Search

PURPOSE To evaluate long-term morbidity and mortality among unilateral, nonsyndromic Wilms tumor (WT) survivors according to conventional treatment regimens. METHODS Cumulative incidence of late mortality (≥ 5 years from diagnosis) and chronic health conditions (CHCs) were evaluated in WT survivors from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Outcomes were evaluated by treatment, including nephrectomy combined with vincristine and actinomycin D (VA), VA + doxorubicin + abdominal radiotherapy (VAD + ART), VAD + ART + whole lung radiotherapy, or receipt of ≥ 4 chemotherapy agents. RESULTS Among 2,008 unilateral WT survivors, 142 deaths occurred (standardized mortality ratio, 2.9, 95% CI, 2.5 to 3.5; 35-year cumulative incidence of death, 7.8%, 95% CI, 6.3 to 9.2). The 35-year cumulative incidence of any grade 3-5 CHC was 34.1% (95% CI, 30.7 to 37.5; rate ratio [RR] compared with siblings 3.0, 95% CI, 2.6 to 3.5). Survivors treated with VA alone had comparable risk for all-cause late mortality relative to the general population (standardized mortality ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.7) and modestly increased risk for grade 3-5 CHCs compared with siblings (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0), but remained at increased risk for intestinal obstruction (RR, 9.4; 95% CI, 3.9 to 22.2) and kidney failure (RR, 11.9; 95% CI, 4.2 to 33.6). Magnitudes of risk for grade 3-5 CHCs, including intestinal obstruction, kidney failure, premature ovarian insufficiency, and heart failure, increased by treatment group intensity. CONCLUSION With approximately 40% of patients with newly diagnosed WT currently treated with VA alone, the burden of late mortality/morbidity in future decades is projected to be lower than that for survivors from earlier eras. Nevertheless, the risk of late effects such as intestinal obstruction and kidney failure was elevated across all treatment groups, and there was a dose-dependent increase in risk for all grade 3-5 CHCs by treatment group intensity.

Background We aimed to characterize premature aging as an accumulation of deficits in survivors of pediatric cancer compared with community controls and examine associations with host and treatment factors, neurocognition, and mortality. Methods Pediatric cancer survivors (n = 4000, median age = 28.6, interquartile range [IQR] = 23-35 years; 20 years postdiagnosis: IQR = 15-27), and community participants without a history of cancer serving as controls (n = 638, median age = 32, IQR = 25-40 years) completed clinical assessments and questionnaires and were followed for mortality through April 30, 2020 (mean [SD] follow-up = 7.0 [3.4] years). A deficit accumulation index (DAI) score was calculated from 44 aging-related items including self-reported daily function, psychosocial symptoms, and health conditions. Items were weighted from 0 (absent) to 1 (present and/or most severe), summed and divided by the total yielding a ratio (higher = more deficits). Scores less than 0.20 are robust, and 0.06 is a clinically meaningful difference. Linear regression compared the DAI in survivors and controls with an age*survivor or control interaction. Logistic regression and Cox-proportional hazards estimated the risk of neurocognitive impairment and death. Models were minimally adjusted for age, sex, and race and ethnicity. Results The adjusted mean DAI among survivors at age 30 years was 0.16 corresponding to age 63 years in controls (33 years premature aging; β = 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06 to 0.08; P Conclusion Pediatric cancer survivors experience clinically significant premature aging. The DAI may be used to identify survivors at greatest risk of poor health outcomes.

Survivors of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are at risk for neurocognitive impairments, which can negatively affect quality of life. Given limited studies, we aimed to describe the neurocognitive outcomes in a cohort of long-term adult HCT survivors. Eligible survivors (age ≥21 years at HCT and alive ≥2 years following HCT) completed a 60-question survey of neurocognitive function and quality of life, which included the Neuro-Quality of Life Cognitive Function Short Form (Neuro-QoL) and the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive Questionnaire (NCQ). Analyses of risk factors included univariate comparisons and multivariable logistic regression. Survivors (n = 1861, 47.7% female, 65.6% allogeneic HCT) were surveyed at a median age of 64.2 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.8-70.5) and a median 12.0 years (IQR, 6.0-21.0) from HCT. Survivors reported average Neuro-QoL scores (50.0 allogeneic; 49.2 autologous survivors) compared with an expected mean of 50 in the general population. On the NCQ, 17.4% to 31.2% of survivors reported impairments (Z-score >1.28) in task efficiency, memory, emotional regulation, or organization, compared with an expected 10% in the general population (all P < .01). In multivariable regression analyses, impaired Neuro-QoL (T-score

