial NSE measurements at all three time points. These results could be validated in an external cohort of 64 patients. Conclusion In post-CPR patients on ECMO, NSE can be used to assess the neurologic outcome. Importantly, specificity was highest if using serial NSE measurements. Further research using prospective datasets is needed to verify these findings.

Purpose: Immunomodulatory therapies have shown beneficial effects in patients with severe COVID-19. Patients with hypercytokinemia might benefit from removal of inflammatory mediators via hemadsorption.Methods: Single-center prospective randomized trial at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients with confirmed COVID-19, refractory shock (norepinephrine ≥0.2 μg/kg/min to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg), IL-6≥500 ng/l and an indication for renal replacement therapy (RRT) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were included. Patients received either hemadsorption therapy (HT) or standard medical therapy (SMT). For HT, a CytoSorb® adsorber was used for up to 5 days and was replaced every 18–24 hours. The primary endpoint was sustained hemodynamic improvement (norepinephrine ≤0.05 µg/kg/min≥24h). Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality, SOFA, and reduction of IL-6, PCT, and MR-proADM. Results: Of 242 screened patients, 24 were randomized and assigned to either HT (N=12) or SMT (N=12). Both groups had similar severity as assessed by SAPS II (median 75 points HT group vs. 79 SMT group, p=0.590) and SOFA (17 vs. 16, p=0.551). At randomization, 22 (92%) patients were on RRT and 11 (46%) had vv-ECMO. Median IL-6 levels were 2269 (IQR 948–3679) and 3747 (1301–5415) ng/l in the HT and SMT group at baseline, respectively (p=0.378). Serum IL-6 reduction in the first 24h of treatment compared between both groups was 83% vs. 46% (p=0.235). Shock resolution (primary endpoint) was reached in 33% (4/12) vs. 17% (2/12) in the HT and SMT group, respectively (p=0.640). 28-day mortality was 58% (7/12) in the HT compared to 67% (8/12) in the SMT group (p=1.0).Conclusion: HT was associated with a non-significant trend towards clinical improvement within the intervention period including reduction of IL-6 levels and shock resolution. In selected patients, HT might therefore be an option for stabilization and bridge to transfer and decision. (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04344080, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04344080, trial registration date 04/14/2020)]

Cardiac arrest is one of the most dramatic medical emergencies. The occurence of cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients, the so called in-hospital cardiac arrest, is common and associated with high mortality. However, in-hospital cardiac arrest has received quite little attention compared to cardiac arrest occuring outside the hospital. The present article reviews the recent literature of in-hospital cardiac arrest and outlines differences in characteristics and outcome compared to out of hospital cardiac arrest. Moreover, current literature regarding occurence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is concisely summarized.CHARAKTERISTIKEN UND URSACHEN DES PRäKLINISCHEN UND INNERKLINISCHEN HERZ-KREISLAUF-STILLSTANDS: Eine große dänische Studie verglich die Charakteristiken von mehr als 12 000 Patienten mit präklinischem oder innerklinischem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand. Interessanterweise zeigten sich zwischen den beiden Gruppen eine ähnliche Demografie sowie eine ähnliche Anzahl an Vorerkrankungen. Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass sich Unterschiede vor allem durch die Charakteristiken des Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstands erklären lassen. Dies ist vor allem im Hinblick auf die derzeit noch unzureichende Studienlage zum innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand interessant. HERZ-KREISLAUF-STILLSTAND AUF DER INTENSIVSTATION: Etwa die Hälfte der innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstände ereignet sich auf der Intensivstation. Zwei kürzlich publizierte Studien befassten sich genauer mit dem Vorkommen, den Ursachen sowie der Prognose von Patienten mit Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand auf der Intensivstation. COVID-19 UND AUSWIRKUNG AUF DEN INNERKLINISCHEN HERZ-KREISLAUF-STILLSTAND: Mehrere Studien zeigten während der COVID-19-Pandemie eine höhere Inzidenz von präklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillständen mit schlechterer Prognose. Aktuell ist unklar, wie oft hospitalisierte Patienten mit COVID-19 einen innerklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand erleiden. Publizierte Arbeiten zeigten eine sehr eingeschränkte Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit. Als führende Ursache zeigte sich überwiegend ein hypoxisch getriggerter Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand mit nicht schockbaren EKG-Rhythmen (Asystolie/PEA). Eine kardiale Ursache fand sich nur selten. Aufgrund der schlechten Prognose wurde von einigen Autoren sogar die Sinnhaftigkeit von Reanimationsmaßnahmen bei COVID-19-Patienten diskutiert.

