Search

Abstract Background Impaired functional capacity is a common symptom in patients with heart failure. Standard measures of left ventricular (LV) function, such as ejection fraction (EF) and LV diastolic parameters, do not correlate with measures of functional capacity. The aim of this study is to determine if measures of global and regional LV strain better correlate with 6-minute walk distance than does EF or measures of LV diastolic function. Methods 120 patients referred to a cardiology clinic for evaluation of known or suspected heart failure were approached for enrollment. Of those 120 patients, 58 had an echocardiogram within 3 months of enrollment with images adequate for regional and global strain assessment, had no contra-indication to exercise testing, and had no previously documented non-cardiac explanation for dyspnea on exertion. In those 58 patients, 6-minute walk distance was measured, LV EF was determined with Simpson’s biplane method, and global and regional longitudinal strain were measured with TomTec Image Arena 4.5.1 software. Results LV EF had no correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.22, p = 0.09) even when controlling for age, gender, and BMI (p = 0.07). No measures of LV diastolic function (including E velocity, Deceleration Time, e’ annular velocities, or E/e’) had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Multiple measures of global and regional LV longitudinal systolic function had a correlation with 6-minute walk distance. Longitudinal strain of the basal LV segments had the strongest correlation with 6-minute walk distance (r= -0.36, p = 0.005), and correlation persisted after controlling for age, gender, BMI, and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004). Conclusions Longitudinal strain correlates with a measure of functional capacity, but LVEF and traditional measures of LV diastolic dysfunction do not. Measures of longitudinal strain, especially in basal LV segments, will likely be an important marker of clinically relevant LV function. Graphical Abstract