PURPOSE Cancer survivors develop cancer and treatment-related morbidities at younger than normal ages and are at risk for early mortality, suggestive of an aging phenotype. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G) is specifically designed to describe the accumulation of comorbidities over time with estimates of severity such as total score (TS) which is a sum of possible conditions weighted by severity. These severity scores can then be used to predict future mortality. METHODS CIRS-G scores were calculated in cancer survivors and their siblings from Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort members from two time points 19 years apart and members of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2004. CIRS-G metrics were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression to determine subsequent mortality risk. RESULTS In total, 14,355 survivors with a median age of 24 (IQR, 18-30) years and 4,022 siblings with a median age of 26 (IQR, 19-33) years provided baseline data; 6,138 survivors and 1,801 siblings provided follow-up data. Cancer survivors had higher median baseline TS than siblings at baseline (5.75 v 3.44) and follow-up (7.76 v 4.79), all P < .01. The mean increase in TS from baseline to follow-up was significantly steeper in cancer survivors (2.89 males and 3.18 females) vs. siblings (1.79 males and 1.69 females) and NHANES population (2.0 males and 1.94 females), all P < .01. Every point increase in baseline TS increased hazard for death by 9% (95% CI, 8 to 10) among survivors. CONCLUSION Application of a geriatric rating scale to characterize disease supports the hypothesis that morbidity accumulation is accelerated in young adult survivors of childhood cancer when compared with siblings and the general population.

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer frequently report cognitive impairment both during and after completion of therapy. Evidence suggests that cancer-related cognitive impairments are related to widespread neural network dysfunction. The default mode network (DMN) is a large conserved network that plays a critical role in integrating the functions of various neural systems. Disruption of the network may play a key role in the development of cognitive impairment. METHODS: We compared neuroimaging and neurocognitive data from 43 newly diagnosed primary breast cancer patients (mean age = 48, standard deviation [SD] = 8.9 years) and 50 frequency-matched healthy female controls (mean age = 50, SD = 10 years) before treatment and 1 year after treatment completion. Functional and effective connectivity measures of the DMN were obtained using graph theory and Bayesian network analysis methods, respectively. RESULTS: Compared with healthy females, the breast cancer group displayed higher global efficiency and path length post-treatment (p

Although pediatric lower extremity sarcoma once was routinely treated with amputation, multiagent chemotherapy as well as the evolution of tumor resection and reconstruction techniques have enabled the wide adoption of limb salvage surgery (LSS). Even though infection and tumor recurrence are established risk factors for early amputation (5 years) after LSS, the frequency of and factors associated with late amputation (≥ 5 years from diagnosis) in children with sarcomas are not known. Additionally, the resulting psychosocial and physical outcomes of these patients compared with those treated with primary amputation or LSS that was not complicated by subsequent amputation are not well studied. Studying these outcomes is critical to enhancing the quality of life of patients with sarcomas.(1) How have treatments changed over time in patients with lower extremity sarcoma who are included in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), and did primary treatment with amputation or LSS affect overall survival at 25 years among patients who had survived at least 5 years from diagnosis? (2) What is the cumulative incidence of amputation after LSS for patients diagnosed with pediatric lower extremity sarcomas 25 years after diagnosis? (3) What are the factors associated with time to late amputation (≥ 5 years after diagnosis) in patients initially treated with LSS for lower extremity sarcomas in the CCSS? (4) What are the comparative social, physical, and emotional health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among patients with sarcoma treated with primary amputation, LSS without amputation, or LSS complicated by late amputation, as assessed by CCSS follow-up questionnaires, the SF-36, and the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 at 20 years after cancer diagnosis?The CCSS is a long-term follow-up study that began in 1994 and is coordinated through St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. It is a retrospective study with longitudinal follow-up of more than 38,000 participants treated for childhood cancer when younger than 21 years at one of 31 collaborating institutions between 1970 and 1999 in the United States and Canada. Participants were eligible for enrollment in the CCSS after they had survived 5 years from diagnosis. Within the CCSS cohort, we included participants who had a diagnosis of lower extremity sarcoma treated with primary amputation (547 patients with a mean age at diagnosis of 13 ± 4 years) or primary LSS (510 patients with a mean age 14 ± 4 years). The LSS cohort was subdivided into LSS without amputation, defined as primary LSS without amputation at the time of latest follow-up; LSS with early amputation, defined as LSS complicated by amputation occurring less than 5 years from diagnosis; or LSS with late amputation, defined as primary LSS in study patients who subsequently underwent amputation 5 years or more from cancer diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of late amputation after primary LSS was estimated. Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariates identified factors associated with late amputation. Modified Poisson regression models were used to compare psychosocial, physical, and HRQOL outcomes among patients treated with primary amputation, LSS without amputation, or LSS complicated by late amputation using validated surveys.More study participants were treated with LSS than with primary amputation in more recent decades. The overall survival at 25 years in this population who survived 5 years from diagnosis was not different between those treated with primary amputation (87% [95% confidence interval [CI] 82% to 91%]) compared with LSS (88% [95% CI 85% to 91%]; p = 0.31). The cumulative incidence of amputation at 25 years after cancer diagnosis and primary LSS was 18% (95% CI 14% to 21%). With the numbers available, the cumulative incidence of late amputation was not different among study patients treated in the 1970s (27% [95% CI 15% to 38%]) versus the 1980s and 1990s (19% [95% CI 13% to 25%] and 15% [95% CI 10% to 19%], respectively; p = 0.15). After controlling for gender, medical and surgical treatment variables, cancer recurrence, and chronic health conditions, gender (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02 [95% CI 1.07 to 3.82]; p = 0.03) and history of prosthetic joint reconstruction (HR 2.58 [95% CI 1.37 to 4.84]; p = 0.003) were associated with an increased likelihood of late amputation. Study patients treated with a primary amputation (relative risk [RR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.15 to 3.64]) and LSS complicated by late amputation (relative risk [RR] 3.85 [95% CI 1.66 to 8.92]) were more likely to be unemployed or unable to attend school than patients treated with LSS without amputation to date. The CCSS cohort treated with primary amputation and those with LSS complicated by late amputation reported worse physical health scores than those without amputation to date, although mental and emotional health outcomes did not differ between the groups.There is a substantial risk of late amputation after LSS, and both primary and late amputation status are associated with decreased physical HRQOL outcomes. Children treated for sarcoma who survive into adulthood after primary amputation and those who undergo late amputation after LSS may benefit from interventions focused on improving physical function and reaching educational and employment milestones. Efforts to improve the physical function of people who have undergone amputation either through prosthetic design or integration into the residuum should be supported. Understanding factors associated with late amputation in the setting of more modern surgical approaches and implants will help surgeons more effectively manage patient expectations and adjust practice to mitigate these risks over the life of the patient.Level III, therapeutic study.

