Search

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Diese Studie untersucht aktuelle Bedürfnisse und Belastungen von ambulanten Krebspatienten im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie. Material und Methoden Zwischen 11/2020 und 02/2021 wurden 122 ambulante Krebspatientinnen und -patienten des Comprehensive Cancer Center München in die Studie eingeschlossen und anhand eines standardisierten, halbstrukturierten Interviews zu Wissensstand und Informationsbedürfnissen in Bezug auf COVID-19, Risikowahrnehmung und Sorgen hinsichtlich der ambulanten Krebsbehandlung, COVID-19-spezifischen Belastungen sowie zum Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem und der Impfbereitschaft befragt. Zusätzlich wurde psychosozialer Distress anhand des Distress-Thermometers (DT) erhoben. Ergebnisse Über ein Drittel der Krebspatienten (34,2 %, n = 41/120) hatte noch Informationsbedarf hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen des Coronavirus auf ihre Erkrankung oder Behandlung. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) waren von Veränderungen der laufenden oder geplanten Krebstherapie betroffen. Bei n = 42/121 (34,7 %) der Patienten zeigte sich ein erhöhter psychosozialer Distress (DT ≥ 5). Die häufigste Corona-spezifische Belastung war die Angst vor einer Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems (77,9 %, n = 95/122), gefolgt von der Befürchtung, dass sich Angehörige noch größere Sorgen um die betroffenen Patienten machen (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) der Patienten sind bereit, sich impfen zu lassen; 60 % (n = 18/30) der zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung Unentschlossenen oder Ablehner wünschen sich vor einer endgültigen Entscheidung für die Impfung ein Informationsgespräch mit ihrem Onkologen/ihrer Onkologin. Schlussfolgerung Corona-spezifische Belastungen von Krebspatienten betreffen insbesondere den Verlauf der Therapie, aber auch eine mögliche Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems. Onkologische Behandler-Teams sollten Fragen ihrer Patienten Raum geben, mögliche Unsicherheiten anerkennen, emotionale Unterstützung leisten und auf valide Informationsquellen aufmerksam machen.

This study investigates current needs and psychosocial burden of out-patients with cancer during the COVID-19-Pandemic.Between 11/2020 and 02/2021 122 cancer patients who underwent out-patient treatment at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich participated in the study. Based on a standardized, semi-structured interview, participants were asked about their knowledge and informational needs related to COVID-19, risk perception and concerns regarding continuing out-patient treatment, COVID-19 related distress, confidence in the national health system, and their readiness to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Additionally, patients filled out the distress thermometer (DT).More than a third of the patients (34,2 %, n = 41/120) wanted to receive more information about the effects of the coronavirus on their cancer and their treatment. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) had faced changes concerning their current or planned treatment. 42/121 (34,7 %) of the patients were clinically distressed (DT ≥ 5). A possible overload of the health care system was the most commonly reported COVID-related concern (77,9 %, n = 95/122), followed by being concerned that their family members might be additionally worried about them (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) of the patients are willing to be vaccinated; 60 % (n = 18/30) of those undecided or refusing at the time of the survey expressed a desire to have a consultation with an oncologist before giving their final consent to vaccination.Corona-specific distress of cancer patients relates in particular to the course of therapy, but also to a possible overload of the health care system. Oncology care teams should allow space for questions from their patients, acknowledge possible uncertainties, provide emotional support, and draw attention to reliable sources of information.Diese Studie untersucht aktuelle Bedürfnisse und Belastungen von ambulanten Krebspatienten im Rahmen der COVID-19-Pandemie.Zwischen 11/2020 und 02/2021 wurden 122 ambulante Krebspatientinnen und -patienten des Comprehensive Cancer Center München in die Studie eingeschlossen und anhand eines standardisierten, halbstrukturierten Interviews zu Wissensstand und Informationsbedürfnissen in Bezug auf COVID-19, Risikowahrnehmung und Sorgen hinsichtlich der ambulanten Krebsbehandlung, COVID-19-spezifischen Belastungen sowie zum Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem und der Impfbereitschaft befragt. Zusätzlich wurde psychosozialer Distress anhand des Distress-Thermometers (DT) erhoben.Über ein Drittel der Krebspatienten (34,2 %, n = 41/120) hatte noch Informationsbedarf hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen des Coronavirus auf ihre Erkrankung oder Behandlung. 17,2 % (n = 21/122) waren von Veränderungen der laufenden oder geplanten Krebstherapie betroffen. Bei n = 42/121 (34,7 %) der Patienten zeigte sich ein erhöhter psychosozialer Distress (DT ≥ 5). Die häufigste Corona-spezifische Belastung war die Angst vor einer Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems (77,9 %, n = 95/122), gefolgt von der Befürchtung, dass sich Angehörige noch größere Sorgen um die betroffenen Patienten machen (56,2 %, n = 68/121). 71,2 % (n = 74/104) der Patienten sind bereit, sich impfen zu lassen; 60 % (n = 18/30) der zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung Unentschlossenen oder Ablehner wünschen sich vor einer endgültigen Entscheidung für die Impfung ein Informationsgespräch mit ihrem Onkologen/ihrer Onkologin.Corona-spezifische Belastungen von Krebspatienten betreffen insbesondere den Verlauf der Therapie, aber auch eine mögliche Überlastung des Gesundheitssystems. Onkologische Behandler-Teams sollten Fragen ihrer Patienten Raum geben, mögliche Unsicherheiten anerkennen, emotionale Unterstützung leisten und auf valide Informationsquellen aufmerksam machen.

