Search

This study identified the effect of badminton lunging directions on impact characteristics, joint kinetics and measurement reliability. A total of 14 badminton players performed 20 lunges in both forehand and backhand sides. Ground reaction force (GRF) and three-dimensional joint moment variables were determined for further analyses. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to determine any differences between the two lunge directions and intra-class correlation (ICC) and sequential averaging analysis (SAA) were used to estimate the minimum number of trials. Compared to the forehand side, participants experienced significantly larger total GRF impulse (+ 3.8%, p = 0.021) and transverse moment (hip + 63.5%, p < 0.001; knee + 80.7%, p = 0.011), but smaller hip (−7.7%), knee (−18.7%) and ankle frontal moments (−58.0%, p < 0.05) in backhand lunges. The minimum number of trials was similar for both lunge directions, as the averaged absolute differences was less than one in both ICC and SAA. Furthermore, smaller minimal number of trials was determined by the ICC (7.9–8.0), compared with the SAA approach (9.5–10.3). Lunge direction would influence GRF and joint loading, but not on the measurement reliability. These results give important insights to establish performance or equipment evaluation protocols during badminton lunges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. BACKGROUND: Balance training may improve motor coordination. However, little is known about the changes in motor coordination during unexpected perturbations to postural control following balance training. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of balance training on motor coordination and knee mechanics during perturbed sidestep cutting maneuvers in healthy adults. METHODS: Twenty-six healthy men were randomly assigned to a training group or a control group. Before balance training, subjects performed unperturbed, 90° sidestep cutting maneuvers and 1 unexpected perturbed cut (10-cm translation of a movable platform). Participants in the training group participated in a 6-week balance training program, while those in the control group followed their regular activity schedule. Both groups were retested after a 6-week period. Surface electromyography was recorded from 16 muscles of the supporting limb and trunk, as well as kinematics and ground reaction forces. Motor modules were extracted from electromyography by nonnegative matrix factorization. External knee abduction moments were calculated using inverse dynamics equations. RESULTS: Balance training reduced the external knee abduction moment (33% ± 25%, P<.03, ηp² = 0.725) and increased the activation of trunk and proximal hip muscles in specific motor modules during perturbed cutting. Balance training also increased burst duration for the motor module related to landing early in the perturbation phase (23% ± 11%, P<.01, ηp² = 0.532). CONCLUSION: Balance training resulted in altered motor coordination and a reduction in knee abduction moment during an unexpected perturbation. The previously reported reduction in injury incidence following balance training may be linked to changes in dynamic postural stability and modular neuromuscular control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Balance recovery during walking requires complex sensory-motor integration. Mechanisms to avoid falls are active concomitantly with human locomotion motor patterns. It has been suggested that gait can be described by a set of motor modules (synergies), but little is known on the modularity of gait during recovery of balance due to unexpected slips. Our hypothesis was that muscular activation during reactive recovery of balance during gait has a modular organization. The aim of the study was to verify this hypothesis when perturbations were delivered in different directions. Eight healthy men walked on a 7-m walkway, which had a moveable force platform embedded in the middle. Subjects experienced unperturbed walking as well as perturbations delivered in the sagittal (forward and backward) and frontal (leftward and rightward) planes. Bilateral full-body kinematics and surface electromyography (EMG) from lower limbs, trunk, and neck were recorded during walking. Synergies and activation signals were extracted from surface EMG signals. Four modules were sufficient to explain the unperturbed gait and the gait perturbed in any of the perturbation directions. Moreover, three of four modules extracted from the unperturbed gait were the same for gait perturbed forward, leftward, and rightward (similarity in synergies = 0.94 ± 0.03). On the other hand, the activation signals were different between unperturbed and perturbed gait (average correlation coefficient = 0.55 ± 0.16). These strategies to recover balance were robust across subjects. In conclusion, changes in lower limb and trunk kinematics provoked by perturbations were reflected in minimal adjustments in the muscular modular organization of walking, with three of four modules preserved from normal walking. Conversely, the activation signals were all substantially influenced by the perturbations, being the result of integration of afferent information and supraspinal control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]