Supplementary Table S7: Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Neurocognitive Performance in Adult Survivors Description: Mildly slower fine motor processing speed was found in survivors with dyslipidemia and abdominal obesity. Visual and visual-motor processing speeds tended to be poorer in survivors with dyslipidemia and abdominal obesity, as did poorer attention performance in survivors with hypertension. Cognitive performance was not related to hyperglycemia or metabolic syndrome.

Background: Hyperuricemia is implicated in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. This study evaluated associations between uric acid (UA), cardiovascular health, and neurocognitive function in adolescent and adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with chemotherapy only.Methods: 126 adolescent [mean (SD) age 14.6 (5.0); 7.8 (1.7) years postdiagnosis] and 226 adult survivors [age 25.4 (4.2) years; 18.1 (4.4) years postdiagnosis] completed comprehensive neurocognitive testing. Concurrent UA measurements were conducted for both groups. For adult survivors, cardiovascular risk factors were assessed, and UA measurements during adolescence [12.3 (4.0) years before neurocognitive testing] were also collected. UA levels were categorized into quartiles for age- and gender-based ranking, and associations with neurocognitive outcomes were examined.Results: Survivors demonstrated worse attention, processing speed, and executive functions than population norms (P values < 0.05). Adolescent survivors with elevated UA had poorer attention (P = 0.04), visual-processing speed (P = 0.03), and cognitive flexibility (P = 0.02). UA was not associated with neurocognitive outcomes in adult survivors. Adult survivors developed dyslipidemia (46%), hypertension (32%), and abdominal obesity (26%), and high UA during adolescence was associated with these cardiovascular risk factors as adults (all P values < 0.01). Fine-motor processing speed was slower in adult survivors with dyslipidemia (P = 0.04) and abdominal obesity (P = 0.04). Poorer attention was marginally associated with hypertension (P = 0.06).Conclusions: Elevated UA is associated with neurocognitive performance in adolescent survivors. In adult survivors, relative elevation of UA during adolescence was predictive of cardiovascular health, which was associated with poorer neurocognitive outcomes.Impact: Future studies should evaluate the mediating role of chronic cardiovascular health conditions between elevated UA and subsequent neurocognitive impairment in survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(8); 1259–67. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Fig. S1: Study Schema This figure summarizes the study design and objectives of this study.

Characterization of toxicity associated with cancer and its treatment is essential to quantify risk, inform optimization of therapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed patients, and guide health surveillance recommendations for long-term survivors. The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) provides a common rubric for grading severity of adverse outcomes in cancer patients that is widely used in clinical trials. The CTCAE has also been used to assess late cancer treatment-related morbidity but is not fully representative of the spectrum of events experienced by pediatric and aging adult survivors of childhood cancer. Also, CTCAE characterization does not routinely integrate detailed patient-reported and medical outcomes data available from clinically assessed cohorts. To address these deficiencies, we standardized the severity grading of long-term and late-onset health events applicable to childhood cancer survivors across their lifespan by modifying the existing CTCAE v4.03 criteria and aligning grading rubrics from other sources for chronic conditions not included or optimally addressed in the CTCAE v4.03. This article describes the methods of late toxicity assessment used in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study, a clinically assessed cohort in which data from multiple diagnostic modalities and patient-reported outcomes are ascertained. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(5); 666–74. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Data with changes

PDF file - 56K, Diagnosis and treatment-related characteristics of the cancer survivor population (participants) and non-participants.