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Despite screening and information efforts, about 10% of patients present with tumor size T3 or T4 at primary diagnosis. Late presentation is associated with more advanced tumor stage and consecutively with worse survival rates. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with a late presentation at primary BC diagnosis differ in their personality from those with early diagnosis. Methods: In this bicentric, observational study, personality traits, positive and negative affectivity, anxiety, spirituality, illness beliefs, and sociodemographic characteristics were assessed in BC patients who presented with T-stages 3 or 4 (late presenters) and T-stages 1 or 2 (controls) at initial diagnosis. Results: Forty patients (20 controls, 20 late presenters) were interviewed. “Late presenters” perceived their disease as long lasting and had significantly more “positive affectivity” in the current trait. Although no significant associations were found, there was a trend for late presenters to have higher education levels, less spiritual longing, less accurate explanation of their illness, less anxiety in the trait scale, and more conscientiousness than the controls. Conclusion: As patients with late presentation for BC differ in specific psychological and sociodemographic characteristics from patients with early BC, the findings of this pilot project warrant additional investigations to identify further specific characteristics and motivations. Identifying patients at risk for late presentation and encouraging them to accept an earlier diagnosis could help to improve their therapy and, finally, their outcome.

Objectives A correlation exists between breast cancer and thyroid disorders, which are common in elderly women. Thyroid hormones are degraded into trace amines, which can bind to the G-protein-coupled receptor trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and thereby activate it. The transformation of thyroid hormones into trace amines is carried out by the ornithine decarboxylase. Previously, we showed that TAAR1 overexpression (IRS ≥6) was associated with a significantly longer OS in primary breast cancer patients during a long-term follow-up of up to 14 years. Aim of the present study was to analyze the regulation of TAAR1 in breast cancer cell lines and the influence of triiodothyronine (T3), thyronamines, and tetraiodothyroacetic acid (Tetrac) on the expression of TAAR1 in breast cancer cells. Methods The effect of T3, thyronamines, and Tetrac on the expression of TAAR1 in breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D was analyzed via PCR and Western blot. A MTT assay was performed to test the metabolic cell viability. A scratch assay was performed to analyze cell migration. Results Stimulation of MCF-7 cells with 10 nM 3-iodothyronamine (T1AM) significantly increased TAAR1 protein expression (P=0.008). In T47D cells, TAAR1 expression was significantly upregulated after the addition of 10 µg/mL estradiol to 10 nM T1AM (P=0.008). A significant (P=0.028) reduction in MCF-7 cell viability through the incubation with T1AM could be detected. Cell migration of MCF cells was significantly reduced through incubation with 10 nM T1AM. Conclusion A significant upregulation of TAAR1 induced by stimulation with T1AM may be a sign for an increased decarboxylation of thyroid hormones in breast cancer cells. In addition, there seems to be an influence of estradiol for the T1AM-induced upregulation of TAAR1 in T47D cells. TAAR1-related cell transduction mechanisms seem to be an interesting target for endocrine treatment options of breast cancer patients.

Objectives l-dopa decarboxylase (DDC) is responsible for the synthesis of dopamine. Dopamine, which binds to the D2-dopamine receptor (D2R), plays an important role in the maintenance of pregnancy. Aim of our study was the analysis of DDC and D2R expression in placentas of spontaneous miscarriages (SMs) and recurrent miscarriages (RMs) in comparison to healthy controls. Methods Patients with SM (n = 15) and RM (n = 15) were compared with patients from healthy pregnancies (n = 15) (pregnancy weeks 7–13 each). Placental tissue has been collected from SMs and RMs from the first trimester (Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, LMU Munich) and from abruptions (private practice, Munich). Placental cell lines, BeWo- and JEG-3 cells, were stimulated with the trace amines T0AM and T1AM in vitro. Results Levels of DDC and D2R in trophoblasts and the decidua were lower in RMs in comparison to healthy controls. Stimulation of BeWo cells with T1AM significantly reduced DDC mRNA and protein levels. Via double-immunofluorescence, a DDC-positive cell type beneath decidual stromal cells and foetal EVT in the decidua could be detected. Conclusions Downregulation of DDC and D2R in trophoblasts of RMs reflects a reduced signal cascade of catecholamines on the foetal side.

A correlation between breast cancer and thyroid disorders has been described in previous studies. Degraded thyroid hormones are referred to as trace amines. These endogenous amines have the ability to bind to the G-protein-coupled receptor TAAR1 (trace amine-associated receptor) and thereby activate it. TAAR1 is able to modulate the serotonergic and dopaminergic system in the brain and has so far been studied in the neurological field. The following study represents the first investigation of the regulation of TAAR1 in primary breast cancer (no metastases, M0). Immunohistochemical analyses were carried out to detect TAAR1 expression in formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast cancer samples. Survival times of primary breast cancer patients (M0) with and without TAAR1 expression in their tumours were compared by Kaplan–Meier curves, and correlations between ordinal variables were determined with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The investigation showed a correlation between TAAR1 expression and tumour differentiation grade. A well differentiated tumour grade (G1) was associated with higher TAAR1 expression and HER2 and HER4 positivity predicted higher TAAR1 expression. A TAAR1 overexpression (IRS ≥ 6) was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02) than that of reduced TAAR1 expression (IRS

