674 results on '"Kerzel, Dirk"'
Search Results
2. Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction
3. Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.’s (2015) probe letter task
4. Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression
5. Persistent effects of salience in visual working memory: Limits of cue-driven guidance
6. Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search
7. Saccadic Selection Does Not Eliminate Attribute Amnesia
8. Attentional templates are protected from retroactive interference during visual search: Converging evidence from event-related potentials
9. Meeting another's gaze shortens subjective time by capturing attention
10. Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search
11. Trial History Contributes to the Optimal Tuning of Attention.
12. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors
13. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection
14. Attribute amnesia can be modulated by foveal presentation and the pre-allocation of endogenous spatial attention
15. The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation
16. Suppression of salient stimuli inside the focus of attention
17. Dense and uniform displays facilitate the detection of salient targets.
18. A novel dissociation between representational momentum and representational gravity through response modality
19. Gaze-cueing requires intact face processing – Insights from acquired prosopagnosia
20. The Distractor Positivity Component and the Inhibition of Distracting Stimuli.
21. Active suppression of salient-but-irrelevant stimuli does not underlie resistance to visual interference
22. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions
23. The contribution of forward masking to saccadic inhibition of return
24. Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction
25. A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996).
26. The PD Reflects Selection of Nontarget Locations, Not Distractor Suppression
27. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search
28. A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct replication of Eimer (1996)
29. The PD Reflects Selection of Nontarget Locations, Not Distractor Suppression.
30. The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search
31. Response bias contributes to distractor suppression in Gaspelin et al.’s (2015) probe letter task
32. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture
33. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture
34. Gaze direction affects visuo-spatial short-term memory
35. Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.’s (2015) probe letter task
36. Lack of automatic attentional orienting by gaze cues following a bilateral loss of visual cortex
37. P
38. Perceptual Grouping Allows for Attention to Cover Noncontiguous Locations and Suppress Capture from Nearby Locations
39. Coordinated Flexibility: How Initial Gaze Position Modulates Eye-Hand Coordination and Reaching
40. Time-Course of Feature-Based Top-Down Control in Saccadic Distractor Effects
41. Is This Object Balanced or Unbalanced? Judgments Are on the Safe Side
42. Guidance of visual search by negative attentional templates depends on task demands.
43. Conflicts during Response Selection Affect Response Programming: Reactions toward the Source of Stimulation
44. Distractor rarity and attentional suppression contribute to statistical learning in visual search
45. Distractor Interference during Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
46. Visual Short-Term Memory During Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
47. A Simon Effect With Stationary Moving Stimuli
48. Biased Competition between Targets and Distractors Reduces Attentional Suppression: Evidence from the Positivity Posterior Contralateral and Distractor Positivity
49. Attention Maintains Mental Extrapolation of Target Position: Irrelevant Distractors Eliminate Forward Displacement after Implied Motion
50. Direct evidence for the optimal tuning of attention
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.