Neuropsychological Event Grading in SJLIFE

Medical Event Grading in SJLIFE

Background: Women with a history of chest radiotherapy have an increased risk of breast cancer; however, many do not undergo annual recommended screening mammography. We sought to characterize the relationship between mammography and potentially modifiable factors, with the goal of identifying targets for intervention to improve utilization.Methods: Of 625 female participants sampled from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, who were treated with chest radiotherapy, 551 responded to a survey about breast cancer screening practices. We used multivariate Poisson regression to assess several lifestyle and emotional factors, health care practices, and perceived breast cancer risk, in relation to reporting a screening mammogram within the last two years.Results: Women who had a Papanicolaou test [prevalence ratio (PR): 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26–2.49], and who perceived their breast cancer risk as higher than the average woman were more likely to have had a mammogram (PR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09–1.46). We detected an attenuated effect of echocardiogram screening [PR, 0.70; 95% CI (0.52–0.95)] on having a mammogram among older women compared with younger women. Smoking, obesity, physical activity, coping, and symptoms of depression and somatization were not associated with mammographic screening.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that compliance with routine and risk-based screening can be an important indicator of mammography in childhood cancer survivors. In addition, there is a need to ensure women understand their increased breast cancer risk, as a means to encouraging them to follow breast surveillance guidelines.Impact: Screening encounters could be used to promote mammography compliance in this population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(11); 1699–706. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose:To identify genetic factors associated with risk of stroke among survivors of childhood cancer treated with cranial radiotherapy (CRT).Experimental Design:We analyzed whole-genome sequencing (36.8-fold) data of 686 childhood cancer survivors of European ancestry [median (range), 40.4 (12.4–64.7) years old; 54% male] from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort study treated with CRT, of whom 116 (17%) had clinically diagnosed stroke. Association analyses (single-variant and Burden/SKAT tests) were performed, adjusting for demographic characteristics and childhood cancer treatment exposures.Results:We identified a genome-wide significant association between 5p15.33 locus and stroke [rs112896372: HR = 2.55; P = 1.42 × 10–8], with a stronger association (HR = 3.68) among survivors treated with CRT dose 25–50 Gray (Gy) and weaker associations among those treated with CRT doses 50 Gy (HRs = 2.14, 2.40, and 2.28). The association was replicated in 90 CRT-exposed African survivors (HR = 3.05; P = 0.034). In CRT-exposed Europeans, rs112896372 significantly (P < 0.001) improved predictive ability (AUC = 0.717) for determining stroke risk than nongenetic factors alone (AUC = 0.663) at 30 years since diagnosis, with significant improvement among African survivors (P = 0.047). SNP rs112896372 was further evaluated in three independent datasets including 1,641 European (HR = 1.54; P = 0.055) and 316 African survivors (HR = 1.88; P = 0.283) not treated with CRT, and 166,988 males in the UK Biobank (OR = 1.0012; P = 0.042).Conclusions:A novel locus 5p15.33 is associated with stroke risk among childhood cancer survivors, with a possible CRT dose-specific effect. The locus is of potential clinical utility in characterizing individuals who may benefit from surveillance and intervention strategies.

Supplementary Table 1a. Analysis of factors associated with having a screening mammogram within the prior two years in women age

Background: Prior studies have identified that survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) report poor health status. It is unknown how risk-stratified therapy impacts the health status of ALL survivors. Methods: We estimated and compared the prevalence of self-reported poor health status among adult (≥18 years) survivors of childhood ALL diagnosed at age Results: Among 5,119 survivors and 4,693 siblings, survivors were more likely to report poor health status in each domain including poor general health (13.5% vs. 7.4%; PR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.69–2.19). Compared with 70s, 90sSR and 90sHR were less likely to report poor general health (90sSR: PR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57–0.98; 90sHR: PR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39–0.87), functional impairment (90sSR: PR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.42–0.76; 90sHR: PR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42–0.95), and activity limitations (90sSR: 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45–0.83; 90sHR: PR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38–0.91). An added adjustment for chronic conditions in multivariable models partially attenuated 90sSR risk estimates. Conclusions: Risk-stratified ALL therapy has succeeded in reducing risk for poor general health, functional impairment, and activity limitations among more recent survivors of standard- and high-risk therapy. Impact: Future research into the relationship between risk-stratified therapy, health status, and late health outcomes may provide new opportunities to further improve late morbidity among survivors.