Objective Many distressed cancer patients do not want or, finally, do not use psychological support. This study aimed at identifying factors associated with the decline of psychological support during hospital stay. Methods This cross-sectional study included inpatients with different cancer diagnoses. Distress was assessed using the short form of the Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer Patients-Revised (QSC-R10) and the Distress Thermometer (DT). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with decline. Results Of 925 patients, 71.6% (n = 662) declined psychological support. Male sex (OR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.69-3.80), low psychosocial distress (OR = 3.76, CI = 2.50-5.67), not feeling depressed (OR = 1.93, CI = 1.24-2.99), perceived overload (OR = 3.37, CI = 2.19-5.20), no previous psychological treatment (OR = 1.88, CI = 1.25-2.83), and feeling well informed about psychological support (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.11-2.46) were associated with decline. Among the patients who indicated clinical distress (46.2%), 53.9% declined psychological support. Male sex (OR = 2.96, CI = 1.71-5.12), not feeling depressed (OR = 1.87, CI = 1.12-3.14), perceived overload (OR = 5.37, CI = 3.07-9.37), agreeableness (OR = 0.70, CI = 0.51-0.95), and feeling well informed about psychological support (OR = 1.81, CI = 1.07-3.07) were uniquely associated with decline in this subgroup. Conclusions Decline of psychological support is primarily due to psychological factors. Feeling well informed about support emerged as a relevant factor associated with decline. Thus, design of informational material and education about available psychological services seem crucial.

Objectives A correlation exists between breast cancer and thyroid disorders, which are common in elderly women. Thyroid hormones are degraded into trace amines, which can bind to the G-protein-coupled receptor trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) and thereby activate it. The transformation of thyroid hormones into trace amines is carried out by the ornithine decarboxylase. Previously, we showed that TAAR1 overexpression (IRS ≥6) was associated with a significantly longer OS in primary breast cancer patients during a long-term follow-up of up to 14 years. Aim of the present study was to analyze the regulation of TAAR1 in breast cancer cell lines and the influence of triiodothyronine (T3), thyronamines, and tetraiodothyroacetic acid (Tetrac) on the expression of TAAR1 in breast cancer cells. Methods The effect of T3, thyronamines, and Tetrac on the expression of TAAR1 in breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D was analyzed via PCR and Western blot. A MTT assay was performed to test the metabolic cell viability. A scratch assay was performed to analyze cell migration. Results Stimulation of MCF-7 cells with 10 nM 3-iodothyronamine (T1AM) significantly increased TAAR1 protein expression (P=0.008). In T47D cells, TAAR1 expression was significantly upregulated after the addition of 10 µg/mL estradiol to 10 nM T1AM (P=0.008). A significant (P=0.028) reduction in MCF-7 cell viability through the incubation with T1AM could be detected. Cell migration of MCF cells was significantly reduced through incubation with 10 nM T1AM. Conclusion A significant upregulation of TAAR1 induced by stimulation with T1AM may be a sign for an increased decarboxylation of thyroid hormones in breast cancer cells. In addition, there seems to be an influence of estradiol for the T1AM-induced upregulation of TAAR1 in T47D cells. TAAR1-related cell transduction mechanisms seem to be an interesting target for endocrine treatment options of breast cancer patients.

Objective There is ongoing debate whether cancer qualifies as traumatic stressor. We investigated prevalence and course of posttraumatic stress in patients with early breast cancer (BC) during their first year after diagnosis and determined effects of mastectomy and chemotherapy. Methods Patients with stage 0–III BC aged ≤65 years were evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV modules for acute and posttraumatic stress disorder (ASD and PTSD, respectively) before treatment, after chemotherapy, and 1 year after diagnosis. Matched controls were assessed at matched intervals. Effects of time, mastectomy, and chemotherapy on BC-related PTSD symptom severity were tested with linear mixed model analysis. Results Stress disorder (ASD or PTSD) related to BC was diagnosed in 6 (3.6%) of 166 patients before treatment and in 3 patients (2.0%) 1 year later. The rate of patients who experienced PTSD symptoms related to BC decreased from 82.5 to 57.3% (p

Introduction It is known that young breast cancer (BC) patients tend to suffer more psychological stress and have lower quality of life than older women, are less sexually active and have more body image issues than healthy women of the same age. They may also be challenged by reproductive concerns. To our knowledge, no data exist about the effect of the disease on the life satisfaction of premenopausal BC patients. This study tries to elucidate life satisfaction in several aspects of daily life in this special cohort as well as aspects of cancer-specific distress and parenting concerns in order to improve our support strategies. Materials and methods In a cross-sectional study design, all patients with < 40 years at primary BC diagnosis treated at Breast Center, CCC LMU Munich (Germany) between 2006 and 2013 were eligible for participation. Standardized questionnaires assessing life satisfaction (Life Satisfaction Questionnaire; Fahrenberg et al, 2000) and cancer-specific distress (Questionnaire on Stress in Cancer patients; Herschbach et al, 2003), as well as a self-developed questionnaire on partnership, employment situation, family planning, demographic and medical data were mailed in 2014. Results 88 patients responded (55%). Compared with population data stratified for age and sex, patients showed significantly less satisfaction in the domains of health (p Discussion In our cohort, the general life satisfaction of young breast cancer survivors showed no difference from women without cancer, but these patients were not satisfied with their general health status and with their sexuality. Also, cancer-related fears and psychosomatic problems considerably stress young patients and thus need to be addressed by supportive care programs. There is also a need for counselling regarding childbearing after BC treatment. In contrast, fertility preservation seems to be well established in medical consultations. In conclusion, tailored supportive care programs have to be realized to respond the unique needs of young BC patients. Citation Format: Burgmann M, Hermelink K, Farr A, Heiduschka A, van Meegen F, Engel J, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Cancer-specific distress, life satisfaction and parenting concerns in young breast cancer survivors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-13.