BACKGROUNDMale sex was repeatedly identified as a risk factor for death and intensive care admission. However, it is yet unclear whether sex hormones are associated with disease severity in COVID-19 patients. We sought to characterize sex differences in hormone levels and cytokine responses in critically ill COVID-19 patients.METHODSWe performed a retrospective cohort study of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Males and females were compared. Multivariate regression was performed to assess the association between sex hormones, cytokine responses and the requirement for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatment.RESULTSWe analyzed sex hormone levels (estradiol and testosterone) of n=181 male and female individuals. These consisted of n=50 critically ill COVID-19 patients (n=39 males, n=11 females), n=42 critically ill non-COVID-19 patients (n=27 males, n=15 females), n=39 non-COVID-19 patients with coronary heart diseases (CHD) (n=25 males, n=14 females) and n=50 healthy individuals (n=30 males, n=20 females). We detected highest estradiol levels in critically ill male COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients (p=0.0123), patients with CHD (p=0.0002) or healthy individuals (p=0.0007). Lowest testosterone levels were detected in critically ill male COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients (p=0.0094), patients with CHD (p=0.0068) or healthy individuals (pp=0.0301; IL-1RA, p=0.0160; IL-6, p=0.0145; MCP-1, p=0.0052; MIP-1α, p=0.0134) were significantly elevated in those with higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (8-11). Linear regression analysis revealed that herein IFN-γ levels correlate with estradiol levels in male and female COVID-19 patients (R2=0.216, =0.0009). Male COVID-19 patients with elevated estradiol levels were more likely to receive ECMO treatment in the course of their ICU stay (p=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS We identified high estradiol and low testosterone levels as a hallmark of critically ill male COVID-19 patients. Elevated estradiol levels in critically ill male COVID-19 patients were positively associated with IFN-γ levels and increased risk for ECMO requirement.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to an ongoing pandemic with a surge of critically ill patients. Very little is known about the occurrence and characteristic of cardiac arrest in critically ill patients with COVID-19 treated at the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim was to investigate the incidence and outcome of intensive care unit cardiac arrest (ICU-CA) in critically ill patients with COVID-19. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data of all consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 admitted (27 February 2020–14 January 2021) at the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Of 183 critically ill patients with COVID-19, 18% (n = 33) had ICU-CA. The median age of the study population was 63 (55–73) years and 66% (n = 120) were male. Demographic characteristics and comorbidities did not differ significantly between patients with and without ICU-CA. Simplified Acute Physiological Score II (SAPS II) (ICU-CA: median 44 points vs. no ICU-CA: 39 points) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (median 12 points vs. 7 points) on admission were significantly higher in patients with ICU-CA. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was present in 91% (n = 30) with and in 63% (n = 94) without ICU-CA (p = 0.002). Mechanical ventilation was more common in patients with ICU-CA (97% vs. 67%). The median stay in ICU before CA was 6 (1–17) days. A total of 33% (n = 11) of ICU-CAs occurred during the first 24 h of ICU stay. The initial rhythm was non-shockable (pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole) in 91% (n = 30), 94% (n = 31) had sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The median time to ROSC was 3 (1–5) minutes. Patients with ICU-CA had significantly higher ICU mortality (61% vs. 37%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that the presence of ARDS (odds ratio (OR) 4.268, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.211–15.036, p = 0.024) and high SAPS II (OR 1.031, 95% CI 0.997–1.065, p = 0.077) were independently associated with the occurrence of ICU-CA. A total of 18% of critically ill patients with COVID-19 suffered from a cardiac arrest within the intensive care unit. The occurrence of ICU-CA was associated with presence of ARDS and severity of illness.