PURPOSE Social integration and relationship issues have been understudied among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. This study compared social relationships (social networks, support, and isolation) between AYA cancer survivors and noncancer controls, and identified social integration mechanisms through which the cancer experience influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs). MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred two AYA cancer survivors and 102 age, sex, and race-matched noncancer controls from a national Internet panel completed an online survey to identify up to 25 of closest friends and relatives whom they have contacted within the past 2 years. Participants' interpersonal connections were used to create a social network index. The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and PROMIS-29 Profile were used to measure social support, perceived isolation or loneliness, and PROs (physical functioning, pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, and depression domains), respectively. Path analysis tested effects of cancer experience on PROs using serial social relationship variables as mediators. RESULTS Compared with controls, survivors of lymphoma, leukemia, and solid tumor had better social networks; however, survivors of solid tumor and central nervous system malignancies had higher perceived loneliness (all P values < .05). Cancer experience was directly associated with poor PROs ( P values < .05 for all domains except fatigue) and indirectly associated through the social network-support-loneliness pathway (all P values < .05). Survivors with higher loneliness had lower physical functioning and higher pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, and depression versus controls with lower loneliness (all P values < .05). CONCLUSION Compared with controls, survivors were more socially connected but experienced greater loneliness, which was associated with poorer PROs. Screening social integration issues during follow-up care and providing appropriate interventions are warranted.

PURPOSE Eight percent of young-adult childhood cancer survivors meet criteria for frailty, an aging phenotype associated with poor health. In the elderly general population, frailty is associated with neurocognitive decline; this association has not been examined in adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS Childhood cancer survivors 18-45 years old (≥ 10 years from diagnosis) were clinically evaluated for prefrailty or frailty (respectively defined as ≥ 2 or ≥ 3 of: muscle wasting, muscle weakness, low energy expenditure, slow walking speed, and exhaustion [Fried criteria]) and completed neuropsychologic assessments at enrollment (January 2008-June 2013) and 5 years later. Weighted linear regression using inverse of sampling probability estimates as weights compared differences in neurocognitive decline in prefrail and frail survivors versus nonfrail survivors, adjusting for diagnosis age, sex, race, CNS–directed therapy (cranial radiation, intrathecal chemotherapy, and neurosurgery), and baseline neurocognitive performance. RESULTS Survivors were on average 30 years old and 22 years from diagnosis; 18% were prefrail and 6% frail at enrollment. Frail survivors declined an average of 0.54 standard deviation (95% CI, −0.93 to −0.15) in short-term verbal recall, whereas nonfrail survivors did not decline (β = .22; difference of βs = −.76; 95% CI, −1.19 to −0.33). Frail survivors declined more than nonfrail survivors on visual-motor processing speed (β = −.40; 95% CI, −0.67 to −0.12), cognitive flexibility (β = −.62; 95% CI, −1.02 to −0.22), and verbal fluency (β = −.23; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.05). Prefrail and frail survivors experienced greater declines in focused attention (prefrail β = −.35; 95% CI, −0.53 to −0.17; frail β = −.48; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.12) compared with nonfrail survivors. CONCLUSION Over approximately 5 years, prefrail and frail young-adult survivors had greater declines in cognitive domains associated with aging and dementia compared with nonfrail survivors. Interventions that have global impact, designed to target the mechanistic underpinnings of frailty, may also mitigate or prevent neurocognitive decline.

Survival rates of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved greatly due to advanced therapies and supportive care. Intrathecal chemotherapy replaced cranial radiation due to radiation-induced neurotoxicity and late-effects. Survivors treated with chemotherapy-only experience neurologic and cognitive problems following cessation of treatment. Very long-term cognitive outcomes remain unclear. Animal models are being generated to assess late-effects of chemotherapy on cognitive function. Although, few address juvenile models of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) and developing brain, results of this review outline neurocognitive effects of chemotherapy consistent with childhood ALL therapy. Studies demonstrate deficits across cognitive domains including spatial memory, executive function, short-term memory, anxiety and depression. Inflammation, oxidative stress, excitotoxity, and other metabolic disruptions may lead to neurodegeneration associated with cognitive impairment observed in ALL survivors. Interventions directly targeting these mechanisms may prevent and/or promote recovery of cognitive function and improve long-term outcomes. Evidence suggests success of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant treatments in reducing cognitive decline. Animal models provide basis for assessing effects of chemotherapy on neurologic processes to guide future clinical investigations.