Background: This study evaluates interventions offered to young breast cancer (BC) patients, including fertility preservation, genetic testing, and counseling for parenthood concerns, and analyzes the effect of BC on biographical issues. Methods: Women who were diagnosed with BC at the age of 18-40 years and who underwent treatment at the Breast Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University (LMU) in Munich between 2006 and 2013, were eligible for this study. Patients received a self-developed questionnaire which covered the following topics: fertility preservation, family planning, genetic testing, parenthood concerns and children's needs, partnership status, and employment situation. Results: Re-evaluating their initial decision on fertility preservation, 76.4% of patients reported satisfaction with their decision. After BC diagnosis, 45.8% reported to have maternal desire, but only 21.7% actually planned to have children. 41.7% of patients missed sufficient counseling regarding parenthood concerns. Analysis of individual employment situations showed that the time period until the return to work was longer in patients who received chemotherapy. The majority of patients (71.6%) did not report changes in their partnership status. Conclusion: Young BC survivors report a lack of communication related to parenthood concerns and future conception, but are satisfied with counseling regarding fertility preservation and genetics.

Besteht eine inverse Assoziation zwischen Krebs und neurodegenerativen Erkrankungen? Eine wachsende Anzahl von Studien deutet auf ein niedrigeres Krebsrisiko bei Alzheimer-Patienten und umgekehrt auf ein geringeres Alzheimer-Risiko bei Krebsuberlebenden hin.

Background Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction has mostly been attributed to chemotherapy; this explanation, however, fails to account for cognitive dysfunction observed in chemotherapy-naive patients. In a controlled, longitudinal, multisite study, we tested the hypothesis that cognitive function in breast cancer patients is affected by cancer-related post-traumatic stress. Methods Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and healthy control subjects, age 65 or younger, underwent three assessments within one year, including paper-and-pencil and computerized neuropsychological tests, clinical diagnostics of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and self-reported cognitive function. Analysis of variance was used to compare three groups of participants—patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy and healthy control subjects—on age- and education-corrected cognitive performance and cognitive change. Differences that were statistically significant after correction for false discovery rate were investigated with linear mixed-effects models and mediation models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Of 226 participants (166 patients and 60 control subjects), 206 completed all assessment sessions (attrition: 8.8%). Patients demonstrated overall cognitive decline (group*time effect on composite z-score: –0.13, P = .04) and scored consistently worse on Go/Nogo errors. The latter effect was mediated by PTSD symptoms (mediation effect: B = 0.15, 95% confidence interval = 0.02 to 0.38). Only chemotherapy patients showed declined reaction time on a computerized alertness test. Overall cognitive performance correlated with self-reported cognitive problems at one year (T = –0.11, P = .02). Conclusions Largely irrespective of chemotherapy, breast cancer patients may encounter very subtle cognitive dysfunction, part of which is mediated by cancer-related post-traumatic stress. Further factors other than treatment side effects remain to be investigated.

// Aurelia Vattai 1 , Vincent Cavailles 2 , Sophie Sixou 3 , Susanne Beyer 1 , Christina Kuhn 1 , Mina Peryanova 1 , Helene Heidegger 1 , Kerstin Hermelink 1 , Doris Mayr 4 , Sven Mahner 1 , Christian Dannecker 1 , Udo Jeschke 1 and Bernd Kost 1 1 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany 2 Institut de Recherche en Cancerologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Universite Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France 3 Universite Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier, F-31062 Toulouse, France 4 Department of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany Correspondence to: Udo Jeschke, email: udo.jeschke@med.uni-muenchen.de Keywords: cervical carcinoma; squamous cell carcinoma; adenocarcinoma; RIP140/NRIP1; LCoR Received: May 18, 2017 Accepted: July 25, 2017 Published: October 31, 2017 ABSTRACT Introduction: RIP140 (Receptor Interacting Protein) is involved in the regulation of oncogenic signaling pathways and in the development of breast and colon cancers. The aim of the study was to analyze the expression of RIP140 and its partner LCoR in cervical cancers, to decipher their relationship with histone protein modifications and to identify a potential link with patient survival. Methods: Immunohistochemical analyses were carried out to quantify RIP140 and LCoR expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections cervical cancer samples. Correlations of RIP140 and LCoR expression with histopathological variables were determined by correlation analyses. Survival rates of patients expressing low or high levels of RIP140 and LCoR were compared by Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: RIP140 overexpression was associated with a significantly shorter overall survival of cervical cancer patients. This effect was significant in the squamous cell carcinoma subtype but not in adenocarcinomas. RIP140 is no longer a significant negative prognosticator for cervical cancer when LCoR expression is low. Discussion: RIP140 is an independent predictor of poor survival of patients with cervical cancer. Patients with tumors expressing low levels of both RIP140 and LCoR showed a better survival compared to patients expressing high levels of RIP140. Modulation of RIP140 and LCoR may represent a novel targeting strategy for cervical cancer prevention and therapy.

