Omodei‐James, Shanti, Wilson, Annabelle, Kropinyeri, Renee, Cameron, Darryl, Wingard, Sharon, Kerrigan, Caitlin, Scriven, Talia, Wilson, Stacy, Mendham, Amy E., Spaeth, Brooke, Stranks, Stephen, Kaambwa, Billingsley, Ullah, Shahid, Worley, Paul, and Ryder, Courtney
Issues Addressed Methods Results Conclusions So What? Addressing the disproportionate burden of type 2 diabetes prevalence in Aboriginal communities is critical. Current literature on diabetes care for Aboriginal people is primarily focused on remote demographics and overwhelmingly dominated by Western biomedical models and deficit paradigms. This qualitative research project adopted a strengths‐based approach to explore the barriers and enablers to diabetes care for Aboriginal people on Ngarrindjeri Country in rural South Australia.Knowledge Interface methodology guided the research as Aboriginal and Western research methods were drawn upon. Data collection occurred using three yarning sessions held on Ngarrindjeri Country. Yarns were transcribed and deidentified before a qualitative thematic analysis was conducted, guided by Dadirri and a constructivist approach to grounded theory.A total of 15 participants attended the yarns. Major barriers identified by participants were underscored by the ongoing impacts of colonisation. This was combated by a current of survival as participants identified enablers to diabetes care, namely a history of healthy community, working at the knowledge interface, motivators for action, and an abundance of community skills and leadership.Despite the raft of barriers detailed by participants throughout the diabetes care journey, Aboriginal people on Ngarrindjeri Country were found to be uniquely positioned to address diabetes prevalence and management.Health promotion efforts with Aboriginal people on Ngarrindjeri Country must acknowledge the sustained impacts of colonisation, while building on the abundance of community enablers, skills and strengths. Opportunities present to do so by adopting holistic, community‐led initiatives that shift away from the dominant biomedical approach to diabetes care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]