PURPOSE Findings from St Jude Total Therapy Study 16 (Total 16) showed early intensification of triple intrathecal therapy (ITT) improved CNS disease control for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at the greatest risk of CNS relapse. We examined the impact of this treatment on end-of-therapy neurocognitive outcomes. METHODS Between 2007 and 2017, 400 (83.5%) of 479 eligible patients treated with Total 16 risk-directed chemotherapy completed protocol-directed neurocognitive testing at the end of therapy. Intensified ITT was defined as ≥ 21 cumulative doses for patients with low-risk ALL (n = 70/194) and ≥ 27 doses for those with standard-to-high risk ALL (n = 81/206). RESULTS Compared with age-normative expectations, the overall group had significantly lower estimated intelligence quotient ( P < .0001), attention ( P = .0051), working memory ( P = .0001), processing speed ( P = .0002), fine motor speed ( P = .0001), and math ( P = .0087). Caregiver ratings of patient functioning showed elevated risk for problems in attention ( P = .0173), executive function ( P = .0001), and adaptive skills ( P = .0001). Among the low-risk treatment group, there were no significant differences between patients treated with or without intensified ITT (all P's >.10). Among patients with standard-to-high risk ALL, those treated with intensified ITT had poorer working memory ( P = .0328) and fine motor speed ( P = .0403), and elevated ratings of inattention ( P = .0189) and executive dysfunction ( P = .0245). In the standard-to-high risk group, females treated with intensified ITT had lower working memory scores. Public insurance status was associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION Standard-to-high risk patients treated with intensified ITT are at moderately increased risk for neurocognitive problems. The findings suggest a threshold effect for ITT exposure, which can inform the design of future clinical trials and approaches to neurocognitive monitoring and intervention.

1.Data_for_Table1_ADI: The derived variables in Table 1 for ADI (area deprivation index). 2.Data_for_Table1_EDU: The derived variables in Table 1 for EDU(educational attainment). 3.Data_for_Table1_PINC: The derived variables in Table 1 for PINC (personal income). How to cite our paper: Song N, Dong Q, Chen C, Li Q, Mulder H, Plyler E, Easton J, Walker E, Olson S, Neale G, Krull KR, Srivastava DK, Ness KK, Zhang J, Hudson MM, Robison LL, Huang IC, Wang Z. Social-epigenetic mediators for racial disparities in pulmonary impairment among childhood cancer survivors. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023 Feb;43(2):290-293. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12371. Epub 2022 Oct 18. PMID: 36256508; PMCID: PMC9926953.

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) often experience treatment-related neurocognitive deficits and significant pain. Pain may exacerbate these cognitive impairments. This study examined neuropathic pain and neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood ALL treated with contemporary therapy on a clinical trial (NCT00137111). There were 345 survivors (45% female, M = 6.9 years at diagnosis) who completed neurocognitive assessments including measures of sustained attention, learning and memory, and parent ratings of attention during at least one of 4 time points: on-therapy (Induction and Reinduction), end of therapy, and 2 years post-therapy. At-risk performance was defined as a score at least 1SD below the age-adjusted mean. Data on neuropathic pain (events, duration, and severity according NCI Common Toxicity Criteria) and pharmacologic pain management (opioids and gabapentin) were ascertained. Results showed that 135 survivors (39%) experienced neuropathic pain during treatment. Compared with those without pain, survivors with pain had greater memory impairments at end of therapy (California Verbal Learning Test [CVLT]-Total, 24% vs 12%, P = 0.046). Within the pain group, survivors who experienced a greater number of pain events (CVLT-Total = -0.88, P = 0.023) and those who were treated with opioids (versus gabapentin) had poorer learning and memory performance (CVLT-Total = -0.73, P = 0.011; Short Delay = -0.57, P = 0.024; Long Delay = -0.62, P = 0.012; and Learning Slope = -0.45, P = 0.042) across time points. These are considered medium-to-large effects (SD = 0.45-0.88). Neuropathic pain may be a risk factor for learning problems after therapy completion, and treatment for pain with opioids may also adversely affect neurocognitive performance. Therefore, patients who experience pain may require closer monitoring and additional intervention for neurocognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of seizure-related factors on neurocognitive, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and social outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: Survivors of childhood cancer treated at St. Jude Children’s Hospital (n = 2022; 48.3% female; median age, 31.5 years; median time since diagnosis, 23.6 years) completed neurocognitive testing and questionnaires. The presence, severity, resolution, and treatment history of seizures were abstracted from medical records. Adjusting for the age at diagnosis, sex, and prior cancer therapy, multivariable models examined the impact of seizures on neurocognitive and HRQOL outcomes. Mediation analyses were conducted for social outcomes. RESULTS: Seizures were identified in 232 survivors (11.5%; 29.9% of survivors with central nervous system [CNS] tumors and 9.0% of those without CNS tumors). In CNS tumor survivors, seizures were associated with poorer executive function and processing speed (P < .02); in non-CNS tumor survivors, seizures were associated with worse function in every domain (P < .05). Among non-CNS survivors, seizure severity was associated with worse processing speed (P = .023), and resolution was associated with better executive function (P = .028) and attention (P = .044). In CNS survivors, seizure resolution was associated with improved attention (P = .047) and memory (P < .02). Mediation analysis revealed that the impact of seizures on social outcomes was mediated by neurocognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: Seizures in cancer survivors adversely affect long-term functional and psychosocial outcomes independently of cancer therapy. The resolution of seizure occurrence is associated with better outcomes. Seizure severity is associated with poorer outcomes and should be a focus of clinical management and patient education.