Self-perceived problems of cognitive functioning after treatment for early-stage breast cancer have the potential to substantially affect the lives of patients. In the past two decades, neuropsychological studies have accumulated evidence of corresponding cognitive deficits that have mostly been attributed to neurotoxic effects of chemotherapy. Nevertheless, observations of impaired cognitive functioning already before the start of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy question the singular role of chemotherapy for the causation of these deficits. The divergence between mostly subtle neuropsychological deficits and often dramatic subjective cognitive complaints as well as the lack of association between both in the majority of studies present an unsolved puzzle. Recent investigations that include brain imaging have begun to yield tentative answers in this regard. The present review aims at briefly summarizing and integrating the current evidence from clinical studies for purposes of patient counseling.

In den letzten Jahrzehnten hat sich in der Onkologie im Allgemeinen und in der gynakologischen Onkologie im Speziellen ein Paradigmenwechsel vollzogen: Neben der Lebensverlangerung und Symptomverbesserung gewannen gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualitat, Krankheitserleben und Krankheitsbewaltigung an Bedeutung. Die Psychoonkologie befasst sich mit den komplexen psychosozialen Aspekten bei der Entdeckung, der Behandlung und im Verlauf der Krebserkrankung 1 . Sie hat sich in den letzten Jahren als interdisziplinares Fachgebiet etabliert und gilt als wichtiger Bestandteil der modernen Krebsmedizin in allen Bereichen der Pravention, Diagnostik, Behandlung und Nachsorge.

Viele Krebspatienten klagen uber Gedachtnis- und Konzentrationsprobleme. Bis vor kurzem galten solche Beeintrachtigungen kognitiver Funktionen als Folge der Chemotherapie und das Phanomen erhielt den Namen Chemobrain oder Chemofog. Allerdings lassen sich einige Forschungsergebnisse nicht mit der Annahme vereinbaren, dass kognitive Storungen bei Krebspatienten eine Nebenwirkung der Chemotherapie sind: Die Storungen wurden auch bei Krebspatienten gefunden, die nicht mit Zytostatika behandelt worden waren. Neuere grose Studien fanden wenig oder gar keine Anhaltspunkte fur negative Effekte einer Chemotherapie auf kognitive Funktionen. Epidemiologische Studien wiesen nach, dass Krebspatienten lebenslang ein erhohtes Risiko fur kognitive Beeintrachtigungen haben, auch wenn sie nicht systemisch behandelt worden sind. Mittlerweile wird deshalb eine multifaktorielle Verursachung der Storungen diskutiert, in der neben verschiedenen Therapien auch die Erkrankung selbst und krankheits- und therapiebedingte Stressbelastungen eine Rolle spielen konnten. Von den Patienten berichtete subjektive kognitive Storungen hangen enger mit dem psychischen Befinden, insbesondere mit Depressivitat, als mit neuropsychologisch nachweisbaren Schadigungen kognitiver Funktionen zusammen.

Objective: Complaints of cognitive dysfunction are frequent among cancer patients. Many studies have identified neuropsychological compromise associated with cancer and cancer therapy; however, the neuropsychological compromise was not related to self-reported cognitive dysfunction. In this prospective study, the authors examined if confounding factors masked an underlying association of self-perceived cognitive function with actual cognitive performance. Determinants of self-perceived cognitive dysfunction were investigated. Methods: Self-perceived cognitive function and cognitive performance were assessed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 1 year after baseline in 101 breast cancer patients randomized to standard versus intensified chemotherapy. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to test the relationships of performance on neuropsychological tests, patient characteristics, and treatment variables to self-reported cognitive function. Change of cognitive performance was tested as a predictor of change in self-reports. Results: Self-perceived cognitive function deteriorated during chemotherapy and had partially recovered 1 year after diagnosis. The personality trait negative affectivity, current depression, and chemotherapy regimen were consistently related to cognitive self-reports. No significant associations with performance in any of the 12 cognitive tests emerged. Change of cognitive performance was not reflected in self-reports of cognitive function. Conclusions: Neuropsychological compromise and self-perceived cognitive dysfunction are independent phenomena in cancer patients. Generally, cancer-associated neuropsychological compromise is not noticed by affected patients, but negative affectivity and treatment burden induce pessimistic self-appraisals of cognitive functioning regardless of the presence of neuropsychological compromise. Clinicians should consider this when determining adequate therapy for patients who complain of ‘chemobrain’. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