To examine self-reported (30-day) sleep versus nightly actigraphy-assessed sleep concordance in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Four hundred seventy-seven participants enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (53.5% female, median (range) age 34.3 (19.3–61.6) years, 25.4 (10.9–49.3) years from diagnosis) completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and ≥ 3 nights of actigraphy. Participants had neurocognitive impairment and/or a self-reported prolonged sleep onset latency (SOL). Self-reported 30-day sleep and nightly actigraphic sleep measures for sleep duration, SOL, and sleep efficiency (SE) were converted into ordinal categories for calculation of weighted kappa coefficients. General linear models estimated associations between measurement concordance and late effects. Agreements between self-reported and actigraphic measures were slight to fair for sleep duration and SOL measures (kw = 0.20 and kw = 0.22, respectively; p

PURPOSE To identify symptom clusters among adult survivors of childhood cancers and test associations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical and neurocognitive performance. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 3,085 survivors (mean age at evaluation 31.9 ± 8.3 years; mean years from diagnosis 28.1 ± 9.1) participating in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Survivors self-reported the presence of 37 symptoms capturing 10 domains (cardiac, pulmonary, sensory, motor/movement, nausea, pain, fatigue, memory, anxiety, and depression). The Short Form-36's Physical/Mental Component Summaries assessed HRQOL; the Physical Performance Test evaluated physical performance; and neurocognitive batteries tested attention, processing/psychomotor speed, memory, and executive function. Latent class analysis identified subgroups of survivors experiencing different patterns of symptom burden (ie, symptom clusters). Multivariable regression models identified risk of cluster membership and tested associations with health outcomes. RESULTS Four symptom clusters were identified including cluster 1 (prevalence 52.4%; low physical, somatization, and psychologic domains), cluster 2 (16.1%; low physical, moderate somatic, and high psychologic domains), cluster 3 (17.6%; high physical, moderate somatic, and low psychologic domains), and cluster 4 (13.9%; high in all three domains). Compared with cluster 1, survivors in cluster 4 were more likely to have less than high school education (odds ratio [OR], 7.71; 95% CI, 4.46 to 13.31), no insurance (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.13), and exposure to corticosteroids (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.03); survivors in cluster 3 were more likely to have received platinum agents (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.68) and brain radiation ≥ 30 Gy (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.33 to 6.86). Survivors in cluster 4 reported the poorest Physical Component Summary/Mental Component Summary scores (31.0/26.7) and physical and neurocognitive performance versus survivors in the other clusters ( P < .001). CONCLUSION Nearly 50% of survivors had moderate to high multisymptom burden, which was associated with sociodemographic, treatment factors, HRQOL, and functional outcomes.

Risk prediction models are important to identify survivors of childhood cancer who are at risk of experiencing poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as they age.To develop and validate prediction models for a decline in HRQOL among adult survivors of childhood cancer.This prognostic study included 4755 adults from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) diagnosed between January 5, 1970, and December 31, 1986, who completed baseline (time 0 [November 3, 1992, to August 28, 2003]) and 2 follow-up (time 1 [February 12, 2002, to May 21, 2005] and time 2 [January 6, 2014, to November 30, 2016]) surveys. Data were analyzed from June 19, 2019, to February 2, 2022.Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and emotional factors, and chronic health conditions (CHCs) were assessed at time 0 and time 1, and neurocognitive factors were assessed at time 1 to predict HRQOL at time 2 and a decline in HRQOL between time 1 and time 2. Impaired health states were defined as CHC grades 2 to 4 using the modified Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, and mental and neurocognitive status as 1 SD or more below reference levels.Health-related quality of life was operationalized using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary and classified by optimal (≥40) or suboptimal (40) at each point (main outcome). A decline in HRQOL was defined as a change from optimal to suboptimal between time 1 and time 2. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with HRQOL decline. The cohort was randomly split into training (80%) and test (20%) data sets for model development and validation; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate prediction performance.A total of 4755 adults (mean [SD] age at time 0, 24.3 [7.6] years; 2623 [55.2%] women) were included in the analysis. Between time 1 and time 2, 285 of 3294 survivors (8.7%) had declining PCS and 278 of 3294 (8.4%) had declining MCS. Risk factors associated with PCS decline included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.67 [95% CI, 1.25-2.24]), family income less than $20 000 vs $80 000 or more (OR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.21-3.30]), presence of CHCs (OR for neurological, 2.16 [95% CI, 1.51-3.10]; OR for endocrine, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.44-3.52]; OR for gastrointestinal tract, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.32-2.69]; OR for respiratory, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.06-2.59]; OR for cardiovascular, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.14-2.06]), and depression (OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.20-2.67]). Risk factors associated with MCS decline included unemployment vs full-time employment (OR, 1.68; [95% CI, 1.19-2.38]), current vs never cigarette smoking (OR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.37-3.00]), depression (OR, 4.29 [95% CI, 2.44-7.55]), somatization (OR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.05-2.53]), impaired task efficiency (OR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.34-2.68]), and impaired organization (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.12-2.48]). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the test models were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.81) for declining PCS and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.60-0.75) for declining MCS.In this prognostic study of adult survivors of childhood cancer who experienced declining HRQOL, CHCs were associated with a decline in physical HRQOL, whereas current smoking and emotional and neurocognitive impairment were associated with a decline in mental HRQOL. These findings suggest that interventions targeting modifiable risk factors are needed to prevent poor HRQOL in this population.

OBJECTIVES We aimed to clinically characterize the health, neurocognitive, and physical function outcomes of curative treatment of Wilms tumor. METHODS Survivors of Wilms tumor (n = 280) participating in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort, a retrospective study with prospective follow-up of individuals treated for childhood cancer at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, were clinically evaluated and compared to age and sex-matched controls (n = 625). Health conditions were graded per a modified version of the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Standardized neurocognitive testing was graded by using age-adjusted z-scores. Impaired physical function was defined by age- and sex-matched z-scores >1.5 SD below controls. Modified Poisson regression was used to compare the prevalence of conditions and multivariable logistic regression to examine treatment associations. RESULTS Median age at evaluation was similar between survivors and controls (30.5 years [9.0–58.0] and 31.0 [12.0–70.0]). Therapies included nephrectomy (100%), vincristine (99.3%), dactinomycin (97.9%), doxorubicin (66.8%), and abdominal (59.3%) and/or chest radiation (25.0%). By age 40 years, survivors averaged 12.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.7–13.8) grade 1–4 and 7.5 (CI: 6.7–8.2) grade 2 to 4 health conditions, compared to 4.2 (CI: 3.9–4.6) and 2.3 (CI: 2.1–2.5), respectively, among controls. Grade 2 to 4 endocrine (53.9%), cardiovascular (26.4%), pulmonary (18.2%), neurologic (8.6%), neoplastic (7.9%), and kidney (7.2%) conditions were most prevalent. Survivors exhibited neurocognitive and physical performance impairments. CONCLUSIONS Wilms tumor survivors experience a threefold higher burden of chronic health conditions compared to controls and late neurocognitive and physical function deficits. Individualized clinical management, counseling, and surveillance may improve long-term health maintenance.

ImportanceLong-term survivors of childhood cancer may be at elevated risk for new neurocognitive impairment and decline as they age into adulthood.ObjectiveTo determine whether aging adult childhood cancer survivors report more new-onset neurocognitive impairments compared with their siblings and to identify risk factors associated with such impairments.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsParticipants of this cohort study included adult survivors of childhood cancer from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and their siblings as a control group. The original cohort included survivors who received a diagnosis between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 1986, for whom longitudinal neurocognitive assessment was available. This study examined the prevalence of new-onset neurocognitive impairment between baseline (23.4 years after diagnosis) and follow-up (35.0 years after diagnosis). The analysis was performed from January 2021 to May 2022.ExposuresCancer treatment exposures were abstracted from medical records. Chronic health conditions were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was new-onset (present at follow-up, but not present at baseline) neurocognitive impairment (defined as a score in the worst 10% of the sibling cohort). Impairment was assessed using the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Neurocognitive questionnaire. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were used to estimate associations of neurocognitive impairment with treatment and health behaviors and conditions using generalized linear models.ResultsThe cohort comprised 2375 survivors (mean [SD] age at evaluation, 31.8 [7.5] years; 1298 women [54.6%]) of childhood cancer, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; 1316 participants), central nervous system (CNS) tumors (488 participants), and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; 571 participants). A total of 232 siblings (mean [SD] age at evaluation, 34.2 [8.4] years; 134 women [57.8%]) were included. Compared with siblings, a higher proportion of survivors with no impairment in memory at baseline had new-onset memory impairment at follow-up: siblings proportion, 7.8% (95% CI, 4.3%-11.4%); ALL survivors treated with chemotherapy only, 14.0% (95% CI, 10.7%-17.4%); ALL survivors treated with cranial radiation (CRT), 25.8% (95% CI, 22.6%-29.0%); CNS tumor survivors, 34.7% (95% CI, 30.0%-39.5%); and HL survivors, 16.6% (95% CI, 13.4%-19.8%). New-onset memory impairment was associated with CRT in CNS tumor survivors (RR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.33-2.90) and alkylator chemotherapy greater than or equal to 8000 mg/m2 in ALL survivors treated without CRT (RR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.28-6.12). Neurologic conditions mediated the impact of CRT on new-onset memory impairment in CNS survivors. Smoking, low educational attainment, and low physical activity were associated with elevated risk for new-onset memory impairment.Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that adult survivors of childhood cancer are at elevated risk for late-onset memory impairment related to modifiable risk factors identified early in survivorship.