There is ongoing debate whether cancer qualifies as traumatic stressor. We investigated prevalence and course of posttraumatic stress in patients with early breast cancer (BC) during their first year after diagnosis and determined effects of mastectomy and chemotherapy.Patients with stage 0-III BC aged ≤65 years were evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV modules for acute and posttraumatic stress disorder (ASD and PTSD, respectively) before treatment, after chemotherapy, and 1 year after diagnosis. Matched controls were assessed at matched intervals. Effects of time, mastectomy, and chemotherapy on BC-related PTSD symptom severity were tested with linear mixed model analysis.Stress disorder (ASD or PTSD) related to BC was diagnosed in 6 (3.6%) of 166 patients before treatment and in 3 patients (2.0%) 1 year later. The rate of patients who experienced PTSD symptoms related to BC decreased from 82.5 to 57.3% (p 0.001), and the mean of BC-related PTSD symptoms diminished from 3.1 to 1.7 (p 0.001). Only university education significantly predicted the course of BC-related PTSD symptom severity (p = 0.009). In 60 controls, no diagnosis of stress disorder, a rate of 18% women experiencing PTSD symptoms, and a mean of 0.4 PTSD symptoms (p vs. patients0.001) were found.Most newly diagnosed patients with BC experience PTSD symptoms, whereas full diagnoses of DSM-IV stress disorder are rare. Symptoms diminish somewhat within 1 year furthered by university education but independently from mastectomy and chemotherapy. Throughout the year after diagnosis, having BC entails markedly increased PTSD symptom burden. Copyright © 2016 John WileySons, Ltd.

Expert consensus-based recommendations regarding key issues in the use of primary (or neoadjuvant) systemic treatment (PST) in patients with early breast cancer are a valuable resource for practising oncologists. PST remains a valuable therapeutic approach for the assessment of biological antitumor activity and clinical efficacy of new treatments in clinical trials. Neoadjuvant trials provide endpoints, such as pathological complete response (pCR) to treatment, that potentially translate into meaningful improvements in overall survival and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant trials need fewer patients and are less expensive than adjuvant trial, and the endpoint of pCR is achieved in months, rather than years. For these reasons, the neoadjuvant setting is ideal for testing emerging targeted therapies in early breast cancer. Although pCR is an early clinical endpoint, its role as a surrogate for long-term outcomes is the key issue. New and better predictors of treatment efficacy are needed to improve treatment and outcomes. After PST, accurate management of post-treatment residual disease is mandatory. The surgery of the sentinel lymph-node could be an acceptable option to spare the axillary dissection in case of clinical negativity (N0) of the axilla at the diagnosis and/or after PST. No data exists yet to support the modulation of the extent of locoregional radiation therapy on the basis of the response attained after PST although trials are underway.

In public perception, breast cancer seems to increasingly have become a manageable disease – to the point that breast cancer patients are sometimes faced with minimization of their condition, expressed in remarks like, ‘Don't be upset – it's only breast cancer.’ Indeed, prospects have considerably brightened for breast cancer patients. Nowadays, the vast majority of them will never develop metastatic disease, and even for those who do there is often some reasonable hope for many more years of life. Nevertheless, in a recently published large-scale investigation, mental disorders were found to be present in 42% of breast cancer patients. No other group of cancer patients showed an equally high rate of psychological morbidity [1]. Why do breast cancer patients experience exceptionally high levels of distress, despite a generally favorable prognosis? Even with enormous advances in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, no affected woman can be sure of permanent cure. Disease progression and its dire consequences remain a constant threat for decades after primary diagnosis. Further, the treatments that are so efficaciously saving lives are at the same time not very successful at preserving the patients’ physical, functional, and psychosocial wellbeing; thus, they come at high costs for the patients [2]. In particular, breast cancer therapy is a massive attack on a woman's female integrity, affecting nearly all key aspects of femininity; namely sexuality, child bearing, ability to breastfeed, and feminine attraction. Both chemotherapy and endocrine therapy have long-lasting or even permanent consequences for sexual functioning [3]. Chemotherapy threatens to destroy a patient's fertility; endocrine therapy deprives her of the actions of estrogens and may force her to delay child bearing for as long as 10 years – which mostly implies forgoing it. Further, chemotherapy inevitably damages a woman's good looks for the better part of a year and bereaves her of a part of her body that is precious to most women, her hair. A considerable number of breast cancer patients still have to undergo mastectomy. This may not only result in disfigurement but also means losing a highly valued organ that plays an important part in sexual activity and – for young women – in child raising. Sophisticated oncoplastic surgery techniques are now available that potentially achieve satisfactory cosmesis; sexual and – probably much less important but not negligible – lactational capacities of the breast, however, are irrevocably lost. Surgery and radiation of the axilla, still necessary in many cases, bear a strong risk of lymphedema that may lead to considerable disfigurement as well. In addition to these harms to femininity, breast cancer therapy exposes many patients to appallingly aversive states that are inadequately labeled as nausea and vomiting, and there is a plethora of other deleterious side effects, several of them painful and even disabling, e.g. peripheral neuropathy. Some breast cancer patients navigate these tribulations with stupefying resilience – many others, understandably, are overwhelmed by them. This not only burdens the patients themselves but also their families. As psycho-oncologists (K.H., U.B.) and patient advocates (R.H.), we are sometimes told what it was like to be a child in a family affected by breast cancer. Some of the stories that are recounted to us are heartbreaking, and they have repercussions throughout adult life, like that of a young patient who consulted one of us because she tended to totally relinquish her own wishes and needs, whereas she anxiously sought to satisfy those of the persons close to her. She reported that her mother had been diagnosed with breast cancer when she herself was a schoolchild. She tried whatever she could to relieve her mother's burden and was happy when her mother was at home and did not cry. The family did not talk about the situation at all. Her father, her little brother, she herself and her mother – all had needed help but none of them received it. When her mother finally died, her devastated father left his adolescent children to return only years later. Psycho-oncology was still in its infancy when this happened some 30 years ago, while it is now firmly established as an integral, indispensable part of breast cancer therapy. Gratifyingly, guidelines are progressively emerging that set standards for identification and treatment of distressed cancer patients, such as the new German psycho-oncology guideline that is described in the editorial by Joachim Weis in this issue [4]. Certainly, psycho-oncology cannot prevent all heartbreak; however, a recent meta-analysis found evidence that psycho-oncologic interventions have sustained small-to-medium effects on emotional distress and quality of life in cancer patients in general. In highly distressed patients, the effects were found to be large [5]. In the issue that is accompanied by this editorial, Susanne Singer and her colleagues report on breast cancer patients’ fears of different treatments as assessed in the large-scale BRENDA II study [6]. Tanja Zimmermann looks into the consequences of breast cancer for both partners in an intimate relationship and delineates interventions for couples [7]. Valerie A. Jenkins and Lesley J. Fallowfield have investigated the reasons why women with breast cancer consent or decline to participate in randomized clinical trials – with surprising results [8].

Background: The usefulness of distress screening in cancer inpatient settings has rarely been investigated. This study evaluated a brief distress screening of inpatients in a breast cancer centre and a gynaecological cancer centre. Patients and Methods: Hospitalised patients with breast or gynaecological cancers were screened with the Distress Thermometer. Patients who scored above the cut-off, were referred by the medical staff, or self-referred were offered bedside psycho-oncological counselling. Results: Of 125 patients, 68 (54.4%) received an offer of counselling, and 62 patients (49.6%) accepted. Most of the counselling was induced by distress screening. Only 4 (3.2%) patients self-referred to the counselling service. Of the counselled patients, 65.8% stated that they had substantially benefited from psycho-oncological support; only 5.6% of the non-counselled patients indicated that they might have benefited from psycho-oncological support. Conclusion: Almost all patients who will accept and benefit from psycho-oncological counselling can be identified if distress screening is used in conjunction with referrals by physicians and nurses. Distress screening is a worthwhile component in a framework of psycho-oncological support in a cancer inpatient setting. It paves the way to counselling for cancer inpatients who need it and are willing to accept it but hesitate to self-refer to psycho-oncological services.

Complaints of cognitive dysfunction are frequent among cancer patients. Many studies have identified neuropsychological compromise associated with cancer and cancer therapy; however, the neuropsychological compromise was not related to self-reported cognitive dysfunction. In this prospective study, the authors examined if confounding factors masked an underlying association of self-perceived cognitive function with actual cognitive performance. Determinants of self-perceived cognitive dysfunction were investigated.Self-perceived cognitive function and cognitive performance were assessed before treatment, at the end of treatment, and 1 year after baseline in 101 breast cancer patients randomized to standard versus intensified chemotherapy. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to test the relationships of performance on neuropsychological tests, patient characteristics, and treatment variables to self-reported cognitive function. Change of cognitive performance was tested as a predictor of change in self-reports.Self-perceived cognitive function deteriorated during chemotherapy and had partially recovered 1 year after diagnosis. The personality trait negative affectivity, current depression, and chemotherapy regimen were consistently related to cognitive self-reports. No significant associations with performance in any of the 12 cognitive tests emerged. Change of cognitive performance was not reflected in self-reports of cognitive function.Neuropsychological compromise and self-perceived cognitive dysfunction are independent phenomena in cancer patients. Generally, cancer-associated neuropsychological compromise is not noticed by affected patients, but negative affectivity and treatment burden induce pessimistic self-appraisals of cognitive functioning regardless of the presence of neuropsychological compromise. Clinicians should consider this when determining adequate therapy for patients who complain of 'chemobrain'.

BACKGROUND. It is suspected that estrogen depletion resulting from treatment may contribute to cognitive compromise in patients with breast cancer. However, the evidence for estrogen effects on cognition is inconclusive, and the consequences of hormonal changes for cognitive function in patients with cancer rarely have been investigated. In this study, the authors investigated the effects of treatment-induced menopause and antiestrogen therapy with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) on cognitive function. METHODS. Cognitive performance was assessed in 101 patients with breast cancer before the start of cancer therapy (T1), toward the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T2), and 1 year after baseline (T3) using 12 cognitive tests. Menopause occurred in a subgroup of patients, and an overlapping subgroup started antiestrogen therapy with tamoxifen or AIs. Linear mixed-effects models that made it possible to determine effects at group levels and individual levels simultaneously were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS. At the group level, a significant favorable effect of induced menopause emerged in a test of executive function (P = .0035). Two additional group-level effects of induced menopause, both favorable, and 2 individual-level effects that were positive in some patients and negative in others were not significant when multiple testing was taken into account. No significant effects of tamoxifen or AIs on cognitive function were observed. CONCLUSIONS. Hormonal changes did not appear to contribute to cognitive compromise in patients with breast cancer during the first year after diagnosis. Antiestrogen treatment with tamoxifen or AIs did not affect cognition, and the effects of induced menopause were more likely to be favorable. However, the possibility that some cognitive decline occurs in individual patients could not be excluded. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND. It is believed widely that chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment occurs in a subgroup of patients with breast cancer. However, recent reports have provided no evidence that chemotherapy affects cognition. In this study, the authors questioned whether cognitive compromise in patients with breast cancer is attributable to chemotherapy. In addition, the effects of therapy-induced menopause and of the erythropoiesis-stimulating factor darbepoetin α on cognitive performance were assessed. METHODS. A battery of neuropsychological tests was used to assess cognitive performance in 101 patients with breast cancer before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T1) and toward the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T2) with combined epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide with concomitant darbepoetin α. Repeated-measures multiple analyses of variance and a reliable-change approach were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS. At T1, the group means ranged below the test norms in 5 of 12 cognitive tests. At T2, multiple analyses of variance (MANOVA) indicated a significant overall improvement in the test results (P < .001). After correcting for practice effects, cognitive decline predominated in 27% of patients, whereas improvement predominated in 28% of patients. Cognitive performance was not related significantly to self-reported cognitive problems, anxiety and depression, menopause, or darbepoetin α administration. CONCLUSIONS. Even before chemotherapy, a subgroup of patients with breast cancer showed cognitive compromise that was unrelated to anxiety or depression. During chemotherapy, cognitive function remained stable in most patients, improved in a subgroup, and deteriorated in another subgroup. The deterioration may have been caused by side effects of chemotherapy, but it also may have been related to currently unidentified factors that cause prechemotherapy cognitive compromise. Therapy-induced menopause and darbepoetin α did not appear to influence cognition. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Background: Pretreatment cognitive impairment in cancer patients is well established but unexplained. Similar cognitive compromise has been observed in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients, and PTSD symptoms are a frequent concomitant of cancer diagnosis. We tested the hypothesis that pretreatment cognitive impairment is attributable to cancer-related post-traumatic stress. Methods: Women aged 65 years or younger who were diagnosed with breast cancer (case patients) or had undergone negative routine breast imaging (control patients) at one of six participating breast centers underwent traditional and computerized neuropsychological testing, clinician-administered diagnostic assessment of stress disorders, and self-report assessments of cognitive function and depression. To minimize confounding, case patients were evaluated prior to any local or systemic treatment. Cognitive indices of case patients, control patients, and normative samples were compared. The patients’ risk of overall cognitive impairment was determined. Linear regression and a mediation model were used to test the study hypothesis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The 166 case patients and 60 well-matched control patients showed near-identical deviations from population norms. Case patients scored worse than control patients on two of 20 cognitive indices (Go/Nogo commission errors, Go/Nogo omission errors). Self-reported cognitive problems were associated with Go/Nogo omission errors and more pronounced in case patients. Only PTSD symptoms (Beta = 0.27, P = .004) and age (Beta = 0.22, P = .04) statistically significantly predicted Go/Nogo errors. The effect of having cancer on Go/Nogo errors was mediated by PTSD symptoms. Case patients did not have an increased risk of overall cognitive impairment. Conclusion: Prior to any treatment, breast cancer patients may show limited cognitive impairment that is apparently largely caused by cancer-related post-traumatic stress.

Immunotherapy is a promising new approach in breast cancer treatment, complementing surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and antihormonal therapy. Primarily, two treatment options are available which are supported by a rapidly growing body of clinical evidence. These are active specific immunotherapy with Theratope and passive immunotherapy targeting the HER-2 receptor with trastuzumab (Herceptin). Trastuzumab has a proven efficacy as monotherapy as well as in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Trastuzumab is generally well tolerated although cardiotoxicity has been observed, especially when in combination with doxorubicin (Adriamycin), where this can be a serious concern. Therefore, less cardiotoxic combinations with docetaxel (Taxotere), vinorelbine (Navelbine) and epirubicin (Pharmorubicin) or cyclophosphamide (Endoxana) have been tested. The combination of trastuzumab with paclitaxel (Taxol) is well approved. The use of trastuzumab in adjuvant and preoperative therapy is currently being examined in controlled trials. After a brief outline of immunotherapy with Theratope and trastuzumab, this article reviews recent and ongoing clinical studies conducted with trastuzumab.

To improve allocation of psychosocial care and to provide patient-oriented support offers, identification of determinants of elevated distress is needed. So far, there is a lack of evidence investigating the interplay between individual disposition and current clinical and psychosocial determinants of distress in the inpatient setting.In this cross-sectional study, we investigated 879 inpatients with different cancer sites treated in a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. Assessment of determinants of elevated distress included sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics as well as dimensions of personality. Multiple linear regression was applied to identify determinants of psychosocial distress.Mean age of the patients was M = 61.9 (SD = 11.8), 48.1% were women. In the multiple linear regression model younger age (β = -0.061, p = 0.033), higher neuroticism (β = 0.178, p = 0.001), having metastases (β = 0.091, p = 0.002), being in a worse physical condition (β = 0.380, p = 0.001), depressive symptoms (β = 0.270, p = 0.001), not feeling well informed about psychological support (β = 0.054, p = 0.046) and previous uptake of psychological treatment (β = 0.067, p = 0.020) showed significant associations with higher psychosocial distress. The adjusted RControlling for sociodemographic characteristics and dispositional vulnerability, that is neuroticism, current clinical and psychosocial characteristics were still associated with hospitalized patients' psychosocial distress. Psycho-oncologists should address both, the more transient emotional responses, such as depressive symptoms, as well as more enduring patient characteristics, like neuroticism.